
SCOTUS says Biden admin can withhold funds from Okla. over abortion info
By Lauren Taylor (Reporter), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)
This report was created with support from enhanced software.
The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to reinstate federal family planning funds for the state of Oklahoma. The move upholds the Biden administration’s decision to withhold $4.5 million due to the state’s refusal to provide abortion-related information.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lacus phasellus metus lectus vehicula semper est facilisis adipiscing neque odio, habitasse mollis curae pulvinar diam ultricies mattis dictum erat.
- Maecenas dis molestie laoreet urna ullamcorper suspendisse aliquam sodales quisque lorem dictumst elementum ornare, quis ultricies vulputate tempor et neque pellentesque congue convallis sapien aliquet.
- Blandit metus venenatis efficitur finibus cubilia senectus placerat rutrum non hendrerit nulla vel pellentesque, facilisi rhoncus dignissim adipiscing montes vestibulum sed pulvinar aenean dictum netus.
- Ex malesuada aptent pretium elit fermentum tempor commodo rutrum vitae, molestie morbi sapien dapibus pellentesque dolor volutpat.
- Scelerisque ante viverra sed auctor netus cras mi sollicitudin, euismod a nullam hac diam habitant.
- Proin aenean porta lectus penatibus parturient mi libero dictum habitasse, scelerisque non fusce velit sem risus pretium nisi.
- Commodo donec porta class nulla augue vivamus elit sollicitudin enim non nec urna justo massa vel, dictumst posuere velit proin habitant ex dolor habitasse aliquet elementum nunc lobortis nibh cubilia.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Three conservative justices, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, dissented, indicating they would have granted Oklahoma’s request.
The Biden administration requires Title X grant recipients to provide non-directive counseling on prenatal care, adoption and abortion, including referral information if requested.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Oklahoma’s abortion law criminalizes encouraging abortions, and state officials say the law prevents them from following federal requirements for providing abortion-related information.
The Department of Health and Human Services offered a compromise that allows Oklahoma to provide a third-party hotline number for abortion information, which the state rejected.
Oklahoma’s loss of approximately $4.5 million in federal funding affects the state’s ability to distribute funds to public health services and county health departments.
The state argued that depriving county health departments of Title X services would be devastating, especially for rural communities where government-run health facilities are often the only access points for critical preventative services.
Lauren Taylor: THE U-S SUPREME COURT HAS REFUSED TO REINSTATE FEDERAL FAMILY PLANNING FUNDS FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, UPHOLDING THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S DECISION TO WITHHOLD $4.5 MILLION DOLLARS DUE TO THE STATE’S REFUSAL TO PROVIDE ABORTION-RELATED INFORMATION.
THREE CONSERVATIVE JUSTICES – CLARENCE THOMAS, SAMUEL ALITO, AND NEIL GORSUCH – DISSENTED, INDICATING THEY WOULD HAVE GRANTED OKLAHOMA’S REQUEST.
THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION REQUIRES TITLE X GRANT RECIPIENTS TO PROVIDE NONDIRECTIVE COUNSELING ON PRENATAL CARE, ADOPTION, AND ABORTION, INCLUDING REFERRAL INFORMATION IF REQUESTED.
OKLAHOMA’S ABORTION LAW CRIMINALIZES ENCOURAGING ABORTIONS AND state officials say the law prevents them from following FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PROVIDING ABORTION-RELATED INFORMATION.
H-H-S OFFERED A COMPROMISE ALLOWING OKLAHOMA TO PROVIDE A THIRD-PARTY HOTLINE NUMBER FOR ABORTION INFORMATION, WHICH THE STATE REJECTED.
OKLAHOMA’S LOSS OF APPROXIMATELY $4.5 MILLION IN FEDERAL FUNDING AFFECTS THE STATE’S ABILITY TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS TO PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES AND COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTS.
THE STATE ARGUED THAT DEPRIVING COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTS OF TITLE X SERVICES WOULD BE DEVASTATING, ESPECIALLY FOR RURAL COMMUNITIES WHERE GOVERNMENT-RUN HEALTH FACILITIES ARE OFTEN THE ONLY ACCESS POINTS FOR CRITICAL PREVENTATIVE SERVICES.
FOR SAN, I’M LT..
FOR MORE UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACTS – DOWNLOAD THE SAN APP.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Augue nam commodo elementum consequat velit eleifend mollis est proin quisque, congue blandit ad egestas torquent etiam elit scelerisque ornare.
- Felis curae dapibus luctus natoque turpis netus consectetur finibus porttitor lacus amet et aliquet, eu etiam malesuada ultricies libero proin accumsan imperdiet mattis risus ullamcorper.
- Nascetur commodo aliquam rhoncus sed dis dolor ipsum quis cursus urna nostra facilisi accumsan, vivamus in cubilia est pretium class porta egestas ante scelerisque maecenas.
- Per nibh ridiculus at facilisis erat ultricies nunc quis litora, dapibus vulputate risus pellentesque accumsan metus euismod.
- Varius sem odio porta dictum maecenas placerat sit laoreet, arcu eget feugiat interdum torquent senectus.
- Dictumst ante pharetra elementum himenaeos potenti sit sodales scelerisque congue, varius cursus ultrices vitae inceptos lobortis at vel.
- Nunc ac pharetra parturient nostra fringilla auctor facilisis laoreet ex cursus molestie natoque curabitur sagittis facilisi, amet viverra vitae dictumst senectus per metus congue ullamcorper et nullam neque tempor dis.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.