Skip to main content
U.S.

‘MAGA celebrates,’ ‘liberals rage’: Media coverage of Daniel Penny’s acquittal

Listen
Share

Daniel Penny has been found not guilty by a jury in the chokehold death of Jordan Neely. The case has sparked widespread analysis in the media, with discussions highlighting a divide over the verdict.

Contrasting headlines reflect the political nature of the case:

CNN: “Why Some MAGA Allies Are Celebrating Daniel Penny’s Acquittal”

Fox News: “Liberals Rage After Daniel Penny Acquitted”

New York attorneys and media analysts from both sides weighed in on a CNN panel. Some argued for Penny’s conviction, while others believed the jury reached the right decision in acquitting him.

“It’s not reasonable to kill somebody for yelling,” Solomon Jones, columnist, said. “He was yelling on the subway… all they knew is that he was yelling on the subway, 140 pounds wet, he was unarmed, there was no way he was going to kill somebody.”

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

“It doesn’t give you a free pass to kill someone because you hear someone is mentally ill,” Bernarda Villalona, criminal defense attorney, said on the panel.

“People on the left can’t seem to tell a difference between the good guys and the bad guys,” Scott Jennings, CNN senior political commentator, said.

The debate over whether race played a role in the case also emerged among panelists. Conservative and moderate hosts among multiple outlets generally believed race was not a factor. However, those with more progressive views argued it was.

“I’m gonna say the dreaded ‘r’ word, race plays a role in this,” Jones stated. “Statistics say that when people kill people who are white, they get harsher sentences, especially if they are people of color.”

Those who disagreed with racializing the case, like Emily Compagno of Fox News, argued that “the jury saw no color in this trial.”

“Those that are racializing this or protesting, to me, do not represent in any way what occurred on that subway,” Compagno said.

The post-trial debate also revolved around whether Penny should be viewed as a hero. Conservative and moderate hosts largely supported the idea, while others rejected it.

“I want to know whether you think, as Congressman Crane does, that Penny should get the Congressional Gold Medal to recognize his heroism,” one panelist asked.

“I think he ought to get the medal and I think we ought to build a statue of this guy in New York City,” Jennings said.

In May 2023, Daniel Penny placed Jordan Neely, a homeless man, into a chokehold on a New York City subway. Witnesses said Neely was acting erratically and threatening passengers. Penny, a former Marine, restrained Neely for about six minutes, and Neely later died.

The prosecution argued that the chokehold led to Neely’s death, charging Penny with second-degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide.

Penny’s legal team claimed self-defense. His defense stated he was protecting himself and other passengers from a mentally ill man making alarming threats. The defense suggested that Neely’s death was the result of a combination of drugs and mental illness.

The judge dismissed a manslaughter charge against Penny last week after the jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict. On Monday, Dec. 9, the jury found Penny not guilty of criminally negligent homicide.

Tags: , , , , ,

[Karah Rucker]

DANIEL PENNY HAS BEEN FOUND NOT GUILTY BY A JURY – IN THE CHOKEHOLD DEATH OF JORDAN NEELY. 

AND THE ANALYSIS OF THE CASE BY PANELS IN THE MEDIA IS CAPTURING A DIVIDE OVER THE VERDICT.

THE POLITICS OF THE CASE IS EVIDENT IN THESE CONTRASTING HEADLINES –

LEFT-LEANING CNN – “WHY SOME MAGA ALLIES ARE CELEBRATING DANIEL PENNY’S ACQUITTAL”.

AND FOX NEWS – A RIGHT-LEANING MEDIA OUTLET – “LIBERALS RAGE AFTER DANIEL PENNY ACQUITTED.”

ON A CNN PANEL – THERE WERE NEW YORK ATTORNEYS AND MEDIA ANALYSTS FROM BOTH SIDES –

SOME WHO FELT PENNY SHOULD HAVE BEEN CONVICTED AND THOSE WHO FELT THE JURY GOT IT RIGHT IN THE ACQUITTAL.

“It’s not reasonable to kill somebody for yelling. He was yelling on the subway…all they knew is that he was yelling on the subway, 140 pounds wet, he was unarmed, there was no way he was going to kill somebody.”

“It doesn’t give you a free pass to kill someone because you hear someone is mentally ill.”

WHETHER THE JURY WAS RIGHT OR WRONG WASN’T THE ONLY POINT OF CONTENTION IN THE CASE.

ANOTHER ONE – IS WHETHER THERE WAS A RACE ELEMENT INVOLVED.

THAT DEBATE PLAYED OUT AMONG PANELISTS ACROSS THE MEDIA SPECTRUM –

WITH CONSERVATIVE AND MODERATE HOSTS BELIEVING RACE DID NOT PLAY A PART –

AND THOSE WITH MORE PROGRESSIVE LEANINGS BELIEVING IT DID.

“I’m gonna say the dreaded ‘r’ word, race plays a role in this.”

“Does it?”

“Yes. statistics say that when people kill people who are white, they get harsher sentences, especially if they are people of color.”

“Those that are racializing this or protesting, to me, do not represent in any way what occurred on that subway and this trial which sees no color.”

“The ultimate question is, why did the jury acquit daniel penny? Is it because they’re racist?”

“America is inherently biased.”

“So the jury is racist – don’t change the subject, is the jury racist?”

“Yes.”

ANOTHER TOPIC THAT KEPT COMING UP IN THE MEDIA’S DEBATE POST-TRIAL –

WAS WHETHER OR NOT DANIEL PENNY SHOULD BE SEEN AS A HERO –

WITH LARGELY CONSERVATIVE AND MODERATE HOSTS BELIEVING HE DESERVES THE TITLE – WHILE THOSE WITH OPPOSING POLITICAL VIEWS SAY PENNY DOES NOT.

“I want to know whether you think as congressman crane does that penny should get the congressional gold medal to recognize his heroism?”

“I think he ought to get the medal and i think we ought to build a statue of this guy in new york city.”

“This guy was convicted in the court of public opinion, despite being a hero, despite all of those on the subway calling him a hero, to larry’s point, he deserves a medal.”

“Can we just stop calling him a hero?”

“I can’t because i do find what he did heroic.”

WHILE THE CASE HAS BEEN POLITICIZED –

THE FAST FACTS ARE THIS.

IN MAY 2023 – DANIEL PENNY PUT JORDAN NEELY INTO A CHOKEHOLD ON A NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY.

WITNESSES SAY NEELY – A HOMELESS MAN – WAS ACTING ERRATICALLY AND MAKING THREATS TO OTHER PASSENGERS.

PENNY – A FORMER MARINE – RESTRAINED NEELY IN A CHOKEHOLD FOR ABOUT SIX MINUTES – AND HE LATER DIED.

THE PROSECUTION ARGUED THE CHOKEHOLD KILLED HIM – 

AND CHARGED PENNY WITH SECOND-DEGREE MANSLAUGHTER AND CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE.

PENNY CLAIMED SELF-DEFENSE – HIS LAWYERS SAYING HE WAS PROTECTING HIMSELF AND PASSENGERS FROM SOMEONE THEY DESCRIBE AS A MENTALLY ILL MAN MAKING ALARMING THREATS AND GESTURES –

HIS LEGAL TEAM SUGGESTED NEELY DIED BECAUSE OF A TOXIC COMBINATION OF DRUGS AND MENTAL ILLNESS.

THE MANSLAUGHTER CHARGE AGAINST NEELY WAS DISMISSED BY THE JUDGE LAST WEEK AFTER THE JURY COULDN’T COME TO A UNANIMOUS DECISION.

AND MONDAY THE JURY FOUND PENNY NOT GUILTY OF CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE.