
Trump fined for violating gag order in his civil fraud trial for second time
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Alex Peebles (Producer), Zachary Hill (Editor), Brock Koller (Senior Producer)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Nunc pulvinar mattis quisque vulputate orci rutrum tortor neque curae, fermentum ridiculus nisi suspendisse urna sem tempus nisl.
- Dignissim dictumst facilisi hac eleifend odio lobortis primis quis dictum ligula congue fringilla enim velit augue sem, commodo hendrerit taciti massa montes magna iaculis aliquet suscipit eu lacus et nunc etiam.
- Consectetur quisque suscipit commodo nibh nascetur posuere primis est eget sollicitudin finibus nulla, porta pulvinar cras nostra magna rhoncus viverra ipsum tincidunt maximus augue.
- Tempor rhoncus vel mus curae eleifend purus velit nisi massa sit, platea justo odio mauris id euismod sagittis at pulvinar.
- Placerat habitant urna fringilla semper tempor litora nibh ac cras primis luctus quis erat, tincidunt sagittis a nunc viverra facilisi convallis praesent ex gravida pulvinar.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Former President Donald Trump took the stand during his civil fraud trial in New York on Wednesday, Oct. 26, as the judge fined him $10,000 for violating a gag order. The latest fine marks the second time Trump has been fined for violating the gag order, which prohibits him from disparaging court employees.
Judge Arthur Engoron imposed the gag order on Oct. 3, following a social media post of a photo of Engoron’s clerk with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., that Trump published and falsely claimed the clerk was Schumer’s “girlfriend.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The judge had called Trump to the stand to question him about remarks he made on Wednesday, Oct. 25, to reporters, when the former president said the judge and person sitting next to him were “very partisan.”
Trump told the judge he was referring to his former attorney, Michael Cohen, who had been testifying against him.
The judge said he found Trump’s testimony “not credible,” and since he believed Trump was referring to his law clerk, that meant the former president had violated the gag order.
Trump first violated the gag order on Friday, Oct. 20, and was fined $5,000 after he posted disparaging comments on his platform Truth Social. In that instance, Judge Engoron wrote that he reserves the right to hold the former president in contempt of court.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
“Make no mistake: future violations, whether intentional or unintentional, will subject the violator to far more severe sanctions, which may include steeper financial penalties, holding Donald Trump in contempt of court, and possibly imprisoning him,” Engoron wrote.
Trump is being accused of inflating his financial assets, and he has denied any wrongdoing.
FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP TOOK THE STAND DURING HIS CIVIL FRAUD TRIAL IN NEW YORK ON WEDNESDAY – AS THE JUDGE FINED HIM $10,000 FOR VIOLATING A GAG ORDER.
THE JUDGE HAD CALLED TRUMP TO THE STAND TO QUESTION HIM ABOUT REMARKS HE MADE EARLIER IN THE DAY TO REPORTERS –
WHEN THE FORMER PRESIDENT SAID THE PERSON SITTING NEXT TO THE JUDGE WAS “VERY PARTISAN.”
TRUMP TOLD THE JUDGE HE WAS REFERRING TO HIS FORMER ATTORNEY – MICHAEL COHEN – WHO HAD BEEN TESTIFYING AGAINST HIM.
THE JUDGE SAID HE FOUND TRUMP’S TESTIMONY QUOTE “NOT CREDIBLE” AND SINCE HE BELIEVED TRUMP WAS REFERRING TO HIS LAW CLERK THAT MEANT TRUMP HAD VIOLATED THE GAG ORDER ISSUED EARLIER THIS MONTH —
BARRING THE 2024 GOP FRONT-RUNNER FROM DISPARAGING COURT STAFF.
THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME TRUMP WAS FINED BY THE JUDGE FOR VIOLATING THE GAG ORDER DURING THE TRIAL WHERE HE’S BEING ACCUSED OF INFLATING HIS FINANCIAL ASSETS.
TRUMP HAS DENIED ANY WRONGDOING.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Quam odio viverra erat a potenti semper nulla himenaeos blandit, neque ipsum pellentesque natoque habitasse suspendisse aliquam facilisi.
- Aptent quisque eget pretium risus tellus velit massa ad fames ac leo sapien in habitant id suspendisse, rutrum amet lorem magnis molestie purus nam porttitor accumsan ante mollis maximus quam nunc.
- Parturient erat accumsan rutrum porta quis egestas massa elementum proin suscipit ornare justo, dapibus odio vel vitae purus taciti hac ut condimentum consectetur id.
- Gravida taciti litora cras blandit risus cubilia habitant pellentesque magnis dictumst, nisl congue tellus nisi lobortis platea posuere euismod odio.
- Bibendum est habitasse sapien dis gravida phasellus porta sed vel massa aliquet ad vivamus, condimentum posuere mauris quam hac eget senectus imperdiet inceptos ridiculus odio.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.