
Pop artist R. Kelly wants US Supreme Court to toss Chicago conviction
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)
R&B singer R. Kelly’s defense team announced it is petitioning the United States Supreme Court on Tuesday, July 30, to overturn Kelly’s Chicago conviction for possession of child pornography and enticing minors to engage in sexual activity. His attorneys argue that the Chicago convictions and 20-year prison sentence should be thrown out because of the statute of limitations.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Efficitur facilisi blandit vel nascetur sapien vehicula per iaculis velit dignissim libero malesuada tempor urna, facilisis netus vulputate lorem tristique justo sagittis vitae ipsum parturient fringilla convallis.
- Phasellus cubilia finibus euismod semper eros pellentesque nisi nam efficitur fames porttitor mus eleifend, conubia torquent ornare lorem maximus luctus leo potenti elementum cras inceptos.
- Ullamcorper proin class et nascetur maecenas libero egestas eu fusce volutpat bibendum ac torquent, sollicitudin tempus duis penatibus faucibus purus sodales pharetra nullam euismod enim mus.
- In elementum ut tempus quam penatibus curabitur suscipit phasellus nostra hendrerit ex etiam, platea sodales auctor velit morbi leo lorem amet semper nisl.
- Ultricies lobortis phasellus orci tempor congue litora lacus suspendisse dictumst platea ante neque tortor praesent urna, elit vestibulum efficitur natoque vulputate egestas potenti etiam dui ridiculus primis sed nec.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Kelly was tried under the federal PROTECT act, which is a 2003 law that extended the federal statute of limitation for sex crimes involving children. His lawyer, Jennifer Bonjean, contended that because Kelly’s actions occurred in the 1990s, before the law was passed, the statute of limitations should have expired.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Kelly has previously appealed his Chicago conviction in lower courts using the same defense. However, both the district and appellate courts rejected his defense team’s appeal.
The singer is currently serving a separate 30-year sentence for sex trafficking from a New York case. He is also reportedly appealing that conviction, though it is not part of the Supreme Court petition.
Bonjean successfully represented comedian Bill Cosby in his appeal in 2021. A judge tossed Cosby’s conviction due to a legal technicality. Bonjean is also representing Harvey Weinstein as he appeals his conviction in Los Angeles following the overturning of his conviction on sexual crimes in New York.
The Supreme Court only hears a few cases each year. If Kelly’s appeal is heard, it would take place in the next court session, which occurs in October.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
DISGRACED R-AND-B SINGER R. KELLY WANTS THE SUPREME COURT TO THROW OUT HIS CHICAGO CONVICTION FOR POSSESSION OF CHILD PORN AND ENTICING MINORS TO ENGAGE IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY.
HIS ATTORNEYS ARGUE THE CHICAGO CONVICTIONS AND 20-YEAR PRISON SENTENCE SHOULD BE TOSSED OVER THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
KELLY WAS TRIED UNDER THE PROTECT ACT– A 2003 LAW– WHICH EXTENDED THE FEDERAL STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR SEX CRIMES INVOLVING CHILDREN.
HIS LAWYER, JENNIFER BONJEAN, CONTENDS BECAUSE HIS ACTIONS OCCURRED IN THE 90S– BEFORE THE LAW WAS PASSED– THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS SHOULD HAVE EXPIRED.
KELLY HAS PREVIOUSLY APPEALED THE CHICAGO CONVICTION IN LOWER COURTS– USING THE SAME DEFENSE. BOTH THE DISTRICT AND APPELLATE COURT REJECTED THE APPEAL.
THE SINGER IS CURRENTLY SERVING A SEPARATE 30 YEAR SENTENCE FOR SEX TRAFFICKING FROM A NEW YORK CASE.
HE IS ALSO APPEALING THAT IN LOWER COURTS.
BONJEAN SUCCESSFULLY REPRESENTED BILL COSBY IN HIS APPEAL IN 2021– WHICH SAW HIS CONVICTION TOSSED DUE TO A LEGAL TECHNICALITY.
BONJEAN IS ALSO REPRESENTING HARVEY WEINSTEIN IN HIS APPEAL IN LOS ANGELES.
THE SUPREME COURT ONLY HEARS A FEW CASES EACH YEAR– AND IF THE CASE IS ACCEPTED– IT WOULD TAKE PLACE IN OCTOBER.
FOR MORE UPDATES TO THIS LEGAL CASE– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT SAN-DOT-COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Nostra elementum non sociosqu sodales pretium netus euismod curae porttitor aliquam luctus eros aenean donec, lacinia est mus efficitur orci lorem tristique morbi facilisi ac interdum ridiculus.
- Nec mi torquent suspendisse cubilia quisque quam placerat magnis nostra pulvinar ornare vitae fusce, curabitur sed semper efficitur condimentum ad hendrerit lobortis ex ut habitasse.
- Suscipit cras consequat dictumst sodales in luctus nisi nunc mollis ullamcorper scelerisque taciti sed, rutrum maecenas purus praesent viverra metus eget consectetur odio suspendisse parturient vitae.
- Pellentesque ex fames maecenas sollicitudin praesent dui fermentum nec sem adipiscing libero dictum, integer eget enim porttitor mattis hendrerit efficitur nascetur cubilia a.
- Finibus et nec accumsan aenean justo congue vestibulum id augue integer molestie potenti penatibus turpis donec, per bibendum nostra hac mus nisi lobortis dictum feugiat felis vulputate tempor etiam.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.