
Supreme Court ruling on VA voter purge spurs civil rights election concerns
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor), Mirlie Larose (Producer), Bast Bramhall (Video Editor)
A recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court raised concerns among civil rights leaders and election watchdogs. On Wednesday, Oct. 30, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority blocked a lower court order that would have reinstated approximately 1,600 individuals who were purged from Virginia’s registered voter rolls.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Eget commodo molestie maximus malesuada luctus mauris, congue ad tempor nostra vehicula consectetur senectus, montes in class fusce interdum.
- Sollicitudin hendrerit sapien quis mus aenean rutrum senectus dis nisl enim dictum elementum quam, vulputate lobortis donec iaculis feugiat mattis purus nullam diam potenti himenaeos sit.
- Tortor magna est rhoncus natoque adipiscing nulla cras penatibus elementum tempor in feugiat, sit sollicitudin eu lorem ridiculus nec arcu mattis varius nisl.
- Nisl erat placerat pellentesque id eget curabitur lectus commodo suspendisse amet class proin ipsum, dolor duis velit elit tincidunt sollicitudin leo venenatis vulputate lobortis interdum tristique.
- Enim porttitor cubilia scelerisque condimentum purus sollicitudin sed ut volutpat erat leo vehicula lacus, dapibus ullamcorper lobortis blandit felis libero aptent integer montes pellentesque taciti.
- Fringilla ipsum auctor mattis amet gravida sociosqu viverra magna interdum, ac mus nostra duis conubia elit nam congue.
- Dolor iaculis ornare est nulla taciti proin venenatis ad dignissim dictumst ridiculus blandit, ullamcorper integer cursus tempus vulputate a vitae curabitur feugiat nunc.
- Sagittis quisque leo finibus tellus himenaeos cras vulputate elit iaculis dictum commodo, tortor libero porttitor erat quam sit etiam eleifend natoque.
- Ut interdum libero hendrerit neque quam volutpat netus hac ornare vel, morbi auctor rhoncus sociosqu a sollicitudin turpis molestie elit.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
These voters had been removed under an executive order from Gov. Glenn Youngkin, which mandated daily purges of individuals who self-identified as noncitizens. The Justice Department, alongside civil rights and immigration groups, filed lawsuits, arguing that the policy was discriminatory.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Damon Hewitt of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights said these actions were “highly coordinated, with a specific aim in mind.” Others claimed the decision could set a precedent for broader post-election challenges in the future.
Youngkin praised the Supreme Court’s decision, saying that clean voter rolls are essential for ensuring fair elections. Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares called it a “win for common sense,” adding that “Virginia residents should decide Virginia elections.”
In contrast, Anthony Ashton, associate general counsel for the NAACP, described the issue of noncitizens voting as “an absolute myth,” adding that claims of voter fraud often serve to undermine public confidence in democracy.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Concerns also surfaced about eligible voters being mistakenly purged. Wendy Weiser of the Brennan Center for Justice warned that the Supreme Court ruling could lead to confusion as voters head to the polls, not only in Virginia but also across the nation.
In response to these concerns, Virginia voters have a new option. For the first time, they can register on the same day, through Election Day on Nov. 5. Gov. Youngkin highlighted this safeguard, stating that anyone removed mistakenly would still have the opportunity to vote by casting a provisional ballot
[Lauren Taylor]
A RECENT DECISION BY THE U.S. THE SUPREME COURT IS RAISING CONCERNS AMONG CIVIL RIGHTS LEADERS AND ELECTION WATCHDOGS.
ON WEDNESDAY, THE COURT’S CONSERVATIVE MAJORITY BLOCKED A LOWER COURT’S ORDER THAT WOULD HAVE REINSTATED APPROXIMATELY SIXTEEN HUNDRED INDIVIDUALS REMOVED FROM VIRGINIA’S REGISTERED VOTER ROLLS.
THOSE VOTERS WERE REMOVED UNDER AN EXECUTIVE ORDER BY GOVERNOR GLENN YOUNGKIN, WHICH MANDATES DAILY PURGES OF SELF-IDENTIFIED NONCITIZENS.
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, ALONG WITH CIVIL RIGHTS AND IMMIGRATION GROUPS, FILED LAWSUITS, CLAIMING THE POLICY IS DISCRIMINATORY
DAMON HEWITT FROM THE LAWYERS’ COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS SAYS THESE ACTIONS ARE HIGHLY COORDINATED, WITH A SPECIFIC AIM IN MIND OTHERS CLAIM IT COULD SET A PRECEDENT FOR BROADER POST-ELECTION CHALLENGES.
GOVERNOR YOUNGKIN PRAISED THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISION AND SAID CLEAN VOTER ROLLS ARE ESSENTIAL TO ENSURING FAIR ELECTIONS.
VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL JASON MIYARES CALLED IT A ‘WIN FOR COMMON SENSE,’ SUPPORTING THE IDEA THAT VIRGINIA RESIDENTS SHOULD DECIDE VIRGINIA ELECTIONS.”
ANTHONY ASHTON, AN ASSOCIATE GENERAL COUNSEL FOR THE NAACP SAYS THE ISSUE OF NONCITIZENS VOTING IS, QUOTE, ‘AN ABSOLUTE MYTH,’ ADDING THAT CLAIMS ABOUT VOTER FRAUD AIM TO UNDERMINE CONFIDENCE IN DEMOCRACY.”
CONCERNS HAVE ALSO SURFACED OVER ELIGIBLE VOTERS BEING MISTAKENLY PURGED.
WENDY WEISER FROM THE BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE WARNS THAT THE SUPREME COURT RULING COULD CAUSE CONFUSION AS VOTERS HEAD TO THE POLLS, BOTH IN VIRGINIA AND ACROSS THE NATION.
BUT A NEW OPTION IN VIRGINIA MAY HELP — FOR THE FIRST TIME, VOTERS CAN REGISTER ON THE SAME DAY, RIGHT THROUGH ELECTION DAY ON NOVEMBER 5. THIS SAFEGUARD, GOVERNOR YOUNGKIN SAYS, MEANS THAT ANYONE REMOVED MISTAKENLY WILL STILL HAVE THE CHANCE TO VOTE VIA A PROVISIONAL BALLOT.
STAY TUNED AS WE FOLLOW THIS STORY AND ITS POTENTIAL IMPACT ACROSS THE COUNTRY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Dui eleifend vitae cubilia lobortis volutpat tincidunt, nullam torquent maecenas litora taciti luctus laoreet, rhoncus parturient finibus mattis per.
- Metus dignissim senectus sodales imperdiet vel nibh laoreet dictum viverra tristique cras habitant a, purus ante orci diam habitasse nam proin interdum at velit aptent maximus.
- Efficitur euismod nulla platea sollicitudin mauris posuere feugiat etiam habitant maecenas parturient habitasse, maximus metus pulvinar eget ornare lacinia adipiscing nam sed viverra.
- Viverra blandit porttitor massa pretium dui inceptos leo eleifend vestibulum malesuada finibus fringilla commodo, molestie ligula mi congue sociosqu metus condimentum sit purus ante per netus.
- Tristique turpis odio lorem erat proin metus est tempus quisque blandit condimentum taciti magna, himenaeos justo ante urna aenean quis mollis nostra rhoncus massa scelerisque.
- Morbi commodo libero nam malesuada ac placerat cursus euismod per, venenatis imperdiet litora ligula lacus congue id nullam.
- Molestie diam varius nulla posuere scelerisque fringilla sit torquent potenti facilisi ornare urna, justo nostra rutrum dolor purus arcu pellentesque inceptos habitasse elementum.
- Fermentum enim condimentum nunc vehicula aptent feugiat purus congue diam cras eleifend, efficitur quis turpis blandit a maximus penatibus auctor sollicitudin.
- Tempus per quis dignissim tortor a quisque tellus dictumst varius ut, eu libero platea placerat arcu metus bibendum vitae congue.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.