Lawsuit claims Columbia protesters had prior knowledge of Oct. 7 Hamas attack


Full story

  • Families of Hamas hostages filed a federal lawsuit accusing pro-Palestine protest organizers at Columbia University of aiding terrorism. The lawsuit claims protest organizers had prior knowledge of the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks in Israel.
  • The complaint cited a “manifesto” allegedly prepared before the attacks and a social media post by Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine shortly before the violence began, suggesting foreknowledge of the events.
  • Mahmoud Khalil, a representative of one of the groups and currently detained, denied the allegations. His lawyers argued he was exercising free speech rights.

Full Story

Families of hostages held by Hamas sued a group of pro-Palestine protesters for allegedly aiding the terror group’s “continuing acts of international terrorism and violations of the law of nations.”

The families claimed organizers of the Columbia University protests had prior knowledge of the Oct. 7, 2023 terror attacks in Israel. 

QR code for SAN app download

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

Who does the lawsuit target?

The lawsuit, filed Monday, March 24, in a Manhattan federal court, named organizers associated with Within Our Lifetime-United for Palestine, Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, Columbia Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace and Columbia University Apartheid Divest. The suit named Mahmoud Khalil, who is detained and facing deportation, as the representative of CUAD. 

The defendants include nine Hamas attack victims. Some defendants had relatives killed or taken hostage during the attacks. Two others are affiliated with Columbia University. They describe themselves as victims of “Hamas’ heinous and ongoing acts of international terrorism.”

The complaint labels the plaintiffs as “Hamas’ propaganda arm in New York City and on the Columbia University campus.”

What does the lawsuit claim?

The lawsuit claimed that the named organizations issued a “manifesto” the day after the Hamas attack in Israel, allegedly created before the group’s advance on Israel.

“The bases for that belief include the timing of the (National Students for Justice in Palestine) Toolkit’s distribution and the signing of the Towfan Al-Aqsa Statement. The bases also include the Toolkit’s inclusion of paraglider graphics,” the filing said.

The complaint also points to a “highly suggestive” social media post published shortly before the attacks began on Oct. 7, 2023.

“Three minutes before Hamas began its attack on Oct. 7, Columbia SJP posted on Instagram ‘We are back!!’ and announced its first meeting of the semester would be announced and that viewers should ‘Say tuned,’” the plaintiffs said. 

The complaint pointed out that Columbia SJP’s account had been dormant for months before the post. Columbia University’s 2023 fall semester started on Sept. 5, a little more than four weeks before the attack. 

Who is Mahmoud Khalil?

Khalil, who awaits trial against the Department of Justice, was a negotiator between protesters and Columbia University officials amid protests on campus. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained him on March 8, 2025, on orders from the State Department.

Since his arrest, he has maintained his innocence, and his lawyers argued that Khalil was exercising his right to free speech. 

Attorneys for the defendant organizations have yet to make a public statement about the allegations.

Tags: , , , ,

Bias comparison

  • Not enough coverage from media outlets on the left to provide a bias comparison.
  • Media outlets in the center uses "bombshell" and relays claims about "propaganda arms."
  • Media outlets on the right emphasize "prior knowledge" and "aiding and abetting." They also highlight the groups' alleged response to a Hamas leader's call for mobilization and their distribution of a "Hamas brochure."

Media landscape

Click on bars to see headlines

16 total sources

Key points from the Left

No summary available because of a lack of coverage.

Report an issue with this summary

  • No coverage from Far Left sources 0 sources
  • No coverage from Left sources 0 sources
  • No coverage from Lean Left sources 0 sources

Key points from the Center

  • On Monday, a lawsuit was filed in New York Southern District Court by victims of the Oct. 7, 2023 attack against Within Our Lifetime, Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine, Columbia-Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace and Columbia University Apartheid Divest, along with their representatives Nerdeen Kiswani, Maryam Alwan, Cameron Jones and Mahmoud Khalil, respectively.
  • The lawsuit alleges that these groups aided and abetted Hamas' terrorism and have ties to the Palestine Committee, founded in 1988 by the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas to fund Hamas operations.
  • The lawsuit claims the defendant groups engaged in pro-terror propaganda, terrorized and assaulted Jewish students, unlawfully took over and damaged university property, and physically assaulted Columbia University employees, with Columbia SJP reactivating its Instagram account just minutes before the Oct. 7 attack.
  • According to the lawsuit, Shlomi Ziv, rescued from Hamas captivity last June, stated that his captors referenced protests planned by the defendants and showed him articles and photographs of Columbia University protests, saying, "That is what gives them strength."
  • The lawsuit, seeking unspecified damages and legal charges, alleges the defendants violated America's Antiterrorism Act and suggests some had prior knowledge of the Oct. 7 attacks, further claiming they are propagandists and recruiters for foreign terrorist organizations, potentially impacting free speech protections.

Report an issue with this summary

Key points from the Right

  • A complaint filed in a New York federal court accuses several activist organizations of prior knowledge of the Oct. 7 attacks, claiming they acted as "propaganda arms" for Hamas.
  • The lawsuit claims these organizations helped Hamas by coordinating communication and supporting actions during the attacks on Israel, citing a joint statement from 83 SJP sections.
  • Shlomi Ziv, a freed hostage, stated that his captors showcased protests at Columbia University, implying connections to Hamas, and the lawsuit names defendants involved in promoting these actions.
  • The plaintiffs seek damages for the alleged support provided to Hamas and argue the defendants violated the Antiterrorism Act by collaborating with a foreign terrorist group.

Report an issue with this summary

Powered by Ground News™