Washington Post columnist resigns after piece critical of Bezos scrapped


Full story

  • Ruth Marcus, a political columnist and associate editor at The Washington Post for four decades, resigned after the paper reportedly refused to publish her critical opinion piece about owner Jeff Bezos. Marcus later said in a resignation letter that, “It breaks my heart to conclude that I must leave.”
  • Bezos’s new policy restricts the opinion section to only topics of “personal liberties and the free market.”
  • The Post has struggled with staff departures and subscriber losses over editorial shifts.

Full Story

A political columnist and associate editor who worked at The Washington Post for four decades resigned following the paper’s decision to reportedly not run her opinion article criticizing owner Jeff Bezos’s latest changes to the news outlet. In a resignation letter from Ruth Marcus, obtained by The New York Times, she stated, “It breaks my heart to conclude that I must leave.”

Marcus added that her decision, “underscores that the traditional freedom of columnists to select the topics they wish to address and say what they think has been dangerously eroded.”

While it’s not clear exactly what Marcus wrote in the opinion piece, she said The Post’s publisher, Will Lewis, declined to run the column, adding that it was her first rejection in nearly 20 years of writing columns.

What editorial changes has Bezos made?

Last month, Bezos announced that The Post would narrow the topics covered by its opinion section to “personal liberties and the free market,” and issued a directive that the paper would not print opposing views.

More than 75,000 digital subscribers canceled in the 48 hours after the policy change, which also saw the resignation of opinions editor David Shipley.

What’s the reaction to Marcus’s resignation?

New York Times columnist David French posted to X following the news of Marcus leaving.

“I frequently disagree with Ruth Marcus, but I’ve never questioned her integrity,” French said. “This is a sad day for Post. I have profound respect for her decision to resign.”

Political commentator Alan F Jr also posted to X, “I don’t think journalism is different than any other job in restricting public criticism of your boss on the company dollar.”

A Post spokesperson said Monday, “We’re grateful for Ruth’s significant contributions to The Washington Post over the past 40 years. We respect her decision to leave and wish her the best.”

The Post has been struggling in recent year. Several other prominent journalists left over Bezos’s changes to the paper, including his decision to not endorse a candidate in the November 2024 presidential election. The editorial staff had prepared to support Democrat Kamala Harris.

That move also led to a mass exodus of subscribers.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left present Marcus' resignation in a concision of censorship, emphasizing the emotional weight of her departure and framing it as a betrayal of journalistic integrity.
  • Media outlets in the center emphasize the erosion of editorial freedom, directly quoting Marcus’s expression of heartbreak over her resignation without invoking stronger emotional language.
  • Media outlets on the right critique Marcus’ history, suggesting a bias against her, while also emphasizing the editorial shift towards libertarian values without emotional framing.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

114 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Ruth Marcus, a columnist at The Washington Post for 40 years, resigned after management declined to publish her column critical of owner Jeff Bezos' editorial policy.
  • The decision to decline Marcus' column highlights concerns about the erosion of columnists' freedom to choose their topics.
  • The financial challenges faced by The Washington Post have intensified since Bezos' directive, which includes not endorsing a presidential candidate.
  • The editorial shift at The Post follows significant financial and editorial challenges, leading to several prominent journalists leaving in recent years.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A columnist at The Washington Post resigned after management chose not to publish her article critical of owner Jeff Bezos's new editorial policy.
  • This incident marked the first time in nearly 20 years that her column had been killed, highlighting a troubling sign regarding editorial freedom.
  • In her resignation, the columnist, Ruth Marcus, stated that freedom for columnists to choose their topics has been dangerously eroded.
  • Marcus expressed her love for The Washington Post but stated, "It breaks my heart to conclude that I must leave."

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A Washington Post opinion editor, Ruth Marcus, resigned after her article critiquing Jeff Bezos was not published.
  • Marcus's resignation followed the departure of another editor over the new directive to focus opinions on libertarian values.
  • In her resignation letter, Marcus claimed the paper's new policy would diminish columnists' freedom and trust with readers.
  • The Washington Post acknowledged Marcus’s contributions, expressing respect for her decision to leave.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Full story

  • Ruth Marcus, a political columnist and associate editor at The Washington Post for four decades, resigned after the paper reportedly refused to publish her critical opinion piece about owner Jeff Bezos. Marcus later said in a resignation letter that, “It breaks my heart to conclude that I must leave.”
  • Bezos’s new policy restricts the opinion section to only topics of “personal liberties and the free market.”
  • The Post has struggled with staff departures and subscriber losses over editorial shifts.

Full Story

A political columnist and associate editor who worked at The Washington Post for four decades resigned following the paper’s decision to reportedly not run her opinion article criticizing owner Jeff Bezos’s latest changes to the news outlet. In a resignation letter from Ruth Marcus, obtained by The New York Times, she stated, “It breaks my heart to conclude that I must leave.”

Marcus added that her decision, “underscores that the traditional freedom of columnists to select the topics they wish to address and say what they think has been dangerously eroded.”

While it’s not clear exactly what Marcus wrote in the opinion piece, she said The Post’s publisher, Will Lewis, declined to run the column, adding that it was her first rejection in nearly 20 years of writing columns.

What editorial changes has Bezos made?

Last month, Bezos announced that The Post would narrow the topics covered by its opinion section to “personal liberties and the free market,” and issued a directive that the paper would not print opposing views.

More than 75,000 digital subscribers canceled in the 48 hours after the policy change, which also saw the resignation of opinions editor David Shipley.

What’s the reaction to Marcus’s resignation?

New York Times columnist David French posted to X following the news of Marcus leaving.

“I frequently disagree with Ruth Marcus, but I’ve never questioned her integrity,” French said. “This is a sad day for Post. I have profound respect for her decision to resign.”

Political commentator Alan F Jr also posted to X, “I don’t think journalism is different than any other job in restricting public criticism of your boss on the company dollar.”

A Post spokesperson said Monday, “We’re grateful for Ruth’s significant contributions to The Washington Post over the past 40 years. We respect her decision to leave and wish her the best.”

The Post has been struggling in recent year. Several other prominent journalists left over Bezos’s changes to the paper, including his decision to not endorse a candidate in the November 2024 presidential election. The editorial staff had prepared to support Democrat Kamala Harris.

That move also led to a mass exodus of subscribers.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left present Marcus' resignation in a concision of censorship, emphasizing the emotional weight of her departure and framing it as a betrayal of journalistic integrity.
  • Media outlets in the center emphasize the erosion of editorial freedom, directly quoting Marcus’s expression of heartbreak over her resignation without invoking stronger emotional language.
  • Media outlets on the right critique Marcus’ history, suggesting a bias against her, while also emphasizing the editorial shift towards libertarian values without emotional framing.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

114 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Ruth Marcus, a columnist at The Washington Post for 40 years, resigned after management declined to publish her column critical of owner Jeff Bezos' editorial policy.
  • The decision to decline Marcus' column highlights concerns about the erosion of columnists' freedom to choose their topics.
  • The financial challenges faced by The Washington Post have intensified since Bezos' directive, which includes not endorsing a presidential candidate.
  • The editorial shift at The Post follows significant financial and editorial challenges, leading to several prominent journalists leaving in recent years.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • A columnist at The Washington Post resigned after management chose not to publish her article critical of owner Jeff Bezos's new editorial policy.
  • This incident marked the first time in nearly 20 years that her column had been killed, highlighting a troubling sign regarding editorial freedom.
  • In her resignation, the columnist, Ruth Marcus, stated that freedom for columnists to choose their topics has been dangerously eroded.
  • Marcus expressed her love for The Washington Post but stated, "It breaks my heart to conclude that I must leave."

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A Washington Post opinion editor, Ruth Marcus, resigned after her article critiquing Jeff Bezos was not published.
  • Marcus's resignation followed the departure of another editor over the new directive to focus opinions on libertarian values.
  • In her resignation letter, Marcus claimed the paper's new policy would diminish columnists' freedom and trust with readers.
  • The Washington Post acknowledged Marcus’s contributions, expressing respect for her decision to leave.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™