Mahmoud Bennett HEY EVERYONE, WE ARE WELL INTO THE 2022 OLYMPICS AND I’VE BEEN KEEPING UP WITH THE LATEST – WELL, THE CONTROVERSIES THAT’S KIND OF MY FORTE
HERE’S THE LATEST FOR YA. IS THERE A DOPING DOUBLE STANDARD?
THAT’S WHAT SOME ARE ASKING AFTER RUSSIAN FIGURE SKATER KAMILA VALIEVA TESTED POSITIVE FOR A BANNED SUBSTANCE KNOWN TO IMPROVE ENDURANCE.
THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT RULED SHE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO COMPETE.
HOWEVER — THE INTERNATIONAL OLYMPIC COMMITTEE SAID THERE’D BE NO MEDAL EVENT IF SHE WERE TO PLACE.
IT’S A DECISION MANY ARE QUESTIONING – INCLUDING SPRINTER SHA’CARRI RICHARDSON, REMEMBER HER?
THE 21-YEAR-OLD AMERICAN WAS EXPECTED TO BE ONE OF THE BIGGEST DRAWS AT THE TOKYO SUMMER GAMES BUT WAS BARRED FROM COMPETING AFTER TESTING POSITIVE FOR MARIJUANA.
“CAN WE GET A SOLID ANSWER ON THE DIFFERENCE OF (VALIEVA’S) SITUATION AND MINES?” RICHARDSON WROTE ON TWITTER.
ONE MAJOR DIFFERENCE – THE AGENCIES OVERSEEING THE RULES.
WHILE VALIEVA’S DOPING INVESTIGATION WAS HANDLED INTERNATIONALLY —
RICHARDSON’S WAS LED BY THE UNITED STATES ANTI-DOPING AGENCY.
AS FOR THE USADA’S FEELINGS ABOUT VALIEVA – WHILE EXPRESSING SYMPATHY FOR HER SITUATION, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE SAYS “ONLY TIME WILL TELL” IF SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO COMPETE.
DO YOU THINK THERE’S A DOUBLE STANDARD? LET ME KNOW IN THE COMMENTS BELOW – AND CHECK OUT MY PREVIOUS STORIES ON THE DOPING SCANDAL AT THE WINTER GAMES.
Tags: Society at Large