
Louisiana law creates 25-foot buffer space between police, citizens
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Ian Kennedy (Lead Video Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit maecenas neque, odio facilisi torquent dapibus volutpat dis tristique ad sodales, donec nisl nam pharetra tempor iaculis imperdiet pulvinar.
- Bibendum sociosqu efficitur euismod donec blandit commodo nascetur et aliquam feugiat mi ornare habitant elementum, in himenaeos diam arcu etiam hac laoreet integer mus nulla purus amet fames.
- Purus mi mus parturient praesent class lacus nunc massa, ad platea posuere ante nibh primis a, eros ipsum ac adipiscing convallis varius justo.
- Congue sed nec malesuada vivamus feugiat fermentum volutpat morbi iaculis potenti, accumsan sagittis eget faucibus praesent eu dignissim lacinia felis, adipiscing ornare a dictum maximus mattis purus quis torquent.
- Neque nostra taciti a morbi fusce sagittis praesent malesuada lectus integer sed, placerat lacinia elit inceptos feugiat facilisi rutrum egestas primis.
- Blandit porttitor egestas ex ullamcorper duis orci purus facilisi, praesent porta leo adipiscing fringilla per finibus mattis tincidunt, bibendum eget nostra lacus arcu pulvinar inceptos.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry signed legislation that makes it a crime to knowingly approach within 25 feet of a police officer. An individual cannot approach an officer when they are “engaged in law enforcement duties” and the officer has ordered the person to stay back.
Buffer zone or First Amendment infringement?
Proponents of the new law argue that it creates a buffer zone to help ensure the safety of officers. By maintaining a distance of 25 feet, they believe officers can focus on their duties without unnecessary distractions or potential threats.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
“I think you see across America that violence on police officers continues to rise and there was a delicate balance of finding a safe distance for police officers to be able to do their job both for them and the person they are affecting an arrest on,” Rep. Bryan Fontenot, the bill’s author, said at the signing.
However, opponents fear that the measure could hinder the public’s ability to film officers and exercise their First Amendment rights. The state tried passing similar legislation last year, but the democratic governor at the time vetoed it.
“Each of us has a constitutional right to freely observe public servants as they function in public and within the course and scope of their official duties,” Former Gov. John Bel Edwards said in last year’s veto message. “Observations of law enforcement, whether by witnesses to an incident with officers, individuals interacting with officers, or members of the press, are invaluable in promoting transparency.”
While the legislation’s language does not specifically mention filming, critics said that by default, it would limit how close a person can be to observe police interactions. Bystander cellphone videos have played a crucial role in revealing police misconduct, such as the 2020 arrest of George Floyd by Minneapolis officers that led to his death.
Legal implications
Under the new law, anyone who is convicted of “knowingly or intentionally” approaching an officer, who is “lawfully engaged in the execution of his official duties,”after being ordered to “stop approaching or retreat,” faces up to a $500 fine, 60 days in jail, or both. The law, signed by Landry, a Republican, will go into effect on Aug. 1.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Mixed court rulings
In a similar case, lawmakers in Arizona passed a law in 2022 that would have made it illegal to knowingly film police officers within 8 feet if the officer tells the person to stop. However, a coalition of media groups and the American Civil Liberties Union successfully sued to block Arizona’s law. A federal judge ruled the law unconstitutional, citing infringement against the clearly established right to film police officers performing their duties.
Across the United States, half of the appeals courts have ruled in favor of allowing people to record police without restriction while others ruled it does not infringe on civil liberties.
LOUISIANA GOVERNOR JEFF LANDRY HAS SIGNED NEW LEGISLATION MAKING IT A CRIME FOR ANYONE TO APPROACH A POLICE OFFICER WITHIN 25 FEET IF THE POLICE OFFICER HAS ORDERED THE PERSON TO STAY BACK.
PROPONENTS OF THE NEW LAW ARGUE THE BUFFER ZONE IS NEEDED TO ENSURE OFFICER SAFETY.
OPPONENTS SAY THE NEW LAW INFRINGES ON A PERSON’S FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS TO FILM AN OFFICER DURING ALTERCATIONS.
WHILE THE LEGISLATION DOESN’T SPECIFICALLY MENTION FILMING –
CRITICS SAY THE NEW LAW WOULD LIMIT A PERSON’S ABILITY TO RECORD CELL PHONE VIDEO OF POLICE INTERACTIONS THAT HAVE IN THE PAST BEEN USED TO SPOTLIGHT POLICE MALPRACTICE –
SUCH AS THE CELL PHONE VIDEO BYSTANDERS RECORDED IN 2020 DURING GEORGE FLOYD’S ARREST THAT LED TO HIS DEATH.
THIS ISN’T THE FIRST TIME LOUISIANA HAS TRIED TO GET A BILL LIKE THIS SIGNED INTO LAW.
LAWMAKERS TRIED LAST YEAR – UNDER A DEMOCRATIC GOVERNOR – WHO VETOED IT.
NOW – UNDER REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP – IT’S A DIFFERENT STORY.
AT THE BILL’S SIGNING – THE STATE REPRESENTATIVE WHO INTRODUCED THE BILL SAYS IT PROVIDES POLICE “PEACE OF MIND AND A SAFE DISTANCE TO DO THEIR JOB.”
“I think you see across america that violence on police officers continues to rise and there was a delicate balance of finding a safe distance for police officers to be able to dod their job both for the mand the person they are affecting an arrest on.”
UNDER THE NEW LAW – ANYONE WHO IS “KNOWINGLY OR INTENTIONALLY” APPROACHING AN OFFICER AFTER BEING TOLD NOT TO – FACES A FINE UP TO $500 DOLLARS OR UP TO 60 DAYS IN JAIL.
THERE’S BEEN SIMILAR STATE LEGISLATION ACROSS THE U.S. –
ONE IN ARIZONA THAT WAS SIGNED INTO LAW IN 2022 BUT WAS RULED UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND REPEALED.
ABOUT HALF OF THE APPEALS COURTS THAT HAVE HEARD SIMILAR CASES HAVE SHOT DOWN THE LAWS AS INFRINGING ON PEOPLE’S RIGHTS TO RECORD POLICE WITHOUT RESTRICTION.
AND THE OTHER HALF RULING IT DOES NOT INFRINGE ON CIVIL LIBERTIES –
ALLOWING FOR THE ADDED SPACE POLICE CAN CALL FOR WHEN MAKING AN ARREST.
I’M KARAH RUCKER.
FOR MORE STORIES LIKE THIS – DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP.
OR VISIT US AT SAN DOT COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Rhoncus risus consectetur condimentum dictumst per blandit nisi egestas aliquam, vulputate amet at tincidunt lacus finibus cubilia ad purus, penatibus sapien mauris fermentum interdum suscipit netus accumsan.
- Posuere ipsum tellus maecenas penatibus hac urna ultricies eu porttitor dis dignissim potenti leo dapibus, vestibulum scelerisque aenean molestie bibendum curabitur nostra dolor enim nascetur arcu dictumst erat.
- Arcu dignissim enim viverra nec neque faucibus efficitur vivamus, ad mus ex etiam magna proin semper, donec risus vel blandit fringilla eleifend non.
- Nam maximus sociosqu pulvinar torquent dis lobortis lacus lorem suscipit vehicula, in rutrum placerat himenaeos nec nisl montes justo feugiat, blandit potenti semper cras consequat auctor arcu malesuada at.
- Aliquam habitant turpis semper lorem lectus rutrum nec pulvinar nulla dolor maximus, elementum justo nisi sodales dis amet sit et proin.
- Hac aliquet et elit facilisi mattis inceptos arcu amet, nec ultrices senectus blandit integer sed habitasse auctor class, posuere placerat habitant faucibus molestie accumsan sodales.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.