Skip to main content
Ruben Navarrette Columnist, host & author
Share
Opinion

Don’t blame Harvard for Claudine Gay’s poor leadership

Ruben Navarrette Columnist, host & author
Share

Following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack on Israel and Israel’s subsequent military response, reports have documented increasing antisemitism on elite college campuses, including Harvard. Dr. Claudine Gay, Harvard’s president, faced accusations of failing to discipline student protesters who advocated for the genocide of Jews. Calls for her resignation intensified after a lackluster performance on Capitol Hill. Gay later walked back some of her testimony, clarifying that “calls for violence against our Jewish community have no place at Harvard.”

Straight Arrow News contributor Ruben Navarrette contends that Dr. Gay, Harvard’s first Black female president, has inadequately managed the esteemed institution through the controversy. He suggests not solely blaming Harvard, however, but its weak leaders, who may be overly eager to avoid conflict and preserve their positions.

Harvard has been under fire lately, and understandably so, given how my alma mater, which once had, as part of a shameful chapter, blatant admissions quotas to keep out Jews in the 1930s — how my school now appears to have gone back in time and become once again a hotbed of antisemitism.

“The fish rots from the head,” as goes the old Yiddish saying, and so if antisemitism has indeed taken root on the river Charles, it happened with an assist from spineless Harvard administrators, who had been way too lenient with ill-mannered students who stormed through campus calling for an intifada, aka the mass slaughter of Jews.

Meanwhile, the liberal media worked overtime to provide an assist of its own to Dr. Claudine Gay, Harvard’s first Black president. Gay narrowly escaped getting canned, despite the fact that she flunked the leadership test and failed Jewish students on campus. And if that wasn’t bad enough, she then doubled down on failure by turning in a pathetic performance before Congress, where she couldn’t even summon the moral clarity to say that calling for the killing of Jews violated Harvard’s code of conduct. Even after all those mistakes and missteps, Gay kept her job.

Harvard has been under fire lately, and understandably so, given how my alma mater, which once had, as part of a shameful chapter, blatant admissions quotas to keep out Jews in the 1930s, how my school now appears to have gone back in time and become once again a hotbed of antisemitism. “The fish rots from the head,” as goes the old Yiddish saying, and so if antisemitism has indeed taken root on the river Charles, it happened with an assist from spineless Harvard administrators, who had been way too lenient with ill-mannered students who stormed through campus calling for an intifada, aka the mass slaughter of Jews. Meanwhile, the liberal media worked overtime to provide an assist of its own to Dr. Claudine Gay, Harvard’s first Black president. Gay narrowly escaped getting canned, despite the fact that she flunked the leadership test and failed Jewish students on campus. And if that wasn’t bad enough, she then doubled down on failure by turning in a pathetic performance before Congress, where she couldn’t even summon the moral clarity to say that calling for the killing of Jews violated Harvard’s code of conduct. Even after all those mistakes and missteps, Gay kept her job, thanks to the support of the Harvard Corporation, one of two ruling bodies that oversee the university. Members of the board didn’t have the guts to fire a racial trailblazer. After all, it took Harvard nearly 400 years to appoint the first Black woman president after a long parade of White men. The school couldn’t really unceremoniously show her the door after less than six months on the job. Harvard was already being called antisemitic, it didn’t want to add racist to the list. Aside from the race issue, Gay’s job security was probably also helped along by the fact that the media accepted her narrative, that she was this kind of heroic warrior for free speech, as opposed to what she really was: A bureaucrat so focused on self-preservation that she was eager to avoid conflict. And that conflict avoidance meant not forcing students at America’s oldest university to conduct themselves in a respectful manner toward one another. That bizarre strategy almost cost Gay her job. It also subjected Harvard to a national ridicule and accusations of, don’t laugh, mind control. I spent the last few weeks being told by people who never went to Harvard that Harvard brainwashes its students and indoctrinates young people to think alike. That’s news to me. And I’m sure it will be news to other Harvard alumni. So you get a handful of my tribe together and you’ll get 30 or 40 or 50 different opinions, a lot of argument, maybe even a few fistfights. Just look at our political class. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, a Democrat, went to Harvard, but so did his predecessor, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. They don’t agree on a whole lot. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, went to Harvard. And so did Texas Democrat Julian Castro. They’ve both been friends of mine for more than 20 years, and I can tell you this much: Those two fellas have completely different worldviews. Finally, look at the Supreme Court, where the current lineup of justices includes four graduates of Harvard Law School: Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan on the left, Neil Gorsuch on the right, and John Roberts somewhere in the center. As someone with two Harvard degrees, believe me when I tell you this, there is no brainwashing going on here. Harvard doesn’t tell you what to think. It never, has never will. It’s content if it manages to get you to actually think, and maybe to think critically. What you do from there is on you. President Gay should now think long and hard about what she’s been through these past few weeks, and sadly, what she put Harvard through, and then she should resolve to do much better going forward.

More from Ruben Navarrette

Latest Commentary

We know it is important to hear from a diverse range of observers on the complex topics we face and believe our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions.

The commentaries published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.


Latest Opinions

In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum. We hope these different voices will help you reach your own conclusions.

The opinions published in this section are solely those of the contributors and do not reflect the views of Straight Arrow News.

Weekly Voices

Left Opinion Right Opinion
Wednesday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Thursday
Left Opinion Right Opinion
Friday
Left Opinion Right Opinion