
Starbucks to pay additional $2.7M over wrongful termination lawsuit
By Karah Rucker (Anchor), Brock Koller (Senior Producer), Ian Kennedy (Editor), Ben Burke (Digital Producer)
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 5% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Vivamus fusce nec senectus facilisi potenti dis euismod laoreet pretium nibh enim non ipsum fames suscipit, lacus praesent nisi dictumst ullamcorper luctus quam eget vehicula elit augue pellentesque inceptos.
- Donec nam mi maximus etiam praesent velit facilisi, mattis iaculis imperdiet aliquam facilisis lobortis proin habitant, posuere suspendisse ullamcorper diam sem odio.
- Quisque luctus non taciti elementum facilisis ex ad mi interdum pharetra tempus, praesent pellentesque euismod sollicitudin nascetur eros urna condimentum curae.
- Sapien ultricies dui condimentum ultrices facilisi cubilia efficitur nascetur suspendisse magna nisi neque, ut dapibus amet elementum facilisis viverra libero varius egestas tempor pellentesque.
- Id porttitor donec cursus pretium dictumst primis rutrum consequat urna, platea risus maecenas metus lectus sed ad velit.
- Nisl augue mus aptent dolor morbi nostra primis tristique convallis imperdiet donec sollicitudin cubilia eget, class amet dignissim ligula non quisque at facilisis lectus aliquet sapien natoque.
- Dui duis primis ultricies per aliquet porttitor suscipit bibendum vestibulum platea dictumst, morbi lobortis ornare erat ligula pellentesque molestie hendrerit a sem.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
A New Jersey federal judge ordered Starbucks to pay an additional $2.7 million to settle a wrongful termination lawsuit from a former regional director against the coffee giant. Starbucks had already been ordered to pay $25.6 million in punitive and compensatory damages to Shannon Phillips after a trial in June of 2023. Court documents show the $2,736,755 in payment ordered Wednesday, Aug. 16, covers back pay, front pay and tax gross.
In her wrongful termination lawsuit, Phillips claimed that “her race was a determinative factor” in Starbucks’ decision to fire her back in 2018. Her firing came less than a month after two Black men were arrested while waiting for a business meeting at a Philadelphia Starbucks.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
An employee called 911, accusing the men of trespassing after they refused to either make a purchase or leave the store. The arrests sparked nationwide protests, prompting Starbucks to close some of its stores for a day for racial bias training. The two men eventually reached a private settlement with Starbucks and the city.
Phillips claimed in the lawsuit that she wasn’t at the store the day of the arrests, and was not involved in the arrests in any way. She said she “actively worked” on “crisis management” efforts and “took steps to ensure that the retail locations within her area were a safe and welcoming environment for all customers, regardless of race.”
In a memo opposing economic damages filed in July, Starbucks argued “that there is no evidence of intentional discrimination.” The company added that Phillips “has failed to present any evidence that she could not earn the same (or perhaps even more) in the future and has similarly presented no evidence, beyond her speculation, as to what benefits she may have received had she remained at Starbucks.”
STARBUCKS HAS BEEN ORDERED TO PAY AN ADDITIONAL 2 POINT 7 MILLION DOLLARS TO A FORMER EMPLOYEE AS PART OF A WRONGFUL TERMINATION SUIT.
THIS IN ADDITION TO THE TWENTY FIVE POINT SIX MILLION DOLLARS AWARDED TO FORMER REGIONAL DIRECTOR SHANNON PHILLIPS IN JUNE.
PHILLIPS, WHO IS WHITE, SUED HER FORMER EMPLOYER SAYING THAT HER RACE WAS A FACTOR IN STARBUCKS FIRING HER AFTER THE CONTROVERSIAL ARRESTS OF TWO BLACK MEN AT A PHILADELPHIA LOCATION IN 2018 SPARKED NATIONIONWIDE PROTESTS.
THE TWO MEN — WAITING FOR A BUSINESS MEETING – WERE ARRESTED AFTER AN EMPLOYEE CALLED 9-1-1 SAYING THEY WERE TRESPASSING DUE TO THEM NOT ORDERING ANYTHING WHILE INSIDE THE STORE.
PHILLIPS WHO WORKED FOR STARBUCKS FOR 13 YEARS SAYS SHE WAS NOT AT THE STORE WHEN THE INCIDENT OCCURRED AND WAS FIRED THE FOLLOWING DAY.
STARBUCKS HAS PREVIOUSLY SAID THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF INTENTIONAL DISCRIMINATION.
THE TWO MEN ARRESTED AT THE STORE REACHED A PRIVATE SETTLEMENT WITH STARBUCKS AND THE CITY.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 5% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Ridiculus sociosqu eu amet massa quam nunc ac natoque interdum fames sed eget pulvinar platea augue, elit tristique convallis eros potenti sodales ultrices nibh habitasse maecenas tempor vivamus placerat.
- Eleifend suspendisse arcu orci cursus tristique etiam massa, nulla erat nullam litora rhoncus proin vehicula hendrerit, aenean class potenti ipsum varius sapien.
- Lobortis sodales eget maximus urna rhoncus torquent curabitur arcu semper gravida malesuada, tristique vivamus ac nisl lacus nam turpis mauris ante.
- Mattis ex aliquam mauris molestie massa enim montes lacus class finibus convallis faucibus, neque id ornare urna rhoncus taciti conubia fermentum ut scelerisque vivamus.
- Lacinia magnis eleifend luctus interdum eros quisque nec adipiscing turpis, cubilia mollis euismod dis consectetur a curabitur etiam.
- Odio tempor egestas sem rutrum nisi viverra quisque ultricies praesent nullam eleifend nisl enim nibh, justo ornare mi tincidunt eget lobortis consequat rhoncus consectetur porttitor mattis venenatis.
- Aliquam condimentum quisque ex donec porttitor magnis augue lectus quis cubilia eros, nisi proin facilisi magna tincidunt vivamus pretium blandit sit varius.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.