Skip to main content
U.S.

Trump’s NIH pick weighs withholding research grants from ‘woke’ colleges

Listen
Share

Universities with “woke policies” could see federal research grants withheld under the new Trump administration, according to the Wall Street Journal. This comes after President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced his plans to address campus culture at elite universities.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s plans include tying the agency’s tens of billions of dollars in research grants to what he defines as “academic freedom.” That’s according to sources familiar with the talks who spoke with the Journal.

Bhattacharya could use a ranking system developed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE). The ranking system would determine a university’s level of academic freedom.

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The system rates universities based on their track record with freedom of speech and how comfortable students feel expressing differing opinions on campus. According to the Journal, schools that punish faculty or uninvite controversial speakers could face reduced funding.

Some universities that currently receive large NIH grants have received poor rankings from FIRE. They include the University of Pennsylvania, Columbia University, and the University of Southern California.

In contrast, schools such as the University of Virginia and Florida State University received praise for their strong academic freedom records.

Bhattacharya’s push to prioritize academic freedom comes after his own struggles with public backlash over his views. Those views include the nation’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

He faced criticism for opposing lockdowns and mask mandates, widely unaccepted positions at the time. Bhattacharya has stated that universities should be places where dissenting ideas are protected, not silenced.

The proposal to tie research grant funding to free speech promotion on campuses has quickly become controversial. Supporters argue it will encourage universities to end “woke” policies and “cancel culture.”

Critics, however, fear the plan could politicize scientific research and hinder innovation.

Some warn linking research grants to political factors could delay crucial medical research and progress on cures for diseases like cancer and Alzheimer’s. They said this is particularly worrisome at progressive universities with successful scientific programs.

Bhattacharya’s proposal is expected to be a key point of discussion during Senate debates on his potential leadership.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

[Karah Rucker]

UNIVERSITIES WITH SO-CALLED “WOKE POLICIES” COULD SEE FEDERAL RESEARCH GRANTS WITHHELD UNDER THE NEW TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.

ACCORDING TO THE WALL STREET JOURNAL –

PRESIDENT-ELECT DONALD TRUMP’S NOMINEE TO LEAD THE “NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH” WILL TAKE ON “CAMPUS CULTURE” AT ELITE UNIVERSITIES –

BY ONLY AWARDING THE AGENCY’S TENS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN RESEARCH GRANTS TO SCHOOLS THAT ALLOW FOR WHAT HE CALLS “ACADEMIC FREEDOM” – ACCORDING TO THE REPORT.

TO DETERMINE A UNIVERSITY’S LEVEL OF “ACADEMIC FREEDOM” –

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya –COULD USE A RANKING SYSTEM DEVELOPED BY THE “FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION” – OR **FIRE –

WHICH SCORES UNIVERSITIES BASED ON ITS TRACK RECORD ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH –

AND HOW COMFORTABLE STUDENTS FEEL EXPRESSING DIFFERING OPINIONS ON CAMPUS.

SCHOOLS THAT PUNISH FACULTY OR DIS-INVITE CONTROVERSIAL SPEAKERS COULD SEE THEIR FUNDING REDUCED ACCORDING TO THE JOURNAL.

SOME UNIVERSITIES THAT CURRENTLY RECEIVE LARGE N-I-H GRANTS –

LIKE THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, COLUMBIA, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA – HAVE BEEN RANKED POORLY BY THE GROUP “FIRE”.

ON THE OTHER HAND –

SCHOOLS LIKE THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, AND FLORIDA STATE –

HAVE RECEIVED HIGH MARKS FOR ACADEMIC FREEDOM.

BHATTACHARYA’S PUSH TO PRIORITIZE ACADEMIC FREEDOM COMES AFTER HIS OWN STRUGGLES WITH PUBLIC PUSHBACK OVER HIS OPINIONS – SPECIFICALLY OVER THE NATION’S PANDEMIC RESPONSE.

HE FACED CRITICISM FOR HIS STANCE AGAINST LOCKDOWNS AND MASK MANDATES – POSITIONS THAT WERE WIDELY NOT ACCEPTED AT THE TIME. BHATTACHARYA TELLINGS COLLEAGUES UNIVERSITIES SHOULD BE PLACES WHERE DISSENTING IDEAS ARE PROTECTED RATHER THAN SILENCED.

THE PROPOSAL OF ATTACHING FREE SPEECH PROMOTION ON CAMPUSES TO THE AMOUNT OF MONEY A UNIVERSITY RECEIVES IN RESEARCH GRANTS –

WAS QUICK TO BECOME CONTROVERSIAL.

SUPPORTERS SAY IT WILL ENCOURAGE UNIVERSITIES TO END WOKE POLICIES AND “CANCEL CULTURE”.

WHILE CRITICS OF THE IDEA FEAR THEY COULD “POLITICIZE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND HARM INNOVATION”.

SOME SAY LINKING RESEARCH GRANTS TO POLITICAL FACTORS COULD SLOW DOWN IMPORTANT MEDICAL RESEARCH IN FINDING CURES FOR CANCER AND ALZHEIMER’S

AT PROGRESSIVE UNIVERSITIES WITH SUCCESSFUL SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMS. 

AS THE SENATE PREPARES FOR DR. BHATTACHARYA’S CONFIRMATION HEARING –

THIS PROPOSAL COULD BECOME PART OF THE CONVERSATION AMONG SENATORS DEBATING HIS PLACE AT THE TOP OF THE N-I-H.

THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.

FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –

DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP.

OR VISIT US ONLINE AT SAN DOT COM.