Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from chilly Colorado. And the news we have in the last few days is that militants, Houthi militants in Yemen, are launching a combination of low-grade ballistic missiles and drones on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. And that’s led the 10 major shipping companies of the world to basically suspend operations in that area, and either tell their ships to wait at the openings to the Red Sea until the threat passes, or simply sail around the Red Sea completely, which means going all the way around to Africa for the Asia-Europe run. Now first, let’s get the caveats out of the way, this is not a state making a determined effort to shut down shipping in the area. That is something that has happened before in the aftermath of the 1973 war between the Arab States and Israel, the Israelis found themselves occupying the eastern side of the Suez Canal. And so they did just that, in order to destroy one of Egypt’s main sources of foreign currency, and forced them to the negotiating table. That’s what it’s play here. We have basically a bunch of drug-addled militants, some of the world’s least competent ones, operating from some of the world’s least valuable land in Yemen, probably at the instigation of the Iranians, who are the primary supporter, because this is a little conflict that is a needle on the side of Saudi Arabia, cost them very little to do it. They’re using some of the same weapons systems that they’re selling to the Russians. And it’s plausible deniability, just causes a lot of heartburn. So this is not a formal shutting down of trade. This is more of a heavy annoyance that has the opportunity maybe get worse. But at the moment, the warheads in play here are, you know, no more than a few pounds to a few dozen pounds each. Nothing that can take out a tanker, nothing that can take out a container ship. The reason everyone’s so touchy about it is the way insurance law works on the seas, is if you sail into a zone where someone is shooting the commercial shipping, your insurance policy is null and void. And so if anything happened, like you need a tow you’re on your own, or God forbid that you actually get a leak either from the attack or from something else, you’re on your own. So out of an abundance of caution, everyone’s just avoiding the area altogether.
Now, who gets affected by this, three big things to keep an eye on. First of all, this is roughly 30% of all global containerized traffic. And the biggest single chunk of that is Chinese exports to the European Union. These routes now need to go around the bulk of the African continent, which based on where the stuff is being sold to, increases the sailing distance by 1/3 to two-thirds. And that means you need 1/3 to two-thirds more container ships to maintain the same flows. So we’re going to see a lot of pinches in the supply chains for finished goods. And these aren’t intermediate products, for the most part, these are finished goods coming from the Chinese, which is obviously going to hit their bottom line in an environment where consumption is basically seized up in China, and all they have left are exports. It’s also going to make it a little bit easier for the Europeans to put trade sanctions on the Chinese for product dumping, for example, in the EV space. The Europeans are always looking for protectionist methods to apply. And if the Chinese are proving unreliable in their deliveries, that will make that case that much easier.
The second thing is crude oil coming from the Persian Gulf, mostly Saudi crude, that is going the north through the Red Sea and Suez, there are a couple of bypass pipelines for Suez that go through Egypt as well, which go into the Mediterranean basin and, of course, Europe. In the aftermath of the Ukraine war, this route has gotten a lot more traffic, because the Europeans are no longer taking Russian crude, so the Persian Gulf has stepped in. It’s about 12% of global energy shipments. Now, if this proves to be any more than a momentary problem, what the Europeans are going to be forced to do, what the Saudis are gonna be forced to do, is to do what happened the last time this was closed down in 1973. The super tanker was developed. The traditional oil tanker only carries about 500,000 barrels, whereas a super tanker can carry a little bit over 2 million. It takes a larger tanker to make the trip all the way around Africa economically viable. And of course, the Saudis know a few people who have super tankers.
So, expect to see larger and larger vessels plying this route, which is going to put pressure on anyone else who is trying to bring in crude from a longer distance. Which brings us to the third problem, and where we’re probably going to see the most pain in the market. And that’s Russian crude exports. Now, when the Ukraine war started, the Europeans basically stopped using Russian crude and then they gobbled up all of the crude that was available within arm’s reach, some from the United States shale fields, some from North Africa, some from West Africa and the rest from the Persian Gulf. That meant we had to, because of a lack of infrastructure, Russian crude had to be exported through the same port points on the Black and the Baltic Sea, but it had to be then shipped through the Mediterranean through Suez, through the Red Sea, across the Arabian Sea to India, Southeast Asia, and China. Well, that is barely an economically viable route now, which is one of the reasons why the Russians are typically selling their crude at a $20 to $30 a barrel discount. But if Suez is closed, then they can no longer send the small tankers through it. And the small tankers don’t have the reach to go all the way around Africa, in addition to all the way around Asia, so you’re looking at something like 1.5 to 2 million barrels a day of Russian crude that might finally actually be stranded if this isn’t solved pretty quickly.
Now, the Russians do have one thing going for them here. The insurance rules that I kind of laid out there are how insurance has been working since the 1980s. But since the Ukraine wars started in western insurers have been bypassing Russian ships completely, you have some Russian players, some Indian players and some Chinese players who have started to offer indemnification insurance. So we might get this really colorful situation where the real shipping companies stop using Suez and the Red Sea, but these shadow companies that have never had to pay out, start using it. And then we get to find out what happens if an Iranian-backed militant force hits a Chinese, Indian or Russian ship, and how it goes down there. So this is an interesting little story. This is not the panic and shipping that I’m anticipating, because there’s no real sovereign behind it. No one’s actually trying to break the shipping routes, but it does raise some interesting mixes of motivations that are probably going to shake out in the next week or two. So stay tuned. I know I’ll be watching. Bye.
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
‘Have a little compassion’: Americans talk high holiday prices, anxiety
Dec 11 Dr. Frank Luntz‘System is rigged’: Black Americans on the American Dream
Nov 27 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extremist’ or ‘phony’: Americans share who they voted for and why
Nov 21 Dr. Frank Luntz‘Extreme’ or ‘fake’: Swing voters weigh Trump or Harris
Nov 4 Dr. Frank LuntzHouthi attacks trigger Red Sea shipping crisis
By Straight Arrow News
In recent weeks, Houthi rebels out of Yemen have been launching attacks on commercial and civilian shipping vessels in the Red Sea. The attacks, which include reports of piracy and attempted piracy, have prompted both a commercial shipping crisis and the threat of an international military response. The United States has already recruited a list of naval allies to help collectively fend off the attacks, including Canada, France, the U.K. and the Netherlands.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan reviews the global economic impact of these attacks and asks several key questions regarding how shipping companies might respond.
The following is an excerpt from Peter’s Dec. 20 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
If any of the gifts you ordered have to go through the Red Sea, it might be time to buy a backup. If you haven’t heard, there has been a series of attacks carried out by Yemeni militants on commercial shipping.
Most of the major shipping companies have suspended operations in the region; no surprise there. However, if you’re not a shipping savant, these attacks in the Red Sea could disrupt nearly 30% of all global container traffic.
Some countries will feel the heat a bit more than the rest of us. Chinese exports to Europe will require longer routes, crude shipments from the Persian Gulf could be disrupted, and don’t get me started on Russian crude exports. This is a complex issue that, if left unattended, could have major consequences down the road.
Everybody, Peter Zeihan here coming to you from chilly Colorado. And the news we have in the last few days is that militants, Houthi militants in Yemen, are launching a combination of low-grade ballistic missiles and drones on commercial shipping in the Red Sea. And that’s led the 10 major shipping companies of the world to basically suspend operations in that area, and either tell their ships to wait at the openings to the Red Sea until the threat passes, or simply sail around the Red Sea completely, which means going all the way around to Africa for the Asia-Europe run. Now first, let’s get the caveats out of the way, this is not a state making a determined effort to shut down shipping in the area. That is something that has happened before in the aftermath of the 1973 war between the Arab States and Israel, the Israelis found themselves occupying the eastern side of the Suez Canal. And so they did just that, in order to destroy one of Egypt’s main sources of foreign currency, and forced them to the negotiating table. That’s what it’s play here. We have basically a bunch of drug-addled militants, some of the world’s least competent ones, operating from some of the world’s least valuable land in Yemen, probably at the instigation of the Iranians, who are the primary supporter, because this is a little conflict that is a needle on the side of Saudi Arabia, cost them very little to do it. They’re using some of the same weapons systems that they’re selling to the Russians. And it’s plausible deniability, just causes a lot of heartburn. So this is not a formal shutting down of trade. This is more of a heavy annoyance that has the opportunity maybe get worse. But at the moment, the warheads in play here are, you know, no more than a few pounds to a few dozen pounds each. Nothing that can take out a tanker, nothing that can take out a container ship. The reason everyone’s so touchy about it is the way insurance law works on the seas, is if you sail into a zone where someone is shooting the commercial shipping, your insurance policy is null and void. And so if anything happened, like you need a tow you’re on your own, or God forbid that you actually get a leak either from the attack or from something else, you’re on your own. So out of an abundance of caution, everyone’s just avoiding the area altogether.
Now, who gets affected by this, three big things to keep an eye on. First of all, this is roughly 30% of all global containerized traffic. And the biggest single chunk of that is Chinese exports to the European Union. These routes now need to go around the bulk of the African continent, which based on where the stuff is being sold to, increases the sailing distance by 1/3 to two-thirds. And that means you need 1/3 to two-thirds more container ships to maintain the same flows. So we’re going to see a lot of pinches in the supply chains for finished goods. And these aren’t intermediate products, for the most part, these are finished goods coming from the Chinese, which is obviously going to hit their bottom line in an environment where consumption is basically seized up in China, and all they have left are exports. It’s also going to make it a little bit easier for the Europeans to put trade sanctions on the Chinese for product dumping, for example, in the EV space. The Europeans are always looking for protectionist methods to apply. And if the Chinese are proving unreliable in their deliveries, that will make that case that much easier.
The second thing is crude oil coming from the Persian Gulf, mostly Saudi crude, that is going the north through the Red Sea and Suez, there are a couple of bypass pipelines for Suez that go through Egypt as well, which go into the Mediterranean basin and, of course, Europe. In the aftermath of the Ukraine war, this route has gotten a lot more traffic, because the Europeans are no longer taking Russian crude, so the Persian Gulf has stepped in. It’s about 12% of global energy shipments. Now, if this proves to be any more than a momentary problem, what the Europeans are going to be forced to do, what the Saudis are gonna be forced to do, is to do what happened the last time this was closed down in 1973. The super tanker was developed. The traditional oil tanker only carries about 500,000 barrels, whereas a super tanker can carry a little bit over 2 million. It takes a larger tanker to make the trip all the way around Africa economically viable. And of course, the Saudis know a few people who have super tankers.
So, expect to see larger and larger vessels plying this route, which is going to put pressure on anyone else who is trying to bring in crude from a longer distance. Which brings us to the third problem, and where we’re probably going to see the most pain in the market. And that’s Russian crude exports. Now, when the Ukraine war started, the Europeans basically stopped using Russian crude and then they gobbled up all of the crude that was available within arm’s reach, some from the United States shale fields, some from North Africa, some from West Africa and the rest from the Persian Gulf. That meant we had to, because of a lack of infrastructure, Russian crude had to be exported through the same port points on the Black and the Baltic Sea, but it had to be then shipped through the Mediterranean through Suez, through the Red Sea, across the Arabian Sea to India, Southeast Asia, and China. Well, that is barely an economically viable route now, which is one of the reasons why the Russians are typically selling their crude at a $20 to $30 a barrel discount. But if Suez is closed, then they can no longer send the small tankers through it. And the small tankers don’t have the reach to go all the way around Africa, in addition to all the way around Asia, so you’re looking at something like 1.5 to 2 million barrels a day of Russian crude that might finally actually be stranded if this isn’t solved pretty quickly.
Now, the Russians do have one thing going for them here. The insurance rules that I kind of laid out there are how insurance has been working since the 1980s. But since the Ukraine wars started in western insurers have been bypassing Russian ships completely, you have some Russian players, some Indian players and some Chinese players who have started to offer indemnification insurance. So we might get this really colorful situation where the real shipping companies stop using Suez and the Red Sea, but these shadow companies that have never had to pay out, start using it. And then we get to find out what happens if an Iranian-backed militant force hits a Chinese, Indian or Russian ship, and how it goes down there. So this is an interesting little story. This is not the panic and shipping that I’m anticipating, because there’s no real sovereign behind it. No one’s actually trying to break the shipping routes, but it does raise some interesting mixes of motivations that are probably going to shake out in the next week or two. So stay tuned. I know I’ll be watching. Bye.
Hurricane Helene hits US coast, Appalachia and beyond
Israel holds upper hand against Lebanon, Hezbollah and Iran
The Sinaloa Cartel civil war
New Ukrainian weapons hit Russia where it hurts
Weighing social costs vs. economic benefits on immigration
Underreported stories from each side
Israel arrests Jerusalem man for spying on behalf of Iran
17 sources | 11% from the left Getty ImagesKFile: Pete Hegseth spread baseless conspiracy theories that January 6 attack was carried out by leftist groups
14 sources | 0% from the right AP ImagesLatest Stories
Test Draft
Congress unveils stopgap bill to avert shutdown
GrubHub agrees to $25m settlement for ‘deceptive’ practices
Disney pulls transgender storyline from upcoming Pixar series
RFK Jr.’s lawyer: NYT report over polio vaccine petition ‘categorically false’
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Give time, love and togetherness for the holidays
Wednesday Adrienne LawrenceDid Democrats learn anything from 2024 election?
Dec 17 Ruben NavarretteGEC shutdown strikes a blow to government censorship
Dec 17 Ben WeingartenElon Musk budget cuts will devastate GOP voters
Dec 16 David Pakman