White House can continue restricting AP’s press privileges, judge rules


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • A federal judge has denied The Associated Press’s request to immediately reinstate full press access, leaving its Oval Office and Air Force One privileges limited. The AP had sued after the White House imposed restrictions over a Gulf of America language dispute.
  • The judge ruled in favor of the White House, but cautioned that its actions might be considered “viewpoint discrimination” and could lose in court.
  • Around 40 news organizations, including Fox News and Newsmax, have expressed support for the AP’s right to access, urging the White House to reverse its decision.

Full Story

The Associated Press will continue to face limited access to the Oval Office and Air Force One after a federal judge denied the AP’s request for an emergency order to reinstate its press privileges.

The AP filed a lawsuit seeking to have its access restored after the White House restricted the organization from certain spaces. The restrictions were imposed due to the AP’s refusal to adopt the term “Gulf of America” instead of “Gulf of Mexico” in its reporting.

Court sides with White House for now

In his ruling, the judge sided with the White House, stating that The Associated Press still has the ability to cover presidential events, even if not always in person. However, he issued a warning to the White House, suggesting that its actions may not withstand future legal scrutiny, calling the decision “clearly viewpoint discrimination.”

“It might be appropriate for the White House… to consider if what they’re doing is really appropriate given the case law.”

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden

Parallels to a 2019 CNN case

This case draws comparisons to a 2019 incident, in which a federal court ordered the White House to reinstate CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s press credentials after they were revoked.

The judge has called for an expedited briefing in the current case, with a hearing scheduled for March 20.

White House responds to ruling

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the ruling during an appearance on Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

“The judge’s denial of The Associated Press reinforces what I said from the podium and what Trump has been saying,” Leavitt said. “Covering the presidency in the most intimate and limited spaces in the White House, in the Oval Office, Air Force One, is a privilege, not a legal right. We want all voices to have that opportunity, which is why we’ve expanded the briefing room to invite truly independent journalists and podcasters to cover this president with honesty and accuracy.”

News organizations rally behind the AP

Last week, 40 news organizations signed a joint letter to the White House in support of The Associated Press. Even some conservative outlets, including Fox News and Newsmax, urged the White House to restore the AP’s access.

Newsmax released a statement, saying, “We can understand President Trump’s frustration because the media has often been unfair to him, but Newsmax supports the AP’s right, as a private organization, to use the language it wants to use in its reporting.”

As of this report, The Associated Press has not commented on the latest ruling.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left show a clear focus on the AP's First Amendment claims, emphasizing perceived governmental overreach and its implications for democracy.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight the judge's skepticism regarding the AP's urgency, framing the ruling as a legal victory for the Trump administration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

72 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge denied The Associated Press's request to restore access to presidential events, stating that the AP did not show any irreparable harm from the ban.
  • The AP argues its First Amendment rights are being violated by the White House's ban due to its use of the term "Gulf of Mexico."
  • White House officials claimed that access to the president is a privilege, not a right, rejecting the AP's complaints about press access.
  • The White House Correspondents' Association expressed support for the AP, stating that punishing media views threatens democracy.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge, Trevor McFadden, denied the Associated Press's emergency request to restore access to the White House, siding with the government that emergency action was unnecessary because no irreparable harm was shown.
  • The Associated Press had sued the Trump administration, claiming it violated its First Amendment rights by retaliating against the outlet for not using "Gulf of America" instead of "Gulf of Mexico."
  • The judge indicated that the Associated Press could still have a case since the government allegedly excluded them due to their terminology choice regarding the Gulf's name.
  • A trial for the Associated Press's lawsuit is set for March 20, as the government maintains that access to the president is not a legal right for journalists.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™
This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • A federal judge has denied The Associated Press’s request to immediately reinstate full press access, leaving its Oval Office and Air Force One privileges limited. The AP had sued after the White House imposed restrictions over a Gulf of America language dispute.
  • The judge ruled in favor of the White House, but cautioned that its actions might be considered “viewpoint discrimination” and could lose in court.
  • Around 40 news organizations, including Fox News and Newsmax, have expressed support for the AP’s right to access, urging the White House to reverse its decision.

Full Story

The Associated Press will continue to face limited access to the Oval Office and Air Force One after a federal judge denied the AP’s request for an emergency order to reinstate its press privileges.

The AP filed a lawsuit seeking to have its access restored after the White House restricted the organization from certain spaces. The restrictions were imposed due to the AP’s refusal to adopt the term “Gulf of America” instead of “Gulf of Mexico” in its reporting.

Court sides with White House for now

In his ruling, the judge sided with the White House, stating that The Associated Press still has the ability to cover presidential events, even if not always in person. However, he issued a warning to the White House, suggesting that its actions may not withstand future legal scrutiny, calling the decision “clearly viewpoint discrimination.”

“It might be appropriate for the White House… to consider if what they’re doing is really appropriate given the case law.”

U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden

Parallels to a 2019 CNN case

This case draws comparisons to a 2019 incident, in which a federal court ordered the White House to reinstate CNN reporter Jim Acosta’s press credentials after they were revoked.

The judge has called for an expedited briefing in the current case, with a hearing scheduled for March 20.

White House responds to ruling

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the ruling during an appearance on Fox News’ Sean Hannity.

“The judge’s denial of The Associated Press reinforces what I said from the podium and what Trump has been saying,” Leavitt said. “Covering the presidency in the most intimate and limited spaces in the White House, in the Oval Office, Air Force One, is a privilege, not a legal right. We want all voices to have that opportunity, which is why we’ve expanded the briefing room to invite truly independent journalists and podcasters to cover this president with honesty and accuracy.”

News organizations rally behind the AP

Last week, 40 news organizations signed a joint letter to the White House in support of The Associated Press. Even some conservative outlets, including Fox News and Newsmax, urged the White House to restore the AP’s access.

Newsmax released a statement, saying, “We can understand President Trump’s frustration because the media has often been unfair to him, but Newsmax supports the AP’s right, as a private organization, to use the language it wants to use in its reporting.”

As of this report, The Associated Press has not commented on the latest ruling.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left show a clear focus on the AP's First Amendment claims, emphasizing perceived governmental overreach and its implications for democracy.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right highlight the judge's skepticism regarding the AP's urgency, framing the ruling as a legal victory for the Trump administration.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

72 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge denied The Associated Press's request to restore access to presidential events, stating that the AP did not show any irreparable harm from the ban.
  • The AP argues its First Amendment rights are being violated by the White House's ban due to its use of the term "Gulf of Mexico."
  • White House officials claimed that access to the president is a privilege, not a right, rejecting the AP's complaints about press access.
  • The White House Correspondents' Association expressed support for the AP, stating that punishing media views threatens democracy.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge, Trevor McFadden, denied the Associated Press's emergency request to restore access to the White House, siding with the government that emergency action was unnecessary because no irreparable harm was shown.
  • The Associated Press had sued the Trump administration, claiming it violated its First Amendment rights by retaliating against the outlet for not using "Gulf of America" instead of "Gulf of Mexico."
  • The judge indicated that the Associated Press could still have a case since the government allegedly excluded them due to their terminology choice regarding the Gulf's name.
  • A trial for the Associated Press's lawsuit is set for March 20, as the government maintains that access to the president is not a legal right for journalists.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™