Musk’s efforts in shuttering USAID likely unconstitutional rules federal judge


Full story

  • A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that Elon Musk likely wielded unconstitutional influence in spearheading the Trump administration’s efforts to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. Bloomberg News reports that it is the most direct ruling when it comes to the legality of Musk’s role as an adviser to President Donald Trump since he took office on Jan. 20.
  • District Judge Theodore Chuang said that USAID workers and contractors who sued the Trump administration were likely to be successful in arguing Musk “exercised significant authority” in the decision to shutter the agency’s headquarters.
  • Chuang wrote Musk likely violated the Constitution’s appointments clause and separation of powers.

Full Story

A federal judge ruled on Tuesday, March 18, that Elon Musk likely wielded unconstitutional influence in conducting the Trump administration’s efforts to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

What did the judge rule?

Bloomberg News reports that it is the most direct ruling when it comes to the legality of Musk’s role as an adviser to President Donald Trump since he took office on Jan. 20.

District Judge Theodore Chuang said that USAID workers and contractors who sued the Trump administration were likely to be successful in arguing Musk “exercised significant authority” in the decision to shutter the agency’s headquarters, which is reserved for officers of the U.S.

That likely means that Musk violated the Constitution’s appointments clause, according to Chuang.

What happens now?

CBS News reports that Chuang ruled in favor of more than two dozen current and former USAID employees and contractors, who challenged attempts to close USAID, which were led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Chuang’s ruling gives the plaintiffs part of their request for a preliminary injunction.

The judge ordered Musk and the DOGE employees to reinstate access to email, payment and other electronic systems for the current and former employees, as well as contractors.

What does the order prohibit Musk from doing?

Chuang also ordered that DOGE and Musk refrain from taking any action to shutter USAID, including putting workers on administrative leave, firing them, closing agency buildings and offices or deleting information on its websites or collections.

DOGE and Musk are now barred under the judge’s order from taking any further actions in relation to USAID without the “express authorization” of an agency official with legal authority to take action.

How does it play into the bigger picture?

DOGE agents reportedly accessed the agency’s financial and personal data systems, and hundreds of USAID employees were placed on administrative leave.

USAID’s website was shut down in February, and email accounts were deactivated.

Tags: , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left describe the judge's ruling as a serious legal claim against Elon Musk, emphasizing potential abuse of power.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize the judge's focus on the appointments clause, framing the actions as undermining constitutional safeguards.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

244 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge ruled that the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development likely violated the Constitution, blocking actions by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
  • U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang ordered the restoration of email and computer access to all USAID employees who were placed on administrative leave.
  • In February, the Trump administration placed most of USAID's staff on leave, impacting at least 1,600 U.S.-based employees.
  • Trump aimed to freeze foreign assistance funding, alleging it was wasteful and advanced a liberal agenda.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge ruled that Elon Musk likely violated the United States Constitution in efforts to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development .
  • Judge Theodore Chuang found there should be efforts to delay any final shutdown of USAID while litigation continues, supporting 26 former employees.
  • Musk's involvement raised concerns about the Constitution's appointments clause, as he was not confirmed by the Senate for his role.
  • The judge blocked the Department of Government Efficiency from taking action related to USAID without permission from agency staff.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™

Full story

  • A federal judge ruled on Tuesday that Elon Musk likely wielded unconstitutional influence in spearheading the Trump administration’s efforts to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. Bloomberg News reports that it is the most direct ruling when it comes to the legality of Musk’s role as an adviser to President Donald Trump since he took office on Jan. 20.
  • District Judge Theodore Chuang said that USAID workers and contractors who sued the Trump administration were likely to be successful in arguing Musk “exercised significant authority” in the decision to shutter the agency’s headquarters.
  • Chuang wrote Musk likely violated the Constitution’s appointments clause and separation of powers.

Full Story

A federal judge ruled on Tuesday, March 18, that Elon Musk likely wielded unconstitutional influence in conducting the Trump administration’s efforts to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

What did the judge rule?

Bloomberg News reports that it is the most direct ruling when it comes to the legality of Musk’s role as an adviser to President Donald Trump since he took office on Jan. 20.

District Judge Theodore Chuang said that USAID workers and contractors who sued the Trump administration were likely to be successful in arguing Musk “exercised significant authority” in the decision to shutter the agency’s headquarters, which is reserved for officers of the U.S.

That likely means that Musk violated the Constitution’s appointments clause, according to Chuang.

What happens now?

CBS News reports that Chuang ruled in favor of more than two dozen current and former USAID employees and contractors, who challenged attempts to close USAID, which were led by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Chuang’s ruling gives the plaintiffs part of their request for a preliminary injunction.

The judge ordered Musk and the DOGE employees to reinstate access to email, payment and other electronic systems for the current and former employees, as well as contractors.

What does the order prohibit Musk from doing?

Chuang also ordered that DOGE and Musk refrain from taking any action to shutter USAID, including putting workers on administrative leave, firing them, closing agency buildings and offices or deleting information on its websites or collections.

DOGE and Musk are now barred under the judge’s order from taking any further actions in relation to USAID without the “express authorization” of an agency official with legal authority to take action.

How does it play into the bigger picture?

DOGE agents reportedly accessed the agency’s financial and personal data systems, and hundreds of USAID employees were placed on administrative leave.

USAID’s website was shut down in February, and email accounts were deactivated.

Tags: , , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Media outlets on the left describe the judge's ruling as a serious legal claim against Elon Musk, emphasizing potential abuse of power.
  • Not enough coverage from media outlets in the center to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize the judge's focus on the appointments clause, framing the actions as undermining constitutional safeguards.

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

244 total sources

Key points from the Left

  • A federal judge ruled that the dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development likely violated the Constitution, blocking actions by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
  • U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang ordered the restoration of email and computer access to all USAID employees who were placed on administrative leave.
  • In February, the Trump administration placed most of USAID's staff on leave, impacting at least 1,600 U.S.-based employees.
  • Trump aimed to freeze foreign assistance funding, alleging it was wasteful and advanced a liberal agenda.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Center

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A federal judge ruled that Elon Musk likely violated the United States Constitution in efforts to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development .
  • Judge Theodore Chuang found there should be efforts to delay any final shutdown of USAID while litigation continues, supporting 26 former employees.
  • Musk's involvement raised concerns about the Constitution's appointments clause, as he was not confirmed by the Senate for his role.
  • The judge blocked the Department of Government Efficiency from taking action related to USAID without permission from agency staff.

Report an issue with this summary

Other (sources without bias rating):

Powered by Ground News™