The U.S. Supreme Court will be hearing arguments in two affirmative action cases at the end of October to decide whether or not race should play a role in college admissions at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. These cases could go against past rulings that allows colleges to consider a student’s race when deciding which students should be admitted. The lawsuits were brought by the anti-affirmative action organization Students for Fair Admissions, which is hoping to reverse policies determined by another Supreme Court ruling in 2016 involving the University of Texas. In that case, the court upheld race-conscious admissions policies by a narrow 4-3 margin, but the three dissenters are now joined by Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, all Trump appointees.

Commentary
-
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
Universities across the nation will be on watch as this debate rages at the highest court on the highest level on an admissions policy that’s been in effect for most of our universities for more than 60 years.
As noted in the Washington Post, I don’t often quote the Washington Post, but they said that this case is making what could be the last stand for affirmative action in public university admissions.”
The reason they said that is remember last time we had this go-around at the court one of the Supreme Court justices said, “We’ve gotta do this race-baiting stuff for another 25 years.” But you know what? This “last stand” could be a better opportunity for us to evaluate where we are today in terms of race, where we are today in terms of education, where we are today in terms of higher learning.
An opportunity to chart a new path perhaps, to go forward, instead of continuing this ill-informed path of the past that we’ve got to consider race in everything we do because some people just can’t self-govern. They don’t have the capacity to make right choices. They don’t have the capacity to bring themselves up to standards. That’s what the left is really saying when they keep insisting we need affirmative action policy in the country. There are just some people who can’t do it so we got to lower our standards.
To be sure, we must have a discussion on how to open the doors for every American to reach their God-given potential. But undermining equal treatment for all and compromising standards of excellence in the pursuit of knowledge is not one of the ways to build a civil and healthy society.
After the Civil Rights Act was signed into law, as a people, we should have done what Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. himself said. He said in his “I Have a Dream” speech, go back into the communities and build, because once the Civil Rights Act was signed into law, we as a nation no longer should’ve been looking at race as a special interest. Through all of these race programs, we should not have been thinking about race as a collective.
In fact if you look at that speech of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., it was broken down into three parts. First he did speak to the nation about their blank check, about the race policies in the South.
Then he spoke to the Negro who was [unintell] and then he spoke to the nation’s Christians, people like himself and said, now let’s roll up our sleeves and get the hard part done, which is to make sure we incorporate everyone as Americans into this beautiful melting pot and dream.
Individually, of course, we’re uniquely made. There’s some beauty in all of us, and ethnicity has that attribute itself.
We want to become race blind but we also don’t want to keep focusing. After the death of King, who removed those barriers. His march was about removing those barriers. Progressives took us down a whole different path. The perception of racism became a business, because we started down this path of putting an emphasis on race.
Next thing you know, we had affirmative action programs, racial preference programs.
And now you fast-forward that to today. There are very few discussions that can take place without emphasizing race. It has hurt us as a nation.
It has kept this heavy emphasis on special interests, on ethnicity that the Dr. King movement was to remove those barriers. Instead of focusing on the color of our skin, let’s perhaps move forward in our thinking. Let’s rethink how we evaluate our students for college admissions.
I’m hoping that the Supreme Court takes the opportunity to dig deeper than they did last time to say do we really need 25 years to figure out that people of all ethnicities can pursue their dream, that they can find themselves, that they have the capacity to self-govern?
We need to move to one that aids our country’s noble pursuit of truth. We need a system to build a more perfect union when it comes to what we’re learning in our colleges but also how our students are getting to college.
We need a union that uplifts every American, not based on the color of their skin, you’ve heard it before again and again, but on the content of their character.
-
Trump and Congress should advance education freedom
On March 11, President Trump announced more layoffs that will reduce the Department of Education to half of its former size. The layoffs are a major step towards eliminating the department altogether, a controversial goal. Proponents of this plan emphasize what they say is the need to invest more in private school vouchers instead of… -
Medicaid is a poverty trap that needs reform
Republicans cannot achieve their goal of cutting $2 trillion in federal spending over the next decade without cuts to Medicaid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Medicaid, the joint federal-state program that provides health coverage to more than 72 million low-income Americans, has been under attack by some Republicans who say it’s a… -
America is a republic with a legislative sausage factory
Republicans control both the House and the Senate, and while they largely agree on a shared set of funding and tax priorities for the federal budget, they have differing opinions about how to arrive at those goals. Specifically, they continue to debate whether they should try to pass everything altogether in one massive bill or… -
Trump, Bondi crack down on sanctuary for criminal migrants
Attorney General Pam Bondi announced that the Justice Department (DOJ) is suing Chicago, along with the states of Illinois and New York, as part of the Trump administration’s crackdown on undocumented immigrants and jurisdictions that restrict cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. President Donald Trump has frequently criticized Chicago and Illinois for having… -
President Trump leads with bold action
The first few weeks of President Donald Trump’s second term have sparked a range of public controversies on everything from the Jan. 6 pardons to the abrupt shutting down of USAID and a constitutional crisis between the branches of government. But while Democrats raise alarms over these and other concerns, Republicans are celebrating the achievement…
Latest Opinions
-
Test post with no body copy
-
Getty Images
How does dyeing the Chicago River on St. Patrick’s Day impact fish?
-
Getty Images
Trapped Antarctic researchers reporting death threats from colleague
-
Getty Images
Democratic Party’s favorability ratings drop to record low: Poll
-
Getty Images
Israel accused of ‘genocidal acts’ against Palestinians in new UN report
Popular Opinions
-
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.