What is TikTok’s new wellness trend ‘sleepmaxxing’ and does it work?
By Kennedy Felton (Lifestyle Correspondent), Shea Taylor (Producer), Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor)
- As more than half of Americans claim they’re not getting enough sleep, the new TikTok wellness trend “sleepmaxxing” gains popularity. It utilizes multiple methods to assist people in achieving the longest, most restorative sleep.
- While many tactics have long been known to work, others have experts raising concerns that they may do more harm than good.
- Experts also said that this trend might result in an obsession with achieving quality sleep, which could actually make it more difficult to fall asleep.
Full story
Are you getting enough sleep? More than half of Americans said they aren’t, according to Gallup. But now, a new TikTok trend called “sleepmaxxing” aims to help people live the dream.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- "Sleepmaxxing" is a trend where people use various practices to improve sleep quality, as described by Dr. Anita Shelgikar from the University of Michigan.
- Experts note that some popular sleep optimization techniques include maintaining a cool, dark room and having a regular sleep schedule.
- Experts warn that some sleepmaxxing practices, like mouth taping, can be dangerous, especially for those with sleep apnea, according to Dr. Jag Sunderram.
- Critics warn that certain sleepmaxxing methods may be harmful, especially for individuals with sleep disorders, according to experts.
- "Sleepmaxxing" is a trend involving various practices to improve sleep quality and quantity, according to Dr. Anita Shelgikar from the University of Michigan.
- Experts state that many "sleepmaxxing" tips, like maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, are based on established sleep health practices, although some may be harmful for those with sleep disorders.
- Dr. Jag Sunderram from Rutgers University warns that focusing too much on sleep can increase stress and worsen sleep over time.
- Over 50% of Canadians reportedly struggle with sleep, highlighting the trend's relevance for public health as noted by the Canadian Sleep Society, which considers insufficient sleep duration a significant issue leading to various health risks.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
What is ‘sleepmaxxing?’
“Sleepmaxxing” utilizes tips and tricks to get longer, more restorative sleep.
Influencers on TikTok have touted several “hacks” to help people hit the hay, from tried-and-true techniques to tech trends.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
What works?
Among the popular TikTok “hacks” are tips that sleep experts have long recognized as effective, such as creating a consistent schedule and adhering to it. This means waking up and going to bed at roughly the same time each day — even on weekends.
Another suggestion is to sleep in a cool, dark and quiet room, which can help individuals wake up bright-eyed and bushy-tailed.
Experts also said limiting your screen time and exposure to bright light before bed are key. They also recommended to avoid drinking alcohol or caffeine a few hours before bedtime.
What are some popular TikTok sleep ‘hacks?’
Additionally, TikTok influencers have suggested other methods, some of which experts say could worsen sleep.
Sleep tracking apps have gained popularity through TikTok. While these apps can be a good way to monitor factors impacting rest, they can also be a distraction and negatively impact how individuals think they’ll sleep before dozing off.
Some sleep experts have recommended using weighted blankets. They said while the blankets can create a sensation of being cuddled or cocooned, they can also relax individuals to the extent that their cortisol levels — the hormone associated with stress — can fall low enough to disrupt their sleep.
Another thing TikTokers swear by for “sleepmaxxing” is red light exposure routines. Only a few studies have found an association between the practice and improved sleep. Others said it can make individuals feel more alert.
Some supplements can help people catch some shut eye, like melatonin, but using them consistently can mask a bigger sleep disorder issue that may need professional intervention.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
How can individuals get their best sleep?
The bottom line is that experts said individuals should focus on the well-known essentials for good sleep and pay close attention to what does and does not work if they try something new.
They also said spending too much time worrying about getting the perfect amount of sleep can keep people up at night.
[Kennedy Felton]
ARE YOU GETTING ENOUGH SLEEP?
MORE THAN HALF OF AMERICANS SAY THEY AREN’T – ACCORDING TO GALLUP.
BUT NOW, A NEW TIKTOK TREND CALLED ‘SLEEPMAXXING” AIMS TO HELP YOU LIVE THE DREAM.
“SLEEPMAXXING” UTILIZES TIPS AND TRICKS TO GET LONGER, MORE RESTORATIVE SLEEP.
INFLUENCERS ON TIKTOK HAVE BEEN TOUTING A NUMBER OF “HACKS” TO HELP YOU HIT THE HAY… FROM TRIED-AND-TRUE TECHNIQUES TO TECH TRENDS.
HERE’S WHAT EXPERTS SAY WE **KNOW** WORKS:
ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE AND STICKING TO IT.
THAT MEANS GETTING UP AND GOING TO BED AT AROUND THE SAME TIME EVERY DAY – EVEN ON WEEKENDS.
SLEEPING IN A COOL, DARK AND QUIET ROOM IS ALSO RECOMMENDED TO HELP YOU WAKE UP BRIGHT EYED AND BUSHY TAILED.
EXPERTS ALSO SAY LIMITING YOUR SCREEN TIME BEFORE BED IS KEY.
AND AVOID DRINKING ALCOHOL OR CAFFEINE A FEW HOURS BEFORE BEDTIME.
ON TOP OF THOSE – TIKTOK INFLUENCERS ARE ALSO SUGGESTING OTHER METHODS… SOME OF WHICH EXPERTS SAY **COULD** MAKE YOUR SLEEP WORSE…
LIKE SLEEP TRACKING APPS.
WHILE THESE APPS CAN BE A GOOD WAY TO MONITOR FACTORS IMPACTING YOUR REST… THEY CAN ALSO BE A DISTRACTION AND NEGATIVELY IMPACT HOW YOU **THINK** YOU’LL SLEEP BEFORE YOU EVEN DOZE OFF.
SOME RECOMMEND WEIGHTED BLANKETS, AND WHILE THEY **CAN** GIVE YOU THE FEELING OF BEING CUDDLED OR COCCOONED… EXPERTS SAY THEY CAN ALSO RELAX YOU SO MUCH YOUR LEVELS OF THE STRESS HORMONE CORTISOL CAN DROP LOW ENOUGH TO INTERRUPT YOUR SLEEP.
ANOTHER THING TIKTOKERS SWEAR BY FOR SLEEPMAXXNIG IS RED LIGHT EXPOSURE ROUTINES.
ONLY A FEW STUDIES HAVE FOUND AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE PRACTICE AND IMPROVED SLEEP… WHILE OTHERS SAY IT CAN MAKE YOU FEEL MORE ALERT.
THERE ARE ALSO SUPPLEMENTS THAT CAN HELP YOU CATCH SOME SHUT-EYE – LIKE MELATONIN – BUT USING THEM CONSISTENTLY CAN MASK A BIGGER SLEEP DISORDER ISSUE THAT MAY NEED PROFESSIONAL INTERVENTION.
AND IRONICALLY – SPENDING TOO MUCH TIME WORRYING ABOUT GETTING THE PERFECT AMOUNT OF SLEEP CAN ACTUALLY KEEP YOU UP AT NIGHT.
STAY UP TO DATE ON ALL YOUR LATEST HEALTH HEADLINES LIKE THIS BY DOWNLOADING THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- "Sleepmaxxing" is a trend where people use various practices to improve sleep quality, as described by Dr. Anita Shelgikar from the University of Michigan.
- Experts note that some popular sleep optimization techniques include maintaining a cool, dark room and having a regular sleep schedule.
- Experts warn that some sleepmaxxing practices, like mouth taping, can be dangerous, especially for those with sleep apnea, according to Dr. Jag Sunderram.
- Critics warn that certain sleepmaxxing methods may be harmful, especially for individuals with sleep disorders, according to experts.
- "Sleepmaxxing" is a trend involving various practices to improve sleep quality and quantity, according to Dr. Anita Shelgikar from the University of Michigan.
- Experts state that many "sleepmaxxing" tips, like maintaining a consistent sleep schedule, are based on established sleep health practices, although some may be harmful for those with sleep disorders.
- Dr. Jag Sunderram from Rutgers University warns that focusing too much on sleep can increase stress and worsen sleep over time.
- Over 50% of Canadians reportedly struggle with sleep, highlighting the trend's relevance for public health as noted by the Canadian Sleep Society, which considers insufficient sleep duration a significant issue leading to various health risks.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Border Patrol agent admits to telling women to expose breasts to get into US
By Jodie Hawkins (Senior Producer)
- A U.S. Border Patrol agent pleaded guilty to making women expose their breasts during virtual processing sessions for U.S. entry. He falsely claimed the women had tattoos on their chests, demanding they show their breasts to “confirm” the information.
- He admitted his actions were for personal gratification, not legitimate security purposes.
- He faces up to two years in prison and a fine, with sentencing scheduled for July 7.
Full Story
A U.S. Border Patrol agent in New York pleaded guilty in federal court to making women expose their breasts to get into the United States. According to the Department of Justice, 53-year-old Shane Millan admitted Friday, March 7 to willfully depriving multiple victims of their constitutional right to be free from unreasonable searches by commanding them to bare their breasts via webcam during virtual processing sessions.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Shane Millan, a former Border Patrol agent, pleaded guilty to two counts of deprivation of rights under color of law on March 7, 2025, according to court records.
- Millan demanded at least two women expose their breasts during virtual border processing hearings, threatening not to sign their paperwork if they refused.
- One woman complied with Millan's demands while her one-year-old child was present during an August 2023 interview, according to court records.
- Millan faces up to two years in prison and a $200,000 fine, with sentencing scheduled for July 7, 2025, as announced by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of New York.
- A former United States Border Patrol agent, Shane Millan, pleaded guilty to two counts of deprivation of rights under color of law on March 7, 2025, as stated by the U.S. Attorney's Office.
- Millan was accused of making women expose their breasts during virtual immigration processing, which were deemed violations of women's constitutional rights to be free from unreasonable searches, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
- During a virtual processing session on August 10, 2023, Millan falsely claimed a woman had a tattoo on her chest and ordered her to show him.
- Millan falsely claimed that requests for women to expose themselves were legitimate searches, but admitted they were for his own gratification.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Right
What did the victims say happened?
In one instance on Aug. 10, 2023, Millan was processing paperwork for a woman when he falsely claimed her file said she had a tattoo on her chest. The woman responded she did not have a tattoo on her chest, but Millan ordered her to show him.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
After she did it once, Millan ordered her to do it again toward the end of the call to confirm there was no tattoo and told her he would not sign the paperwork unless she did, according to court documents.
On Aug. 25, 2023, Millan interviewed another woman via webcam demanding the same thing, after he told her husband and children to leave the room.
What did Millan admit in his guilty plea?
Millan admitted he told the women that his requests were for legitimate searches incident to admission into the United States, but he knew his demands to see the victims’ breasts were for his own gratification.
Millan is scheduled to be sentenced on July 7. He faces up to two years in prison and a fine of up to $200,000
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Shane Millan, a former Border Patrol agent, pleaded guilty to two counts of deprivation of rights under color of law on March 7, 2025, according to court records.
- Millan demanded at least two women expose their breasts during virtual border processing hearings, threatening not to sign their paperwork if they refused.
- One woman complied with Millan's demands while her one-year-old child was present during an August 2023 interview, according to court records.
- Millan faces up to two years in prison and a $200,000 fine, with sentencing scheduled for July 7, 2025, as announced by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of New York.
- A former United States Border Patrol agent, Shane Millan, pleaded guilty to two counts of deprivation of rights under color of law on March 7, 2025, as stated by the U.S. Attorney's Office.
- Millan was accused of making women expose their breasts during virtual immigration processing, which were deemed violations of women's constitutional rights to be free from unreasonable searches, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
- During a virtual processing session on August 10, 2023, Millan falsely claimed a woman had a tattoo on her chest and ordered her to show him.
- Millan falsely claimed that requests for women to expose themselves were legitimate searches, but admitted they were for his own gratification.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Right
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
AOC, Luna team up to cap credit card interest rates at 10%
By Ray Bogan (Political Correspondent), Snorre Wik (Photographer/Video Editor)
- Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Anna Paulina Luna introduced a bill that, if passed, would cap credit card interest rates at 10% nationwide. The bill would allow individuals to sue if they’re charged a higher rate.
- President Trump promised to cut rates during his campaign. Sens. Josh Hawley and Bernie Sanders introduced the same bill in the Senate.
- The average credit card interest rate is 21.47%, according to WalletHub.
Full Story
One of President Donald Trump’s biggest supporters and the face of the progressive movement have teamed up in an effort to cut credit card interest rates in half. Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., introduced a bill that, if passed, would cap credit card interest rates at 10% nationwide.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Adipiscing finibus efficitur lobortis ipsum lorem phasellus cras egestas molestie tristique luctus, lacinia pellentesque litora elit rhoncus rutrum vulputate nunc nam duis porttitor, dapibus tempus tortor ridiculus facilisi quam dolor imperdiet purus eu.
- Congue eros lacus rutrum platea porttitor fusce natoque tortor curae sagittis vulputate tempus montes dapibus torquent, nam a lacinia dis nibh commodo consequat et praesent in luctus netus hac risus.
- Luctus libero himenaeos feugiat mattis efficitur duis fames lorem amet, posuere parturient tempor per nam aenean accumsan iaculis.
- Cubilia condimentum quisque adipiscing hac netus porttitor nam pharetra dui ut ac, commodo mattis fermentum etiam ad duis curabitur luctus mi sagittis.
- Neque condimentum hendrerit congue quisque habitasse pharetra posuere nulla risus ultrices a porttitor velit litora, orci class fermentum ex dictumst cras torquent tortor quis eleifend sagittis sapien mollis.
- Pellentesque sapien dapibus auctor venenatis condimentum consequat purus lacus taciti eros, commodo arcu torquent curae iaculis magna a suscipit felis, mi odio in dui nisi placerat hac lectus lorem.
Bias Distribution
Left
Left
Untracked Bias
What are lawmakers saying about the legislation?
“For too long, credit card companies have abused working-class Americans with absurd interest rates, trapping them in an almost insurmountable amount of debt,” Luna said in a statement. “We need a fair solution — and that means getting rid of the status quo and putting a reasonable cap on interest rates.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“Credit cards with high interest rates regularly trap working people in endless cycles of debt,” Ocasio-Cortez said about the legislation. “At a time when families are struggling to make ends meet, we cannot allow big banks to shake down our communities for profit.”
Credit card interest rates have become a bipartisan cause for concern over the last few years. Trump promised to cut rates in September 2024 while campaigning.
“While working Americans catch up, we’re going to put a temporary cap on credit card interest rates at 10%; we have no choice,” Trump said. “Because they can’t afford to pay off their credit card.”
Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., introduced the same bill in February.
“When large financial institutions charge over 25% interest on credit cards, they are not engaged in the business of making credit available,” Sanders said. “They are engaged in extortion and loan sharking.”
What is the credit card industry’s response?
The Consumer Bankers Association, which represents credit card companies, said price-setting has been proven to harm Americans.
It said individuals who lose access to bank credit are often forced to use even riskier lending methods like payday loans which can charge and an annual percentage rate of 300% or more.
“Research clearly shows that when politicians, rather than the free market, dictate prices, consumers ultimately pay the price through limited choices outside the well-regulated banking system,” CBA CEO Lindsey Johnson stated.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What does the bill actually do?
The bill allows individuals to sue credit card companies if they’re charged more than 10% so they can receive a full refund of the difference.
The average credit card interest rate is 21.47%, according to WalletHub. That’s lower than the record 22.8% set in 2023 but nearly double 2013, when the rate was just 12.9%.
In the final months of 2024, Americans held $1.2 trillion in credit card debt.
[Ray Bogan]
One of President Trump’s biggest supporters and the face of the progressive movement have teamed up in an effort to cut credit card interest rates in half.
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., introduced a bill that, if passed, would cap credit card interest rates at 10% nationwide.
The pair say credit card companies have abused working class Americans by trapping them in an endless cycle of debt. The bill allows individuals to sue credit card companies if they’re charged more than 10% to receive a full refund of the difference.
The average credit card interest rate is 21.47%, according to WalletHub. That’s lower than the record 22.8% set in 2023 but nearly double 2013 when the rate was 12.9%.
In the final months of 2024, Americans held $1.2 trillion in credit card debt.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Conubia praesent curae ullamcorper lectus curabitur tortor nullam netus posuere at ipsum, porta dictum lorem egestas litora hac adipiscing auctor torquent feugiat euismod, pretium risus iaculis placerat tellus hendrerit turpis molestie pellentesque convallis.
- Interdum cursus donec hac facilisi euismod nunc a iaculis phasellus sem adipiscing risus aptent pretium finibus, torquent leo porta imperdiet semper fermentum ultrices arcu eget ornare ipsum quis laoreet senectus.
- Ipsum in ridiculus habitant ad curae feugiat porttitor curabitur sapien, mollis bibendum condimentum dignissim torquent ante volutpat id.
- Gravida elementum fringilla conubia laoreet quis euismod torquent rhoncus maximus duis viverra, fermentum ad ac aenean justo feugiat inceptos ipsum neque sem.
- Commodo elementum nisi interdum fringilla ut rhoncus mollis consectetur senectus scelerisque leo euismod dis lorem, pulvinar urna ac eros quisque nullam finibus iaculis felis magna sem amet suscipit.
- Dictum amet pretium enim accumsan elementum ultrices pellentesque donec dui cursus, fermentum malesuada finibus phasellus id taciti leo odio sagittis, neque proin ornare maximus platea tincidunt laoreet mattis curabitur.
Bias Distribution
Left
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

China, Russia and Iran show off naval abilities with joint drills in Gulf of Oman
By William Jackson (Producer), Ali Caldwell (Motion Graphic Designer)
- China, Russia and Iran are strengthening military ties through joint naval drills, seeking to enhance regional security cooperation. The exercises demonstrate growing coordination among the three nations in strategic waters.
- The drills, dubbed “Security Belt-2025,” involve simulated maritime attacks, joint search and rescue operations and vessel inspections near Iran’s Chabahar port.
- Observers from multiple nations monitor the exercises, highlighting evolving security dynamics and potential implications for global trade and regional stability.
Full Story
China, Russia and Iran have launched joint naval drills near the Iranian port of Chabahar on the Gulf of Oman to strengthen military cooperation and regional security.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- The navies of Iran, Russia and China began joint military drills in the Gulf of Oman to enhance military cooperation, according to Iranian media.
- These exercises will involve 15 combat ships and various operations, as stated by Russia's Defense Ministry.
- China is participating with a guided-missile destroyer and a supply ship, according to the Chinese Defense Ministry's statement.
- The joint exercises aim to strengthen ties among the three nations amid rising tensions with the U.S., analysts report.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Joint naval drills involving Iran, Russia and China will begin on March 10 in Chabahar, Iran, as reported by Iran's Tasnim news agency.
- The drills will include maritime training such as damage control and joint search and rescue operations, according to China's Defense Ministry.
- The People's Liberation Army will send the destroyer Baotou and the resupply ship Gaoyouhu to participate in the exercises.
- The exercises aim to enhance military trust and foster cooperation among the participating nations' armed forces, according to China's Defense Ministry.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The “Security Belt-2025” exercises include simulated maritime attacks, joint search and rescue drills and vessel inspections.

China’s defense ministry says that Beijing deployed the Type 052D guided-missile destroyer Baotou and the supply ship Gaoyouhu from the 47th naval escort task force. The drills also include warships from Iran’s conventional navy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Russian naval forces.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Why does this location matter?
The Gulf of Oman is a critical trade route and a key passage for global oil and gas shipments. Conducting naval exercises in these waters increases the military presence of China, Russia and Iran in a region closely monitored by Western powers.

Iranian state media reported that observers from several nations, including Azerbaijan, South Africa, Oman, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Qatar, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates and Sri Lanka are monitoring the drills.
What is driving closer military ties?
China, Russia and Iran have conducted similar naval exercises in recent years, including 2023 and 2024. The latest drills reflect ongoing security coordination among the three nations.
In January, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed an agreement expanding trade and military cooperation.
Meanwhile, U.S. relations with Russia and Iran remain strained. Washington continues to pressure Tehran over its nuclear program, while Russia remains engaged in its war in Ukraine. These exercises coincide with broader shifts in international security alliances.
How does this affect global security?
The naval drills highlight evolving security dynamics. Russia has deepened its military and economic ties with China and Iran, while all three nations continue to assert their presence in key strategic regions.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
While Moscow and Tehran have not disclosed which of their fleets are participating, Russian ships from the Pacific Fleet conducted artillery drills in the eastern Indian Ocean earlier this month.
Military forces from these nations operating in a key maritime corridor raise questions about regional security and global trade stability.
As China, Russia and Iran expand their military coordination, their naval activities in strategic waterways continue to develop. The long-term implications of these exercises remain uncertain.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- The navies of Iran, Russia and China began joint military drills in the Gulf of Oman to enhance military cooperation, according to Iranian media.
- These exercises will involve 15 combat ships and various operations, as stated by Russia's Defense Ministry.
- China is participating with a guided-missile destroyer and a supply ship, according to the Chinese Defense Ministry's statement.
- The joint exercises aim to strengthen ties among the three nations amid rising tensions with the U.S., analysts report.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- Joint naval drills involving Iran, Russia and China will begin on March 10 in Chabahar, Iran, as reported by Iran's Tasnim news agency.
- The drills will include maritime training such as damage control and joint search and rescue operations, according to China's Defense Ministry.
- The People's Liberation Army will send the destroyer Baotou and the resupply ship Gaoyouhu to participate in the exercises.
- The exercises aim to enhance military trust and foster cooperation among the participating nations' armed forces, according to China's Defense Ministry.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Stock market continues its dive as Trump leaves recession on the table
By Simone Del Rosario (Business Correspondent), Brent Jabbour (Senior Producer), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor)
- The Dow tumbled nearly 900 points and the Nasdaq just had its worst trading day since 2022 as stocks roiled Monday, March 10.
- President Donald Trump declined to rule out an upcoming recession during an interview that aired Sunday. The comments come as the stock market was already sinking with uncertainty over the administration’s tariff policies.
- U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick firmly wrote off the chance of a recession.
Full Story
President Donald Trump declined to rule out the possibility of a recession in the next 12 months. His comments came during an interview with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo on “Sunday Morning Futures,” on Sunday, March 9.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Stocks dropped as investors worried about an economic slowdown after President Donald Trump suggested a potential recession due to tariffs.
- The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 325 points, or 8%, while both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite reached their lowest levels since September 2024.
- Consumer confidence decreased, with a New York Federal Reserve survey showing rising concerns about paying bills and inflation expectations increasing to 3.1%.
- Trump stated that the economy is in a "period of transition" and acknowledged a one in five chance of recession over the next year.
- Wall Street's sell-off is worsening as worries about the economy and President Donald Trump's tariffs deepen, with the S&P 500 down 1.9% in morning trading.
- The S&P 500 is now 7.8% below its all-time high from February 19, following a stretch of market volatility attributed to tariffs.
- Nvidia's stock fell 4%, bringing its year-to-date loss to 19.5%.
- Trump expressed uncertainty about a potential recession in 2025.
- U.S. Stock futures are down after President Donald Trump stated he dislikes predicting a recession in 2025, mentioning a one-in-five chance while discussing economic changes.
- The S&P 500 index dropped 2.1% and is down 8% from its all-time high set on February 19.
- Goldman Sachs economist David Mericle has lowered his growth forecast to 1.7% for 2025, citing increased tariffs as a key factor.
- Investors are moving into U.S. Treasury bonds amid falling stock prices, causing yields to drop as concerns about the economy mount.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
“I hate to predict things like that,” he said in response to a question from Bartiromo about whether there would be a recession. “There is a period of transition because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America. That’s a big thing. It takes a little time.”
But some in the Trump administration are more definitive when it comes to questions about a recession.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“Donald Trump is a winner; he’s going to win for the American people,” Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday, March 9. “That’s just the way it’s going to be. There’s going to be no recession in America.”
Stock market sinks on Trump’s comments, tariff developments
All three major stock market indexes sank on Monday, March 10, as investors are rattled about what the future holds regarding tariffs.
The Nasdaq had its worst day since 2022, dropping 4% in a single day. The S&P 500 dropped 2.7%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell nearly 900 points, closing about 2.1% down.
In February 2025, Trump announced he would impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada. He later delayed the levies for a month.
The tariffs on Mexico and Canada took effect on Tuesday, March 4, but by Wednesday, March 5, the president offered relief for American automakers for 30 days. By the end of the week, Trump put a hold on tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement until April 2025.
A recent survey of economists from the U.S., Canada and Mexico by Reuters found 70 of the 74 polled said the risk of recession in their economies has increased.
“I wanted to help Mexico and Canada to a certain extent. We’re a big, big country, and they do a lot of their business with us, whereas in our case, it’s much less significant,” Trump said in the Sunday interview. “And I wanted to help the American car makers until April 2.”
Election gains wiped from the board
Markets have been reeling in recent weeks as investors worry about the impact the president’s tariffs could have on U.S. consumers and the economy as a whole. During the week of March 3, the S&P 500 and tech-heavy Nasdaq each lost more than 3%. Meanwhile, the Dow fell 2.4%.
Markets surged after Trump won the election in November. As of Monday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq have given up all of those gains and are now below where they were on Election Day.
“What I have to do is build a strong country. You can’t really watch the stock market,” Trump said of recent swings in equity markets. “If you look at China, they have [a] 100-year perspective. We go by quarters.”
How to determine a recession
Traditionally, the U.S. enters a recession if it faces two consecutive quarters of declining economic activity. At this time, the U.S. is nowhere close to that. The economy grew at an annual rate of more than 2% last quarter.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
But two consecutive quarters of economic contraction doesn’t necessarily signify a recession these days. A group of eight economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research are tasked with taking a more nuanced approach to declaring an official recession. The experts who make the decision say a recession “involves a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months.”
News Coverage:
“Equity futures down into the red after stocks posted their worst week since September.”
“President Donald Trump’s sending markets on a roller coaster ride amid his policy changes, especially trade policy.”
Simone Del Rosario:
Markets continued to fall on Monday as President Donald Trump declined to rule out a recession during an interview with Fox Business.
Question: Are you expecting a recession this year?
President Donald Trump: I hate to predict things like that. There is a period of transition because what we’re doing is very big. We’re bringing wealth back to America. That’s a big thing. And there are always periods of, it takes a little time. It takes a little time.
Simone Del Rosario:
His commerce secretary was more definitive in his comments.
Question: Should Americans brace for a recession?
Howard Lutnick: Absolutely not. Anybody that bets against Donald Trump, it’s like the same people that thought Donald Trump wasn’t going to win a year ago. Donald Trump is a winner, he’s going to win for the American People. That’s just the way it’s going to be. There’s going to be no recession in America.
Simone Del Rosario:
Markets have been reeling in recent weeks as investors worry about the impact the president’s tariffs could have on U.S. consumers and the economy as a whole. The extent of the tariffs continues to take shape.
Last month, Trump announced he would impose 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada. He then delayed the levies for a month, taking effect Tuesday of last week. On Wednesday, he offered tariff relief for American automakers for 30 days. By the end of the week, Trump put a hold on tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada covered by the USMCA until next month.
Donald Trump:
I wanted to help Mexico and Canada, to a certain extent, we’re a big, big country, and they do a lot of their business with us, whereas in our case, it’s much less significant. We do very little with Canada by comparison, and I wanted to help the American car makers until April 2. April 2. It becomes all reciprocal. What they charge us, we charge them.
Simone Del Rosario:
Last week, the S&P 500 (-3.1%) and tech-heavy Nasdaq (-3.5%) each lost more than 3%. Meanwhile, the Dow went down 2.4%.
Markets went on a bit of tear after President Trump won the election in November. As of Monday, the S&P 500 and NASDAQ have given up all of those gains and are now below the level seen on Election Day.
Donald Trump:
Look, what I have to do is build a strong country. You can’t really watch the stock market. If you look at China, they have 100 year perspective. We have a quarter. We go by quarters. That’s true, and you can’t go by that.
Simone Del Rosario:
No matter how much the stock market struggles, it doesn’t necessarily mean a recession is in the works. Traditionally, the U.S. enters a recession if it faces two consecutive quarters of declining economic activity. At this time, we’re nowhere close to that. The economy grew at an annual rate of more than 2% last quarter.
But really, even two quarters of decline doesn’t always cut it. A group of eight economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research are tasked with taking a more nuanced approach to declaring an official recession. The folks who make that decision say a recession “involves a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months.”
Currently, you’re not seeing that full-throated warning that a downturn is in the offing.
Some headlines point to concerns…
Newsweek cites economists being “increasingly worried” about a recession. CNBC writes economists see the president as “an agency of chaos and confusion” but don’t see a recession as inevitable yet.
But even if there is that full-throated warning, that alone does not spell recession. Remember that in 2022, and again in 2023, many economists fully expected the U.S. to enter a recession that never happened.
So if the stock market can’t tell you, and the headlines can’t tell you, what about the music? Search “recession pop” at SAN.com or the SAN app for this unconventional recession clue.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Stocks dropped as investors worried about an economic slowdown after President Donald Trump suggested a potential recession due to tariffs.
- The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 325 points, or 8%, while both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite reached their lowest levels since September 2024.
- Consumer confidence decreased, with a New York Federal Reserve survey showing rising concerns about paying bills and inflation expectations increasing to 3.1%.
- Trump stated that the economy is in a "period of transition" and acknowledged a one in five chance of recession over the next year.
- Wall Street's sell-off is worsening as worries about the economy and President Donald Trump's tariffs deepen, with the S&P 500 down 1.9% in morning trading.
- The S&P 500 is now 7.8% below its all-time high from February 19, following a stretch of market volatility attributed to tariffs.
- Nvidia's stock fell 4%, bringing its year-to-date loss to 19.5%.
- Trump expressed uncertainty about a potential recession in 2025.
- U.S. Stock futures are down after President Donald Trump stated he dislikes predicting a recession in 2025, mentioning a one-in-five chance while discussing economic changes.
- The S&P 500 index dropped 2.1% and is down 8% from its all-time high set on February 19.
- Goldman Sachs economist David Mericle has lowered his growth forecast to 1.7% for 2025, citing increased tariffs as a key factor.
- Investors are moving into U.S. Treasury bonds amid falling stock prices, causing yields to drop as concerns about the economy mount.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Trump says Ukraine ‘may not survive’ war against Russia even with US support
Published UpdatedBy Ryan Robertson (Anchor), Jodie Hawkins (Senior Producer)
- President Donald Trump has mostly lifted the freeze on U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine. He said he hopes for progress during peace talks with Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia.
- The U.S. had previously stopped sharing some intelligence with Ukraine after a meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy turned negative.
- Sen. Lindsey Graham expressed concerns about suspending aid to Ukraine, warning that cutting support could result in worse consequences than the Afghanistan withdrawal.
Full Story
President Donald Trump said he largely lifted the freeze on U.S. intelligence sharing with Ukraine as he looks to broker a peace deal between Kyiv and Moscow. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One Sunday, March 9, the suspension on intel sharing is mostly over.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Orci metus per gravida inceptos ad adipiscing praesent dictum, nostra scelerisque dictumst eros pulvinar sit condimentum platea, penatibus morbi nibh nisi augue in habitasse.
- Vulputate sem odio morbi erat ultricies hendrerit quis libero elementum sodales, porta tristique dictum rhoncus a inceptos nam et.
- Arcu dolor dui at venenatis dictum imperdiet molestie malesuada sociosqu platea netus lectus rutrum, sapien tempor erat aptent mattis hendrerit cras vel nascetur a hac ac.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
The president added he expects a lot of progress during the talks with Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia, which begin on Tuesday, March 11.
“We want to do anything we can to get Ukraine to be serious about getting something done,” Trump said.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Why did the U.S. stop providing intelligence to Ukraine?
The U.S. stopped providing Ukraine some intelligence that was helping its military target Russian forces. The suspension came after a meeting at the White House between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took a negative turn.
A barrage of missile attacks, some on civilian targets, by Russia in recent days prompted questions over Trump’s decision to limit assistance.
Trump acknowledged the toll of recent fighting. However, in an interview with Fox News Sunday, he said Ukraine might not be able to survive against Russia even if the U.S. went ahead with full-blown support.
“Are you comfortable with that? The fact that you walked away and Ukraine may not survive,” journalist Maria Bartiromo asked Trump.
“It may not survive anyway,” Trump replied.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he’s worried about the consequences of suspending aid and intelligence sharing to Ukraine as the fighting continues against Russia.
“If we pull the plug on Ukraine, it’d be worse than Afghanistan,” Graham said. “I don’t think President Trump has any desire to do that, but until we have a ceasefire, I would give Ukraine what they need in terms of intelligence and weapons to themselves.”
Graham criticized the way Zelenskyy handled himself in the Oval Office meeting with President Trump and Vice President JD Vance.
Zelenskyy was pressing the American leaders on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s history of breaking ceasefire agreements. Zelenskyy’s comments prompted Trump and Vance to accuse the embattled leader of being ungrateful for U.S. support.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What happens next?
U.S. and Ukrainian officials are preparing to meet on Tuesday in Saudi Arabia. The groups will try to restore diplomatic ties during the meetings. This includes trying to restore the possibility of a minerals deal Zelenskyy and Trump were supposed to sign directly after their White House meeting.
[Ryan]
PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP SAYS HE LARGELY LIFTED THE FREEZE ON U-S INTELLIGENCE SHARING WITH UKRAINE AS HE LOOKS TO BROKER A PEACE DEAL BETWEEN KYIV AND MOSCOW.
TRUMP TOLD REPORTERS ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE SUNDAY THE SUSPENSION ON INTEL SHARING IS MOSTLY OVER– … ADDING HE EXPECTS A LOT OF PROGRESS DURING THE TALKS WITH UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS IN SAUDIA ARABIA THIS WEEK.
THE U-S STOPPED PROVIDING UKRAINE SOME INTELLIGENCE THAT WAS HELPING ITS MILITARY TARGET RUSSIAN FORCES. THE SUSPENSION CAME AFTER A MEETING AT THE WHITE HOUSE BETWEEN TRUMP AND UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY TURNED SOUR
A BARRAGE OF MISSILE ATTACKS, SOME ON CIVILIAN TARGETS, BY RUSSIA IN RECENT DAYS PROMPTED QUESTIONS OVER TRUMP’S DECISION TO LIMIT ASSISTANCE.
TRUMP ACKNOWLEDGED THE TOLL OF RECENT FIGHTING, BUT IN AN INTERVIEW WITH FOX NEWS SUNDAY, HE SAID UKRAINE MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO SURVIVE AGAINST RUSSIA EVEN IF THE U-S WENT AHEAD WITH FULL-BLOWN SUPPORT.
are you comfortable with that? The fact that you walked away and Ukraine may not survive. It may not survive anyway.
SENATOR LINDSEY GRAHAM ISAYS HE’S WORRIED ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUSPENDING AID AND INTELLIGENCE SHARING TO UKRAINE AS THE FIGHTING CONTINUES AGAINST RUSSIA.
If we pull the plug on Ukraine, it’d be worse than Afghanistan. I don’t think President Trump has any desire to do that … But until we have a ceasefire, I would give Ukraine what they need in terms of intelligence and weapons to themselves.
GRAHAM CRITICIZED THE WAY ZELENSKYY HANDLED HIMSELF IN THE OVAL OFFICE MEETING WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP AND VICE PRESIDENT VANCE.
AS WE REPORTED EARLIER, ZELENSKYY WAS PRESSING THE AMERICAN LEADERS ON RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN’S HISTORY OF BREAKING CEASEFIRE AGREEMENTS … WHICH PROMPTED TRUMP AND AND VANCE TO ACCUSE THE EMBATTLED LEADER OF BEING UNGRATEFUL FOR U-S SUPPORT.
I’m talking about the kind of diplomacy that’s going to end the destruction of your country. i think it’s disrespectful for you to come to the oval office to try to litigate this in front of the American media.
U-S AND UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS ARE PREPARING TO MEET THIS WEEK IN SAUDI ARABIA IN AN EFFORT TO RESTORE DIPLOMATIC TIES, INCLUDING THE POSSIBLE RESURRECTION OF A MINERALS DEAL ZELENSKYY AND TRUMP WERE SUPPOSED TO SIGN DIRECTLY AFTER THEIR WHITE HOUSE MEETING.
FOR MORE UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING LIKE THIS DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY,
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Justo sit nisi nostra accumsan arcu integer dolor curae, pharetra litora duis vehicula porttitor mauris adipiscing natoque, phasellus aenean tortor faucibus fermentum eros ad.
- Ac pellentesque inceptos aenean pulvinar vitae in venenatis auctor vestibulum commodo, malesuada id curae ornare euismod accumsan eu vel.
- Sem vivamus ut turpis torquent curae metus odio est donec natoque leo nulla pretium, eget elementum pulvinar lacus tempor in maecenas amet cras euismod congue himenaeos.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Russian drones are rewriting the battle for Kursk, Ukraine’s grip weakens
By Ryan Robertson (Anchor), William Jackson (Producer), Shianne DeLeon (Video Editor)
- Russian forces intensified pressure on Ukrainian positions in Kursk, leveraging cutting-edge drones and foreign troops to challenge Ukraine’s control. This escalation threatens to reverse Ukraine’s recent gains and undermine its hold on the strategic region.
- Russia’s Rubicon Center uses sophisticated drone tactics to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses, targeting supply routes and bypassing countermeasures.
- Ukraine dominates drone warfare in Donetsk, pinning down Russian troops, but struggles to counter Russia’s drones in Kursk, highlighting a growing gap in electronic warfare.
Full Story
Russian forces are tightening their grip on the Ukrainian-held area in western Russia’s Kursk region, deploying advanced drone units and North Korean troops alongside marines and paratroopers. The push threatened Ukraine’s hold on Sudzha, a key military base, reversing gains made in February 2025, just as the U.S. cut off intelligence sharing and weapons shipments to Kyiv.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Russia stated that its troops have retaken Viktorovka, Nikolayevka and Staraya Sorochina from Ukrainian control, amid a loss of territory for Ukraine in the Kursk region.
- Ukrainian activist Sergiy Sternenko noted that the logistics situation in the Kursk region is critically deteriorating, with routes under enemy fire control.
- At least 20 people have died in Russian strikes, including reported casualties in towns such as Dobropillya and Kharkiv during recent attacks.
- According to DeepState, the situation worsened for Ukrainian forces after a breach in their defense lines near Sudzha, which is currently under Kyiv's control.
- Thousands of Ukrainian troops in Russia's Kursk region are nearly surrounded by Russian forces, marking a significant setback for Kyiv, which aimed to leverage its presence in peace talks.
- Open source maps show that around three-quarters of the Ukrainian force have been almost encircled by Russian advances, cutting supply lines.
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that the incursion was intended to divert Russian resources and create a bargaining chip for future peace discussions.
- Military analysts report that if Ukrainian forces do not restore the situation quickly, the Kursk salient may close into an encircled pocket, leading to a difficult retreat.
- Ukrainian troops in Kursk are nearly encircled by Russian forces and cut off from main supply lines, according to open source maps on March 7.
- The situation for Ukraine has deteriorated sharply in three days, with Russian forces retaking territory and nearly cutting the Ukrainian force in two.
- Military analyst Pasi Paroinen stated that Ukrainian forces face the risk of encirclement or a dangerous retreat back into Ukraine.
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the operation aimed to relieve pressure on defenders by forcing Russia to divert resources.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The Kremlin’s Rubicon Center of Advanced Unmanned Systems is leading the assault, using sophisticated drone tactics to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses. These drones target supply routes, strike multiple vehicles simultaneously, and function as mobile landmines — detonating under passing convoys.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Unlike other Russian units struggling against Ukraine’s jamming technology, Rubicon’s drones rapidly switch frequencies, allowing them to bypass Ukrainian countermeasures. Ukrainian forces already lost hundreds of vehicles, including Bradley fighting vehicles and armored transport trucks, forcing them into a more defensive posture.
Why is Ukraine struggling to counter Russia’s drone tactics in Kursk?
In Kursk, the advantage remains with Russia. Without effective countermeasures against Rubicon’s drones, Ukrainian troops face a growing challenge in holding their ground.
Ukrainian fighter jets have bombed Russian supply depots and troops have repelled incursions. However, experts warn that without significant improvements in jamming technology, Kursk may become increasingly difficult to defend.
How does Ukraine’s drone strategy compare in Donetsk?
While Russia holds the advantage in Kursk, the situation is starkly different in Donetsk. Ukrainian forces are establishing a strong drone presence, pinning down Russian troops who recently captured Chasiv Yar.
Russian forces report constant waves of Ukrainian FPV drones striking any movement, while supply convoys and armored vehicles struggle to reach the front lines.
Ukrainian forces deployed road-cutting drones to disrupt Russian logistics and are actively hunting enemy UAV teams before they can launch attacks.
Why is Ukraine’s jamming technology more effective in Donetsk?
The effectiveness of Ukraine’s jamming technology in Donetsk is frustrating Russian forces, who complain that their electronic warfare systems cover less than half the frequencies Ukraine uses.
Moscow sent new jammers to the front lines, but they have proven ineffective against Kyiv’s adaptive tactics.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
What does this mean for the future of the war?
Drone warfare is reshaping the battlefield across Ukraine. While Kyiv dominates the skies over Donetsk, Russia’s drone surge in Kursk is forcing Ukraine to adapt or risk losing its foothold in the region.
Ukraine’s air dominance in Donetsk stalled Russia’s advance, but the growing drone threat in Kursk could tip the balance unless Kyiv closes the gap in electronic warfare.
[Ryan Robertson]
RUSSIAN FORCES ARE TIGHTENING THEIR GRIP AROUND KURSK, THE UKRAINIAN-HELD AREA IN WESTERN RUSSIA THE NEWS COMES JUST AS THE U-S CUT OFF INTELLIGENCE SHARING AND WEAPONS SHIPMENTS TO KYIV.
RUSSIA IS DEPLOYING ADVANCED DRONE UNITS AND NORTH KOREAN TROOPS ALONGSIDE MARINES AND PARATROOPERS. THE PUSH THREATENS UKRAINE’S HOLD ON SUDZHA, A KEY MILITARY BASE, REVERSING GAINS MADE LAST MONTH
LEADING THE ASSAULT IS THE KREMLIN’S RUBICON CENTER OF ADVANCED UNMANNED SYSTEMS, USING SOPHISTICATED DRONE TACTICS TO OVERWHELM UKRAINIAN DEFENSES.
THESE DRONES TARGET SUPPLY ROUTES, STRIKE MULTIPLE VEHICLES SIMULTANEOUSLY, AND EVEN FUNCTION AS MOBILE LANDMINES—LANDING AND DETONATING UNDER PASSING CONVOYS.
UNLIKE OTHER RUSSIAN UNITS STRUGGLING AGAINST UKRAINE’S JAMMING TECHNOLOGY, RUBICON’S DRONES CAN RAPIDLY SWITCH FREQUENCIES, KEEPING THEM OPERATIONAL. UKRAINIAN FORCES HAVE ALREADY LOST HUNDREDS OF VEHICLES, INCLUDING BRADLEY INFANTRY FIGHTING VEHICLES AND ARMORED TRANSPORT TRUCKS, FORCING THEM INTO EVEN MORE OF A DEFENSIVE POSTURE.
IN KURSK, THE ADVANTAGE REMAINS WITH RUSSIA. UKRAINIAN FIGHTER JETS BOMBED RUSSIAN SUPPLY DEPOTS, AND TROOPS ON THE GROUND REPELLED INCURSIONS, BUT HOLDING THE REGION MAY BECOME INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT.
STILL WHILE RUSSIA HOLDS THE UPPER HAND IN KURSK, THE SITUATION IS STARKLY DIFFERENT IN DONETSK.
THERE, UKRAINE DOMINATES THE AIRSPACE, PINNING DOWN RUSSIAN TROOPS WHO RECENTLY CAPTURED CHASIV YAR. RUSSIAN FORCES REPORT CONSTANT WAVES OF UKRAINIAN FPV DRONES STRIKING ANY MOVEMENT, WHILE SUPPLY CONVOYS AND ARMORED VEHICLES STRUGGLE TO REACH THE FRONT LINES. UKRAINIAN FORCES DEPLOYED ROAD-CUTTING DRONES TO DISRUPT RUSSIAN LOGISTICS AND ARE SYSTEMATICALLY TARGETING ENEMY UAV TEAMS BEFORE THEY CAN LAUNCH ATTACKS.
UKRAINE’S SIGNAL JAMMING TECHNOLOGY IS ALSO FRUSTRATING RUSSIAN FORCES, WHO COMPLAIN THEIR ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSTEMS COVER LESS THAN HALF THE FREQUENCIES KYIV USES. MOSCOW SENT NEW JAMMERS TO THE FRONT LINES, BUT SO FAR, THEY HAVE PROVEN INEFFECTIVE AGAINST UKRAINE’S ADAPTIVE TACTICS.
IN RESPONSE, RUSSIA IS RELYING MORE ON DRONES LINKED TO OPERATORS VIA FIBER OPTIC CABLE…BUT THAT TACTIC CAN ALSO EXPOSE THE PILOT’S LOCATION TO ENEMY ATTACK.
FURTHER PROOF DRONE WARFARE IS RESHAPING THE BATTLEFIELD, FORCING BOTH SIDES TO ADAPT IN REAL TIME.
FOR MORE OF OUR UNBIASED, STRAIGHT FACT REPORTING – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP TODAY, OR LOG ON TO SAN.COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Russia stated that its troops have retaken Viktorovka, Nikolayevka and Staraya Sorochina from Ukrainian control, amid a loss of territory for Ukraine in the Kursk region.
- Ukrainian activist Sergiy Sternenko noted that the logistics situation in the Kursk region is critically deteriorating, with routes under enemy fire control.
- At least 20 people have died in Russian strikes, including reported casualties in towns such as Dobropillya and Kharkiv during recent attacks.
- According to DeepState, the situation worsened for Ukrainian forces after a breach in their defense lines near Sudzha, which is currently under Kyiv's control.
- Thousands of Ukrainian troops in Russia's Kursk region are nearly surrounded by Russian forces, marking a significant setback for Kyiv, which aimed to leverage its presence in peace talks.
- Open source maps show that around three-quarters of the Ukrainian force have been almost encircled by Russian advances, cutting supply lines.
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy stated that the incursion was intended to divert Russian resources and create a bargaining chip for future peace discussions.
- Military analysts report that if Ukrainian forces do not restore the situation quickly, the Kursk salient may close into an encircled pocket, leading to a difficult retreat.
- Ukrainian troops in Kursk are nearly encircled by Russian forces and cut off from main supply lines, according to open source maps on March 7.
- The situation for Ukraine has deteriorated sharply in three days, with Russian forces retaking territory and nearly cutting the Ukrainian force in two.
- Military analyst Pasi Paroinen stated that Ukrainian forces face the risk of encirclement or a dangerous retreat back into Ukraine.
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the operation aimed to relieve pressure on defenders by forcing Russia to divert resources.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Missouri wins $24 billion lawsuit against Beijing over hoarding of PPE
By Kennedy Felton (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Bast Bramhall (Video Editor)
- Missouri won a roughly $24 billion lawsuit that accused China of hoarding personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The victory brings a potential end to a five-year legal battle after Missouri sued Beijing for “obstructing the production, purchase and export of critical medical equipment, including PPE, during the pandemic.”
- As Straight Arrow News previously reported, a court of appeals ruled in January to allow the case to move forward, overturning a lower court’s decision.
- The appeals court, however, ordered accusations be limited to the hoarding of PPE as opposed to the initial suit, which claimed China hid information on the origins of COVID-19.
Full Story
Missouri won a roughly $24 billion lawsuit that accused China of hoarding personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 4% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lectus nunc morbi rhoncus aliquet faucibus eu senectus vestibulum feugiat ut pulvinar mus vivamus maximus libero platea consequat aptent, eleifend turpis fringilla magna conubia praesent tellus metus enim leo lobortis sagittis curabitur mi litora nullam.
- Proin vestibulum consequat cubilia magnis morbi platea hac turpis elit, placerat enim pulvinar urna quisque maximus tellus ligula aptent faucibus, quis dapibus aliquet fames molestie luctus ac ultricies.
- Porta malesuada parturient feugiat arcu ornare augue consequat nibh integer eu litora consectetur nam cras lacus neque ad aliquet vivamus.
- Eleifend id aliquet molestie ridiculus adipiscing at praesent posuere maecenas, non nunc vel dis sociosqu efficitur per.
- Cras neque integer pulvinar conubia enim fermentum habitasse amet pellentesque magna libero condimentum velit elit etiam sociosqu hac montes, urna finibus id nunc dictum porttitor fusce faucibus maecenas tristique sapien facilisi leo himenaeos class phasellus.
- Rutrum ac quis faucibus netus nullam vel sit nisi leo purus porta tempus mattis senectus, molestie varius tempor habitasse rhoncus aptent quam platea in ad volutpat suscipit egestas.
- Condimentum vestibulum finibus nulla consectetur habitasse placerat dui suscipit mauris varius facilisi, ultricies lacinia pretium quis id viverra imperdiet lorem sollicitudin ridiculus, tellus lectus faucibus vivamus lobortis ornare hac porta pulvinar maecenas.
- Purus dui tempor ligula leo suscipit finibus urna nam ante aliquet porta laoreet, interdum ut quis pharetra per quisque placerat vivamus vitae habitasse aenean.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The victory brings a potential end to a five-year legal battle after Missouri sued Beijing for “obstructing the production, purchase and export of critical medical equipment, including PPE, during the pandemic.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
How did the case progress to this point?
As Straight Arrow News previously reported, a court of appeals ruled in January to allow the case to move forward, which overturned a lower court’s decision.
The appeals court, however, ordered accusations against China be limited to the hoarding of PPE as opposed to the initial suit, which claimed Beijing hid information on the origins of COVID-19.
What did Missouri’s attorney general say about the judgment?
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey called the federal judge’s ruling on Friday, March 7, a “landmark victory.”
Bailey said in a statement, “China refused to show up to court, but that doesn’t mean they get away with causing untold suffering and economic devastation. We intend to collect every penny by seizing Chinese-owned assets, including Missouri farmland.”
Bailey’s office said that the judgment is the largest dollar amount the state has ever been awarded in a lawsuit, six times larger than the previous record.
Bailey celebrated the ruling on X, writing, “Hey China, you owe Missouri $24 billion. I just won a judgment in court. Pay up — or we start seizing assets and farmland.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
How has China responded?
China has yet to respond to the judgment, but warned in the past that it may take retaliatory action.
[KENNEDY FELTON]
MISSOURI WON A ROUGHLY 24 BILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT ACCUSING CHINA OF HOARDING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.
THE VICTORY BRINGS A POTENTIAL END TO A FIVE-YEAR LEGAL BATTLE AFTER MISSOURI SUED BEIJING FOR “OBSTRUCTING THE PRODUCTION PURCHASE, AND EXPORT OF CRITICAL MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING P-P-E, DURING THE PANDEMIC.”
AS STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED, A COURT OF APPEALS RULED IN JANUARY TO ALLOW THE CASE TO MOVE FORWARD, OVERTURNING A LOWER COURT’S DECISION.
THE APPEALS COURT, HOWEVER, ORDERED ACCUSATIONS BE LIMITED TO THE HOARDING OF P-P-E AS OPPOSED TO THE INITIAL SUIT, WHICH CLAIMED CHINA HID INFO ON THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19.
MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL ANDREW BAILEY CALLED THE FEDERAL JUDGE’S RULING FRIDAY A “LANDMARK VICTORY”
BAILEY SAID “CHINA REFUSED TO SHOW UP TO COURT, BUT THAT DOESN’T MEAN THEY GET AWAY WITH CAUSING UNTOLD SUFFERING AND ECONOMIC DEVASTATION. WE INTEND TO COLLECT EVERY PENNY BY SEIZING CHINESE-OWNED ASSETS, INCLUDING MISSOURI FARMLAND.
BAILEY’S OFFICE SAYS THE JUDGMENT IS THE LARGEST DOLLAR AMOUNT THE STATE HAS EVER BEEN AWARDED IN A LAWSUIT, SIX TIMES LARGER THAN THE PREVIOUS RECORD.
THE A-G CELEBRATED THE RULING ON X, WRITING:
“HEY CHINA, YOU OWE MISSOURI 24-BILLION DOLLARS. I JUST WON A JUDGMENT IN COURT. PAY UP– OR WE START SEIZING ASSETS AND FARMLAND.
CHINA HAS YET TO RESPOND TO THE JUDGMENT, BUT WARNED IN THE PAST IT MAY TAKE RETALIATORY ACTION.
FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M KENNEDY FELTON.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 4% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Magna convallis sit habitasse aliquet sem ex egestas nunc viverra est porta euismod arcu phasellus lacus rutrum laoreet pharetra, inceptos maecenas tincidunt purus pulvinar amet facilisis interdum eu leo porttitor et vestibulum tempus ornare lobortis.
- Libero nunc laoreet morbi quam sit rutrum sagittis maecenas scelerisque, faucibus eu porta neque massa phasellus facilisis integer pharetra sem, eleifend torquent aliquet quis mollis conubia nibh nulla.
- Urna augue litora viverra aliquam tortor id laoreet imperdiet vel ex ornare vulputate lacinia donec montes netus volutpat aliquet arcu.
- Inceptos aenean aliquet mollis praesent aptent velit amet odio consectetur, maximus convallis ridiculus dis dictum commodo ullamcorper.
- Donec netus vel porta pulvinar eu semper efficitur eros rhoncus purus lacus mi sapien scelerisque duis dictum sagittis class, neque sociosqu aenean convallis proin elementum elit sem consectetur nullam tellus placerat leo curae per nam.
- Vivamus nibh eleifend sem turpis lobortis ridiculus suscipit bibendum leo natoque urna at sodales egestas, mollis lectus hac efficitur habitasse pharetra magnis rutrum senectus volutpat adipiscing facilisi himenaeos.
- Mi nunc sociosqu nascetur vulputate efficitur faucibus ipsum facilisi a lectus placerat, nulla cursus fames eleifend aenean platea enim fringilla risus praesent, facilisis magna sem arcu porttitor tortor sagittis urna porta consectetur.
- Natoque ipsum hac integer leo facilisi sociosqu neque lacinia justo aliquet urna mattis, iaculis est eleifend dictumst ullamcorper massa faucibus arcu feugiat efficitur ad.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Transportation sec. rescinds memos on environment, social justice infrastructure
By Diane Duenez (Managing Weekend Editor)
- Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy rescinded two Biden-era memos to refocus on traditional infrastructure priorities. The shift excludes social justice and environmental considerations.
- The decision aligns with President Donald Trump’s executive order to eliminate DEI mandates in federal agencies.
- The Department of Education archived DEI-related documents and placed DEI initiative leaders on administrative leave following the executive order.
Full Story
Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced Monday, March 10 that his department will roll back two Biden-era memos that incorporated social justice and environmental considerations into infrastructure project planning.
The change in policy aims to shift focus to traditional infrastructure priorities and discard additional requirements related to greenhouse gas emissions and equity.
“Under President Trump’s leadership, the Department of Transportation is getting back to basics — building critical infrastructure projects that move people and move commerce safely,” Duffy said.
Why is the transportation policy shifting?
The move aligns with an executive order Trump signed on Jan. 20, which called for the end of all diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, mandates in the federal government. Agencies were given 60 days to comply.
Which other departments are already in compliance?
The Department of Defense and Department of Education were among the first to begin those efforts.
“There are more executive orders coming that we fully support: removing DEI inside the Pentagon, reinstating troops who were pushed out because of COVID mandates, iron dome for America,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told reporters after he was sworn in. “This is happening quickly.”
Within days of the executive order, the Department of Education removed or archived hundreds of guidance documents, reports and training materials that included mentions of DEI. The department also placed employees charged with leading DEI initiatives on paid administrative leave.
Straight Arrows News reached out to the Transportation Department and, as of publishing time, has not heard back.
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
US increased its global weapons exports, but will its dominance continue?
Published UpdatedBy Ryan Robertson (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Michael Edwards (Video Editor)
- The U.S. is still the world’s largest arms dealer, increasing its dominance year over year. However, that title may be in jeopardy if Europe decides to find another arms dealer.
- The United States exported 43% of global weapons from 2020 to 2024, up from 35% over the previous period in 2019, according to a new report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute or SIPRI.
- The U.S. accounted for 64% of imports to European and NATO nations from 2020 through 2024, up from 52% between 2015 and 2019.
Full Story
The United States is still the world’s largest arms dealer, increasing its dominance year over year, but that title might be in jeopardy if Europe decides to find another arms dealer.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- From 2020 to 2024, Ukraine became the world's largest arms importer, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
- The United States is the leading weapons exporter, accounting for 43% of global exports, compared to France's 9.6%, as stated by Mathew George.
- NATO countries in Europe more than doubled their arms imports in five years, with over 60% being U.S. purchases, as researchers reported on March 10.
- Russia's arms exports have declined 64% from 2020 to 2024, attributed to international sanctions and reduced foreign orders, as noted by SIPRI.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- In the period from 2020 to 2024, Ukraine emerged as the world’s largest arms importer, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
- The United States accounted for 43% of global arms exports, significantly leading over France, which had 9.6%, as reported by SIPRI.
- European NATO countries doubled their arms imports from 2015-2019 to 2020-2024, with over 60% being US weapons, reflecting a shift in European defense needs.
- As a result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and sanctions, Russian arms exports fell to 7.8% of the global market, down from 21%.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
What are the latest numbers?
The United States exported 43% of global weapons from 2020 to 2024, up from 35% over the previous period ending in 2019, according to a new report from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute or SIPRI on Monday, March 10.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The report stated the U.S. accounted for 64% of imports to European NATO nations from 2020 through 2024. That’s up from 52% between 2015 and 2019, according to the report.
What’s spurring the growth?
The SIPRI data shows the American arms industry is benefitting from rising European defense spending, spurred on by Russia’s war against Ukraine.
European allies bulked up on U.S.-supplied Patriot Air Defense Missile Systems, HIMARS launchers and F-35s in recent years as a result of that war.
Why are there concerns?
However, many of those same allies are now wary of the U.S. after the Trump administration’s move to halt deliveries of U.S. weapons, spare parts and intelligence Kyiv. Many European leaders are questioning whether the U.S. could do the same to them.
Analysts and lawmakers said this may impact Europe’s desire for American weaponry.
What are European leaders saying?
France’s President Emmanuel Macron is calling on Europe to bolster its own defenses instead of relying on the United States.
France now reportedly ranks as the globe’s second-largest weapons exporter. Countries like Germany, the United Kingdom and Denmark are increasing military spending. South Korea is also a burgeoning arms exporter and many analysts Straight Arrow News Anchor Ryan Robertson spoke with tell him Europe could turn to Seoul to as a result.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Why will U.S. exports to Europe likely continue?
Despite the concerns, analysts said Europe will likely keep buying some weapons from the U.S. because no one else makes anything like them, like F-35s and Patriot or THAAD systems for land-based defense against ballistic missiles.
[RYAN ROBERTSON]
THE U-S IS STILL THE WORLD’S LARGEST ARMS TRADER, INCREASING ITS DOMINANCE YEAR OVER YEAR. BUT THAT TITLE MIGHT BE IN JEOPARDY IF EUROPE DECIDES TO FIND ANOTHER DEALER.
LET’S GET TO THE NUMBERS.
THE U-S EXPORTED 43 PERCENT OF GLOBAL WEAPONS FROM 2020 TO 2024, UP FROM 35 PERCENT OVER THE PREVIOUS PERIOD ENDING IN 2019.
THAT’S ACCORDING TO A NEW REPORT FROM THE STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OR SIPRI (SIP-REE).
THE U-S ACCOUNTED FOR 64 PERCENT OF IMPORTS TO EUROPEAN NATO NATIONS FROM 2020 THROUGH 2024, UP FROM 52 PERCENT BETWEEN 2015 AND 2019.
THE SIPRI DATA SHOWS THE AMERICAN ARMS INDUSTRY IS BENEFITING FROM RISING EUROPEAN DEFENSE SPENDING–SPURRED ON BY RUSSIA’S WAR AGAINST UKRAINE
EUROPEAN ALLIES BULKED UP ON U-S SUPPLIED PATRIOT AIR DEFENSE MISSILE SYSTEMS, HIMARS LAUNCHERS AND F-35’S IN RECENT YEARS AS A RESULT.
BUT MANY OF THOSE SAME ALLIES ARE NOW WARY OF THE U-S, AFTER THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S MOVE TO HALT DELIVERIES OF U-S WEAPONS, SPARE PARTS AND INTELLIGENCE TO KYIV. MANY EUROPEAN LEADERS ARE QUESTIONING WHETHER THE U-S COULD DO THE SAME TO THEM.
ANALYSTS AND LAWMAKERS SAY THIS MAY IMPACT EUROPE’S DESIRE FOR AMERICAN WEAPONRY.
FRANCE’S PRESIDENT EMMANUEL MACRON IS CALLING ON EUROPE TO BOLSTER ITS OWN DEFENSES INSTEAD OF RELYING ON THE U-S..
FRANCE NOW RANKS AS THE GLOBE’S SECOND-LARGEST WEAPONS EXPORTER AND COUNTRIES LIKE GERMANY, THE U-K AND DENMARK ARE INCREASING MILITARY SPENDING. SOUTH KOREA IS ALSO A BURGEONING ARMS EXPORTERS, AND MANY ANALYSTS I SPEAK WITH TELL ME EUROPE COULD TURN TO SEOUL TO SOOTHE ITS APPETITE FOR MORE WEAPONRY.
BUT IT’S NOT HAPPENING QUITE YET. AND DESPITE THE CONCERNS, ANALYSTS SAY EUROPE WILL LIKELY KEEP BUYING SOME WEAPONS FROM THE U-S BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE MAKES ANYTHING LIKE THEM–THINK F-35S AND PATRIOT OR THAAD SYSTEMS FOR LAND-BASED DEFENSE AGAINST BALLISTIC MISSILES.
FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M RYAN ROBERTSON.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- From 2020 to 2024, Ukraine became the world's largest arms importer, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
- The United States is the leading weapons exporter, accounting for 43% of global exports, compared to France's 9.6%, as stated by Mathew George.
- NATO countries in Europe more than doubled their arms imports in five years, with over 60% being U.S. purchases, as researchers reported on March 10.
- Russia's arms exports have declined 64% from 2020 to 2024, attributed to international sanctions and reduced foreign orders, as noted by SIPRI.
- No summary available because of a lack of coverage.
- In the period from 2020 to 2024, Ukraine emerged as the world’s largest arms importer, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
- The United States accounted for 43% of global arms exports, significantly leading over France, which had 9.6%, as reported by SIPRI.
- European NATO countries doubled their arms imports from 2015-2019 to 2020-2024, with over 60% being US weapons, reflecting a shift in European defense needs.
- As a result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and sanctions, Russian arms exports fell to 7.8% of the global market, down from 21%.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.