Supreme Court says states can prosecute certain crimes in Indian territory


Summary

Lorem ipsum dolor

Neque tempus tincidunt urna nisi sollicitudin porttitor rutrum condimentum massa feugiat habitasse finibus est, phasellus etiam maximus curabitur ligula sodales interdum purus curae id maecenas.

Parturient quam placerat pharetra

Magna praesent ridiculus tempor arcu quisque est, interdum suspendisse netus a.

Vitae vel per

Nam etiam ultricies per orci varius ridiculus elementum mollis arcu maecenas, dolor ullamcorper nullam inceptos platea parturient leo placerat.

Ad sodales ex vehicula

Ligula porttitor faucibus quisque dui urna per erat platea vehicula sollicitudin massa dapibus aptent pulvinar egestas, hendrerit taciti lorem magna tincidunt eros felis rutrum pellentesque sagittis finibus nisl vivamus id.


Full story

The Supreme Court has affirmed a state’s jurisdiction for prosecuting crimes committed in Indian territory. The case stems from an instance of child neglect against a member of Oklahoma’s Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians by a non-Native American on an Indian reservation.

In the case of Oklahoma v Castro-Huerta, the nation’s highest court ruled 5-4 that states and the federal government both have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians on Indian land. Justice Brent Kavanauah wrote the majority opinion in the case, stating, “This Court has long held that Indian country is part of a State, not separate from it. Under the Constitution, States have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes within their territory except when preempted by federal law or by principles of tribal self-government.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.

What’s the background?

Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta was convicted of neglecting his stepdaughter in 2015 and sentenced to 35 years in prison. That conviction was later vacated because the crime occured in “Indian country.” Castro-Huerta later pleaded guilty to the charges in a federal court.

The ruling adds context to the jurisdiction the state has for prosecuting non-Native Americans for crimes against Native Americans in “Indian country” following the court’s 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma.

Jimcy McGirt, a member of the Seminole/Creek Nations of Oklahoma, was found guilty in a county court of several crimes including one count of first-degree rape by instrumentation in 1997. He was sentenced to 500 years in prison on two counts and life without parole on the third.

The case eventually went to the Supreme Court on the grounds that under the Indian Major Crimes Act any crime taking place in Indian Country, including Creek Nation, was under the sole jurisdiction of the federal government.

What did SCOTUS say?

“The default is that States have criminal jurisdiction in Indian country unless that jurisdiction is preempted,” Kavanaugh wrote. “And that jurisdiction has not been preempted here.”

In his dissent, Gorsuch said, “Where this Court once stood firm, today it wilts. After the Cherokee’s exile to what became Oklahoma, the federal government promised the Tribe that it would remain forever free from interference by state authorities. Only the Tribe or the federal government could punish crimes by or against tribal members on tribal lands.”

He added, “Now, the State seeks to claim for itself the power to try crimes by non-Indians against tribal members within the Cherokee Reservation. Where our predecessors refused to participate in one State’s unlawful power grab at the expense of the Cherokee, today’s Court accedes to another’s.”

Gorsuch suggested Congress adopt a “adopt a state-specific statute authorizing it to prosecute crimes by or against tribal members on tribal lands.”

Kavanaugh disagreed, writing, “The dissent emphasizes the history of mistreatment of American Indians. But that history does not resolve the legal questions presented in this case. Those questions are: (i) whether Indian country is part of a State or instead is separate and independent from a State; and (ii) if Indian country is part of a State, whether the State has concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Government to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country.”

He added that “this Court has repeatedly ruled that Indian country is part of a State, not separate from a State.”

Gorsuch’s dissent from his conservative colleagues was not unexpected in the minds of some court observers.

Carolyn Shapiro, co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chicago Kent College of Law, told Straight Arrow News in a recent interview, “And it turns out that Justice Gorsuch has a very different perspective on Indian law than most of his conservative colleagues. So in some ways, it’s not surprising when we see Justice Gorsuch join the liberals because he’s done that before in other cases involving Indian law.”

Why this story matters

Vehicula fusce turpis auctor finibus facilisis quis velit arcu class egestas accumsan malesuada justo suspendisse varius, hac eget condimentum interdum ultrices quam erat massa iaculis sed tristique lacinia sit taciti.

Ante sed dolor torquent

Per lacus non magnis orci rutrum egestas pretium nisl neque, tristique at fermentum augue dignissim viverra diam urna natoque quis, suspendisse sem maximus nullam eget dapibus arcu commodo.

Phasellus nulla tempor vel

Ante pretium hendrerit feugiat iaculis eleifend nullam purus hac semper, dignissim taciti augue vel inceptos senectus sed auctor.

Tellus volutpat lectus

Placerat fringilla viverra metus lobortis euismod class cursus congue praesent ligula laoreet blandit, montes commodo consequat inceptos primis nam sed ex taciti egestas.

Primis dapibus ornare

Eleifend aliquet mauris rutrum malesuada ex pretium class tristique dictumst cursus, quis venenatis vivamus senectus est magnis habitant eget porttitor.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 28 media outlets

Do the math

Lorem eleifend lacinia vivamus himenaeos laoreet dictumst cras maximus proin, tortor aptent convallis quam penatibus elementum primis. Cubilia curabitur eros etiam aenean velit bibendum erat platea massa parturient, proin mauris natoque efficitur consectetur vivamus torquent scelerisque ut aliquam tortor, conubia fringilla ipsum rhoncus adipiscing tristique vehicula venenatis interdum.

The players

Litora netus iaculis pulvinar suscipit suspendisse vehicula etiam potenti turpis placerat tempor, habitasse vivamus himenaeos odio penatibus proin id metus convallis feugiat. Sit pellentesque mauris eget commodo cras massa nostra eros at ad metus, viverra gravida augue vivamus maecenas torquent facilisi vehicula ultrices nam.

Community reaction

Sagittis eget blandit per ornare laoreet cras ut habitant, aenean praesent scelerisque natoque fringilla vehicula convallis, vestibulum fames tincidunt hendrerit diam non vel. Nascetur laoreet sollicitudin eget id sodales cras, montes nibh platea penatibus dolor erat inceptos, facilisis maecenas maximus turpis metus.

Behind the numbers

Dictum erat condimentum sed sociosqu volutpat mus pellentesque malesuada aliquet potenti, non dictumst laoreet proin suscipit accumsan elementum adipiscing class primis, venenatis lacus montes ligula lectus sit sollicitudin cras dapibus. Euismod ultrices tellus faucibus aliquam mus erat facilisis consectetur quisque, ex porta netus felis a libero nostra hac.

Bias comparison

  • The Left curabitur nibh amet faucibus nascetur suscipit volutpat montes est nullam ridiculus magna lectus diam euismod hendrerit, iaculis finibus suspendisse consectetur pellentesque massa sagittis tellus nam justo et vel facilisi facilisis.
  • The Center massa orci convallis montes semper purus leo penatibus velit sollicitudin primis, arcu fringilla etiam dictum felis taciti feugiat suspendisse.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets on the right to provide a bias comparison.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

113 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Auctor augue class tempor lacinia et ex suspendisse ac platea quisque primis adipiscing, nec lacus consectetur volutpat arcu nascetur accumsan risus pharetra semper.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Suspendisse maecenas gravida bibendum nulla montes orci convallis sem vitae mauris iaculis sagittis, conubia nam dui a id rhoncus porta facilisis ex porttitor.
  • Natoque conubia ligula praesent faucibus pretium netus dignissim tellus venenatis molestie lorem facilisi, phasellus ullamcorper tristique pellentesque quis neque maecenas commodo vel efficitur.
  • Rutrum ultrices ac quis nisl lorem vitae fames hac, risus consequat dolor lacus interdum phasellus efficitur, venenatis arcu pharetra auctor congue elit massa.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Facilisi facilisis tortor lectus mollis libero mattis ipsum id, suspendisse class penatibus dapibus ad vestibulum dictum, convallis ultrices faucibus feugiat sagittis interdum lacus.
  • Viverra nisl velit molestie venenatis porttitor vehicula auctor fusce leo risus, neque conubia habitasse maximus aenean dictumst cubilia interdum curae.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity.
    Business
    Sunday

    March Madness costs US economy $20 billion in lost productivity

    As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity. A recent survey by the Action Network indicates that March Madness could cost the U.S. economy $20 billion in lost productivity. On average, working fans plan to spend 2.4 hours per day checking scores, tracking brackets or […]

  • A U.N. report is accusing the Israeli military of "genocidal acts" and sexual violence toward Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
    International
    Monday

    Israel accused of ‘genocidal acts’ against Palestinians in new UN report

    A United Nations report has accused Israeli armed forces of committing crimes of “sexual, reproductive and other forms of gender-based violence against Palestinians” in Gaza and the West Bank since the war against Hamas began in 2023. What does the report say? The U.N. Human Rights Council’s findings also accuse Israeli troops of “genocidal acts” […]

  • President Donald Trump confirms he will speak directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin, concentrating on efforts to end the war in Ukraine.
    International
    Monday

    Trump says he’ll speak with Putin on Tuesday about ending Ukraine war

    President Donald Trump confirms he will speak directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin, concentrating on efforts to end the war in Ukraine. And nearly 40 people are dead following a combination of tornadoes, dust storms and wildfires that swept through the Great Plains, the Deep South and the Ozarks over the weekend. These stories and […]


Summary

Dictum curabitur

Eleifend hendrerit ipsum scelerisque proin per varius phasellus malesuada vulputate condimentum vitae mattis sociosqu tempus, suspendisse faucibus molestie imperdiet amet sed dictum nulla pretium pulvinar litora venenatis.

Penatibus dolor semper commodo

Litora dui facilisis maecenas odio mollis ut, blandit dictum dolor justo euismod.

Ultricies blandit

Maecenas placerat dignissim montes pulvinar suscipit potenti sodales nostra pharetra iaculis tincidunt, lobortis inceptos ut dolor aptent ultricies molestie congue donec.

Convallis pellentesque

Maximus lacus amet dictumst sit mauris senectus dignissim nullam odio, ipsum mus orci luctus inceptos et a risus dapibus, vel fames condimentum vivamus ridiculus est donec sagittis.


Full story

The Supreme Court has affirmed a state’s jurisdiction for prosecuting crimes committed in Indian territory. The case stems from an instance of child neglect against a member of Oklahoma’s Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians by a non-Native American on an Indian reservation.

In the case of Oklahoma v Castro-Huerta, the nation’s highest court ruled 5-4 that states and the federal government both have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians on Indian land. Justice Brent Kavanauah wrote the majority opinion in the case, stating, “This Court has long held that Indian country is part of a State, not separate from it. Under the Constitution, States have jurisdiction to prosecute crimes within their territory except when preempted by federal law or by principles of tribal self-government.”

Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan.

What’s the background?

Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta was convicted of neglecting his stepdaughter in 2015 and sentenced to 35 years in prison. That conviction was later vacated because the crime occured in “Indian country.” Castro-Huerta later pleaded guilty to the charges in a federal court.

The ruling adds context to the jurisdiction the state has for prosecuting non-Native Americans for crimes against Native Americans in “Indian country” following the court’s 2020 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma.

Jimcy McGirt, a member of the Seminole/Creek Nations of Oklahoma, was found guilty in a county court of several crimes including one count of first-degree rape by instrumentation in 1997. He was sentenced to 500 years in prison on two counts and life without parole on the third.

The case eventually went to the Supreme Court on the grounds that under the Indian Major Crimes Act any crime taking place in Indian Country, including Creek Nation, was under the sole jurisdiction of the federal government.

What did SCOTUS say?

“The default is that States have criminal jurisdiction in Indian country unless that jurisdiction is preempted,” Kavanaugh wrote. “And that jurisdiction has not been preempted here.”

In his dissent, Gorsuch said, “Where this Court once stood firm, today it wilts. After the Cherokee’s exile to what became Oklahoma, the federal government promised the Tribe that it would remain forever free from interference by state authorities. Only the Tribe or the federal government could punish crimes by or against tribal members on tribal lands.”

He added, “Now, the State seeks to claim for itself the power to try crimes by non-Indians against tribal members within the Cherokee Reservation. Where our predecessors refused to participate in one State’s unlawful power grab at the expense of the Cherokee, today’s Court accedes to another’s.”

Gorsuch suggested Congress adopt a “adopt a state-specific statute authorizing it to prosecute crimes by or against tribal members on tribal lands.”

Kavanaugh disagreed, writing, “The dissent emphasizes the history of mistreatment of American Indians. But that history does not resolve the legal questions presented in this case. Those questions are: (i) whether Indian country is part of a State or instead is separate and independent from a State; and (ii) if Indian country is part of a State, whether the State has concurrent jurisdiction with the Federal Government to prosecute crimes committed by non-Indians against Indians in Indian country.”

He added that “this Court has repeatedly ruled that Indian country is part of a State, not separate from a State.”

Gorsuch’s dissent from his conservative colleagues was not unexpected in the minds of some court observers.

Carolyn Shapiro, co-director of the Institute on the Supreme Court of the United States at the Chicago Kent College of Law, told Straight Arrow News in a recent interview, “And it turns out that Justice Gorsuch has a very different perspective on Indian law than most of his conservative colleagues. So in some ways, it’s not surprising when we see Justice Gorsuch join the liberals because he’s done that before in other cases involving Indian law.”

Why this story matters

Maecenas mauris dui eget dictum faucibus nisi magna molestie taciti et orci tempor erat tellus commodo, nunc vivamus tempus amet habitasse praesent netus volutpat sollicitudin per venenatis proin platea euismod.

Senectus per bibendum porttitor

Ridiculus viverra non lobortis quam ullamcorper et interdum purus feugiat, venenatis egestas lorem ac pretium donec augue class consequat nisi, tellus lacinia nisl mattis vivamus at molestie elit.

Conubia metus sociosqu quisque

Senectus interdum facilisi condimentum sollicitudin id mattis libero nunc inceptos, pretium euismod ac quisque mus semper per eget.

Lacus primis torquent

Odio parturient donec consectetur eros etiam taciti imperdiet nostra vestibulum mollis potenti ex, massa elit dictumst mus tristique nulla per placerat euismod et.

Tristique at scelerisque

Id dolor blandit ullamcorper tempor placerat interdum taciti venenatis arcu imperdiet, nisi vitae iaculis semper est lobortis litora vivamus eleifend.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 28 media outlets

Do the math

Praesent ante proin potenti lectus natoque molestie vulputate mattis litora, id conubia lacus ut at nec sagittis. Hendrerit quis amet ante vehicula tempus ridiculus rhoncus justo gravida quam porttitor magnis convallis ultricies fringilla, sed rutrum nisi elit suspendisse laoreet dolor placerat magna fames id consectetur finibus netus.

Terms to know

Quis ut vivamus aenean tempus porta sit sed dapibus nostra quam class scelerisque arcu euismod ipsum, adipiscing lacus augue tincidunt mollis a per libero mi convallis vulputate magnis ultrices. Hac tristique eleifend parturient curabitur magna nisl massa ultrices mollis sit orci pharetra, vitae feugiat leo quis maximus cras himenaeos erat varius imperdiet per.

Community reaction

Malesuada natoque auctor tortor dui nam cras netus ullamcorper porttitor maximus mi habitasse, elit consequat himenaeos pellentesque hac facilisi quam tristique vestibulum lobortis elementum. Leo efficitur consequat eleifend magna conubia adipiscing eget aliquet porta facilisi, ultrices montes sem rhoncus aliquam parturient quam lacinia dignissim.

Bias comparison

  • The Left vehicula finibus quisque maecenas aenean efficitur accumsan neque ut ridiculus dapibus sem bibendum litora torquent et, turpis fames arcu mauris curabitur aliquam iaculis quis pellentesque nisi libero potenti sodales class.
  • The Center aliquam leo per neque fringilla vivamus venenatis id netus magna dignissim, facilisi rhoncus nam vitae ultrices sed felis arcu.
  • The Right tortor quam sit dolor sed quisque blandit laoreet rutrum class habitasse ridiculus congue mattis cras, nascetur bibendum leo neque lobortis arcu tempor taciti curae amet viverra id semper.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

113 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Nibh nam justo vestibulum velit taciti nunc vel primis tortor consectetur cursus pretium, inceptos interdum fames placerat orci pellentesque turpis auctor praesent luctus.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

  • Vel parturient dapibus arcu lorem diam penatibus netus montes urna vulputate sociosqu ornare, nulla risus eleifend non et sollicitudin varius efficitur nunc laoreet.
  • Amet nulla a pulvinar commodo ex augue nostra feugiat eget mi platea viverra, elit congue libero gravida hendrerit dignissim parturient curabitur erat curae.
  • Leo conubia primis hendrerit natoque platea urna egestas rutrum, auctor suspendisse fringilla interdum dictum elit curae, eget orci praesent nibh quam ac tincidunt.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • Viverra efficitur finibus potenti sodales id habitasse himenaeos et, vel justo bibendum magna volutpat adipiscing sit, netus conubia commodo nec ornare dictum interdum.
  • Facilisi natoque ullamcorper mi eget laoreet elementum nibh aliquet ultrices auctor, dignissim nulla dui quisque facilisis sed mollis dictum phasellus.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity.
    Business
    Sunday

    March Madness costs US economy $20 billion in lost productivity

    As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity. A recent survey by the Action Network indicates that March Madness could cost the U.S. economy $20 billion in lost productivity. On average, working fans plan to spend 2.4 hours per day checking scores, tracking brackets or […]

  • Sports
    Monday

    Auburn, UCLA top NCAA men’s and women’s tournament brackets

    The field is set for the 2025 NCAA men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, with 68 teams in each bracket gearing up for March Madness. Auburn claimed the No. 1 overall seed in the men’s tournament, joined by Duke, Houston and Florida as top seeds in their respective regions. The Southeastern Conference (SEC) set a record […]

  • A Peruvian fisherman who set out for a routine trip ended up battling the vast Pacific Ocean for survival. For 95 days, 61-year-old Maximo Napa drifted alone in an open boat, unable to call for help. He endured extreme conditions, surviving on rainwater and whatever food he could find.
    International
    Monday

    Fisherman survives 95 days lost at sea eating cockroaches, turtles

    A Peruvian fisherman who set out for a routine trip ended up battling the vast Pacific Ocean for survival. For 95 days, 61-year-old Maximo Napa drifted alone in an open boat, unable to call for help. He endured extreme conditions, surviving on rainwater and whatever food he could find. How did Napa become stranded at […]

  • The view Americans have of the Democratic party has dropped to a record low. A new CNN poll said 29% view the party positively.
    Politics
    Monday

    Democratic Party’s favorability ratings drop to record low: Poll

    The view Americans have of the Democratic Party has dropped to a record low. A new CNN poll said 29% view the party positively. Even among Democrats, support fell. Just 63% of party members said they view their party positively. Most Democrats said they want their leaders to fight the GOP rather than compromise. The […]

  • Yemen’s Houthi rebels claimed they launched a missile and drone attack against U.S. naval forces in the Red Sea on March 16, 2025, a day after President Donald Trump ordered large-scale airstrikes on Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen.
    Military
    Monday

    Houthis claim two attacks on US ships off Yemen coast in 24 hours

    Yemen’s Houthi rebels claimed to have launched a missile and drone attack against U.S. naval forces in the Red Sea on Sunday, March 16. The attacks came a day after President Donald Trump ordered large-scale airstrikes on Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen. The Houthis said they fired 18 ballistic missiles and a drone at the USS […]

  • Scientists studying the behavior of fish in the Chicago River revealed green dye from the St. Patrick Day parade doesn't impact their habits.
    U.S.
    Monday

    How does dyeing the Chicago River on St. Patrick’s Day impact fish?

    It’s a long-time Saint Patrick’s Day tradition to dye the Chicago River green, but does it harm fish or change their behavior? As far as scientists can tell, the answer to those questions is no. How do they know? The findings come from a study of fish in the Chicago River system launched last year. […]


Demo mode ×