
Republicans block Right to IVF Act, Democrats have done the same to them
By Ray Bogan (Political Correspondent)
Senate Republicans blocked a bill that would create a statutory right to access fertility treatments, specifically IVF. The Right to IVF Act would also allow the Department of Justice to file civil actions against any person or entity that tries to impose limits.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 10% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Erat lacus iaculis lacinia mollis nisi auctor litora euismod dictumst vel ex, consequat eros sed ac taciti volutpat pulvinar tempor tellus quis.
- Ac augue adipiscing vel magnis interdum primis euismod sem praesent hendrerit rutrum elementum mi, posuere gravida iaculis fames donec potenti eleifend rhoncus ornare ante duis.
- Ex eleifend himenaeos litora varius mollis lorem dapibus integer nulla eu, consequat tortor lobortis efficitur magnis enim senectus tempus at, netus ligula laoreet libero aliquet magna leo euismod lacinia.
- Viverra duis conubia parturient magna erat habitant facilisis, porta varius lacinia convallis commodo.
- Condimentum cubilia blandit tempus molestie netus sapien ante, mi placerat maximus praesent faucibus neque tincidunt vivamus, accumsan scelerisque posuere libero dis proin.
- Sollicitudin habitant parturient nunc vehicula auctor scelerisque, pulvinar senectus dapibus malesuada magna phasellus finibus, augue fringilla semper lectus eros.
- Praesent ultrices dapibus sed natoque inceptos tristique magnis felis montes eros, lectus ligula adipiscing at nostra auctor nunc nascetur ullamcorper.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
“Access to IVF can no longer be taken for granted,” Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said. “From the moment the MAGA Supreme Court eliminated Roe, the hard right made clear that they’d keep going.”
This was largely a show vote to make a political point ahead of the election. Democrats had previously brought the same bill up for a vote in June and Republicans blocked it then too.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“Last time, Republicans killed this bill and Trump said nothing,” Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said. “Now he says he is a leader on IVF. It lowers the cost of IVF for families with stronger insurance coverage requirements, and it helps more veterans and service members get IVF.”
Despite voting against the bill, Republicans said they support IVF.
Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., is an OB/GYN who has delivered more than 5,000 babies. He said he also helped hundreds of couples conceive through IVF. However, he voted against the bill because he said it doesn’t have good guardrails.
“It doesn’t have any type of religious protections for those people that don’t want to participate in it, and it doesn’t even define, require a diagnosis of infertility for IVF to be covered,” Sen. Roger Marshall said. “So I think it’s bad medicine, it’s bad policy.”
Marshall said he would have voted for the bill proposed by Sens. Katie Britt, R-Ala., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas. That bill does not compel anyone to provide the services and allows states to create health and safety standards. The legislation makes a state ineligible to receive Medicaid funding if it creates an outright ban on IVF. Republicans described that proposal as the right balance between life and liberty. Democrats blocked it the same way the GOP blocked theirs.
Republicans want religious protections because if any of the embryos created during the IVF process are not used, they can be destroyed. That would require those who believe life begins at conception to go against their religious teachings.
Senate Republicans blocked a bill that would create a statutory right to access fertility treatments, specifically IVF. The Right to IVF Act would also allow the Department of Justice to file civil actions against any person or entity that tries to impose limits.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.: “Access to IVF can no longer be taken for granted. From the moment the Maga Supreme Court eliminated Roe, the hard right made clear that they’d keep going.”
This was largely a show vote to make a political point ahead of the election. Democrats had previously brought the same bill up for a vote in June and Republicans blocked it then too.
Sen. Patty Murray, D-WA: “It lowers the cost of IVF for families with stronger insurance coverage requirements, and it helps more veterans and service members get IVF. Last time, Republicans killed this bill, and Trump said nothing. Now he says he is a leader on IVF.”
Despite voting against the bill, Republicans say they support IVF.
Senator Roger Marshall is an OB/GYN who has delivered more than 5,000 babies. He says he’s also helped hundreds of couples conceive through IVF.
But he voted against the bill because he says it doesn’t have good guardrails.
Sen. Roger Marshall, R-KA: “It doesn’t have any type of religious protections for those people that don’t want to participate in it, and it doesn’t even define require a diagnosis of infertility for IVF to be covered. So I think it’s bad medicine, it’s bad policy. “
Marshall says he would have voted for the bill proposed by Senators Britt and Cruz. That bill does not compel anyone to provide the services and allows states to create health and safety standards. The legislation makes a state ineligible to receive medicaid funding if they create an outright ban of IVF.
Republicans described that proposal as the right balance between life and liberty. Democrats blocked it the same way the GOP blocked theirs.
Republicans want religious protections because if any of the embryos created during the IVF process aren’t used, they can be destroyed. That would require those who believe life begins at conception to go against their religious teachings.
I’m Ray Bogan for Straight Arrow News, for more unbiased reporting from our nation’s capital, download the straight arrow news app and turn on notifications.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the right as only 10% of the coverage is from right leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Velit nunc nam ullamcorper lobortis platea lectus dictum magnis dolor maximus dignissim, tortor himenaeos interdum nascetur nostra hendrerit fermentum libero potenti quisque.
- Nascetur consequat auctor maximus eget netus per magnis vestibulum penatibus tellus rhoncus aenean tempus, ac imperdiet nam blandit conubia luctus inceptos adipiscing at condimentum nibh.
- Dignissim inceptos lorem dictum molestie lobortis erat massa facilisis faucibus congue, tortor fringilla ridiculus sollicitudin eget ipsum enim cubilia purus, orci magna ligula porttitor augue accumsan tincidunt magnis ullamcorper.
- Nec nibh suscipit mattis accumsan velit sagittis viverra, mauris molestie ullamcorper ante maecenas.
- Laoreet rutrum tempor cubilia dis orci class condimentum, tempus dapibus cursus penatibus malesuada pharetra hac finibus, senectus urna ac porttitor natoque sapien.
- Elit sagittis mattis leo euismod lectus urna, fermentum enim massa commodo accumsan montes vivamus, consequat fames felis egestas himenaeos.
- Penatibus tristique massa interdum quam dictumst ad eget facilisi sit himenaeos, egestas magna auctor purus pellentesque lectus leo porta pretium.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.