Skip to main content
Ryan Robertson Anchor, Reporter, Video Editor
Share
Military

What options does Europe have considering Trump, Ukraine?

Listen
Share
Ryan Robertson Anchor, Reporter, Video Editor
Share

  • President Trump’s stance on Ukraine and European security marks a significant departure from past U.S. policy, leaving European leaders in shock. The Atlantic Council warns that Europe must strengthen its leverage with both the Trump administration and Russia to ensure its security.
  • European nations are considering various responses: Italy could contribute its air force, France and the U.K. may send peacekeeping troops, and Poland and the Baltics are increasing defense spending. Germany, despite being Ukraine’s biggest supporter, faces military readiness challenges.
  • The future of European security remains uncertain, but the U.S. administration has made it clear that Europe can no longer rely on American firepower for protection.

Full Story

U.S. President Donald Trump’s stance on Ukraine, its defense against Russia and the future of European security vastly differs from his predecessors. For decades, the United States was the main force guaranteeing safety on the European continent, but in recent weeks, President Trump and his representatives have painted a very different picture.

The Atlantic Council, a Washington-based think tank, calls this shift a wake-up call for Europe. In a recent post on its website, Atlantic Council experts describe the reactions from different countries and lay out possible responses European nations, and their militaries, might take in light of this new paradigm.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

While we can’t cover every reaction and recommendation, here are the highlights.

Shock among European leaders

According to the Atlantic Council, European leaders remain in a state of shock following remarks from U.S. leadership. For instance, President Trump recently stated Ukraine started the war. Trump also labeled its leader a “dictator” because there were no elections in the past three years.

For the sake of the truth: Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine. Ukraine’s constitution prohibits elections during wartime, and if anyone in the world meets the definition of a dictator, it’s Vladimir Putin.

The Atlantic Council notes this separation from facts is leading many Europeans to question whether the U.S. is still an ally. To ensure Europe’s future security, the think tank argues European nations must strengthen their leverage with the Trump administration and Russia.

What are Europe’s possible responses?

The Atlantic Council suggests each country should play to its strengths.

Italy could use its air force to help secure Ukrainian airspace. While its army is stretched thin, Italy’s air force is relatively large and already conducting missions in the Baltics.

France and the U.K. both expressed openness to sending troops to Ukraine in a peacekeeping capacity. French President Emmanuel Macron is a longtime advocate for European “strategic autonomy.” The Atlantic Council believes he now has more leverage to push that argument.

The U.K. is grappling with concerns about replacing the international rules-based order with a “might is right” approach to diplomacy. The British government remains frustrated President Trump engaged directly with Putin while excluding Ukraine and other allies. However, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has a strong relationship with Trump. The Atlantic Council suggests it could be used to build bridges between the U.S. and Europe.

Germany is Ukraine’s biggest supporter in Europe, both financially and militarily. However, its own military readiness is in poor shape after years of underfunding. Unlike the U.K. and France, Germany does not possess nuclear weapons, making it more reliant on the U.S. for strategic deterrence.

If a call went out for European nations to send troops to Ukraine, Germany may not have forces readily available. This puts Germany in an awkward position as it navigates the shifting geopolitical landscape.

Poland and the Baltics push for defense spending

The Baltic states and Poland strongly support increased defense spending. Poland is the only European country allocating nearly 5% of its GDP to defense. Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia are also willing to meet that threshold. These nations want Europe to take greater responsibility for its own defense, though the Baltic states still believe the U.S. should serve as the ultimate security guarantor.

Poland’s efforts to build up its military and reduce dependence on Russian oil earned it the title of “Model Ally” from U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth. However, Poland’s prime minister said his country will not send troops to Ukraine. That would be a sensitive issue since the two nations fought a war in the early 20th century. To get around that issue, though, the Atlantic Council suggests Poland could send troops to Estonia, allowing British forces stationed there to be redeployed to Ukraine if necessary.

Clarity in the uncertainty

Will European nations need to send troops to Ukraine? At this point, no one knows for sure. However, one thing is clear: the current U.S. administration is firm in its stance that the days of Europeans relying on American firepower for protection are over.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

U.S. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S OUTLOOK ON UKRAINE, ITS DEFENSE AGAINST RUSSIA, AND THE FUTURE OF EUROPEAN SECURITY IS VASTLY DIFFERENT FROM HIS PREDECESSORS. FOR DECADES, THE UNITED STATES WAS THE MAIN FORCE GUARANTEEING SAFETY ON THE EUROPEAN CONTINENT, BUT OVER THE LAST FEW WEEK’S PRESIDENT TRUMP AND HIS REPRESENTATIVES PAINTED A VERY DIFFERENT PICTURE.

THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL, A WASHINGTON-BASED THINK TANK, CALLS IT A WAKE-UP CALL FOR EUROPE, AND ITS EXPERTS DESCRIBE THE REACTIONS FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES IN A RECENTLY PUBLISHED BLOG POST. THOSE EXPERTS ALSO LAID OUT POSSIBLE RESPONSES EUROPEAN COUNTRIES, AND THEIR MILITARIES, MIGHT TAKE IN LIGHT OF THIS NEW PARADIGM.

WE CAN’T GO OVER EVERY REACTION AND RECOMMENDATION, BUT HERE ARE THE HIGHLIGHTS.

FOR STARTERS, ALL THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL EXPERTS AGREE EUROPEAN LEADERS ARE STILL IN A STATE OF SHOCK FOLLOWING THE REMARKS FROM THE U.S. LEADERSHIP. FOR INSTANCE, PRESIDENT TRUMP SAYING UKRAINE STARTED THE WAR AND ITS LEADER WAS A DICTATOR BECAUSE THERE WEREN’T ANY ELECTIONS OVER THE LAST THREE YEARS.

FOR THE SAKE OF THE TRUTH, RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN ORDERED THE INVASION OF UKRAINE. UKRAINE’S CONSTITUTION PROHIBITS ELECTIONS DURING A WAR, AND IF ANYONE IN THE WORLD MEETS THE DESCRIPTION OF A DICTATOR, IT’S VLADIMIR PUTIN.

THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL SAYS IT’S THIS SEPARATION FROM FACTS, THOUGH, THAT HAS MANY EUROPEANS WONDERING IF THE U.S. IS EVEN STILL AN ALLY. THEREFORE, IN ORDER TO BEST SECURE EUROPE’S SAFETY IN THE FUTURE, THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL SAYS EUROPE NEEDS TO STRENGTHEN ITS LEVERAGE WITH THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION AND WITH RUSSIA.

HOW CAN IT DO THAT? BY EACH COUNTRY PLAYING TO ITS STRENGTHS.

THE A.C. SUGGESTS ITALY COULD USE ITS AIR FORCE TO HELP SECURE UKRAINIAN AIRSPACE. THE ITALIAN ARMY IS STRETCHED THIN, BUT ITS AIR FORCE IS FAIRLY LARGE AND IS ALREADY FLYING MISSIONS IN THE BALTICS.

FRANCE AND THE U.K. BOTH SAID THEY WERE OPEN TO SENDING TROOPS TO UKRAINE IN SOME SORT OF PEACE-KEEPING CAPACITY. EVEN BEFORE THE MOST RECENT REVELATIONS FROM THE WHITE HOUSE, FRENCH PRESIDENT EMANUAL MACRON WAS SAYING EUROPE SHOULD HAVE ‘STRATEGIC AUTONOMY OR ELSE IT COULD DIE.’ THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL SAYS MACRON LIKELY HAS WHAT HE NEEDS TO WIN THAT ARGUMENT NOW.

IN THE U.K., THE BRITS ARE WONDERING IF THE CONCEPT OF AN INTERNATIONAL RULES BASED ORDER IS BEING REPLACED WITH THE OLD ‘MIGHT IS RIGHT’ ATTITUDE OF DIPLOMACY. THE BRITS ARE STILL UPSET PRESIDENT TRUMP OPENED UP NEGOTIATIONS DIRECTLY WITH PUTIN WHILE EXCLUDING UKRAINE AND EVERYONE ELSE. BRITISH PRIME MINISTER SIR KEIR STARMER DOES HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH TRUMP, WHICH THE A.C. SAYS HE COULD USE TO TRY AND BUILD SOME BRIDGES BETWEEN THE U.S. AND EUROPE.

GERMANY IS UKRAINE’S BIGGEST SUPPORTER IN EUROPE, BOTH FINANCIALLY AND MILITARILY. CONVERSELY, THE GERMAN MILITARY ITSELF IS IN A VERY SORRY STATE OF READINESS AFTER MORE THAN A DECADE OF BEING UNDERFUNDED. GERMANY ALSO DOESN’T HAVE NUKES LIKE THE U.K. AND FRANCE, WHICH MEANS IT RELIES MORE ON THE U.S. FOR STRATEGIC DETERRENCE. SO, THE GERMANS ARE IN A BIT OF AN AWKWARD POSITION, AND IF A CALL CAME OUT FOR EUROPE TO MUSTER FORCES TO SEND TO UKRAINE, GERMANY MAY NOT HAVE ANYONE TO SEND.

POLAND AND THE BALTICS ARE ALL IN FAVOR OF INCREASED DEFENSIVE SPENDING. POLAND IS THE ONLY EUROPEAN COUNTRY SPENDING CLOSE TO 5% OF ITS GDP ON DEFENSE. LITHUANIA, LATVIA AND ESTONIA ARE WILLING TO MEET THAT THRESHOLD TOO, AND WANT EUROPE TO TAKE MORE OF A LEAD IN ITS OWN DEFENSE. BUT THE BALTIC STATES ARE TAKING A MORE NUANCED APPROACH, SAYING THE U.S. SHOULD STILL BE THE BACKSTOP TO GUARANTEE SECURITY ON THE CONTINENT.

POLAND’S PUSH TO ARM ITSELF AND CUT ITS DEPENDENCE ON RUSSIAN OIL EARNED IT THE MONIKER OF ‘MODEL ALLY’ FROM U.S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE PETE HEGSETH. POLAND’S PRIME MINISTER SAYS THE COUNTRY WILL NOT SEND TROOPS TO UKRAINE, LARGELY BECAUSE THE TWO NATIONS FOUGHT A WAR IN THE EARLY 20TH CENTURY. BUT TO GET AROUND THAT BAD BLOOD, THE ATLANTIC COUNCIL SAYS POLAND COULD SEND SOLDIERS TO ESTONIA, WHICH WOULD FREE UP THE BRITS STATIONED THERE SO THEY CAN BE RE-DEPLOYED TO UKRAINE. IF IT COMES TO THAT.

WILL IT THOUGH? NO ONE REALLY KNOWS AT THIS POINT. THE ONE THING THAT IS CLEAR: THE CURRENT U.S. ADMINISTRATION’S STAUNCH STANCE THE DAYS OF EUROPEANS RELYING ON AMERICAN FIREPOWER FOR PROTECTION ARE OVER.

FOR MORE UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT UPDATES LIKE THIS, DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.

Demo mode ×