A “ground-breaking” scientific discovery made 13,000 feet below the ocean’s surface would fundamentally change humanity’s understanding of how oxygen is produced, but its findings are being called into question. A company with vested interests in whether or not this science is considered valid has claimed this research regarding “dark oxygen” is “flawed” and “misleading.”
The study, led by Andrew Sweetman of the Scottish Marine Association, focused on polymetallic nodules found on the ocean seabed. These nodules, rich in minerals crucial to the production of clean energy infrastructure, were identified by the researchers as potential sources of oxygen.
Sweetman has warned that removing these nodules to extract the rare earth elements they hold could disrupt this potential source of oxygen production.
However, The Metals Company, which seeks to mine these polymetallic nodules to support renewable energy technologies such as wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicles (EVs), has criticized Sweetman’s findings. The company disputes the existence of dark oxygen, claiming that the research is flawed.
In a statement to Straight Arrow News, The Metals Company asserted: “Rarely has a dataset been published that so emphatically undermines the leading hypothesis. Yet, Sweetman’s supposed findings of ‘dark oxygen’ were sensationalized in media headlines worldwide.”
The Metals Company has since issued a formal scientific rebuttal, accusing Sweetman’s team of omitting critical data, misrepresenting research, and conducting contaminated experiments. The company said it hopes this rebuttal will “inject some integrity into the conversation, and aid in correcting the scientific record.”
In response, the Scottish Marine Association indicated that it is preparing a counter to The Metals Company’s critique, maintaining that its research was transparent. Sweetman’s team stated, “We don’t have anything to hide.”