Everybody, Peter Zeihan coming to you from Colorado. The big news over the weekend is that a Hong Kong court has ruled that China’s largest property development group Evergrande, is bankrupt and needs to be broken up. This is something that the Chinese government has spent a lot of effort on the last two years not happening. Because well, let me give you a little backstory. So there’s two big things that dominate the Chinese economy. The first is something I call hyper financialization. The idea that the government both de facto confiscates the savings of the citizen population. So it can only go into projects funded by Chinese state banks, as well as massively expanding the money supply to the tune of like almost triple what we have here in the United States, in Order now to make sure that there is plenty of cash sloshing around in the system so that banks can loan anything in any amount and low terms to anyone at any time. Because if they can do that, they can expand, expand, expand and hire, hire, hire. And people who have jobs don’t go on long walks in large groups together. It’s a public stability, political control approach to finance, it’s not about profit, it’s about throughput, because throughput requires a lot of bodies. Anyway, that’s the goal. In that sort of situation, you get two things. Number one, you get companies like Evergrande, who gorge on all this bottomless supply of debt to build, build, build, build, build, even if there’s no demand. Second, you get a population who knows that their private savings is almost worthless, because the Chinese government is forcing them to keep it in the state banks. And they want to put into a hard asset that preferably the state can’t control. And if they can’t get their money out of the country, then the next best thing is a hard asset in the country, which typically is property. So you get people pooling their private savings in order to buy condos, and each condo is typically a owned by a different consortium of private individuals making entangling it. Also, you have somewhere probably in the vicinity of 1.5 billion units in the country that have never been lifted and never will be lived in. So you’re talking about 100% overbilled conservatively, Some estimates say it’s as high as 3 billion, which is just so far beyond stupid, anyway, Evergrande going down means that their debts aren’t gonna be services anymore, and the physical assets they have are gonna be parceled up and foreign investors are gonna be coming in seeing what bits that they can get, none of these things are things that the Chinese Communist Party would normally allow to happen. So there’s a couple of ways that this can go, none of them are good. Option number one, is we follow a western style bankruptcy and restitution program where this system is broken up, and a lot of their assets are sold at pennies, maybe dimes on $1. And it just goes away. If that happens, we will have a very clear idea of just how much the oversupply in the market is. And you can count on private citizens being up in arms, probably, I mean, the best estimate I’ve seen out of China is that 70% of total private savings is wrapped up in real estate. And most of these assets are worth no more than 10 cents on the dollar. So if you have a fire sale, the single largest player, which controls 1/6 of the market, holy shit, things are gonna get real very, very, very quickly. Option number two, is that the Chinese step in and abrogate the Hong Kong ruling. Now legally, this cannot happen. But the Chinese Communist Party is not really big on legal details when it comes to Hong Kong in particular, I have no doubt that they could stick their noses in that, if that happens that Evergrande goes on some sort of state drip, and everything with the system just kind of limps on with the understanding now that Hong Kong has no legal authority over its own holdings, which will start an exodus of what few international firms are still there. Regardless how this goes don’t expect anything in the market to get better. This is not like say, the TARP program that the United States put into place back in 2008 at the bottom of the subprime crisis, which kind of froze the market and put a floor under things and allowed for reforms and economic growth to eventually heal the damage of the subprime crisis. This is this is a one off decision that is not just holding back one rock from rolling down the hill. Evergrande may be the biggest player in this market. But it is by far not the only one who has been doing stupid things like this building condos that have no demand are running it like a Ponzi scheme. Every development company in the country basically operates this way. And the second and third largest players in the industry are state owned, so you can count on the Chinese government not using this as an opportunity to break with the old model and put into place something sustainable. And even if all of a sudden this place were run by a bunch of Austrian economists. It’s too late. housing demand legitimate housing demand housing demand for houses that people actually live in, is dominated by people aged 20 to 45 people who were started out. Well, 45 years ago, the Chinese government instituted the one child policy. You combine that with the most rapid urbanization program in human history, and there are no longer enough people under age 45 to do anything that is consumption led, including home buying. So there is no path out of this that follows any pattern that we have established in a market environment, which leads us to political and social outcomes, where the market economics are just atrocious and getting worse by the day, with a government that is becoming evermore nervous about the state of the economy, and the loyalty of its population. I don’t want to say anything overly dramatic is like this is where it all starts to fall apart because we’ve had a lot of things that go down in the last 18 months. But this cuts to the core of what enables the average citizen to actually support the government. And there’s no way we move forward from this without a lot of side damage.
Related
Commentary
Our commentary partners will help you reach your own conclusions on complex topics.
What happens to China after Xi Jinping dies?
Jul 15 Peter ZeihanImpact of Italy’s older, shrinking population
Jul 8 Peter Zeihan‘On death’s door’: Undecided voters react to first debate
Jul 5 Dr. Frank LuntzBiden and Trump are both unfit to be president
Jul 5 Peter ZeihanEvergrande liquidation will hit China hard
By Straight Arrow News
Evergrande, China’s largest property developer, is on the verge of extinction after a Hong Kong court ordered its liquidation, citing the company’s inability to restructure its $300 billion debt. Once China’s largest seller of real estate, the company flourished by preselling apartments to middle-income Chinese. However, within the last few years, it found itself on the financial brink, missing interest payments and halting construction projects.
Straight Arrow News contributor Peter Zeihan delves into the origins of the Evergrande collapse and predicts potentially “dire economic consequences” for the world’s second-largest economy.
Excerpted from Peter’s Jan. 31 “Zeihan on Geopolitics” newsletter:
Evergrande, formerly China’s largest property developer, has just declared bankruptcy, and the fallout is going to be massive. Let’s look at how we got to this point and some potential paths forward.
The collapse of Evergrande is a consequence of the Chinese government’s hyper-financialization policy that floods the economy with citizens’ savings to ensure stability… clearly it didn’t work. However, years of this policy have contributed to a massive overbuild of real estate, which is where many Chinese citizens have parked their private savings.
So, the potential for economic turmoil to ensue is quite high. How can China prevent this from happening? They can follow a Western-style bankruptcy procedure, which could stir up a whole slew of problems, or the government could intervene and circumvent the court ruling, which could spark concern internationally and diminish the legal autonomy of Hong Kong.
Regardless of which path is chosen, there will be dire economic consequences and myriad of issues for China’s social stability.
Everybody, Peter Zeihan coming to you from Colorado. The big news over the weekend is that a Hong Kong court has ruled that China’s largest property development group Evergrande, is bankrupt and needs to be broken up. This is something that the Chinese government has spent a lot of effort on the last two years not happening. Because well, let me give you a little backstory. So there’s two big things that dominate the Chinese economy. The first is something I call hyper financialization. The idea that the government both de facto confiscates the savings of the citizen population. So it can only go into projects funded by Chinese state banks, as well as massively expanding the money supply to the tune of like almost triple what we have here in the United States, in Order now to make sure that there is plenty of cash sloshing around in the system so that banks can loan anything in any amount and low terms to anyone at any time. Because if they can do that, they can expand, expand, expand and hire, hire, hire. And people who have jobs don’t go on long walks in large groups together. It’s a public stability, political control approach to finance, it’s not about profit, it’s about throughput, because throughput requires a lot of bodies. Anyway, that’s the goal. In that sort of situation, you get two things. Number one, you get companies like Evergrande, who gorge on all this bottomless supply of debt to build, build, build, build, build, even if there’s no demand. Second, you get a population who knows that their private savings is almost worthless, because the Chinese government is forcing them to keep it in the state banks. And they want to put into a hard asset that preferably the state can’t control. And if they can’t get their money out of the country, then the next best thing is a hard asset in the country, which typically is property. So you get people pooling their private savings in order to buy condos, and each condo is typically a owned by a different consortium of private individuals making entangling it. Also, you have somewhere probably in the vicinity of 1.5 billion units in the country that have never been lifted and never will be lived in. So you’re talking about 100% overbilled conservatively, Some estimates say it’s as high as 3 billion, which is just so far beyond stupid, anyway, Evergrande going down means that their debts aren’t gonna be services anymore, and the physical assets they have are gonna be parceled up and foreign investors are gonna be coming in seeing what bits that they can get, none of these things are things that the Chinese Communist Party would normally allow to happen. So there’s a couple of ways that this can go, none of them are good. Option number one, is we follow a western style bankruptcy and restitution program where this system is broken up, and a lot of their assets are sold at pennies, maybe dimes on $1. And it just goes away. If that happens, we will have a very clear idea of just how much the oversupply in the market is. And you can count on private citizens being up in arms, probably, I mean, the best estimate I’ve seen out of China is that 70% of total private savings is wrapped up in real estate. And most of these assets are worth no more than 10 cents on the dollar. So if you have a fire sale, the single largest player, which controls 1/6 of the market, holy shit, things are gonna get real very, very, very quickly. Option number two, is that the Chinese step in and abrogate the Hong Kong ruling. Now legally, this cannot happen. But the Chinese Communist Party is not really big on legal details when it comes to Hong Kong in particular, I have no doubt that they could stick their noses in that, if that happens that Evergrande goes on some sort of state drip, and everything with the system just kind of limps on with the understanding now that Hong Kong has no legal authority over its own holdings, which will start an exodus of what few international firms are still there. Regardless how this goes don’t expect anything in the market to get better. This is not like say, the TARP program that the United States put into place back in 2008 at the bottom of the subprime crisis, which kind of froze the market and put a floor under things and allowed for reforms and economic growth to eventually heal the damage of the subprime crisis. This is this is a one off decision that is not just holding back one rock from rolling down the hill. Evergrande may be the biggest player in this market. But it is by far not the only one who has been doing stupid things like this building condos that have no demand are running it like a Ponzi scheme. Every development company in the country basically operates this way. And the second and third largest players in the industry are state owned, so you can count on the Chinese government not using this as an opportunity to break with the old model and put into place something sustainable. And even if all of a sudden this place were run by a bunch of Austrian economists. It’s too late. housing demand legitimate housing demand housing demand for houses that people actually live in, is dominated by people aged 20 to 45 people who were started out. Well, 45 years ago, the Chinese government instituted the one child policy. You combine that with the most rapid urbanization program in human history, and there are no longer enough people under age 45 to do anything that is consumption led, including home buying. So there is no path out of this that follows any pattern that we have established in a market environment, which leads us to political and social outcomes, where the market economics are just atrocious and getting worse by the day, with a government that is becoming evermore nervous about the state of the economy, and the loyalty of its population. I don’t want to say anything overly dramatic is like this is where it all starts to fall apart because we’ve had a lot of things that go down in the last 18 months. But this cuts to the core of what enables the average citizen to actually support the government. And there’s no way we move forward from this without a lot of side damage.
Related
What happens to China after Xi Jinping dies?
Impact of Italy’s older, shrinking population
Biden and Trump are both unfit to be president
Why the West can’t quit Russian oil
Why Israel’s Supreme Court ended draft exemptions
Underreported stories from each side
House Republicans request interview with White House physician
14 sources | 14% from the left AP ImagesIs college worth it? Poll finds only 36% of Americans have confidence in higher education
20 sources | 6% from the right Getty ImagesLatest Stories
Top House Democrats call for Biden to step aside in private meeting
Test promo headline
Biden looks to solidify support from Democrats after debate
Immunity ruling: Biden issues warning, Trump looks to overturn conviction
Jay’s Test Post 1111
Popular Opinions
In addition to the facts, we believe it’s vital to hear perspectives from all sides of the political spectrum.
Should Biden step aside or not?
Jul 8 David PakmanDebate disaster raises questions about Biden’s capacity to lead
Jul 5 Star ParkerAmericans deserve younger candidates, better ideas
Jul 5 Dr. Rashad RicheyDespite poor debate performance, Biden deserves our support
Jul 5 Jordan Reid