‘The end of soup on van Goghs’: Just Stop Oil to halt its climate protests


Full story

  • Just Stop Oil announced it would stop its “controversial” protests at the end of April, stating that its campaign has contributed to progress in climate policy. The group has advocated for an end to oil and gas extraction in the United Kingdom by 2030.
  • While Just Stop Oil says the decision to end its demonstrations is a result of the Labour Party’s commitment to ending new gas and oil projects, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has denied this is the government’s position.
  • The organization plans to shift its activism strategy, arguing that systemic political corruption requires new approaches beyond public demonstrations.

Full Story

Just Stop Oil, the climate activist group known for staging some of the United Kingdom’s most high-profile protests in recent years, has announced it will step back from these types of demonstrations at the end of April. The organization advocated for the U.K. to end oil and gas extraction by 2030. They also employed what has been described as “controversial” tactics to raise awareness of its cause.

“Three years after bursting on the scene in a blaze of orange, at the end of April we will be hanging up the hi vis,” Just Stop Oil said in a statement. “It is the end of soup on Van Goghs, cornstarch on Stonehenge and slow marching in the streets. But it is not the end of trials, of tagging and surveillance, of fines, probation and years in prison.”

Why have Just Stop Oil protests generated controversy?

The group has gained widespread attention for its protest actions. They include throwing soup at a Vincent van Gogh painting and spraying paint on Stonehenge. They also poured liquid latex over a robot at a Tesla store.

Just Stop Oil claims these methods have contributed to keeping 4.4 million barrels of oil in the ground. They say the methods were necessary to highlight the urgency of climate action.

Why is Just Stop Oil stepping back from these types of protests?

According to Just Stop Oil, the decision to halt this campaign of demonstrations follows what it views as progress toward its objectives. The organization asserts that the U.K.’s Labour Party has committed to ending new gas and oil projects as part of its government policy.

However, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has refuted this claim. The spokesperson said Just Stop Oil caused “a significant amount of disruption and public nuisance” and that the government intends to continue utilizing oil and gas resources for the foreseeable future.

What happens next?

The group’s final planned protest is scheduled to take place outside the U.K. Parliament on April 26. Despite ending its current methods, Just Stop Oil insists this is not the end of its civil resistance efforts.

The organization has indicated plans to explore alternative approaches, claiming that “corporations and billionaires are corrupting political systems” worldwide. In their view, they say “nothing short of a revolution” will bring about necessary change.

Tags: , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left while acknowledging "disruptive" tactics, contextualize the group's actions within a broader narrative of climate urgency and oppressive anti-protest laws, even highlighting JSO's claim of influencing government policy to end new oil and gas and labeling the political establishment as "morally bankrupt.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize the disruption and framed the group as "eco-terrorists" ceasing "publicity stunts" and planning a "final act of chaos," expressing relief at their departure with the phrase "won't be missed.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

64 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Just Stop Oil announced it will end its disruptive protests, including throwing soup on artworks and smashing glass, due to tighter anti-protest laws and declining public support for such actions.
  • The UK government has implemented a policy to not issue new licenses for oil and gas exploration, supporting Just Stop Oil's initial demands.
  • Just Stop Oil reported they have kept over 4.4 billion barrels of oil underground, declaring their campaign one of the most successful in civil resistance history.
  • The climate group plans to focus on a new strategy for activism, moving away from direct actions in light of changing political conditions and public sentiment.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Just Stop Oil announced it will end its direct protests, claiming its demands are now government policy, which they call a success.
  • They report having kept over 4.4 billion barrels of oil in the ground and have had rulings against new oil licenses.
  • Despite ceasing protests, Just Stop Oil will continue to advocate for political prisoners and oppose anti-protest laws in the UK.
  • They plan one final lower-risk action on April 26 in Parliament Square, but will not aim for arrests thereafter.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Full story

  • Just Stop Oil announced it would stop its “controversial” protests at the end of April, stating that its campaign has contributed to progress in climate policy. The group has advocated for an end to oil and gas extraction in the United Kingdom by 2030.
  • While Just Stop Oil says the decision to end its demonstrations is a result of the Labour Party’s commitment to ending new gas and oil projects, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has denied this is the government’s position.
  • The organization plans to shift its activism strategy, arguing that systemic political corruption requires new approaches beyond public demonstrations.

Full Story

Just Stop Oil, the climate activist group known for staging some of the United Kingdom’s most high-profile protests in recent years, has announced it will step back from these types of demonstrations at the end of April. The organization advocated for the U.K. to end oil and gas extraction by 2030. They also employed what has been described as “controversial” tactics to raise awareness of its cause.

“Three years after bursting on the scene in a blaze of orange, at the end of April we will be hanging up the hi vis,” Just Stop Oil said in a statement. “It is the end of soup on Van Goghs, cornstarch on Stonehenge and slow marching in the streets. But it is not the end of trials, of tagging and surveillance, of fines, probation and years in prison.”

Why have Just Stop Oil protests generated controversy?

The group has gained widespread attention for its protest actions. They include throwing soup at a Vincent van Gogh painting and spraying paint on Stonehenge. They also poured liquid latex over a robot at a Tesla store.

Just Stop Oil claims these methods have contributed to keeping 4.4 million barrels of oil in the ground. They say the methods were necessary to highlight the urgency of climate action.

Why is Just Stop Oil stepping back from these types of protests?

According to Just Stop Oil, the decision to halt this campaign of demonstrations follows what it views as progress toward its objectives. The organization asserts that the U.K.’s Labour Party has committed to ending new gas and oil projects as part of its government policy.

However, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has refuted this claim. The spokesperson said Just Stop Oil caused “a significant amount of disruption and public nuisance” and that the government intends to continue utilizing oil and gas resources for the foreseeable future.

What happens next?

The group’s final planned protest is scheduled to take place outside the U.K. Parliament on April 26. Despite ending its current methods, Just Stop Oil insists this is not the end of its civil resistance efforts.

The organization has indicated plans to explore alternative approaches, claiming that “corporations and billionaires are corrupting political systems” worldwide. In their view, they say “nothing short of a revolution” will bring about necessary change.

Tags: , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left while acknowledging "disruptive" tactics, contextualize the group's actions within a broader narrative of climate urgency and oppressive anti-protest laws, even highlighting JSO's claim of influencing government policy to end new oil and gas and labeling the political establishment as "morally bankrupt.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize the disruption and framed the group as "eco-terrorists" ceasing "publicity stunts" and planning a "final act of chaos," expressing relief at their departure with the phrase "won't be missed.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

64 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Just Stop Oil announced it will end its disruptive protests, including throwing soup on artworks and smashing glass, due to tighter anti-protest laws and declining public support for such actions.
  • The UK government has implemented a policy to not issue new licenses for oil and gas exploration, supporting Just Stop Oil's initial demands.
  • Just Stop Oil reported they have kept over 4.4 billion barrels of oil underground, declaring their campaign one of the most successful in civil resistance history.
  • The climate group plans to focus on a new strategy for activism, moving away from direct actions in light of changing political conditions and public sentiment.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Just Stop Oil announced it will end its direct protests, claiming its demands are now government policy, which they call a success.
  • They report having kept over 4.4 billion barrels of oil in the ground and have had rulings against new oil licenses.
  • Despite ceasing protests, Just Stop Oil will continue to advocate for political prisoners and oppose anti-protest laws in the UK.
  • They plan one final lower-risk action on April 26 in Parliament Square, but will not aim for arrests thereafter.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™