Well, Vice President Kamala Harris’s acceptance speech at the convention will be a big deal, and the press will cover it intensely. The fact is, the speech she gave last Friday in North Carolina may be the most important speech of the entire campaign, for reasons I don’t understand, she decided to outline an extraordinarily big government socialist position to take on the question of the price of food, to suggest that the real problem wasn’t that the government was spending too much, that inflation was going up in general, but instead to suggest that somehow people were gouging prices, that corporations were in some sneaky way trying to rip off people. Now the problem with that is that it leads you down a road of suggesting that big government socialism works, and that free enterprise capitalism does not work, and that doesn’t work for politicians, because the average American knows that having a government bureaucrat watch the price of eggs, for the price of milk, for the price of meat, isn’t going to solve anything that, in fact, the real problem with inflation is too much spending, and that’s what made this speech doubly bad, because in this speech in North Carolina, Vice President Harris suggested $1,700,000,000,000
in additional spending. Now, I found that really strange, because the fact is, most Americans, almost 80% think that the government spends too much money, not too little. Most Americans believe that big government deficits increase the price increases, increase inflation and make life harder for the average American. So here you had a moment when the one hand, for the last couple of weeks, Vice President Harris has been running around trying to deny that her record has the San Francisco radicals accurate, trying to suggest that she now has different views, different ideas. And then on Friday, she went out and for reasons I literally can’t understand, decided to give a speech which was more radical, involved more government intervention than anything that Bernie Sanders has ever suggested. And Bernie Sanders is the only self described socialist serving in the US Senate. So if you’re to the left of Bernie Sanders, it’s pretty hard to argue that, in fact, you’re really in an average position. And that gets me to what I think will be the key test of the fall campaign. Are we going to see someone named Kamala Harris who works really hard not to represent the Biden administration, not to represent San Francisco radicalism, or are we going to gradually see vice president Harris tied down to having already been vice president for over 1300
days, and clearly indicating in key speeches like North Carolina that she really is a big government socialist? I think that’s the key test of this presidential campaign and.
Kamala Harris really is a big-government socialist
By Straight Arrow News
On Aug. 16 in North Carolina, Vice President Kamala Harris delivered her first major policy speech, outlining the key elements of her economic agenda. The speech emphasized her plans to challenge big corporations and reduce the cost of living.
Watch the video above as Straight Arrow News contributor Newt Gingrich argues that Harris’ speech advocates for extensive government intervention and is indicative of her socialist ambitions.
Be the first to know when Newt Gingrich publishes a new opinion! Download the Straight Arrow News app and enable push notifications today!
The following is an excerpt from the above video:
Well, Vice President Kamala Harris’s acceptance speech at the convention will be a big deal, and the press will cover it intensely. The fact is, the speech she gave last Friday in North Carolina may be the most important speech of the entire campaign.
For reasons I don’t understand, she decided to outline an extraordinarily big government, socialist position to take on the question of the price of food, to suggest that the real problem wasn’t that the government was spending too much, that inflation was going up in general, but instead to suggest that somehow people were gouging prices, that corporations were in some sneaky way trying to rip off people.
Now the problem with that is that it leads you down a road of suggesting that big government socialism works, and that free enterprise capitalism does not work. And that doesn’t work for politicians, because the average American knows that having a government bureaucrat watch the price of eggs, or the price of milk, or the price of meat, isn’t going to solve anything — that, in fact, the real problem with inflation is too much spending. And that’s what made this speech doubly bad, because in this speech in North Carolina, Vice President Harris suggested $1.7 trillion in additional spending.
Interested in opposing perspectives? Have a look at how our other contributors view this issue from across the political spectrum:
David Pakman: Why Trump’s attacks on Kamala Harris are not working.
Dr. Rashad Richey: Kamala Harris’ theme is that she is not Donald Trump.
Well, Vice President Kamala Harris’s acceptance speech at the convention will be a big deal, and the press will cover it intensely. The fact is, the speech she gave last Friday in North Carolina may be the most important speech of the entire campaign, for reasons I don’t understand, she decided to outline an extraordinarily big government socialist position to take on the question of the price of food, to suggest that the real problem wasn’t that the government was spending too much, that inflation was going up in general, but instead to suggest that somehow people were gouging prices, that corporations were in some sneaky way trying to rip off people. Now the problem with that is that it leads you down a road of suggesting that big government socialism works, and that free enterprise capitalism does not work, and that doesn’t work for politicians, because the average American knows that having a government bureaucrat watch the price of eggs, for the price of milk, for the price of meat, isn’t going to solve anything that, in fact, the real problem with inflation is too much spending, and that’s what made this speech doubly bad, because in this speech in North Carolina, Vice President Harris suggested $1,700,000,000,000
in additional spending. Now, I found that really strange, because the fact is, most Americans, almost 80% think that the government spends too much money, not too little. Most Americans believe that big government deficits increase the price increases, increase inflation and make life harder for the average American. So here you had a moment when the one hand, for the last couple of weeks, Vice President Harris has been running around trying to deny that her record has the San Francisco radicals accurate, trying to suggest that she now has different views, different ideas. And then on Friday, she went out and for reasons I literally can’t understand, decided to give a speech which was more radical, involved more government intervention than anything that Bernie Sanders has ever suggested. And Bernie Sanders is the only self described socialist serving in the US Senate. So if you’re to the left of Bernie Sanders, it’s pretty hard to argue that, in fact, you’re really in an average position. And that gets me to what I think will be the key test of the fall campaign. Are we going to see someone named Kamala Harris who works really hard not to represent the Biden administration, not to represent San Francisco radicalism, or are we going to gradually see vice president Harris tied down to having already been vice president for over 1300
days, and clearly indicating in key speeches like North Carolina that she really is a big government socialist? I think that’s the key test of this presidential campaign and.
We need one big budget reconciliation bill, not two
Looking forward to major shift in US government
The United States should stay out of Syria
Congress must invest in military, stay vigilant
Trump can nominate Patel, Hegseth, but will Senate confirm?
Underreported stories from each side
Hunter Biden artworks worth ‘millions of dollars’ destroyed in LA fires: NY Post
13 sources | 0% from the left ReutersCanadian industry groups call for help facing US tariffs
60 sources | 15% from the right Mert Alper Dervis/Anadolu Agency via Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Bias Comparison but no Bias Summaries
Bias Summaries but no Bias Comparison
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison with two sides
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison – Bias Left Summaries missing
Both Bias Summaries and Bias Comparison
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
We need one big budget reconciliation bill, not two
Jan 15 Newt GingrichRFK Jr. at Health Department a chance to tackle drug addiction crisis
Jan 15 Adrienne LawrenceIs Meta’s free speech overhaul a power play or real change?
Jan 14 Ben WeingartenAmerica is deeply divided. Here’s what you can do.
Jan 14 Ruben Navarrette