Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to driver burned by hot coffee


Summary

Lorem ipsum dolor

Neque tempus tincidunt urna nisi sollicitudin porttitor rutrum condimentum massa feugiat habitasse finibus est, phasellus etiam maximus curabitur ligula sodales interdum purus curae id maecenas.

Parturient quam placerat pharetra

Magna praesent ridiculus tempor arcu quisque est, interdum suspendisse netus a.

Vitae vel per

Nam etiam ultricies per orci varius ridiculus elementum mollis arcu maecenas, dolor ullamcorper nullam inceptos platea parturient leo placerat.

Ad sodales ex vehicula

Ligula porttitor faucibus quisque dui urna per erat platea vehicula sollicitudin massa dapibus aptent pulvinar egestas, hendrerit taciti lorem magna tincidunt eros felis rutrum pellentesque sagittis finibus nisl vivamus id.


A jury in California has ordered Starbucks to pay big bucks for an incident that left a delivery driver burned several years ago.

Full story

  • A California man won a multi-million dollar judgment against coffee giant Starbucks. Michael Garcia claimed he was badly burned when a hot drink spilled on him while he was at a drive-through in Los Angeles.
  • A jury awarded him $50 million.
  • Starbucks said it sympathizes with the man but disagrees with the amount awarded. The company also adhered to the highest safety standards when handling hot drinks.

Full Story

A California jury ordered Starbucks to pay big bucks for an incident that left a delivery driver burned several years ago. Jurors awarded the man $50 million.

What happened to the man who led the lawsuit?

The driver, Michael Garcia, alleged that he was picking up drinks at a drive-through at a Los Angeles Starbucks when an improperly secured lid led to a spill that left him severely burned.

According to his attorney, Garcia was picking up three beverages, and one of the hot drinks was not fully secured in the container. When the barista handed Garcia the order, the hot drink fell out of the container and spilled onto his lap.

What type of injuries did Garcia say he suffered?

The lawsuit claimed Garcia suffered severe burns, disfigurement and debilitating nerve damage to his genitals. It said that Garcia suffered damage including, but not limited to, physical pain, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life and emotional distress.

In 2020, Garcia filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court, accusing Starbucks of breaching its duty of care by failing to secure the lid.

What is the reaction from Starbucks?

Starbucks released a statement after the decision.

“We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, but we disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages to be excessive,” the company said.

Starbucks said it intends to appeal the $50 million verdict and has consistently upheld the highest safety standards in handling hot beverages.

Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

Netus etiam ad malesuada accumsan faucibus litora aenean venenatis tellus, cras justo rutrum facilisis hac aliquam consequat ac.

Odio eget aptent

Sodales orci facilisis nisl tempus porttitor nulla imperdiet nunc luctus, suscipit magnis aenean semper tortor donec etiam tempor ullamcorper, vestibulum mauris fames aptent est diam phasellus ipsum.

Amet a

Consectetur nec fermentum felis augue tempor leo litora dapibus cubilia auctor ultrices condimentum sagittis convallis, magnis ex congue natoque sociosqu per velit quam eget justo viverra mattis senectus.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 22 media outlets

Diverging views

Aptent ridiculus adipiscing est eu conubia dignissim sociosqu mollis ullamcorper, aliquam sagittis dictum auctor interdum quisque nibh. Congue massa habitant hac finibus mattis malesuada maximus etiam leo facilisis, ullamcorper volutpat diam tristique bibendum est dictumst rhoncus facilisi nisl aliquam, odio ultricies scelerisque elit nec mauris ipsum erat iaculis.

The players

Convallis cubilia laoreet praesent augue platea ipsum hac litora magnis arcu cursus, vehicula est eu quam interdum ullamcorper penatibus semper dictum libero. Netus donec volutpat class amet sociosqu leo tincidunt habitant nulla molestie semper, nunc quis viverra est luctus dictumst pulvinar ipsum varius eleifend.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the Starbucks settlement as a "win" for the individual, emphasizing Starbucks being "ordered to pay" for "permanent disfigurement," thus highlighting corporate accountability and victim advocacy.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right, while acknowledging the "life-altering burns," de-emphasized the victim's perspective and highlighted the large settlement amount and details like the settlement offers, potentially framing it as excessive litigation.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

183 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Starbucks has been ordered to pay Michael Garcia nearly $50 million after he was severely burned by a spilled drink from their drive-thru.
  • A jury in California found that Starbucks failed in its duty of care, as Garcia's injuries resulted from an employee's negligence during a drive-thru pickup on Feb. 8, 2020.
  • Garcia has experienced ongoing physical pain, mental anguish and permanent disfigurement as a result of the incident, according to his attorneys.
  • Starbucks plans to appeal the jury's decision, stating they disagree with the finding of fault and the amount awarded to Garcia.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A Los Angeles jury awarded Michael Garcia $50 million after he suffered life-altering burns from a spilled cup of hot tea at a Starbucks drive-thru on Feb. 8, 2020.
  • Garcia sustained third-degree burns and permanent injuries, with ongoing pain requiring multiple surgeries.
  • The lawsuit accused Starbucks of breaching safety duties by using a poorly constructed lid for the hot drink, which contributed to the incident.
  • Starbucks plans to appeal the jury's decision and maintains that it was not at fault for the incident.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity.
    Business
    Sunday

    March Madness costs US economy $20 billion in lost productivity

    As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity. A recent survey by the Action Network indicates that March Madness could cost the U.S. economy $20 billion in lost productivity. On average, working fans plan to spend 2.4 hours per day checking scores, tracking brackets or […]

  • A U.N. report is accusing the Israeli military of "genocidal acts" and sexual violence toward Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
    International
    Monday

    Israel accused of ‘genocidal acts’ against Palestinians in new UN report

    A United Nations report has accused Israeli armed forces of committing crimes of “sexual, reproductive and other forms of gender-based violence against Palestinians” in Gaza and the West Bank since the war against Hamas began in 2023. What does the report say? The U.N. Human Rights Council’s findings also accuse Israeli troops of “genocidal acts” […]

  • President Donald Trump confirms he will speak directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin, concentrating on efforts to end the war in Ukraine.
    International
    Monday

    Trump says he’ll speak with Putin on Tuesday about ending Ukraine war

    President Donald Trump confirms he will speak directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin, concentrating on efforts to end the war in Ukraine. And nearly 40 people are dead following a combination of tornadoes, dust storms and wildfires that swept through the Great Plains, the Deep South and the Ozarks over the weekend. These stories and […]


A jury in California has ordered Starbucks to pay big bucks for an incident that left a delivery driver burned several years ago.

Summary

Id eleifend pellentesque

Sit curabitur est lectus porta varius fames platea nibh turpis bibendum, euismod vestibulum sollicitudin leo praesent tempus mi justo nullam, semper ad rutrum arcu suscipit etiam tortor malesuada pretium.

Aenean convallis

Pretium fermentum phasellus nec ac erat orci suspendisse nunc vestibulum fames lacinia habitasse aliquet et nisl dui parturient, sed rhoncus sollicitudin curae egestas augue nisi blandit natoque mollis dolor molestie cras congue sagittis.

Leo taciti urna

Tincidunt quisque dictum id felis tempus ad interdum class turpis lectus feugiat, porttitor sit ac tellus himenaeos aptent lacus ut lobortis.


Full story

  • A California man won a multi-million dollar judgment against coffee giant Starbucks. Michael Garcia claimed he was badly burned when a hot drink spilled on him while he was at a drive-through in Los Angeles.
  • A jury awarded him $50 million.
  • Starbucks said it sympathizes with the man but disagrees with the amount awarded. The company also adhered to the highest safety standards when handling hot drinks.

Full Story

A California jury ordered Starbucks to pay big bucks for an incident that left a delivery driver burned several years ago. Jurors awarded the man $50 million.

What happened to the man who led the lawsuit?

The driver, Michael Garcia, alleged that he was picking up drinks at a drive-through at a Los Angeles Starbucks when an improperly secured lid led to a spill that left him severely burned.

According to his attorney, Garcia was picking up three beverages, and one of the hot drinks was not fully secured in the container. When the barista handed Garcia the order, the hot drink fell out of the container and spilled onto his lap.

What type of injuries did Garcia say he suffered?

The lawsuit claimed Garcia suffered severe burns, disfigurement and debilitating nerve damage to his genitals. It said that Garcia suffered damage including, but not limited to, physical pain, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life and emotional distress.

In 2020, Garcia filed a lawsuit in California Superior Court, accusing Starbucks of breaching its duty of care by failing to secure the lid.

What is the reaction from Starbucks?

Starbucks released a statement after the decision.

“We sympathize with Mr. Garcia, but we disagree with the jury’s decision that we were at fault for this incident and believe the damages to be excessive,” the company said.

Starbucks said it intends to appeal the $50 million verdict and has consistently upheld the highest safety standards in handling hot beverages.

Tags: , , ,

Why this story matters

Volutpat tortor varius nascetur molestie euismod purus turpis primis hac, vehicula congue sollicitudin commodo feugiat bibendum vestibulum maximus.

Phasellus ligula himenaeos

Dignissim dolor commodo placerat quam lacus viverra iaculis aptent amet, erat tempor turpis faucibus ut pharetra tortor quis praesent, arcu mus massa himenaeos vel dictumst natoque dapibus.

Facilisi nullam

Gravida ridiculus magna facilisis litora quis habitasse purus tempus lorem dui ex per curae a, tempor eget sem aliquam efficitur libero est tincidunt ligula congue vivamus sit finibus.

Get the big picture

Synthesized coverage insights across 22 media outlets

Diverging views

Placerat neque elementum sem nulla montes tellus velit dictum lacinia quisque finibus aptent porttitor bibendum auctor, purus commodo suscipit tristique iaculis euismod porta praesent ad urna gravida pretium orci hendrerit. Purus cras commodo condimentum erat ante aliquam penatibus pharetra quis donec malesuada sodales, porta felis lorem primis dictumst leo amet laoreet placerat facilisis sit.

Common ground

Hendrerit egestas tortor dapibus nulla per fames iaculis, rutrum rhoncus nullam fringilla pharetra. Habitasse nostra montes lectus mi taciti adipiscing egestas, nec interdum justo erat fusce fermentum.

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left framed the Starbucks settlement as a "win" for the individual, emphasizing Starbucks being "ordered to pay" for "permanent disfigurement," thus highlighting corporate accountability and victim advocacy.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right, while acknowledging the "life-altering burns," de-emphasized the victim's perspective and highlighted the large settlement amount and details like the settlement offers, potentially framing it as excessive litigation.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

183 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • Starbucks has been ordered to pay Michael Garcia nearly $50 million after he was severely burned by a spilled drink from their drive-thru.
  • A jury in California found that Starbucks failed in its duty of care, as Garcia's injuries resulted from an employee's negligence during a drive-thru pickup on Feb. 8, 2020.
  • Garcia has experienced ongoing physical pain, mental anguish and permanent disfigurement as a result of the incident, according to his attorneys.
  • Starbucks plans to appeal the jury's decision, stating they disagree with the finding of fault and the amount awarded to Garcia.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A Los Angeles jury awarded Michael Garcia $50 million after he suffered life-altering burns from a spilled cup of hot tea at a Starbucks drive-thru on Feb. 8, 2020.
  • Garcia sustained third-degree burns and permanent injuries, with ongoing pain requiring multiple surgeries.
  • The lawsuit accused Starbucks of breaching safety duties by using a poorly constructed lid for the hot drink, which contributed to the incident.
  • Starbucks plans to appeal the jury's decision and maintains that it was not at fault for the incident.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Timeline

  • As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity.
    Business
    Sunday

    March Madness costs US economy $20 billion in lost productivity

    As college basketball fans finalize their brackets for March Madness, employers brace for a significant drop in productivity. A recent survey by the Action Network indicates that March Madness could cost the U.S. economy $20 billion in lost productivity. On average, working fans plan to spend 2.4 hours per day checking scores, tracking brackets or […]

  • Sports
    Monday

    Auburn, UCLA top NCAA men’s and women’s tournament brackets

    The field is set for the 2025 NCAA men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, with 68 teams in each bracket gearing up for March Madness. Auburn claimed the No. 1 overall seed in the men’s tournament, joined by Duke, Houston and Florida as top seeds in their respective regions. The Southeastern Conference (SEC) set a record […]

  • A Peruvian fisherman who set out for a routine trip ended up battling the vast Pacific Ocean for survival. For 95 days, 61-year-old Maximo Napa drifted alone in an open boat, unable to call for help. He endured extreme conditions, surviving on rainwater and whatever food he could find.
    International
    Monday

    Fisherman survives 95 days lost at sea eating cockroaches, turtles

    A Peruvian fisherman who set out for a routine trip ended up battling the vast Pacific Ocean for survival. For 95 days, 61-year-old Maximo Napa drifted alone in an open boat, unable to call for help. He endured extreme conditions, surviving on rainwater and whatever food he could find. How did Napa become stranded at […]

  • The view Americans have of the Democratic party has dropped to a record low. A new CNN poll said 29% view the party positively.
    Politics
    Monday

    Democratic Party’s favorability ratings drop to record low: Poll

    The view Americans have of the Democratic Party has dropped to a record low. A new CNN poll said 29% view the party positively. Even among Democrats, support fell. Just 63% of party members said they view their party positively. Most Democrats said they want their leaders to fight the GOP rather than compromise. The […]

  • Yemen’s Houthi rebels claimed they launched a missile and drone attack against U.S. naval forces in the Red Sea on March 16, 2025, a day after President Donald Trump ordered large-scale airstrikes on Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen.
    Military
    Monday

    Houthis claim two attacks on US ships off Yemen coast in 24 hours

    Yemen’s Houthi rebels claimed to have launched a missile and drone attack against U.S. naval forces in the Red Sea on Sunday, March 16. The attacks came a day after President Donald Trump ordered large-scale airstrikes on Houthi-controlled areas in Yemen. The Houthis said they fired 18 ballistic missiles and a drone at the USS […]

  • Scientists studying the behavior of fish in the Chicago River revealed green dye from the St. Patrick Day parade doesn't impact their habits.
    U.S.
    Monday

    How does dyeing the Chicago River on St. Patrick’s Day impact fish?

    It’s a long-time Saint Patrick’s Day tradition to dye the Chicago River green, but does it harm fish or change their behavior? As far as scientists can tell, the answer to those questions is no. How do they know? The findings come from a study of fish in the Chicago River system launched last year. […]


Demo mode ×