Trump goes after judge overseeing Signal chat lawsuit, calls system ‘rigged’


This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • President Trump criticized Judge James Boasberg after he was assigned to both the Venezuelan deportation case and a lawsuit involving the use of a Signal group chat by Trump officials. Trump called the system “rigged” and requested an investigation into the process.
  • Trump accused Boasberg of having a personal bias and family conflicts, claiming the judge has been assigned multiple “Trump cases” in a way that seems unfair, and called for a “wheel” rotation system for judge assignments.
  • Earlier in March, Boasberg blocked a deportation order for Venezuelan gang members, which Trump later criticized, calling for Boasberg’s impeachment.

Full Story

President Trump called for an investigation into what he’s referring to as a “rigged system,” after the same judge assigned to his Venezuelan deportation case has been asked to oversee the lawsuit involving the Trump administration’s use of a Signal group chat.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg was assigned to the case Wednesday, March 26, which involves allegations that top Trump officials violated their obligations under the Federal Records Act regarding the Signal messages about the recent attack on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

The lawsuit, filed by the government watchdog group American Oversight, argued administration officials violated the law through the “unlawful destruction of federal records” after the Signal chats were set to disappear after a certain number of weeks.

Boasberg has also been presiding over a lawsuit challenging Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act for authority to deport Venezuelan members of Tren de Aragua, which the U.S. has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

What did Trump say about Boasberg on the Signal case?

President Trump posted his thoughts about Boasberg to Truth Social early Thursday, March 27.

“How disgraceful it is that ‘Judge’ James Boasberg has just been given a fourth ‘Trump case,’ something which is, statistically, impossible.”

Trump claimed Republicans couldn’t earn a win against the judge, especially a “Trump Republican” adding, “He is highly conflicted, not only in his hatred of me — massive trump derangement syndrome! — but also, because of disqualifying family conflicts.” 

The president also called for a “wheel” type rotation for judges to be assigned to cases.

“Boasberg seems to be grabbing the ‘trump cases’ all to himself, even though it is not supposed to happen that way,” Trump posted.

Trump ended his post by criticizing the entire D.C. District Court, claiming he can’t get an “honest ruling.”

“Our nation’s courts are broken, with New York and D.C. being the most preeminent of all in their corruption and radicalism. There must be an immediate investigation of this rigged system, before it is too late,” he wrote.

According to Politico, a spokesperson for Boasberg said he was chosen out of the 20 jurists on the bench by the court’s random assignment process.

What happened with the deportation case?

Judge Boasberg clashed with Trump earlier this month when he blocked a 14-day deportation order for Tren de Aragua gang members.

Hours after Trump signed the proclamation, Boasberg issued a stay ordering the planes carrying the gang members to not leave the U.S. or turn around.

Trump then called for Boasberg, who was nominated by President Barrack Obama, to be impeached, naming Boasberg a “Radical left lunatic of a judge, a troublemaker and agitator.”

The administration claimed the planes were already out of U.S. territory when Boasberg’s order came down, but the American Civil Liberties Union claimed the administration may have purposefully defied the court order.

A U.S. court of appeals Wednesday upheld the order to temporarily block some of those deportations.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Signal chat leak as an "extraordinary breach" and a "national security debacle," emphasizing outrage and potential compromise by foreign entities while highlighting a DoD warning about Signal's vulnerabilities, a detail de-emphasized elsewhere.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right focus on a judge "fighting Trump," characterizing the judge's assignment to the case as "legally provocative" and echoing Trump's description of him as a "Radical Left Lunatic."

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

51 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg was assigned to a lawsuit regarding the misuse of a Signal group chat by Trump officials to discuss military plans against Yemen's Houthis.
  • The lawsuit, filed by the watchdog group American Oversight, alleges violations of federal record-keeping laws related to message deletions in the Signal chat.
  • Republican lawmakers have called for Judge Boasberg's impeachment, alleging bias in his judicial decisions regarding the administration's deportation actions and military discussions.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Judge James Boasberg has been assigned a lawsuit related to Signal messages involving members of the Trump administration, as confirmed by court documents.
  • American Oversight filed the lawsuit, accusing officials of violating the Federal Records Act by using an erasing platform for government communications.
  • President Donald Trump has called for Boasberg's impeachment after he halted deportation flights, labeling him a 'crooked' judge.
  • Chief Justice John Roberts stated that impeachment is not appropriate for judicial disagreements, highlighting the independence of the judiciary.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A lawsuit has been filed against the Trump administration over leaked Pentagon plans discussed in a Signal group chat, assigned to Judge James Boasberg.
  • American Oversight claims that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others violated federal records laws by discussing Houthi attack plans in the chat.
  • Judge Boasberg's assignment to the case raised concerns about bias, with some asking him to recuse himself to maintain court integrity.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™
This recording was made using enhanced software.

Full story

  • President Trump criticized Judge James Boasberg after he was assigned to both the Venezuelan deportation case and a lawsuit involving the use of a Signal group chat by Trump officials. Trump called the system “rigged” and requested an investigation into the process.
  • Trump accused Boasberg of having a personal bias and family conflicts, claiming the judge has been assigned multiple “Trump cases” in a way that seems unfair, and called for a “wheel” rotation system for judge assignments.
  • Earlier in March, Boasberg blocked a deportation order for Venezuelan gang members, which Trump later criticized, calling for Boasberg’s impeachment.

Full Story

President Trump called for an investigation into what he’s referring to as a “rigged system,” after the same judge assigned to his Venezuelan deportation case has been asked to oversee the lawsuit involving the Trump administration’s use of a Signal group chat.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg was assigned to the case Wednesday, March 26, which involves allegations that top Trump officials violated their obligations under the Federal Records Act regarding the Signal messages about the recent attack on Houthi rebels in Yemen.

The lawsuit, filed by the government watchdog group American Oversight, argued administration officials violated the law through the “unlawful destruction of federal records” after the Signal chats were set to disappear after a certain number of weeks.

Boasberg has also been presiding over a lawsuit challenging Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act for authority to deport Venezuelan members of Tren de Aragua, which the U.S. has designated as a foreign terrorist organization.

What did Trump say about Boasberg on the Signal case?

President Trump posted his thoughts about Boasberg to Truth Social early Thursday, March 27.

“How disgraceful it is that ‘Judge’ James Boasberg has just been given a fourth ‘Trump case,’ something which is, statistically, impossible.”

Trump claimed Republicans couldn’t earn a win against the judge, especially a “Trump Republican” adding, “He is highly conflicted, not only in his hatred of me — massive trump derangement syndrome! — but also, because of disqualifying family conflicts.” 

The president also called for a “wheel” type rotation for judges to be assigned to cases.

“Boasberg seems to be grabbing the ‘trump cases’ all to himself, even though it is not supposed to happen that way,” Trump posted.

Trump ended his post by criticizing the entire D.C. District Court, claiming he can’t get an “honest ruling.”

“Our nation’s courts are broken, with New York and D.C. being the most preeminent of all in their corruption and radicalism. There must be an immediate investigation of this rigged system, before it is too late,” he wrote.

According to Politico, a spokesperson for Boasberg said he was chosen out of the 20 jurists on the bench by the court’s random assignment process.

What happened with the deportation case?

Judge Boasberg clashed with Trump earlier this month when he blocked a 14-day deportation order for Tren de Aragua gang members.

Hours after Trump signed the proclamation, Boasberg issued a stay ordering the planes carrying the gang members to not leave the U.S. or turn around.

Trump then called for Boasberg, who was nominated by President Barrack Obama, to be impeached, naming Boasberg a “Radical left lunatic of a judge, a troublemaker and agitator.”

The administration claimed the planes were already out of U.S. territory when Boasberg’s order came down, but the American Civil Liberties Union claimed the administration may have purposefully defied the court order.

A U.S. court of appeals Wednesday upheld the order to temporarily block some of those deportations.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left frame the Signal chat leak as an "extraordinary breach" and a "national security debacle," emphasizing outrage and potential compromise by foreign entities while highlighting a DoD warning about Signal's vulnerabilities, a detail de-emphasized elsewhere.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right focus on a judge "fighting Trump," characterizing the judge's assignment to the case as "legally provocative" and echoing Trump's description of him as a "Radical Left Lunatic."

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

51 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg was assigned to a lawsuit regarding the misuse of a Signal group chat by Trump officials to discuss military plans against Yemen's Houthis.
  • The lawsuit, filed by the watchdog group American Oversight, alleges violations of federal record-keeping laws related to message deletions in the Signal chat.
  • Republican lawmakers have called for Judge Boasberg's impeachment, alleging bias in his judicial decisions regarding the administration's deportation actions and military discussions.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Judge James Boasberg has been assigned a lawsuit related to Signal messages involving members of the Trump administration, as confirmed by court documents.
  • American Oversight filed the lawsuit, accusing officials of violating the Federal Records Act by using an erasing platform for government communications.
  • President Donald Trump has called for Boasberg's impeachment after he halted deportation flights, labeling him a 'crooked' judge.
  • Chief Justice John Roberts stated that impeachment is not appropriate for judicial disagreements, highlighting the independence of the judiciary.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A lawsuit has been filed against the Trump administration over leaked Pentagon plans discussed in a Signal group chat, assigned to Judge James Boasberg.
  • American Oversight claims that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and others violated federal records laws by discussing Houthi attack plans in the chat.
  • Judge Boasberg's assignment to the case raised concerns about bias, with some asking him to recuse himself to maintain court integrity.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™