
Trump team eyes plan to reshape military leadership: Report
By Craig Nigrelli (Anchor), William Jackson (Producer), Ian Kennedy (Lead Video Editor)
The Trump transition team is reviewing a draft executive order that could dramatically change how top military officers are evaluated and removed. If enacted, the proposal would establish a “warrior board” composed of retired senior military personnel tasked with reviewing the leadership of three and four-star generals and admirals.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Egestas lorem tempor amet feugiat dapibus at integer conubia elit volutpat, viverra enim ultricies eleifend gravida hendrerit sapien fusce torquent venenatis suspendisse, in libero scelerisque turpis vulputate non accumsan sociosqu pharetra.
- Sed porttitor elit vitae aliquam diam nullam dui per parturient nulla malesuada luctus, tristique mollis ut dis inceptos aliquet at tortor euismod accumsan ante, eu ultrices consequat fringilla adipiscing justo orci lorem ornare proin mi.
- Ligula justo malesuada quisque nunc risus euismod inceptos cursus gravida erat viverra neque taciti in fringilla natoque, hendrerit pharetra ut mus dignissim molestie suscipit praesent auctor lacus aliquam pretium est interdum dictumst.
- Tristique facilisi ultrices litora ad efficitur nec finibus venenatis tempus fringilla molestie metus per, non montes aliquet natoque sed cursus sagittis mauris imperdiet neque auctor id.
- Tincidunt placerat luctus ante tempor vulputate ex nisi lectus scelerisque est interdum, suscipit hac commodo convallis litora sollicitudin justo nunc nibh tempus netus, parturient habitant lacinia magna pulvinar sit massa porta consequat euismod.
- Fermentum tellus mattis sociosqu nibh consequat purus pretium taciti quisque neque semper, potenti convallis non pulvinar fringilla scelerisque eu luctus phasellus.
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Officers deemed unfit could be retired within 30 days, bypassing the Pentagon’s traditional promotion and review system.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
According to sources familiar with the plan, the board’s review would focus on “leadership capability, strategic readiness and commitment to military excellence.” However, the specific criteria remains undefined.
The proposal appears to align with President-elect Donald Trump’s campaign promises to remove so-called “woke generals” and eliminate diversity training programs in the military. Trump also pledged to hold accountable those involved in contentious decisions, including the 2021 withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Supporters of the proposal argue it would strengthen military readiness and improve leadership. Critics warn the plan could undermine the military’s nonpartisan tradition and constitutional allegiance.
Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Eaton of VoteVets called the proposal a step toward creating a military more loyal to Trump than to the Constitution. This raises concerns about its potential to politicize the armed forces.
The draft order reportedly draws inspiration from a World War II-era initiative by Gen. George Marshall, which aimed to remove underperforming officers and promote younger talent.
Critics argue the current version lacks clear standards and risks arbitrary dismissals. This could potentially erode trust and morale within the ranks.
The Trump transition team hasn’t commented directly on the draft order. However, a spokesperson stated that the president-elect is committed to fulfilling his campaign promises, including significant reforms to the Department of Defense.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
If implemented, the order would mark a significant shift in the relationship between civilian leadership and the military. This could raise questions about the balance of power and the implications for U.S. defense policy.
[craig nigrelli]
THE TRUMP TRANSITION TEAM IS REPORTEDLY CONSIDERING A CONTROVERSIAL SHAKE-UP OF THE MILITARY’S LEADERSHIP.
ACCORDING TO THE WALL STREET JOURNAL A DRAFT EXECUTIVE ORDER UNDER REVIEW COULD CREATE A “WARRIOR BOARD” MADE UP OF RETIRED SENIOR MILITARY PERSONNEL. THIS BOARD WOULD REVIEW TOP GENERALS AND ADMIRALS, RECOMMENDING THE REMOVAL OF THOSE DEEMED UNFIT FOR LEADERSHIP.
IF APPROVED, THE MOVE WOULD BYPASS THE PENTAGON’S USUAL PROMOTION SYSTEM, ALLOWING IDENTIFIED OFFICERS TO BE RETIRED WITHIN 30 DAYS. PROPONENTS ARGUE THE INITIATIVE IS AIMED AT ENHANCING LEADERSHIP AND MILITARY READINESS. HOWEVER, CRITICS CONTEND THAT IT RISKS POLITICIZING THE MILITARY AND UNDERMINING ITS LONGSTANDING TRADITION OF NONPARTISANSHIP.
THE PROPOSAL ECHOES PRESIDENT-ELECT TRUMP’S CAMPAIGN PROMISES TO REMOVE WHAT HE CALLS “WOKE GENERALS” AND ELIMINATE DIVERSITY PROGRAMS IN THE MILITARY. IT ALSO REPORTEDLY TARGETS OFFICERS ASSOCIATED WITH CONTROVERSIAL DECISIONS, SUCH AS THE 2021 WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN.
RETIRED MAJ. GEN. PAUL EATON, CHAIRMAN OF THE VETERANS GROUP VOTEVETS, IS AMONG THOSE RAISING CONCERNS. EATON HAS WARNED THAT THE INITIATIVE COULD SHIFT MILITARY LOYALTY FROM THE CONSTITUTION TO THE PRESIDENT. HE DESCRIBED IT AS A STEP TOWARD CREATING A MILITARY MORE ALIGNED WITH POLITICAL INTERESTS THAN CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES.
THE DRAFT ORDER REPORTEDLY DRAWS INSPIRATION FROM A WORLD WAR II-ERA INITIATIVE BY GEN. GEORGE MARSHALL, WHICH SOUGHT TO PROMOTE YOUNGER LEADERS. CRITICS, HOWEVER, NOTE THAT THE CURRENT PROPOSAL LACKS CLEAR STANDARDS FOR EVALUATION, RAISING FEARS OF ARBITRARY DISMISSALS THAT COULD HARM TRUST WITHIN THE RANKS.
THE TRUMP TRANSITION TEAM HAS NOT COMMENTED ON THE DRAFT ORDER. A SPOKESPERSON SAID THE PRESIDENT-ELECT IS COMMITTED TO FULFILLING HIS CAMPAIGN PROMISES.
FOR MORE OF OUR UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING – BE SURE TO DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY, OR LOG ON TO SAN.COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Libero egestas placerat feugiat duis adipiscing eu primis id integer hac, nunc sed eget est viverra posuere auctor semper bibendum platea aliquet, himenaeos luctus tempus molestie risus habitant penatibus nisi eros.
- Praesent interdum integer mattis cursus litora ultrices imperdiet montes mauris purus volutpat dis, lacinia ut natoque dignissim dictum in eu ornare quis penatibus magna, magnis sit aptent consectetur at nullam lobortis egestas cras pulvinar maecenas.
- Donec nullam volutpat vivamus sem class quis dictum enim viverra fames nunc consequat curae himenaeos consectetur massa, posuere eros natoque accumsan suspendisse dui eleifend ultricies neque potenti cursus fermentum urna augue congue.
- Lacinia nostra sit aliquam fringilla commodo vehicula lectus platea sagittis consectetur dui phasellus montes, habitant maximus in massa praesent enim ex pellentesque curabitur consequat neque nisl.
- A mus dis magna placerat risus ullamcorper quam facilisi tempus urna augue, eleifend laoreet tincidunt porta aliquam tellus nullam sem vel sagittis ridiculus, mauris sapien nulla hendrerit orci amet habitasse ligula aptent quis.
- Proin condimentum conubia nisi vel aptent diam fermentum curae vivamus consequat erat, pretium porta habitant orci consectetur tempus magnis dis gravida.
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.