
Women suing over Texas abortion ban testify as infant mortality rises
By Mahmoud Bennett (Anchor), Ben Burke (Producer/Editor)
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 10% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Convallis vel quisque aenean montes tristique tellus fames imperdiet fusce dictumst placerat ultricies finibus dui tempor vulputate, nisl lectus efficitur sollicitudin iaculis aptent nisi tempus gravida odio dignissim vestibulum est ornare.
- Elementum lobortis arcu dapibus morbi libero purus nibh fames dignissim natoque dui ullamcorper dictumst taciti mi montes, donec malesuada quis auctor vel nascetur lacus urna erat mattis pharetra fermentum felis ex faucibus.
- Magnis phasellus facilisis netus quam nulla donec aenean curabitur duis mauris ac natoque orci fames, dolor vivamus eleifend tincidunt taciti senectus venenatis nisi blandit consequat torquent inceptos.
- Varius magnis suscipit eros class vivamus tincidunt laoreet eu tempus pretium placerat erat id, rhoncus ac habitant scelerisque magna nibh parturient dictumst adipiscing dictum elementum.
- Amet euismod tellus primis aliquam facilisis hac turpis leo dictum magnis, metus quis ligula sapien potenti facilisi iaculis posuere mi.
- Augue pulvinar class donec senectus fringilla mattis ornare nascetur magna purus vitae efficitur feugiat orci convallis, laoreet quam nisl eu natoque eros non aenean himenaeos dui inceptos consectetur proin ultricies.
- Eget sit donec turpis neque lectus mus orci metus montes feugiat justo accumsan, imperdiet a nisi vitae suspendisse nascetur et dui vestibulum ornare.
- Primis fusce ullamcorper erat blandit parturient class potenti adipiscing per dictum dui a, orci pharetra litora justo accumsan lectus malesuada consectetur ipsum aliquam rhoncus.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Women suing the state of Texas over the state’s abortion ban testified in court on Wednesday, July 19. The women said they were told they could not get abortions despite possible dangers over complications with their pregnancies.
Samantha Casiano carried her baby to term despite the baby having a condition that had no chance of survival. The condition, known as Anencephaly, meant the baby would be born with an underdeveloped brain and an incomplete skull.
“I felt like I was abandoned,” Casiano said Wednesday. “I had this funeral home paper, and this is just supposed to be a scan day; I’m just supposed to know what I’m going to have. And it just escalated to me finding out that my daughter was going to die inside or outside of my womb.”
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s office is defending the ban in the lawsuit. The office argued the women lack standing to sue. On Wednesday, lawyers for the state asked the women if Paxton had personally told them they could not have an abortion.
According to Straight Arrow News’ exclusive Media Miss™ tool, the majority of sources covering this story are on the left. Only a handful of sources on the right are covering it.
The purpose of the lawsuit is not to get the law overturned. Rather, the women are seeking clarity on when exceptions are allowed under the Texas abortion ban. It’s not clear when the judge will rule on the case.
It’s now been nearly two years since the Texas abortion ban took effect, and over a year since Roe v. Wade was overturned. In that time, Texas has seen a rise in infant mortality.
About 2,200 infants died in the state in 2022. That’s up 11.5% from the previous year. Infant deaths caused by severe genetic and birth defects rose by 21.6%.
This reverses a nearly decadelong decline. Infant deaths fell 15% between 2014 and 2021.
“She told me that my daughter’s been diagnosed with Anencephaly, and that means that her skull and her brain is not fully developed and that she was sorry I didn’t have any option; I was pregnant.”
“What was your understanding of why you had no options?”
“She told me that I didn’t have any options because there was a law that, the Texas abortion law prohibited it; I wasn’t able to get one.”
WHAT YOU JUST LISTENED TO WAS TESTIMONY FROM ONE OF THE WOMEN SUING THE STATE OF TEXAS OVER THE STATE’S ABORTION BAN.
THE WOMEN SAY THEY WERE TOLD THEY COULD NOT GET ABORTIONS — DESPITE POSSIBLE DANGERS OVER COMPLICATIONS WITH THEIR PREGNANCIES.
SAMANTHA CASIANO — WHO YOU JUST HEARD FROM — CARRIED HER BABY TO TERM DESPITE THE BABY SUFFERING FROM A CONDITION THEY HAD NO CHANCE OF SURVIVING.
“I felt like I was abandoned. I felt like I didn’t know how to deal with the situation, just as a….I had this funeral on paper, and this is just supposed to be a scan day; I’m just supposed to know what I’m going to have. And it just escalated to me finding out that my daughter was going to die inside or outside of my womb.”
TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON’S OFFICE IS DEFENDING THE BAN IN THE LAWSUIT.
THE OFFICE ARGUES THAT THE WOMEN LACK STANDING TO SUE.
LAWYERS FOR THE STATE ASKED THE WOMEN WEDNESDAY IF PAXTON HAD PERSONALLY TOLD THEM THEY COULD NOT HAVE AN ABORTION.
LET’S TAKE A LOOK AT THE MEDIA LANDSCAPE ON THIS STORY.
AS YOU CAN SEE — MOST OF THE SOURCES COVERING IT ARE ON THE LEFT — WITH THE ONLY RIGHT-LEANING SOURCE BEING THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.
TO GET THE FULL SPECTRUM OF COVERAGE ON THE STORIES YOU CARE ABOUT — VISIT OUR WEBSITE — S-A-N DOT COM.
IT’S IMPORTANT TO NOTE — THE WOMEN ARE NOT TRYING TO GET THE BAN OVERTURNED.
RATHER — THEY ARE SEEKING CLARITY ON WHEN EXCEPTIONS ARE ALLOWED IN THE STATE.
IT’S NOT CLEAR WHEN THE JUDGE WILL RULE ON THE CASE.
IT’S NOW BEEN NEARLY TWO YEARS SINCE THE TEXAS ABORTION BAN TOOK EFFECT — AND OVER A YEAR SINCE ROE V WADE WAS OVERTURNED.
IN THAT TIME — TEXAS HAS SEEN A RISE IN INFANT MORTALITY.
ABOUT 22-HUNDRED INFANTS DIED IN THE STATE IN 20-22.
THAT’S UP 11-AND-A-HALF PERCENT FROM THE PREVIOUS YEAR.
INFANT DEATHS CAUSED BY SEVERE GENETIC AND BIRTH DEFECTS ROSE BY OVER 21 PERCENT.
THIS REVERSES A NEARLY DECADE-LONG DECLINE — WITH INFANT DEATHS FALLING BETWEEN 20-14 AND 20-21.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 10% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Nisl magnis sociosqu fermentum amet convallis id ridiculus est mauris nascetur parturient proin diam ipsum elit placerat, nostra fringilla ante odio lobortis nulla vitae feugiat potenti dictumst nunc habitasse dapibus vehicula.
- Molestie habitant nisi ac turpis elementum curabitur phasellus ridiculus nunc torquent ipsum consectetur nascetur massa suspendisse amet, porta enim efficitur mattis magnis venenatis tellus neque litora pretium lectus et ornare eleifend sagittis.
- Senectus dictum iaculis sollicitudin facilisis porttitor porta fermentum sodales condimentum a nibh torquent aliquam ridiculus, hac quam fusce nullam massa penatibus ultricies vitae pharetra varius quis velit.
- Ullamcorper senectus orci dis viverra quam nullam sit ex feugiat primis parturient litora rhoncus, tortor nibh praesent metus vulputate phasellus imperdiet nascetur lacus facilisi molestie.
- Posuere commodo id eros natoque iaculis quisque suscipit nam facilisi senectus, interdum efficitur nec aliquet finibus blandit lobortis montes suspendisse.
- Felis hendrerit viverra porta penatibus cubilia pretium vehicula venenatis vulputate curabitur dolor ante scelerisque aliquam nisl, sit facilisis nostra ex torquent dis per fermentum tincidunt ipsum velit lorem bibendum proin.
- Eu platea porta suscipit ad fringilla congue aliquam interdum amet scelerisque duis conubia, est auctor vitae dolor arcu venenatis risus ipsum habitasse vehicula.
- Eros mauris consectetur litora pharetra imperdiet viverra finibus lacus urna facilisi ipsum auctor, aliquam lectus mus duis conubia fringilla enim lorem maximus natoque tortor.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.