Skip to main content
Ray Bogan Political Correspondent
Share
Politics

Senate Dems seek to limit Supreme Court funding to force ethics code reform

Ray Bogan Political Correspondent
Share

Media Landscape

MediaMiss™This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 11% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn more about this data
Left 36% Center 53% Right 11%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

Senate Democrats want to hold back some Supreme Court funding until the justices create what’s described as a “clear and enforceable” code of ethics. In a letter to the Appropriations Committee, 15 Democrats asked that $10 million in funding be withheld until the justices comply with Congress’ demand. 

“Congress has broad authority to compel the Supreme Court to institute these reforms,” the letter stated. “During recent ‘interbranch disputes’ between Congress and ‘a recalcitrant Executive Branch,’ some courts have encouraged Congress to ‘withhold appropriations,’ which can act as a ‘powerful incentive’ for action within the executive branch. Nothing in the Constitution mandates that the judiciary be treated any differently when Congress is faced with judicial recalcitrance.”

The senators are urging the Appropriations Committee to add a stipulation into the 2024 funding bill that would hold the funds until the justices create a code of ethics with set parameters, including how they will publicly release information about recusals. 

Republicans are accusing Democrats of trying to hold back money the court specifically requested for security. 

“The left is willing to threaten the lives of the justices,” Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said. “This is disgraceful. Every senator who signed this letter should be embarrassed.”

Democrats contend they have passed bills to enhance security for not just Supreme Court justices but all federal judges. 

“We have an obligation to protect them. And it was Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has provided round the clock security for Supreme Court justices from the U.S. Marshals at their home, which I think is entirely proper,” Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said. “So there’s no question about the bipartisan commitment to their safety.” 

If the Senate adds the funding stipulation, the House would have to agree to it, likely leading to a negotiation or stalemate. 

Meanwhile, Senate Republicans are accusing Garland of providing misleading testimony to the Judiciary Committee.

In May 2022, dozens of people gathered outside Supreme Court justices’ homes to protest the Dobbs decision, which had just been leaked to the press. Garland told the committee that the U.S. Marshals who were sent to protect the justices’ families had the full authority to arrest people under any federal statute. 

But Sen. Katie Britt, R-Ala., publicized training slides shown to the marshals as a briefing before the detail began. The slides told marshals to avoid making arrests unless “absolutely necessary,” and to coordinate any arrest with the U.S. Attorney’s Office ahead of time. 

Attorney General Garland and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco have been asked previously if they wants to amend their testimony on the matter but declined.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Senate Democrats want to hold back some Supreme Court funding until the justices create what’s described as a clear and enforceable code of ethics. 

 

In a letter to the Appropriations committee, 15 lawmakers wrote: 

Congress has broad authority to compel the Supreme Court to institute these reforms… and during disputes, some courts have encouraged Congress to “withhold appropriations,” which can act as a “powerful incentive”for action within the executive branch. Nothing in the Constitution mandates that the judiciary be treated any differently when Congress is faced with judicial recalcitrance.

 

So the Senators are urging the Appropriations committee to add a stipulation into the 2024 funding bill, that would hold back $10 million dollars in Supreme court funding until they create a code of ethics with set parameters, including how they’ll publicly release information about recusals. 

 

Republicans are accusing Democrats of trying to hold back $10 million dollars the court specifically requested for security. 

 

Sen. Ted Cruz R-Texas: “We had 15 Senate Democrats, including six members of this committee, send a letter to the Appropriations Committee threatening to cut off the funding for security at the Supreme Court. The left is willing to threaten the lives of the justices.”  

 

Democrats say they have passed bills to enhance security for not just Supreme Court Justices but all federal judges. 

 

Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.: “We have an obligation to protect them. And it was attorney general Garrett Merrick Garland, Merrick Garland, who has provided round the clock security for Supreme Court justices from the US Marshals at their home, which I think is entirely proper. So there’s no question about the bipartisan commitment to their safety.” 

 

If the Senate tries to hold back the money, the House would have to agree to it, likely leading to a negotiation or stalemate. Straight from DC, I’m Ray Bogan.