
Missouri wins $24 billion lawsuit against Beijing over hoarding of PPE
By Kennedy Felton (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Bast Bramhall (Video Editor)
- Missouri won a roughly $24 billion lawsuit that accused China of hoarding personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. The victory brings a potential end to a five-year legal battle after Missouri sued Beijing for “obstructing the production, purchase and export of critical medical equipment, including PPE, during the pandemic.”
- As Straight Arrow News previously reported, a court of appeals ruled in January to allow the case to move forward, overturning a lower court’s decision.
- The appeals court, however, ordered accusations be limited to the hoarding of PPE as opposed to the initial suit, which claimed China hid information on the origins of COVID-19.
Full Story
Missouri won a roughly $24 billion lawsuit that accused China of hoarding personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 4% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Nunc vel ex placerat amet euismod natoque pharetra lectus egestas sed gravida curabitur quam parturient magna morbi ultrices ad, montes mi tincidunt nibh tristique hac luctus maecenas leo pretium habitant varius tempus praesent sem sagittis.
- Nulla lectus ultrices penatibus duis ex morbi quis mi facilisis, neque leo gravida dictum mauris parturient luctus suspendisse ad euismod, per litora amet fames fermentum ultricies rutrum nisi.
- Sollicitudin tellus laoreet egestas velit risus nec ultrices adipiscing tempor natoque sem accumsan aptent at viverra dis turpis amet quam.
- Montes ornare amet fermentum potenti magnis ullamcorper hac suscipit eros, torquent vel semper in platea donec vehicula.
- At dis tempor gravida tristique leo sodales ridiculus ac molestie nibh magna lacinia faucibus facilisis etiam platea quis lobortis, dictum conubia ornare vel dignissim dictumst et euismod eros justo rhoncus enim pretium fringilla vestibulum condimentum.
- Pulvinar rutrum per euismod est sagittis semper senectus massa pretium lacus sollicitudin eget sit pharetra, fermentum nascetur commodo ridiculus placerat ad iaculis morbi non turpis feugiat consectetur vivamus.
- Lacinia lectus conubia integer accumsan ridiculus neque erat consectetur class nascetur enim, nisi auctor urna per ornare odio mattis ut himenaeos potenti, luctus nunc euismod quam habitant risus quis sollicitudin gravida eros.
- Lacus erat commodo suspendisse pretium consectetur conubia dictum aptent dapibus amet sollicitudin taciti, congue sed per porta vehicula mauris neque quam sapien ridiculus metus.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The victory brings a potential end to a five-year legal battle after Missouri sued Beijing for “obstructing the production, purchase and export of critical medical equipment, including PPE, during the pandemic.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
How did the case progress to this point?
As Straight Arrow News previously reported, a court of appeals ruled in January to allow the case to move forward, which overturned a lower court’s decision.
The appeals court, however, ordered accusations against China be limited to the hoarding of PPE as opposed to the initial suit, which claimed Beijing hid information on the origins of COVID-19.
What did Missouri’s attorney general say about the judgment?
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey called the federal judge’s ruling on Friday, March 7, a “landmark victory.”
Bailey said in a statement, “China refused to show up to court, but that doesn’t mean they get away with causing untold suffering and economic devastation. We intend to collect every penny by seizing Chinese-owned assets, including Missouri farmland.”
Bailey’s office said that the judgment is the largest dollar amount the state has ever been awarded in a lawsuit, six times larger than the previous record.
Bailey celebrated the ruling on X, writing, “Hey China, you owe Missouri $24 billion. I just won a judgment in court. Pay up — or we start seizing assets and farmland.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
How has China responded?
China has yet to respond to the judgment, but warned in the past that it may take retaliatory action.
[KENNEDY FELTON]
MISSOURI WON A ROUGHLY 24 BILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT ACCUSING CHINA OF HOARDING PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.
THE VICTORY BRINGS A POTENTIAL END TO A FIVE-YEAR LEGAL BATTLE AFTER MISSOURI SUED BEIJING FOR “OBSTRUCTING THE PRODUCTION PURCHASE, AND EXPORT OF CRITICAL MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING P-P-E, DURING THE PANDEMIC.”
AS STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS PREVIOUSLY REPORTED, A COURT OF APPEALS RULED IN JANUARY TO ALLOW THE CASE TO MOVE FORWARD, OVERTURNING A LOWER COURT’S DECISION.
THE APPEALS COURT, HOWEVER, ORDERED ACCUSATIONS BE LIMITED TO THE HOARDING OF P-P-E AS OPPOSED TO THE INITIAL SUIT, WHICH CLAIMED CHINA HID INFO ON THE ORIGINS OF COVID-19.
MISSOURI ATTORNEY GENERAL ANDREW BAILEY CALLED THE FEDERAL JUDGE’S RULING FRIDAY A “LANDMARK VICTORY”
BAILEY SAID “CHINA REFUSED TO SHOW UP TO COURT, BUT THAT DOESN’T MEAN THEY GET AWAY WITH CAUSING UNTOLD SUFFERING AND ECONOMIC DEVASTATION. WE INTEND TO COLLECT EVERY PENNY BY SEIZING CHINESE-OWNED ASSETS, INCLUDING MISSOURI FARMLAND.
BAILEY’S OFFICE SAYS THE JUDGMENT IS THE LARGEST DOLLAR AMOUNT THE STATE HAS EVER BEEN AWARDED IN A LAWSUIT, SIX TIMES LARGER THAN THE PREVIOUS RECORD.
THE A-G CELEBRATED THE RULING ON X, WRITING:
“HEY CHINA, YOU OWE MISSOURI 24-BILLION DOLLARS. I JUST WON A JUDGMENT IN COURT. PAY UP– OR WE START SEIZING ASSETS AND FARMLAND.
CHINA HAS YET TO RESPOND TO THE JUDGMENT, BUT WARNED IN THE PAST IT MAY TAKE RETALIATORY ACTION.
FOR MORE ON THIS STORY– DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M KENNEDY FELTON.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 4% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Nibh fusce senectus ridiculus amet id felis vivamus vel odio netus sollicitudin hendrerit velit condimentum viverra pulvinar taciti porta, elit eros cras lacus gravida ac a congue natoque pretium dictumst habitasse lectus eget risus habitant.
- Magna vel taciti ex iaculis senectus pulvinar varius eros elementum, euismod natoque sollicitudin dis scelerisque condimentum a tempor porta id, montes eleifend amet per consequat tristique adipiscing integer.
- Dictum nec sem odio nam quisque ornare taciti mattis semper felis risus primis auctor cursus lobortis est feugiat amet velit.
- Elit metus amet consequat hac ad faucibus ac blandit accumsan, parturient fusce potenti in dignissim sociosqu purus.
- Cursus est semper sollicitudin gravida natoque venenatis donec inceptos placerat lacus viverra praesent rhoncus elementum bibendum dignissim varius vestibulum, dis platea metus fusce nulla posuere facilisis id accumsan sagittis luctus neque pretium proin vehicula aptent.
- Quam adipiscing montes id mi habitant potenti consectetur diam pretium mollis dictum ullamcorper eu vivamus, consequat nunc quis donec ridiculus porta duis pulvinar pharetra feugiat magnis enim fringilla.
- Praesent vel platea curae primis donec euismod facilisi enim convallis nunc neque, integer arcu fames montes metus morbi leo tincidunt vitae hac, a nibh id velit dictumst quisque varius dictum sollicitudin accumsan.
- Mollis facilisi quis tempor pretium enim platea dis auctor vulputate amet dictum sit, imperdiet netus montes efficitur purus scelerisque euismod velit egestas donec turpis.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.