data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8784/d87842c7960a985b341f6471ab0928198fce8fa6" alt="Democrats changing the order of their primaries, replacing Iowa with South Carolina in the lead-off position, favors Biden."
Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Democrats have decided to change the order of the Democratic primaries in 2024 in a way that I have been advocating for for years, but it has now become controversial because it also seems to be designed to help Joe Biden. And some are saying this is not about doing what’s right. It’s about doing what’s good for Joe Biden, so let’s discuss it for a very long time. Now, the Democratic primaries start with caucuses in Iowa, this has been controversial for a couple of different reasons. One is the caucus process is not you show up you spend a minute filling out your ballot and you leave the caucus process is sort of people gather at tables, and they talk about candidates and support moves around and consolidates one way or the other. So it’s a longer process. And that can be a disincentive for people to participate. It also has been sort of controversial, because Iowa isn’t really representative of anything about the democratic electorate nationally, Iowa is like 90%. White, even though the country is nowhere near 90%. White at this point in time, Iowa is disproportionately rural, whereas Democrats in particular, but many Americans 10s of millions of Americans actually live in urban and suburban settings, which are very much lacking in Iowa. And generally speaking in terms of you could say, income or education or whatever. I was not really representative of anything. So why does Iowa get this privileged spot at the beginning of the primary process? That’s been one of the criticisms. And I think that that is a fair criticism. A lot of different solutions have been proposed. This includes randomly changing the order of primaries every election cycle so that every state gets an opportunity to go first or sort of early, or specifically selecting some states that are more representative of the Democratic electorate nationally, and saying they get to go first. Well, the decision that Democrats have made for 2024 Is that South Carolina is going to get to go first. And South Carolina, in a vacuum is actually a pretty damn good choice for states to go first, South Carolina has more urban versus rural population than Iowa does. Although South Carolina doesn’t exactly have huge cities. What is the population? Let’s see cities in South Carolina by population. You’ve got Charleston, Columbia, and North Charleston, all with over 100,000 people, okay, actually, that may not end up being that different than than Iowa. But certainly racially, South Carolina is far more representative of the United States in and the Democratic electorate in South Carolina. 69% of the population is white, which is much closer to the national average. So South Carolina is actually quite a good choice. But what is the problem? The problem is that South Carolina being first is really good for Joe Biden. If you think back to 2020, Joe Biden was not looking particularly good in those early primaries. And then it came to South Carolina, in South Carolina, I even remember where I was, when I found out about the results. I was out with a at a particular event with some friends and then looked at the results. And then it was Biden had won, and something had just changed what with James Clyburn endorsement and a couple other Democratic candidates dropping out. Joe Biden, buoyed by black support, in fact, won South Carolina, and that completely turned around the primaries for Biden support consolidated around Biden, the rest is history. He won the nomination and eventually became president of the United States. So in any year, Joe Biden, South Carolina being the first primary would have made sense in this particular election cycle, it is being called a way to try to guarantee that Joe Biden doesn’t face a prominence or likely to succeed challenge from other Democrats. Is that a fair criticism? It is fair, but at the same time, South Carolina does make a lot of sense. Now, the other interesting wrinkle to all of this is that Joe Biden has signaled his intention to run for reelection in 2024. But he has not actually declared I am running I am now a candidate for re election. There have also been questions about if Biden does run for re election, does he drop count Kamala Harris as his running mate, and bring someone else in? Because Kamala Harris is not particularly well liked. That’s a perfectly fair and reasonable question to ask, but also a controversial one because even if Kamala Harris is not particularly well liked, dropping your VP and saying I’m going to run with someone else, signals trouble and it may actually do more harm than good. So there are still many questions about whether Joe Biden will run in 2024 and how that campaign will look but but I have never thought that it made sense for Iowa to be the first primary and I am glad that it is not going to be
-
The real costs of Trump’s tariffs
In a high-stakes trade war initiated by U.S. President Donald Trump less than two weeks into his second term, the United States imposed 25% tariffs on all non-exempt imports from Canada, 10% for China, and nearly implemented a similar 25% tariff on Mexican imports before striking a last-minute deal with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Following… -
H-1B visa program ignites a civil war within MAGA
On his first day back in the White House, President Donald Trump signed a record number of executive orders, including some intending to revise Biden-era immigration policies. However, one program stayed the same: the H-1B visa, which allows companies to hire highly skilled foreign workers. This has sparked a debate between two of Trump’s allies,… -
Voters must hold Trump accountable to his economic promises
Former President Biden leaves behind a soaring U.S. economy that economists say is the envy of the world. With record-low unemployment, record-high stocks, rising wages and 3% annual GDP growth, some analysts say it will be a difficult task for Trump to perform as well as Biden has. Yet President Donald Trump campaigned on the… -
Tracking economic trends from Biden to Trump
As Donald Trump starts his second presidential term, he’s stepping into an economy that looks very different from the one he passed to Joe Biden four years ago. The economy today boasts of consistent growth, lower inflation, rising wages and record-low unemployment. Trump has nonetheless made bold promises for the U.S. economy, including imposing tariffs… -
Facebook ending fact-checking will deepen social media bias
Mark Zuckerberg recently announced that Facebook will be terminating all remaining fact-checking programs and implementing an X-style “Community Notes” feature, where users post notes for discussion without fact checks. Zuckerberg cited the results of the November 2024 U.S. election as a “tipping point,” proving to him that Americans are more interested in unrestricted free speech…
Latest Opinions
-
Getty Images
New England city votes to become a sanctuary for transgender community
-
U.S. Army photo by Michel Sauret
Team USA athletes making life-changing memories at Invictus 2025
-
Getty Images
China recruiting ‘planetary defense’ unit to protect Earth from 2032 asteroid
-
Getty Images
Plans to buy armored Tesla vehicles suddenly gone from State Department list
-
UAF
Ukraine unveils underground ‘Hell-making’ missile facility
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.