THE SUPREME COURT DECIDED MONDAY  TO ALLOW A RULING BARRING EMERGENCY ABORTIONS THAT VIOLATE TEXAS LAW TO STAND.

THE JUSTICES PROVIDED NO REASONING FOR THEIR DECISION, LEAVING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND LABOR ACT — AND STATE ABORTION BANS – UNADDRESSED.

THE EMERGENCY MEDICAL TREATMENT AND LABOR ACT ENSURES PATIENTS – REGARDLESS OF THEIR ABILITY TO PAY ARE STABILIZED IN THE EVENT OF ANY EMERGENCY.

HOSPITALS THAT DO NOT COMPLY CAN LOSE FEDERAL FUNDING.

THE HIGH COURT’S  RULING EFFECTIVELY BLOCKS ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL GUIDANCE REQUIRING HOSPITALS TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY ABORTIONS WHEN MATERNAL HEALTH IS AT RISK.

THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION ARGUED THAT FEDERAL LAW MANDATES HOSPITALS TO PERFORM ABORTIONS IF PATIENT’S HEALTH OR LIFE IS AT RISK – EVEN IF THE PROCEDURE IS BANNED IN THE STATE.

HOWEVER – REPRESENTATIVES FOR TEXAS ARGUED – THE STATE DOES HAVE EXCEPTIONS IN PLACE FOR THE LIFE OF THE MOTHER AND THE HEALTH OF THE MOTHER, AS WELL.

TEXAS’ ABORTION BAN, PERMITS THE PROCEDURE ONLY WHEN A WOMAN’S LIFE IS AT RISK OR FACES ‘SUBSTANTIAL IMPAIRMENT OF A MAJOR BODILY FUNCTION,’ BUT THE LAW HAS CREATED UNCERTAINTY FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.

EMERGENCY ROOMS ACROSS TEXAS HAVE REPORTED AN INCREASE IN CASES OF PREGNANT WOMEN IN DISTRESS BEING TURNED AWAY, AS HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS GRAPPLE WITH THE CONFLICT BETWEEN MEDICAL PRACTICES AND LEGAL COMPLIANCE.

THE SUPREME COURT’S RULING REINFORCES STATE AUTHORITY IN RESTRICTING ABORTIONS, POTENTIALLY SETTING A PRECEDENT FOR OTHER STATES WITH STRICT ABORTION LAWS.