I had a friend who is a very, very good financial investor, who turned to me the other day and said, Why are we allowing the colleges to take even more money when they’re already rich? And I said, what do you mean? She said, Well, look at Harvard. It has over 40 billion — not million — $40 billion in endowment. And why should we be paying student loans for somebody who goes to a place that already has $40 billion?
And then went on the suggestion. If you were to actually tax the endowments of the richest colleges in America, they could, in fact, help pay off the student loan program, without the average everyday worker having to pay for it. Suddenly, you’d have the college graduates, paying for the college graduates. It would be a very different approach, and frankly, it’s one I’ve thought about a lot.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in endowment fund, why aren’t you giving free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators.
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
There’s more than enough money in all the major endowments in the United States to do a great deal to help people learn, not just on their particular campus, but across the country. It’s an interesting idea — it’s at least worth talking about. And I think people would be shocked to learn just how much money some of these big universities have
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Have a little compassion’: Americans talk high holiday prices, anxiety
Dec 11 Dr. Frank Luntz‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Nov 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank LuntzUniversities should use endowments to pay off student loans
By Straight Arrow News
In an unsurprising ruling, the Supreme Court decided to repeal President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program, which was aimed at reducing federal education debt. College tuition has been steadily increasing, resulting in student loan debt that has nearly tripled in the past 15 years. As tuition continues to rise, top universities’ endowment funds are growing.
Straight Arrow News contributor Newt Gingrich argues that these substantial endowments should be used for paying off student loans and funding scholarships, rather than being allocated to administrative expenses.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in an endowment fund, why aren’t you given free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators?
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
I had a friend who is a very, very good financial investor, who turned to me the other day and said, Why are we allowing the colleges to take even more money when they’re already rich? And I said, what do you mean? She said, Well, look at Harvard. It has over 40 billion — not million — $40 billion in endowment. And why should we be paying student loans for somebody who goes to a place that already has $40 billion?
And then went on the suggestion. If you were to actually tax the endowments of the richest colleges in America, they could, in fact, help pay off the student loan program, without the average everyday worker having to pay for it. Suddenly, you’d have the college graduates, paying for the college graduates. It would be a very different approach, and frankly, it’s one I’ve thought about a lot.
Why should a place like Yale, or Stanford, or Harvard even have a tuition? If you’ve got billions of dollars sitting there in endowment fund, why aren’t you giving free education? And for that matter, if you have the scale of money that Harvard does — and there are a number of other universities in this group who have billions of dollars — why isn’t that part of helping educate the country, rather than sitting there to be used by the faculty and the administrators, who then hire more faculty and more administrators, and particularly administrators.
It’s breathtaking to look at some of these campuses and realize how many people they have now employed there. And you have to say to yourself, why should the average working American have to help subsidize somebody to go to a place like Harvard or Yale, or Stanford or Princeton? Shouldn’t in fact, the endowments of those schools be potentially a place to get the scholarship money for the students, including at the community colleges?
There’s more than enough money in all the major endowments in the United States to do a great deal to help people learn, not just on their particular campus, but across the country. It’s an interesting idea — it’s at least worth talking about. And I think people would be shocked to learn just how much money some of these big universities have
Congress must invest in military, stay vigilant
Trump can nominate Patel, Hegseth, but will Senate confirm?
Thanksgiving 2024 brings new president and fresh opportunities
Trump poised to unleash transformative mandate
Democrats will have to sort out future of their party
Underreported stories from each side
Israel arrests Jerusalem man for spying on behalf of Iran
17 sources | 11% from the left Getty ImagesKFile: Pete Hegseth spread baseless conspiracy theories that January 6 attack was carried out by leftist groups
14 sources | 0% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
Congress unveils stopgap bill to avert shutdown
GrubHub agrees to $25m settlement for ‘deceptive’ practices
Disney pulls transgender storyline from upcoming Pixar series
RFK Jr.’s lawyer: NYT report over polio vaccine petition ‘categorically false’
'Dirty Dancing,' 'among 25 films named to National Film Registry
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Give time, love and togetherness for the holidays
Wednesday Adrienne LawrenceDid Democrats learn anything from 2024 election?
Tuesday Ruben NavarretteGEC shutdown strikes a blow to government censorship
Tuesday Ben WeingartenElon Musk budget cuts will devastate GOP voters
Monday David Pakman