I had a friend who is a very, very good financial investor, who turned to me the other day and said, Why are we allowing the colleges to take even more money when they’re already rich? And I said, what do you mean? She said, Well, look at Harvard. It has over 40 billion — not million — $40 billion in endowment. And why should we be paying student loans for somebody who goes to a place that already has $40 billion?
And then went on the suggestion. If you were to actually tax the endowments of the richest colleges in America, they could, in fact, help pay off the student loan program, without the average everyday worker having to pay for it. Suddenly, you’d have the college graduates, paying for the college graduates. It would be a very different approach, and frankly, it’s one I’ve thought about a lot.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in endowment fund, why aren’t you giving free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators.
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
There’s more than enough money in all the major endowments in the United States to do a great deal to help people learn, not just on their particular campus, but across the country. It’s an interesting idea — it’s at least worth talking about. And I think people would be shocked to learn just how much money some of these big universities have
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘A promise’: Cadets describe their journeys at West Point
Jan 10 Dr. Frank Luntz‘A disturbing pick’: Americans debate Musk, Trump’s cabinet picks
Jan 3 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Dysfunctional’: Americans share criticisms of Congress
Dec 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Dec 20 Dr. Frank LuntzUniversities should use endowments to pay off student loans
By Straight Arrow News
In an unsurprising ruling, the Supreme Court decided to repeal President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, which was aimed at reducing federal education debt. College tuition has been steadily increasing, resulting in student loan debt that has nearly tripled in the past 15 years. As tuition continues to rise, top universities’ endowment funds are growing.
Straight Arrow News contributor Newt Gingrich argues that these substantial endowments should be used for paying off student loans and funding scholarships, rather than being allocated to administrative expenses.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in an endowment fund, why aren’t you given free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators?
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
I had a friend who is a very, very good financial investor, who turned to me the other day and said, Why are we allowing the colleges to take even more money when they’re already rich? And I said, what do you mean? She said, Well, look at Harvard. It has over 40 billion — not million — $40 billion in endowment. And why should we be paying student loans for somebody who goes to a place that already has $40 billion?
And then went on the suggestion. If you were to actually tax the endowments of the richest colleges in America, they could, in fact, help pay off the student loan program, without the average everyday worker having to pay for it. Suddenly, you’d have the college graduates, paying for the college graduates. It would be a very different approach, and frankly, it’s one I’ve thought about a lot.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in endowment fund, why aren’t you giving free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators.
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
There’s more than enough money in all the major endowments in the United States to do a great deal to help people learn, not just on their particular campus, but across the country. It’s an interesting idea — it’s at least worth talking about. And I think people would be shocked to learn just how much money some of these big universities have
We need one big budget reconciliation bill, not two
Looking forward to major shift in US government
The United States should stay out of Syria
Congress must invest in military, stay vigilant
Trump can nominate Patel, Hegseth, but will Senate confirm?
Underreported stories from each side
Hunter Biden artworks worth ‘millions of dollars’ destroyed in LA fires: NY Post
13 sources | 0% from the left ReutersCanadian industry groups call for help facing US tariffs
60 sources | 15% from the right Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu Agency via Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Bias Comparison but no Bias Summaries
Bias Summaries but no Bias Comparison
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison with two sides
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison – Bias Left Summaries missing
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
We need one big budget reconciliation bill, not two
Jan 15 Newt GingrichRFK Jr. at Health Department a chance to tackle drug addiction crisis
Jan 15 Adrienne LawrenceIs Meta’s free speech overhaul a power play or real change?
Jan 14 Ben WeingartenAmerica is deeply divided. Here’s what you can do.
Jan 14 Ruben Navarrette