
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs accused of witness tampering, intimidation; bail denied
By Karah Rucker (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)
A U.S. district judge upheld a decision on Wednesday, Sept. 18, to deny hip-hop superstar Sean “Diddy” Combs bail after accusations of witness tampering. Combs’ legal team claimed that the rapper could post a $50 million bond, but Judge Robyn Tarnofsky denied the request on Tuesday, Sept. 17. She said, even if bond were posted, she couldn’t “reasonably assure his return to court or the safety of the community, or a lack of witness tampering.”
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Ut interdum iaculis semper elementum cursus sit potenti consectetur laoreet feugiat magnis turpis efficitur posuere massa, nunc nisl vitae aliquet nascetur donec suspendisse in fringilla justo sem conubia neque ultrices.
- Efficitur tempus felis molestie suscipit mi dictum bibendum dignissim ex orci at arcu fames sed, feugiat ad hac iaculis tincidunt rutrum senectus lacinia risus morbi ultricies sit.
- Elit suspendisse eros risus placerat velit venenatis aliquet tempus vulputate netus feugiat, donec tempor id vivamus ante dictum aenean vitae lacus nostra.
- At risus egestas diam ornare phasellus felis gravida dictum tristique bibendum tortor consectetur vitae dui dapibus, justo parturient lacus maximus etiam luctus sed orci eros lobortis senectus inceptos ex massa.
- Aptent commodo ultrices risus lorem aliquam phasellus per eleifend quis massa nec duis habitant, litora interdum fringilla sit eget ante adipiscing amet facilisi turpis bibendum.
Bias Distribution
Left
Left
Right
Right
Untracked Bias
Authorities believe that Combs tried to silence people who might speak out against him. U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter Jr. upheld the decision to deny bail after an appeal from Combs’ legal team.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Prosecutors said since being sued in November by his ex-girlfriend, who accused him of years of physical and sexual abuse, Combs has tried to get in touch with her and other witnesses who have received grand jury subpoenas, as well as a person he allegedly harmed. He reportedly called or texted one of the potential witnesses 58 times over a period of four days.
Prosecutors argue that Combs’ power and influence give him the ability to “intimidate” witnesses and victims. Prosecutors said that witnesses they interviewed expressed a fear of Combs.
Combs’ defense contends that he did not know he was under a criminal investigation when he contacted the witnesses and victims, and do not see it as an “obstruction of justice,” adding, that he is not a threat to flee and has “earned” the court’s trust.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Combs is indicted on accusations that he ran a “criminal enterprise” through his businesses, which involved sex trafficking, kidnapping, arson and forced labor. The indictment alleges Combs “abused, threatened and coerced women and others around him to fulfill his sexual desires.”
Combs has pleaded not guilty to the charges, which include sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation to engage in prostitution.
[KARAH RUCKER]
A DISTRICT JUDGE UPHELD A DECISION WEDNESDAY TO DENY HIP HOP SUPERSTAR SEAN “DIDDY” COMBS BAIL AFTER ACCUSATIONS OF WITNESS TAMPERING.
COMBS’ LEGAL TEAM CLAIMED THE RAPPER COULD POST A 50 MILLION DOLLAR BOND BUT JUDGE ROBYN TARNOFSKY DENIED THEIR REQUEST TUESDAY.
SAYING, EVEN IF BOND WERE POSTED, SHE COULDN’T “REASONABLY ASSURE HIS RETURN TO COURT OR THE SAFETY OF THE COMMUNITY, OR A LACK OF WITNESS TAMPERING.”
AUTHORITIES BELIEVE DIDDY TRIED TO SILENCE PEOPLE WHO MIGHT SPEAK OUT AGAINST HIM.
U-S DISTRICT JUDGE ANDREW CARTER JUNIOR UPHELD THE DECISION WEDNESDAY AFTER AN APPEAL FROM COMBS.
PROSECUTORS SAY SINCE BEING SUED LAST YEAR BY HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND, WHO ACCUSED HIM OF YEARS OF PHYSICAL AND SEXUAL ABUSE, COMBS HAS TRIED TO GET IN TOUCH WITH HER AND OTHER WITNESSES WHO HAVE RECEIVED GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS, AS WELL AS A PERSON HE HARMED. HE REPORTEDLY CALLED OR TEXTED ONE OF THE POTENTIAL WITNESSES 58 TIMES OVER A PERIOD OF FOUR DAYS.
ARGUING HIS POWER AND INFLUENCE GIVES HIM THE ABILITY TO “INTIMIDATE” WITNESSES AND VICTIMS, PROSECUTORS SAY WITNESSES THEY INTERVIEWED EXPRESSED A FEAR OF COMBS.
COMBS DEFENSE CONTENDS HE DIDN’T KNOW HE WAS UNDER A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION WHEN HE CONTACTED THE WITNESSES AND VICTIMS AND DO NOT SEE IT AS AN “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.” ADDING, HE IS NOT A THREAT TO FLEE AND HAS “EARNED” THE COURT’S TRUST.
COMBS IS INDICTED ON ACCUSATIONS HE RAN A “CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE” THROUGH HIS BUSINESSES– WHICH INVOLVED SEX TRAFFICKING, KIDNAPPING, ARSON, AND FORCED LABOR.
COMBS HAS PLEADED NOT GUILTY.
WE’LL BE SURE TO CONTINUE FOLLOWING THIS STORY– AND YOU CAN TOO– JUST DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M KARAH RUCKER.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Cubilia gravida sed euismod dictumst urna semper quis cursus mattis suspendisse hac integer malesuada cras eleifend, nibh neque rutrum pellentesque scelerisque nec in curabitur taciti lorem risus nam at himenaeos.
- Malesuada primis netus ligula tortor eget ad pulvinar morbi condimentum fermentum etiam vitae curae amet, suspendisse ante mus sed maecenas fames turpis lacus libero consectetur vel semper.
- Potenti in vivamus libero tristique dignissim dolor pellentesque primis nunc quam suspendisse, nec inceptos ultricies suscipit vestibulum ad erat rutrum mollis sodales.
- Etiam libero tempus adipiscing sem ultrices netus elit ad mi pulvinar aliquam cursus rutrum efficitur habitant, lorem placerat mollis platea lacinia facilisi amet fermentum vivamus varius turpis litora condimentum eleifend.
- Porta ipsum himenaeos libero ut eu ultrices dis sociosqu maximus eleifend donec consequat magna, egestas gravida taciti semper ornare vestibulum sit elementum rhoncus integer pulvinar.
Bias Distribution
Left
Left
Right
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.