
Left and right raise concerns over judge, prosecutor in Trump documents case
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter/Producer), Stacey Chamberlain (Digital Producer)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Natoque porttitor nisi est orci imperdiet odio posuere maecenas hendrerit nascetur elementum lacinia rhoncus etiam, faucibus ullamcorper dictumst iaculis elit eget magnis ad vivamus cursus fusce nostra sed.
- Litora in integer porta aliquam curae ut lorem lacus velit imperdiet adipiscing lectus, placerat habitant pulvinar potenti commodo primis non purus diam risus vulputate erat class, ante enim facilisis cubilia penatibus phasellus natoque nullam nec est varius.
- Montes ultrices diam faucibus at porttitor sodales malesuada magnis efficitur porta nullam, suspendisse habitant ad habitasse duis tempus massa velit neque sagittis.
- Egestas dolor integer vel ultricies per purus taciti lacinia nisi gravida velit at hendrerit elit, in accumsan phasellus facilisis rutrum et posuere hac dictumst interdum nec finibus viverra.
- Lorem convallis leo tempor platea elementum natoque at litora suspendisse vitae lacus, ante senectus imperdiet parturient congue torquent ultrices cursus mauris.
- Ex lorem torquent cursus venenatis lobortis dolor, non vulputate finibus in litora, sapien inceptos nam nec ac.
- Sapien elementum taciti vestibulum aenean mauris nulla augue vitae justo inceptos eros lectus porta condimentum, imperdiet adipiscing urna euismod vulputate parturient proin hendrerit sagittis consequat tempus senectus conubia.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
With former President Donald Trump’s trial imminent, two controversial players who are likely to preside in the historic case are gaining attention. Judge Aileen Cannon has been randomly selected to hear the case. She was appointed to the federal bench by Trump in 2020. Therefore, some Democrats are calling for her recusal from the case.
Judge Cannon previously ruled in favor of Trump to appoint a special master to review the classified documents seized at Mar-A-Lago last year. Critics argue that there is a conflict of interest due to her close ties with Trump.
If he were to be convicted, Cannon would be the one to decide Trump’s sentence and whether or not he would serve any time in prison. She also has the power to rule on motions, dismiss counts and dismiss the indictment all together.
The other controversial figure in the trial is federal prosecutor Karen Gilbert. Gilbert will sit alongside special counsel Jack Smith to represent the Department of Justice. Republicans are questioning her credibility in the case, calling her “corrupt” and “unethical” after once being reprimanded by a federal judge for secretly recording a defense lawyer.
Gilbert resigned from her position after allegations of eavesdropping on phone conversations between witnesses and a defense attorney back in 2009.
Years later, she was prosecuted again after being promoted by the DOJ.
There are very different pictures of how these two major players in the Trump trial are being teed up by the media.
While there is a plethora of coverage on the Trump-appointed judge and the implications that could come from her presiding over the case, mainstream media isn’t reporting Gilbert, who a district judge said acted in “bad faith” and “knowingly and repeatedly violated ethical guidelines.”
Check out the media landscape using the Straight Arrow News Media Miss tool.
KARAH RUCKER: WITH FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S TRIAL IMMINENT – WE WANT TO INTRODUCE YOU TO TWO PIVOTAL PLAYERS LIKELY TO PRESIDE IN THE HISTORIC CASE. BOTH ARE CONTROVERSIAL.
HIGHLIGHTING JUDGE, TOP PROSECUTOR IN TRUMP TRIAL
THE JUDGE WHO WAS RANDOMLY SELECTED TO HEAR THE CASE – IS JUDGE AILEEN CANNON. A TRUMP APPOINTEE. THERE ARE CALLS FROM DEMOCRATS FOR HER RECUSAL FROM THE CASE BECAUSE OF HER TIES TO THE FORMER PRESIDENT.
THEN THERE’S KAREN GILBERT – A LEADING PROSECUTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – AND LIKELY TRIAL-ATTORNEY – WHOM REPUBLICANS CALL ‘CORRUPT’ AND “UNETHICAL’ WITH A HISTORY OF BEING REPRIMANDED AS A PROSECUTOR IN MIAMI.
JUDGE AILEEN CANNON APPOINTED BY TRUMP IN 2020
FIRST – WE’LL TAKE A LOOK AT JUDGE CANNON. WHO IS NO STRANGER TO THE CASE.
SHE PREVIOUSLY RULED IN FAVOR OF TRUMP TO APPOINT A SPECIAL MASTER LAST YEAR TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS SEIZED AT MAR-A-LAGO. CRITICS ARGUE THERE’S A CONFLICT OF INTEREST – GIVEN PRESIDENT TRUMP APPOINTED HER TO THE FEDERAL BENCH BACK IN 20-20.
IF THE MAN WHO ELEVATED HER CAREER WERE CONVICTED – CANNON WOULD BE THE ONE TO DECIDE HIS SENTENCE – AND WHETHER OR NOT HE WOULD SERVE TIME IN PRISON. SHE COULD ALSO RULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNTS OR THE ENTIRE INDICTMENT.
FEDERAL PROSECUTOR KAREN GILBERT PREVIOUSLY REPRIMANDED
THEN THERE’S FEDERAL PROSECUTOR KAREN GILBERT. WHO WILL SIT ALONGSIDE SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH REPRESENTING THE DOJ. BUT REPUBLICANS ARE QUESTIONING **HER CREDIBILITY IN THE CASE – CALLING HER “CORRUPT” AFTER ONCE BEING REPRIMANDED BY A FEDERAL JUDGE FOR SECRETLY RECORDING A DEFENSE LAWYER. SHE RESIGNED FROM HER POSITION AFTER ALLEGATIONS OF EAVESDROPPING ON PHONE CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN WITNESSES AND A DEFENSE ATTORNEY. THAT WAS IN 2009.
YEARS LATER – SHE WAS PROSECUTING AGAIN – PROMOTED BY THE DOJ.
LITTLE MEDIA COVERAGE ON SPECIAL COUNSEL PROSECUTOR
THERE’S A VERY DIFFERENT PICTURE IN HOW THESE TWO ARE BEING TEED UP BY THE MEDIA. THERE’S A PLETHORA OF COVERAGE ON THE TRUMP APPOINTED JUDGE AND THE IMPLICATIONS THAT COULD COME FROM HER PRESIDING OVER THE CASE.
BUT THE MEDIA ISN’T TALKING ABOUT THE DOJ’S LEADING PROSECUTOR WHO A DISTRICT JUDGE SAID ACTED IN “BAD FAITH” AND “KNOWINGLY AND REPEATEDLY VIOLATED ETHICAL GUIDELINES.”
POLITICO CALLS CANNON “ONE OF TRUMP’S FAVORITE JUDGES.” NBC – “HOW THE FLORIDA JUDGE COULD HOBBLE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S CASE.” THE NEW YORK TIMES – HOW A TRUMP APPOINTED JUDGE COULD INFLUENCE THE CASE.
CONTROVERSY AND CONCERNS SURROUND JUDGE, PROSECUTOR
THERE ARE NO HEADLINES TO SHOW OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REPORTING ON KAREN GILBERT – BECAUSE THEY’RE NOT COVERING IT. NOT CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, AND SO FORTH. CNN MENTIONS KAREN GILBERT IN AN ARTICLE – BUT ONLY DESCRIBES HER AS A “SEASONED MIAMI PROSECUTOR”.
BEFORE TRUMP’S TRIAL – WE WANTED TO SHARE CONCERNS SURROUNDING BOTH THE JUDGE AND LEAD PROSECUTOR – SERVING PIVOTAL ROLES AND PART OF HISTORY.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Egestas sociosqu curae dui dignissim facilisi non amet lobortis nostra turpis ac imperdiet arcu varius, at convallis lacus neque senectus hac himenaeos habitant praesent faucibus erat felis orci.
- Nisi quisque quis netus sem finibus lorem facilisis pulvinar montes facilisi nulla hendrerit, fusce class eleifend accumsan auctor ut mattis nunc suscipit consectetur donec maecenas phasellus, congue eget natoque taciti fermentum condimentum egestas tristique cursus dui rhoncus.
- Vel venenatis suscipit at pellentesque sociosqu nibh mauris himenaeos urna netus tristique, porttitor class habitant adipiscing quam aptent feugiat montes blandit fames.
- Augue litora quis enim ipsum risus nunc ante imperdiet curae conubia montes pellentesque nostra senectus, quisque tempus condimentum natoque ultricies tortor amet proin lacus dictum cursus purus sit.
- Facilisis ex inceptos et eros ac egestas pellentesque nisi porttitor integer pulvinar, congue posuere facilisi sapien cubilia sodales venenatis faucibus aliquam.
- Nascetur facilisis sodales faucibus commodo semper litora, mattis donec purus quisque nisi, nec tincidunt nam cursus vehicula.
- Nec ac ante torquent magna aliquam odio per integer eu tincidunt ullamcorper hendrerit netus ornare, facilisi nulla vivamus massa donec sapien malesuada nostra fames in aptent posuere penatibus.
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.