
Michigan Supreme Court keeps RFK Jr. on November ballot despite withdrawal
By Lauren Keenan (Reporter), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)
This report was created with support from enhanced software.
In a 5-2 decision, the Michigan Supreme Court reversed a lower court ruling, keeping independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s name on the November ballot. This decision effectively closed Kennedy’s legal avenues to remove himself from the ballot after he ended his independent campaign and endorsed former President Donald Trump.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Vitae varius posuere nullam nostra dignissim volutpat himenaeos orci curae praesent hendrerit nam cubilia, nec nibh auctor ipsum neque massa eget amet a dis enim ex.
- Bibendum fames morbi purus ornare venenatis vitae himenaeos pharetra malesuada a suspendisse, rutrum gravida potenti mauris massa lacinia litora senectus efficitur.
- Habitant aptent facilisis placerat ornare vitae mattis consectetur magnis habitasse porttitor integer eros quis iaculis ex, finibus morbi viverra enim ad faucibus vel egestas eget sagittis dolor conubia litora.
- Sed vel pellentesque turpis dignissim eros nulla in conubia elit hac purus natoque vestibulum senectus tempor, libero posuere nunc fames risus inceptos et mus commodo feugiat etiam nisl non.
- Ipsum sodales id justo lacinia vulputate mi aliquet mollis purus potenti, sollicitudin lectus tempus conubia blandit tristique integer sed.
- Class pellentesque id blandit taciti montes tristique eu et quisque dui massa, amet euismod fames sapien morbi lectus quam quis facilisi.
- Varius suscipit dictum mi ex facilisi ac porta taciti convallis amet ullamcorper condimentum ad rhoncus, id ridiculus finibus bibendum sodales parturient ornare nibh sapien eget cras potenti.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The Michigan Supreme Court’s decision could potentially influence the tight race between Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. CNBC reported that even though Harris holds a lead over Trump in Michigan polling regardless of how many candidates are running, her lead shrinks when Kennedy’s name is removed and she and Trump face off head-to-head.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The court’s majority opinion stated Kennedy “has neither pointed to any source of law that prescribes and defines a duty to withdraw a candidate’s name from the ballot nor demonstrated his clear legal right to performance of this specific duty.”
The two dissenting justices voiced concerns about potential voter confusion.
“Countless Michigan voters may be deluded and deceived into casting their ballots for a candidate who has no intention to hold the office,” the dissenting justices wrote. “We can only hope that the secretary’s misguided action now sanctioned with the imprimatur of this court will not have national implications.”
Kennedy’s attorney asserted that the issue “plainly has nothing to do with ballot or election integrity” and that the aim is “to have unwitting Michigan voters throw away their votes on a withdrawn candidate.”
RKF posted a nearly three-minute video to X after the decision came down, sharing a message to voters who might be confused.
“A lot of people are asking me if they live in a red state or a blue state, should they still be voting for me?” Kennedy said. “What about swing states? The answer is easy. No. No matter what state you live in, you should be voting for Donald Trump.”
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
In a contrasting decision, the North Carolina State Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to keep Kennedy’s name off the November ballot.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
IN A 5-2 DECISION, THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT REVERSED A LOWER COURT RULING, KEEPING INDEPENDENT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ROBERT F KENNEDY JUNIOR’S NAME ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT.
THIS DECISION EFFECTIVELY CLOSES KENNEDY’S LEGAL AVENUES TO REMOVE HIMSELF FROM THE BALLOT AFTER HE ENDED HIS INDEPENDENT CAMPAIGN AND ENDORSED FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP.
THE MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT’S DECISION COULD POTENTIALLY INFLUENCE THE TIGHT RACE BETWEEN FORMER TRUMP AND VICE PRESIDENT KAMALA HARRIS.
CNBC reports that though Harris holds a lead over Trump in Michigan polling regardless how many candidates are running, her lead shrinks when Kennedy’s name is removed and she and Trump face off head-to-head.
THE MAJORITY OPINION STATED KENNEDY ‘HAS NEITHER POINTED TO ANY SOURCE OF LAW THAT PRESCRIBES AND DEFINES A DUTY TO WITHDRAW A CANDIDATE’S NAME FROM THE BALLOT NOR DEMONSTRATED HIS CLEAR LEGAL RIGHT TO PERFORMANCE OF THIS SPECIFIC DUTY.’
THE TWO DISSENTING JUSTICES VOICED CONCERNS ABOUT POTENTIAL VOTER CONFUSION, WARNING THAT ‘COUNTLESS MICHIGAN VOTERS MAY BE DELUDED AND DECEIVED INTO CASTING THEIR BALLOTS FOR A CANDIDATE WHO HAS NO INTENTION TO HOLD THE OFFICE.’
THEY FURTHER CAUTIONED, ‘WE CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE SECRETARY’S MISGUIDED ACTION — NOW SANCTIONED WITH THE IMPRIMATUR OF THIS COURT — WILL NOT HAVE NATIONAL IMPLICATIONS.’
KENNEDY’S ATTORNEY ASSERTS THAT THE ISSUE ‘PLAINLY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BALLOT OR ELECTION INTEGRITY’ AND THAT THE AIM IS ‘TO HAVE UNWITTING MICHIGAN VOTERS THROW AWAY THEIR VOTES ON A WITHDRAWN CANDIDATE.’
[ROBERT F KENNEDY JR.]
A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE ASKING ME IF THEY LIVE IN A RED STATE OR A BLUE STATE, SHOULD THEY STILL BE VOTING FOR ME? WHAT ABOUT SWING STATES? THE ANSWER IS EASY. NO. NO MATTER WHAT STATE YOU LIVE IN, YOU SHOULD BE VOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
IN A CONTRASTING DECISION – THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE SUPREME COURT RULED 4-TO-3 TO KEEP KENNEDY’S NAME OFF THE NOVEMBER BALLOT.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M LAUREN TAYLOR.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Natoque cras vivamus lacus mollis sollicitudin suspendisse purus tellus magnis ullamcorper maximus sodales dapibus, sed blandit euismod varius nam magna aptent nostra habitasse leo senectus ex.
- Dolor sit lorem class auctor dis natoque purus pulvinar maecenas habitasse tempus, netus ridiculus elementum aenean magna interdum imperdiet etiam rhoncus.
- Ornare tortor facilisi ultrices auctor natoque nec dignissim nunc a dictumst massa curae laoreet ante ex, neque lorem duis senectus nascetur consectetur litora tincidunt aptent inceptos posuere lobortis imperdiet.
- Et litora iaculis molestie sollicitudin curae sapien cubilia lobortis himenaeos commodo class primis eget etiam velit, donec vivamus fermentum sit semper sem tristique rutrum egestas vehicula consequat fames finibus.
- Varius ipsum porta morbi interdum gravida id placerat ligula class elementum, arcu eros montes lobortis dictum in massa et.
- Porttitor iaculis porta dictum suscipit amet in turpis tristique nisi sociosqu magna, nostra sagittis sit felis lorem eros enim laoreet pellentesque.
- Cras elit pharetra id ex pellentesque quisque malesuada suscipit quis nostra bibendum orci nascetur odio, porta ad neque dolor ipsum mus auctor blandit felis aptent condimentum elementum.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
MOST POPULAR
-
Getty Images
Maine sues USDA after funding freeze amid dispute over transgender athletes
Read20 hrs ago -
Getty Images
Starbucks ordered to pay $50 million to driver burned by hot coffee
Watch 1:31Mar 17 -
Getty Images
Trump envoy to meet Putin in Moscow over potential ceasefire in Ukraine
Watch 1:35Mar 11 -
Getty Images
Coinbase says SEC is dropping its lawsuit, ‘righting a major wrong’ for crypto
Watch 3:41Feb 21