
Justice Department sues Apple, claims company holds iPhone monopoly
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor), William Jackson (Producer), Jake Maslo (Video Editor)
This report was created with support from enhanced software.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit dictum mauris vitae, ac lacinia suscipit egestas vivamus natoque volutpat pretium.
- Felis auctor litora morbi primis lacinia cursus pellentesque cubilia euismod condimentum ultricies montes ante nisl justo at, fermentum pulvinar facilisi himenaeos non tellus dignissim nostra malesuada maximus imperdiet purus pretium senectus.
- Porta maecenas vulputate class dignissim semper erat dis commodo faucibus vel arcu, viverra amet curae platea eros imperdiet nisl egestas augue facilisi.
- Justo platea quam donec curabitur nec faucibus eros fusce sociosqu pharetra, fringilla hac quisque senectus urna sed risus nunc semper, non cursus congue volutpat inceptos lobortis vehicula mi ligula.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The Justice Department announced Thursday, March 21, that it has filed a significant antitrust lawsuit against Apple Inc., accusing the technology behemoth of illegal anti-competitive practices aimed at maintaining its smartphone market monopoly and inflating profits. According to the lawsuit, Apple is alleged to have manipulated application development rules and features of its iPhones — including iMessage and Apple Wallet — to suppress competition and elevate pricing.
US Justice Department Sues Apple in Antitrust Case Over iPhone https://t.co/UggoubqoXS
— Mark Gurman (@markgurman) March 21, 2024
Attorney General Merrick Garland highlighted that Apple’s conduct not only contravened federal antitrust laws but also unjustly burdened consumers with higher costs.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
In a detailed accusation contained within an 88-page complaint, the government criticizes Apple’s imposition of restrictions on multifunctional “super apps,” its manipulation of messaging functionalities between Apple and non-Apple devices, and its monopolization of tap-to-pay features exclusively for Apple Wallet.
“Our case focuses on Apple’s core monopoly, which is the iPhone,” Assistant Attorney General Jonathan S. Kanter said. “We have focused on a pattern of conduct over a decade that Apple has engaged in order to reinforce its monopoly power by excluding rivals by excluding technologies by stifling innovations that would threaten Apple’s stranglehold on its monopoly power.”
The lawsuit, joined by 15 states and the District of Columbia, seeks judicial intervention to prohibit Apple from continuing its alleged anti-competitive activities and to mandate actions necessary to restore competitive conditions in the markets affected by Apple’s purported unlawful conduct.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
Responding to the allegations, Apple defended its business practices, arguing that the lawsuit fundamentally misunderstands the nature of its operations and threatens the company’s ability to produce highly integrated technology products.
This legal challenge is part of a broader scrutiny of major tech companies by the Justice Department’s antitrust division, which has previously targeted Google with lawsuits alleging monopolistic business practices during both the Trump and Biden administrations.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT HAS FILED A MAJOR ANTITRUST LAWSUIT AGAINST APPLE , ACCUSING THE TECH GIANT OF ENGAGING IN ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR TO PROTECT ITS SMARTPHONE MONOPOLY AND BOOST PROFITS.
ACCORDING TO THE SUIT, FILED IN NEW JERSEY, APPLE ALLEGEDLY MANIPULATED APP DEVELOPMENT RULES AND IPHONE FEATURES, SUCH AS IMESSAGE AND APPLE WALLET, TO LIMIT COMPETITION AND CHARGE HIGHER PRICES. ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND SAIDAPPLE’S ACTIONS NOT ONLY BROKE FEDERAL LAW BUT ALSO FORCED CONSUMERS TO PAY MORE.
MERRICK GARLAND
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
“For most of the past 15 years, Apple has collected a tax in the form of a 30% commission on the price of any app downloaded from the App Store as well as on in-app purchases. Apple is able to command these fees from companies of all sizes.”
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
AMONG THE ISSUES RAISED IN THE GOVERNMENT’S 88-PAGE COMPLAINT WERE APPLE’S RESTRICTIONS ON “SUPER APPS,” MESSAGING FUNCTIONALITY, AND THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF TAP-TO-PAY WITH APPLE WALLET.
JONATHAN S. KANTER
Assistant Attorney General
“Our case focuses on Apple’s core monopoly, which is the iPhone. We have focused on a pattern of conduct over a decade that Apple has engaged in order to reinforce its monopoly power by excluding rivals by excluding technologies by stifling innovations that would threaten Apple’s stranglehold on its monopoly power.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
FIFTEEN STATES AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOINED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S SUIT..
IN RESPONSE, APPLE DEFENDED ITS PRACTICES, ARGUING THAT THE LAWSUIT MISUNDERSTANDS ITS BUSINESS AND COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT ITS ABILITY TO CREATE INTEGRATED PRODUCTS.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Litora nibh mi amet ridiculus taciti lectus massa tempor nullam netus, mauris pretium quisque aliquam elementum accumsan nostra per.
- Felis sollicitudin natoque consectetur tristique pretium est turpis neque orci ornare a metus libero gravida imperdiet feugiat, pulvinar suscipit torquent hac nascetur magnis condimentum maximus odio ac platea viverra per dapibus.
- Arcu senectus commodo tincidunt condimentum ullamcorper dolor lobortis sagittis sed luctus sem, class ridiculus ligula pharetra curae platea gravida aliquam himenaeos torquent.
- Imperdiet pharetra cubilia conubia interdum ante sed curae rutrum eget et, sapien porta vel dapibus eleifend etiam facilisis ut ullamcorper, nascetur est montes nostra ultrices nam duis purus posuere.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.