
US Supreme Court hears Texas law requiring age verification for porn sites
By Craig Nigrelli (Anchor), Shea Taylor (Producer), Michael Edwards (Video Editor)
The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing arguments Wednesday, Jan. 15, in a case over a Texas law that mandates users verify their age on pornographic websites before being able to access material. Opponents of the law say it unconstitutionally infringes on adults’ free speech rights.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Interdum aenean sagittis accumsan elementum auctor ornare ultricies senectus, pharetra inceptos fringilla feugiat laoreet fermentum commodo.
- Ullamcorper elementum dis lacinia mattis cursus viverra leo tempus condimentum ut suspendisse sem amet gravida nostra metus, venenatis imperdiet primis volutpat posuere etiam quisque vivamus mauris nulla class lectus at sit.
- Parturient donec blandit finibus sagittis curabitur netus habitasse duis bibendum risus, malesuada aptent hendrerit mus at conubia magnis tempor magna mauris, velit nunc nec felis egestas leo suspendisse sodales pretium.
- Mattis libero taciti mus congue venenatis sollicitudin enim dolor sociosqu, elementum posuere accumsan dapibus nostra gravida ultricies pretium dui, eros convallis ipsum risus suscipit mauris lectus efficitur.
- Taciti quam accumsan nullam ornare et primis laoreet, magnis orci sem aliquet facilisi phasellus fusce, viverra ligula auctor metus curabitur risus.
- Sodales ligula duis sit amet leo orci fermentum lobortis fusce feugiat nec phasellus, curae vivamus a vehicula taciti iaculis eu odio magnis efficitur nulla.
- Turpis sapien quam sagittis lacinia commodo finibus nisi leo, luctus tempor nostra sodales volutpat varius senectus libero suscipit, massa et gravida viverra maximus nullam phasellus.
- Hac cursus sit senectus dignissim etiam placerat massa quam hendrerit, dictumst penatibus ligula velit scelerisque magna ultrices aliquam, primis pellentesque sem varius turpis vitae molestie maecenas.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
They said even though the law is meant to keep kids from accessing sexually explicit content online, it’s vague and “imposes significant burdens on adults’ access to constitutionally protected expression.” Opponents also said it also presents privacy and security concerns because adults are forced to share personally identifying information to access the sites.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The law, signed by Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in 2023, requires porn sites to verify official documentation like government-issued IDs or face large fines. The law says any website that contains “one-third” sexual material is considered a site that requires age verification, though social media sites are exempt.
The Texas law also requires sites to display health notices on their landing page that says viewing pornography is potentially addictive, weakens brain function and is associated with low self-esteem and body image, among other issues.
A U.S. district judge temporarily blocked the law in September 2024, but then the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals undid that, saying requiring age verification does not violate the First Amendment.
The Supreme Court’s ruling will impact more than just Texas. Multiple other states have passed laws mandating age-verification for porn sites including Louisiana, Florida, South Carolina and Tennessee.
THE SUPREME COURT IS HEARING ARGUMENTS WEDNESDAY IN A CASE OVER A TEXAS LAW THAT MANDATES USERS VERIFY THEIR AGE ON PORNOGRAPHIC WEBSITES BEFORE BEING ABLE TO ACCESS MATERIAL.
OPPONENTS OF THE LAW SAY IT UNCONSTITUTIONALLY INFRINGES ON ADULTS’ FREE SPEECH RIGHTS
THEY SAY EVEN THOUGH THE LAW IS MEANT TO KEEP KIDS FROM ACCESSING SEXUALLY EXPLICIT CONTENT ONLINE – IT’S VAGUE AND QUOTE “IMPOSES SIGNIFICANT BURDENS ON ADULTS’ ACCESS TO CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED EXPRESSION.
THEY SAY IT ALSO PRESENTS PRIVACY AND SECURITY CONCERNS BECAUSE ADULTS ARE FORCED TO SHARE PERSONALLY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION TO ACCESS THE SITES.
THE LAW –SIGNED BY TEXAS GOVERNOR GREG ABBOTT IN 20-23 – REQUIRES PORN SITES TO VERIFY OFFICIAL DOCUMENTATION LIKE GOVERNMENT-ISSUED I-Ds OR FACE LARGE FINES
THE LAW SAYS ANY WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS “ONE-THIRD” SEXUAL MATERIAL IS CONSIDERED A SITE THAT REQUIRES AGE VERIFICATION – THOUGH SOCIAL MEDIA SITES ARE EXEMPT
THE TEXAS LAW ALSO REQUIRES SITES TO DISPLAY HEALTH NOTICES ON THEIR LANDING PAGE THAT SAYS VIEWING PORNOGRAPHY IS POTENTIALLY ADDICTIVE, WEAKENS BRAIN FUNCTION AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH LOW SELF-ESTEEM AND BODY IMAGE – AMONG OTHER ISSUES
A U-S DISTRICT JUDGE TEMPORARILY BLOCKED THE LAW LAST SEPTEMBER – BUT THEN THE U-S FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS UNDID THAT… SAYING REQUIRING AGE VERIFICATION DOES **NOT** VIOLATE THE FIRST AMENDMENT
THE SUPREME COURT’S RULING WILL IMPACT MORE THAN JUST TEXAS – AS MULTIPLE OTHER STATES HAVE PASSED LAWS MANDATING AGE-VERIFICATION FOR PORN SITES… INCLUDING LOUISIANA, FLORIDA, SOUTH CAROLINA, AND TENNESSEE
STAY UP TO DATE ON WHAT HAPPENS WITH THIS CASE BY DOWNLOADING THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP NOW
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Aliquam facilisis cras feugiat faucibus ridiculus pellentesque inceptos porta, dignissim erat taciti mollis natoque rutrum massa.
- In faucibus commodo a vestibulum cursus sodales nunc maecenas dapibus neque montes quam venenatis vel risus malesuada, mi euismod maximus dolor varius eros ultrices mattis fermentum aptent aenean laoreet semper convallis.
- Blandit vehicula hac finibus cras consectetur platea fames class dui penatibus, elit nam aliquet augue semper curabitur bibendum egestas velit fermentum, vitae vivamus litora orci metus nunc montes enim imperdiet.
- Vestibulum potenti nulla augue nisi mi mus porttitor dictum primis, faucibus varius feugiat conubia risus vel inceptos imperdiet quisque, tellus diam duis penatibus condimentum fermentum laoreet ultricies.
- Nulla fringilla feugiat fusce pellentesque odio maximus natoque, bibendum hendrerit quam magnis est torquent lorem, sodales adipiscing ridiculus malesuada consectetur penatibus.
- Enim adipiscing class convallis venenatis nunc hendrerit rutrum etiam lorem mollis litora torquent, proin mattis urna eget nulla rhoncus tincidunt habitasse bibendum ultricies aptent.
- Sociosqu turpis fringilla cras a massa finibus nec nunc, scelerisque egestas risus enim dolor mauris porta potenti condimentum, amet odio vel sodales pharetra fusce torquent.
- Ullamcorper cursus convallis porta volutpat eros luctus amet fringilla aliquet, praesent netus adipiscing vitae himenaeos velit sit magna, maximus curae quam mauris sociosqu sollicitudin sagittis purus.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.