Skip to main content
Karah Rucker Anchor/Reporter/Producer
Share
U.S.

Left and right raise concerns over judge, prosecutor in Trump documents case

Karah Rucker Anchor/Reporter/Producer
Share

Media Landscape

See who else is reporting on this story and which side of the political spectrum they lean. To read other sources, click on the plus signs below. Learn more about this data
Left 35% Center 49% Right 16%
Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News

With former President Donald Trump’s trial imminent, two controversial players who are likely to preside in the historic case are gaining attention. Judge Aileen Cannon has been randomly selected to hear the case. She was appointed to the federal bench by Trump in 2020. Therefore, some Democrats are calling for her recusal from the case.

Judge Cannon previously ruled in favor of Trump to appoint a special master to review the classified documents seized at Mar-A-Lago last year. Critics argue that there is a conflict of interest due to her close ties with Trump. 

If he were to be convicted, Cannon would be the one to decide Trump’s sentence and whether or not he would serve any time in prison. She also has the power to rule on motions, dismiss counts and dismiss the indictment all together.

The other controversial figure in the trial is federal prosecutor Karen Gilbert. Gilbert will sit alongside special counsel Jack Smith to represent the Department of Justice. Republicans are questioning her credibility in the case, calling her “corrupt” and “unethical” after once being reprimanded by a federal judge for secretly recording a defense lawyer. 

Gilbert resigned from her position after allegations of eavesdropping on phone conversations between witnesses and a defense attorney back in 2009.

Years later, she was prosecuted again after being promoted by the DOJ.

There are very different pictures of how these two major players in the Trump trial are being teed up by the media.

While there is a plethora of coverage on the Trump-appointed judge and the implications that could come from her presiding over the case, mainstream media isn’t reporting Gilbert, who a district judge said acted in “bad faith” and “knowingly and repeatedly violated ethical guidelines.”

Check out the media landscape using the Straight Arrow News Media Miss tool.

Tags: , , , ,

KARAH RUCKER: WITH FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP’S TRIAL IMMINENT – WE WANT TO INTRODUCE YOU TO TWO PIVOTAL PLAYERS LIKELY TO PRESIDE IN THE HISTORIC CASE. BOTH ARE CONTROVERSIAL.

 

HIGHLIGHTING JUDGE, TOP PROSECUTOR IN TRUMP TRIAL

 

THE JUDGE WHO WAS RANDOMLY SELECTED TO HEAR THE CASE – IS JUDGE AILEEN CANNON. A TRUMP APPOINTEE. THERE ARE CALLS FROM DEMOCRATS FOR HER RECUSAL FROM THE CASE BECAUSE OF HER TIES TO THE FORMER PRESIDENT.

THEN THERE’S KAREN GILBERT – A LEADING PROSECUTOR FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – AND LIKELY TRIAL-ATTORNEY – WHOM REPUBLICANS CALL ‘CORRUPT’ AND “UNETHICAL’ WITH A HISTORY OF BEING REPRIMANDED AS A PROSECUTOR IN MIAMI.

 

JUDGE AILEEN CANNON APPOINTED BY TRUMP IN 2020

 

FIRST – WE’LL TAKE A LOOK AT JUDGE CANNON. WHO IS NO STRANGER TO THE CASE.

SHE PREVIOUSLY RULED IN FAVOR OF TRUMP TO APPOINT A SPECIAL MASTER LAST YEAR TO REVIEW DOCUMENTS SEIZED AT MAR-A-LAGO. CRITICS ARGUE THERE’S A CONFLICT OF INTEREST – GIVEN PRESIDENT TRUMP APPOINTED HER TO THE FEDERAL BENCH BACK IN 20-20.

 

IF THE MAN WHO ELEVATED HER CAREER WERE CONVICTED – CANNON WOULD BE THE ONE TO DECIDE HIS SENTENCE – AND WHETHER OR NOT HE WOULD SERVE TIME IN PRISON. SHE COULD ALSO RULE ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS COUNTS OR THE ENTIRE INDICTMENT.

 

FEDERAL PROSECUTOR KAREN GILBERT PREVIOUSLY REPRIMANDED

 

THEN THERE’S FEDERAL PROSECUTOR KAREN GILBERT. WHO WILL SIT ALONGSIDE SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH REPRESENTING THE DOJ. BUT REPUBLICANS ARE QUESTIONING **HER CREDIBILITY IN THE CASE – CALLING HER “CORRUPT” AFTER ONCE BEING REPRIMANDED BY A FEDERAL JUDGE FOR SECRETLY RECORDING A DEFENSE LAWYER. SHE RESIGNED FROM HER POSITION AFTER ALLEGATIONS OF EAVESDROPPING ON PHONE CONVERSATIONS BETWEEN WITNESSES AND A DEFENSE ATTORNEY. THAT WAS IN 2009.

 

YEARS LATER – SHE WAS PROSECUTING AGAIN – PROMOTED BY THE DOJ.

 

LITTLE MEDIA COVERAGE ON SPECIAL COUNSEL PROSECUTOR

 

THERE’S A VERY DIFFERENT PICTURE IN HOW THESE TWO ARE BEING TEED UP BY THE MEDIA. THERE’S A PLETHORA OF COVERAGE ON THE TRUMP APPOINTED JUDGE AND THE IMPLICATIONS THAT COULD COME FROM HER PRESIDING OVER THE CASE.

 

BUT THE MEDIA ISN’T TALKING ABOUT THE DOJ’S LEADING PROSECUTOR WHO A DISTRICT JUDGE SAID ACTED IN “BAD FAITH” AND “KNOWINGLY AND REPEATEDLY VIOLATED ETHICAL GUIDELINES.”

 

POLITICO CALLS CANNON “ONE OF TRUMP’S FAVORITE JUDGES.” NBC – “HOW THE FLORIDA JUDGE COULD HOBBLE THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S CASE.” THE NEW YORK TIMES – HOW A TRUMP APPOINTED JUDGE COULD INFLUENCE THE CASE.

 

CONTROVERSY AND CONCERNS SURROUND JUDGE, PROSECUTOR

 

THERE ARE NO HEADLINES TO SHOW OF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REPORTING ON KAREN GILBERT – BECAUSE THEY’RE NOT COVERING IT. NOT CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, AND SO FORTH. CNN MENTIONS KAREN GILBERT IN AN ARTICLE – BUT ONLY DESCRIBES HER AS A “SEASONED MIAMI PROSECUTOR”.

 

BEFORE TRUMP’S TRIAL – WE WANTED TO SHARE CONCERNS SURROUNDING BOTH THE JUDGE AND LEAD PROSECUTOR – SERVING PIVOTAL ROLES AND PART OF HISTORY.