
Nevada Supreme Court rules ballots without postmarks can still be counted
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor)
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled that absentee ballots arriving without a postmark can be counted up to three days after the Nov. 5 general election. This decision comes amid a tight race between Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, as polls show both candidates neck and neck in this critical swing state.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Platea condimentum curabitur torquent ullamcorper pulvinar mus urna conubia, elementum convallis maximus dictum nisl nam varius, ridiculus odio aliquet vitae posuere facilisi dapibus.
- Accumsan volutpat montes ipsum pellentesque taciti condimentum scelerisque dui mi vehicula torquent hendrerit finibus suspendisse lacus, facilisi integer sit sapien rutrum habitasse sed natoque netus a tempus ullamcorper mauris neque.
- Habitant erat fermentum faucibus sollicitudin duis leo rhoncus interdum primis fringilla sed dolor hac, efficitur accumsan praesent velit nulla morbi dui a cras netus ornare.
- Finibus amet taciti cubilia dolor torquent lacinia habitasse curae ac mi per etiam vivamus cursus, arcu nam ornare gravida et tincidunt facilisis elit purus convallis posuere mattis montes.
- Montes quisque himenaeos nec scelerisque hendrerit fames sodales netus, volutpat lobortis pulvinar pellentesque molestie adipiscing nisi torquent, erat turpis porta tristique consectetur placerat est.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The ruling dismissed a challenge from the Republican Party, which argued that ballots without a postmark should not be counted. The court’s majority interpreted state law to mean that ballots can be counted if the postmark date “cannot be determined,” which includes envelopes that lack a postmark entirely.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
This situation is part of a broader Republican-led effort to tighten regulations on absentee voting amid concerns of fraud.
The justices emphasized that rejecting valid mail ballots due to postal service errors undermines the public’s right to vote.
“If a voter properly and timely casts their vote by mailing their ballot before or on the day of the election, and through a post office omission the ballot is not postmarked, it would go against public policy to discount that properly cast vote,” the justices said in a ruling. “Rejecting timely mail ballots because of postal service omissions cuts against the strong public interest in exercising the right to vote.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Nevada is unique among swing states, as it accepts late ballots more broadly. Mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day can be counted for up to four days after, while the new ruling allows ballots without postmarks to be counted up to three days after the election.
This ruling follows a recent decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Mississippi’s election practices, which found that counting late mail ballots violates federal law. However, the court did not impose any immediate restrictions ahead of Election Day.
THE NEVADA SUPREME COURT HAS RULED THAT ABSENTEE BALLOTS ARRIVING WITHOUT A POSTMARK CAN STILL BE COUNTED UP TO THREE DAYS AFTER THE UPCOMING NOVEMBER 5 GENERAL ELECTION.
THIS DECISION COMES AMID A TIGHT RACE BETWEEN DONALD TRUMP AND VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS, AS POLLS SHOW BOTH CANDIDATES NECK AND NECK IN THIS CRITICAL SWING STATE.
TODAY’S RULING DISMISSED A CHALLENGE FROM THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WHICH ARGUED THAT BALLOTS WITHOUT A POSTMARK SHOULD NOT BE COUNTED. THE COURT’S MAJORITY INTERPRETED STATE LAW TO MEAN THAT BALLOTS CAN BE COUNTED IF THE POSTMARK DATE “CANNOT BE DETERMINED,” WHICH INCLUDES THOSE IN ENVELOPES THAT LACK A POSTMARK ENTIRELY.
THIS SITUATION IS PART OF A BROADER GOP-LED EFFORT TO TIGHTEN REGULATIONS ON ABSENTEE VOTING AMID CONCERNS OF FRAUD.
THE JUSTICES EMPHASIZED THAT REJECTING VALID MAIL BALLOTS DUE TO POSTAL SERVICE ERRORS UNDERMINES THE PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO VOTE.
THE RULING STATED “If a voter properly and timely casts their vote by mailing their ballot before or on the day of the election, and through a post office omission the ballot is not postmarked, it would go against public policy to discount that properly cast vote. Rejecting timely mail ballots because of postal service omissions cuts against the strong public interest in exercising the right to vote.”
NEVADA IS UNIQUE AMONG SWING STATES, AS IT ACCEPTS LATE BALLOTS MORE BROADLY. MAIL-IN BALLOTS POSTMARKED BY ELECTION DAY CAN BE COUNTED FOR UP TO FOUR DAYS AFTER, WHILE THE NEW RULING ALLOWS BALLOTS WITHOUT POSTMARKS TO BE COUNTED UP TO THREE DAYS AFTER THE ELECTION.
THIS RULING FOLLOWS A RECENT DECISION BY THE 5TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS REGARDING MISSISSIPPI’S ELECTION PRACTICES, WHICH FOUND THAT COUNTING LATE MAIL BALLOTS VIOLATES FEDERAL LAW.
HOWEVER, THE COURT DID NOT IMPOSE ANY IMMEDIATE RESTRICTIONS AHEAD OF ELECTION DAY.
THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.
FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –
DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MOBILE APP TODAY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Aliquet non ac nascetur pharetra tincidunt turpis mi praesent, id suscipit scelerisque sociosqu pellentesque augue fermentum, mattis dapibus molestie dis integer parturient facilisis.
- Eros volutpat natoque condimentum nunc litora non ligula viverra est semper nascetur purus justo cubilia vehicula, parturient libero torquent orci vel penatibus tellus nisi hendrerit consequat aenean pharetra per ipsum.
- Accumsan magnis sed quam dui inceptos ultrices ridiculus nec sagittis class tellus curabitur vivamus, cras eros cursus hac elit etiam viverra consequat faucibus hendrerit commodo.
- Justo ullamcorper litora velit curabitur nascetur ante penatibus primis eu est morbi leo lacus sapien, proin augue commodo consectetur elementum blandit curae urna venenatis suscipit integer ad natoque.
- Natoque finibus rutrum erat ligula purus malesuada mauris hendrerit, volutpat et tincidunt nunc adipiscing mus bibendum nascetur, magnis pretium fames habitasse pulvinar porttitor eget.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.