If you want a quintessential example of the treachery of the Biden administration’s foreign policy, look no further than the faux terrorism designation it recently slapped on Yemen’s Houthis. On January 17, after weeks of attacks on the U.S. and its allies turning the Red Sea into a no-go zone, the White House was finally compelled to take action, re-designating the Shia jihadist group as a terrorist organization. There were a couple of caveats the re-designation, though.
First, it came with a series of carve-outs the Houthis will no doubt exploit. Among the exceptions to the sanctions imposed in the group are those relating to quote “the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components or software updates, telecommunications, mail and certain internet-based communications, personal remittances and refined petroleum products.” Think a terrorist group won’t milk those loopholes to the nth degree? Goods can be traded for money. Money can be traded for weapons. It’s called fungibility.
Second, the Biden Administration State Department re-designated the Houthis as a specially designated terrorist group. The Biden Treasury Department, however, did not re-designate Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization, as the Trump administration had done back in 2021. The end result, as the Washington Free Beacon reports, the State Department designation will neither criminalize support for the group, compel banks to seize its assets, nor allow victims of its savagery to receive compensation from assets seized.
The Houthis can even still obtain visas, while Jews in Judea and Samaria designated as impediments to a two-state solution the Biden administration seeks to impose on it are getting hit with visa bans. The stated rationale for re-designating the group only under a Swiss-cheese State Department regime is to permit vital aid to the war-torn country. But that was the rationale for removing the terrorism designations in the first place. So, was the administration lying then, or is it lying now?
Let’s be real about what’s going on. The Biden Administration has undertaken cosmetic measures, pinprick strikes, and a phony re-designation here for the same reason it de-designated the group in the first place: Because its Middle East policies to aid, abet and enable Iran and its proxies while orienting America away from its traditional Sunni partners and Israel, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is arming and helping the Houthis execute these attacks on American assets and those of our allies, yet you’ll never hear a word from the administration about Iran support for the Houthis. Just as the administration has done everything they can to de-link Iran from Hamas’ October 7 attack, despite all evidence to the contrary, as I’ve long speculated, and as I believe is being borne out every day, in the wake of Iran-proxy Hamas’ Holocaust-level attack against Israel, the Biden administration’s response has been to deter Israel from striking Iran and its proxies, and doing what needs to be done to swiftly destroy Hamas, because it is chiefly concerned about defending the Mullahcracy and its proxies in service of its policy to make them the region’s collective strong horse, just as Barack Obama had tried to do.
Biden has to balance the political reality that the American public is opposed to this policy. While his radical left, his base, wants him to go further and faster in putting the screws to our allies and promoting our enemies, every decision he makes is about creating the appearance of standing with our friends while shaving them and minimally punishing our enemies so as not to scuttle the overall malign objective. In this way, the fake Houthi designation is a perfect microcosm of the Biden administration’s policy.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘A promise’: Cadets describe their journeys at West Point
Jan 10 Dr. Frank Luntz‘A disturbing pick’: Americans debate Musk, Trump’s cabinet picks
Jan 3 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Dysfunctional’: Americans share criticisms of Congress
Dec 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Dec 20 Dr. Frank LuntzUS response to Houthis is an example of bad Biden policy
By Straight Arrow News
In the wake of the Israel-Hamas war, Yemen’s Houthis — who share certain geopolitical objectives with Hamas — have escalated their attacks on shipping vessels in the Red Sea, with the stated aim of crippling Israeli trade and commerce. The conflict escalated recently when Houthi fighters attacked a U.S. Navy vessel, and the U.S. then coordinated a series of fast counter-strikes against 60 Houthi targets. Following the strikes, the Biden administration officially re-designated the Houthis as a “Specially Designated Global Terrorist group.”
Straight Arrow News contributor Ben Weingarten mocks the Biden administration for what Weingarten says is a weak, hypocritical and disingenuous U.S. response to Houthi attacks in the Red Sea. Weingarten argues that the response is “a perfect microcosm” for everything wrong with Biden’s foreign policy at large.
If you want a quintessential example of the treachery of the Biden administration’s foreign policy, look no further than the faux terrorism designation it recently slapped on Yemen’s Houthis. On Jan. 17, after weeks of attacks on the U.S. and its allies turning the Red Sea into a no-go zone, the White House was finally compelled to take action, re-designating the Shia jihadist group as a terrorist organization. There were a couple of caveats to the re-designation, though.
First, it came with a series of carve-outs the Houthis will no doubt exploit. Among the exceptions to the sanctions imposed in the group are those relating to “the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components or software updates, telecommunications, mail and certain internet-based communications, personal remittances and refined petroleum products.” Think a terrorist group won’t milk those loopholes to the nth degree? Goods can be traded for money. Money can be traded for weapons. It’s called fungibility.
If you want a quintessential example of the treachery of the Biden administration’s foreign policy, look no further than the faux terrorism designation it recently slapped on Yemen’s Houthis. On January 17, after weeks of attacks on the U.S. and its allies turning the Red Sea into a no-go zone, the White House was finally compelled to take action, re-designating the Shia jihadist group as a terrorist organization. There were a couple of caveats the re-designation, though.
First, it came with a series of carve-outs the Houthis will no doubt exploit. Among the exceptions to the sanctions imposed in the group are those relating to quote “the provision of agricultural commodities, medicine, medical devices, replacement parts and components or software updates, telecommunications, mail and certain internet-based communications, personal remittances and refined petroleum products.” Think a terrorist group won’t milk those loopholes to the nth degree? Goods can be traded for money. Money can be traded for weapons. It’s called fungibility.
Second, the Biden Administration State Department re-designated the Houthis as a specially designated terrorist group. The Biden Treasury Department, however, did not re-designate Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization, as the Trump administration had done back in 2021. The end result, as the Washington Free Beacon reports, the State Department designation will neither criminalize support for the group, compel banks to seize its assets, nor allow victims of its savagery to receive compensation from assets seized.
The Houthis can even still obtain visas, while Jews in Judea and Samaria designated as impediments to a two-state solution the Biden administration seeks to impose on it are getting hit with visa bans. The stated rationale for re-designating the group only under a Swiss-cheese State Department regime is to permit vital aid to the war-torn country. But that was the rationale for removing the terrorism designations in the first place. So, was the administration lying then, or is it lying now?
Let’s be real about what’s going on. The Biden Administration has undertaken cosmetic measures, pinprick strikes, and a phony re-designation here for the same reason it de-designated the group in the first place: Because its Middle East policies to aid, abet and enable Iran and its proxies while orienting America away from its traditional Sunni partners and Israel, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is arming and helping the Houthis execute these attacks on American assets and those of our allies, yet you’ll never hear a word from the administration about Iran support for the Houthis. Just as the administration has done everything they can to de-link Iran from Hamas’ October 7 attack, despite all evidence to the contrary, as I’ve long speculated, and as I believe is being borne out every day, in the wake of Iran-proxy Hamas’ Holocaust-level attack against Israel, the Biden administration’s response has been to deter Israel from striking Iran and its proxies, and doing what needs to be done to swiftly destroy Hamas, because it is chiefly concerned about defending the Mullahcracy and its proxies in service of its policy to make them the region’s collective strong horse, just as Barack Obama had tried to do.
Biden has to balance the political reality that the American public is opposed to this policy. While his radical left, his base, wants him to go further and faster in putting the screws to our allies and promoting our enemies, every decision he makes is about creating the appearance of standing with our friends while shaving them and minimally punishing our enemies so as not to scuttle the overall malign objective. In this way, the fake Houthi designation is a perfect microcosm of the Biden administration’s policy.
Is Meta’s free speech overhaul a power play or real change?
Trump must confront jihadism and Islamist supremacism
DOJ spied on Congress during ‘Russiagate’ investigation
Will somebody explain what’s happening with these drones?
GEC shutdown strikes a blow to government censorship
Underreported stories from each side
Hunter Biden artworks worth ‘millions of dollars’ destroyed in LA fires: NY Post
13 sources | 0% from the left ReutersCanadian industry groups call for help facing US tariffs
60 sources | 15% from the right Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu Agency via Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Elasticsearch scheduled test post
Grand Central Station transformed as ‘Severance’ cast promotes season 2
Bias Comparison but no Bias Summaries
Bias Summaries but no Bias Comparison
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison with two sides
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
We need one big budget reconciliation bill, not two
Jan 15 Newt GingrichRFK Jr. at Health Department a chance to tackle drug addiction crisis
Jan 15 Adrienne LawrenceIs Meta’s free speech overhaul a power play or real change?
Jan 14 Ben WeingartenAmerica is deeply divided. Here’s what you can do.
Jan 14 Ruben Navarrette