Okay, well listen, it’s bad enough that a political pundit can have a show and become the de facto propaganda minister for a government. But now, these individuals are becoming propaganda ministers for whoever will pay them the most money. Tucker Carlson, at one time, was the de facto propaganda minister for Donald Trump, the apologist-in-chief, I would say. But now, he has decided to hitch his wagon, pitch his tent, and he has decided to cozy up to Vladimir Putin. He just gave what some would call an interview. I call it a lecture. He was lectured to for over two hours.
In this alleged interview, Putin basically read a dissertation to Tucker Carlson. And then this dissertation, which by the way, Vladimir Putin wrote in 2021, you could check it out, in this dissertation, he provides an outline that somehow blames everybody else for the war, rather than Putin himself. Sounds familiar, right?
Let me give you some nuances. It should have been clear that this was already a fixed match, so to speak. I’m sure Tucker Carlson was paid a good chunk of change for this interview. In Putin’s account, the war was actually brought by the United States. Yeah, the war that Russia has decided to launch against the nation [of] Ukraine, well, that war is because of the U.S., that’s according to Putin. Now, in this thesis, I mean interview, Putin lays out a couple of reasons. He says in 2008, it was George Bush, George W. Bush, who opened the door for Ukraine’s partnership or membership into NATO, which had already taken over many of Russia’s former allies in Central and Eastern Europe. In 2014, the CIA engineered a coup, according to the narrative, which brought to power neo-Nazis, who sent soldiers to other provinces, according to the narrative, where many Russian speakers lived, forcing Moscow to come to their aid.
Now, the account is actually fifty percent true, alright. So the parts that are false, however, [are] massively crucial. Let me break it down. It is true that in 2008, at the NATO summit, it was Bush who declared not only Ukraine but also Georgia would become a NATO ally. Alright. He then pressured Western allies to agree there was no timeline set for any of this. What did it really do? It gave Ukraine false hope. And it stoked the paranoia of Vladimir Putin. But once again, this is part of the narrative, right?
You see, Putin decided to move because he, according to how he sails the war, did not want to have all NATO allies in such strategic positions. But see, here’s what Tucker Carlson failed to do. If this is true, according to Putin, that means the war did not start under Biden. That’s what this means. And he is saying that he started looking at Ukraine as a possible enemy nation when George W. Bush made the declaration. That means that it is because of a Republican president, a Republican proclamation, and under the nose of a Republican named Donald Trump for four years while he got his military ready to invade Ukraine. You see, Tucker decided not to ask any of these questions that were actually lay ups, easy to understand. So what is the next move? Tucker will now convince you that Vladimir Putin had absolutely no choice. All you have to do is read between the lines.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘A promise’: Cadets describe their journeys at West Point
Jan 10 Dr. Frank Luntz‘A disturbing pick’: Americans debate Musk, Trump’s cabinet picks
Jan 3 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Dysfunctional’: Americans share criticisms of Congress
Dec 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Instill optimism’: Americans on how future generations can succeed
Dec 20 Dr. Frank LuntzPutin lectures Tucker Carlson, blames US for war in Ukraine
By Straight Arrow News
Tucker Carlson, an American journalist popular with the far right, recently traveled to Moscow to interview President Vladimir Putin about Russia’s war in Ukraine. During the interview, Putin explained his public reasons for the invasion and promised that he had no intention of invading other neighboring nations in Europe. The Russian dictator consistently made similar statements about Ukraine previously–even up to the day before he invaded it in February 2022.
Straight Arrow News contributor Dr. Rashad Richey contends that it is more accurate to call the Carlson-Putin discussion a “lecture” as opposed to an “interview,” and he predicts that Tucker will only continue to parrot Moscow’s disinformation to an increasingly extreme degree over time.
Okay, well listen, it’s bad enough that a political pundit can have a show and become the de facto propaganda minister for a government. But now, these individuals are becoming propaganda ministers for whoever will pay them the most money. Tucker Carlson, at one time, was the de facto propaganda minister for Donald Trump, the apologist-in-chief, I would say. But now, he has decided to hitch his wagon, pitch his tent, and he has decided to cozy up to Vladimir Putin. He just gave what some would call an interview. I call it a lecture. He was lectured to for over two hours.
In this alleged interview, Putin basically read a dissertation to Tucker Carlson. And then this dissertation, which by the way, Vladimir Putin wrote in 2021, you could check it out, in this dissertation, he provides an outline that somehow blames everybody else for the war, rather than Putin himself. Sounds familiar, right?
Let me give you some nuances. It should have been clear that this was already a fixed match, so to speak. I’m sure Tucker Carlson was paid a good chunk of change for this interview. In Putin’s account, the war was actually brought by the United States. Yeah, the war that Russia has decided to launch against the nation [of] Ukraine, well, that war is because of the U.S., that’s according to Putin.
Okay, well listen, it’s bad enough that a political pundit can have a show and become the de facto propaganda minister for a government. But now, these individuals are becoming propaganda ministers for whoever will pay them the most money. Tucker Carlson, at one time, was the de facto propaganda minister for Donald Trump, the apologist-in-chief, I would say. But now, he has decided to hitch his wagon, pitch his tent, and he has decided to cozy up to Vladimir Putin. He just gave what some would call an interview. I call it a lecture. He was lectured to for over two hours.
In this alleged interview, Putin basically read a dissertation to Tucker Carlson. And then this dissertation, which by the way, Vladimir Putin wrote in 2021, you could check it out, in this dissertation, he provides an outline that somehow blames everybody else for the war, rather than Putin himself. Sounds familiar, right?
Let me give you some nuances. It should have been clear that this was already a fixed match, so to speak. I’m sure Tucker Carlson was paid a good chunk of change for this interview. In Putin’s account, the war was actually brought by the United States. Yeah, the war that Russia has decided to launch against the nation [of] Ukraine, well, that war is because of the U.S., that’s according to Putin. Now, in this thesis, I mean interview, Putin lays out a couple of reasons. He says in 2008, it was George Bush, George W. Bush, who opened the door for Ukraine’s partnership or membership into NATO, which had already taken over many of Russia’s former allies in Central and Eastern Europe. In 2014, the CIA engineered a coup, according to the narrative, which brought to power neo-Nazis, who sent soldiers to other provinces, according to the narrative, where many Russian speakers lived, forcing Moscow to come to their aid.
Now, the account is actually fifty percent true, alright. So the parts that are false, however, [are] massively crucial. Let me break it down. It is true that in 2008, at the NATO summit, it was Bush who declared not only Ukraine but also Georgia would become a NATO ally. Alright. He then pressured Western allies to agree there was no timeline set for any of this. What did it really do? It gave Ukraine false hope. And it stoked the paranoia of Vladimir Putin. But once again, this is part of the narrative, right?
You see, Putin decided to move because he, according to how he sails the war, did not want to have all NATO allies in such strategic positions. But see, here’s what Tucker Carlson failed to do. If this is true, according to Putin, that means the war did not start under Biden. That’s what this means. And he is saying that he started looking at Ukraine as a possible enemy nation when George W. Bush made the declaration. That means that it is because of a Republican president, a Republican proclamation, and under the nose of a Republican named Donald Trump for four years while he got his military ready to invade Ukraine. You see, Tucker decided not to ask any of these questions that were actually lay ups, easy to understand. So what is the next move? Tucker will now convince you that Vladimir Putin had absolutely no choice. All you have to do is read between the lines.
For those disillusioned by election, 2025 is the year to reengage
2025 looking to be a uniquely disastrous year in politics
It’s time to take failed capitalism out of Christmas
Trump’s nominees indicate betrayal of our democracy
As Trump plans to weaponize FBI, Biden had to pardon Hunter
Underreported stories from each side
Hunter Biden artworks worth ‘millions of dollars’ destroyed in LA fires: NY Post
13 sources | 0% from the left ReutersCanadian industry groups call for help facing US tariffs
60 sources | 15% from the right Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu Agency via Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Grand Central Station transformed as ‘Severance’ cast promotes season 2
Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket lifts off on first space flight
Netanyahu delays meeting over ceasefire, claims 'last-minute crisis'
Biden warns of ‘oligarchy,’ ‘tech-industrial complex’ in farewell speech
Many Americans don't know they're using AI: Poll
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
We need one big budget reconciliation bill, not two
Jan 15 Newt GingrichRFK Jr. at Health Department a chance to tackle drug addiction crisis
Jan 15 Adrienne LawrenceIs Meta’s free speech overhaul a power play or real change?
Jan 14 Ben WeingartenAmerica is deeply divided. Here’s what you can do.
Jan 14 Ruben Navarrette