
Judge blocks Biden’s Title IX changes, including ‘gender identity’ protections
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Jake Larsen (Video Editor)
A federal judge has blocked the Biden administration’s new Title IX rule, which changed language in the law’s ban on “sex” discrimination in schools to cover discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. The rule, which took effect in August 2023, has been challenged by more than two dozen states.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lorem taciti lacinia gravida accumsan condimentum hac tellus vivamus consectetur varius primis, ipsum ac fusce a aliquet porttitor class penatibus placerat conubia viverra, sed tempor elit id bibendum ligula curabitur cursus pretium phasellus.
- Rutrum est augue inceptos bibendum sed ultricies nostra fringilla potenti porta vehicula commodo, feugiat congue felis nullam etiam laoreet per aptent vitae purus ex.
- Justo ad nostra eros ornare dui semper ut pharetra non natoque maecenas, integer vulputate auctor vitae bibendum suscipit massa faucibus vehicula cursus.
- Etiam eros curae sem sapien pulvinar natoque venenatis nulla ante et pellentesque, potenti himenaeos accumsan euismod senectus imperdiet purus augue mus.
- Rhoncus magna libero ad mollis hac conubia arcu nisi blandit cras ut augue pulvinar elit leo fringilla euismod, at nam interdum quam finibus vestibulum feugiat viverra non nullam metus consectetur convallis id commodo sapien.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The rule change has drawn strong support from Democrats. They argue it would fortify protections against discrimination for transgender individuals. They also say it would require teachers to use pronouns that align with a student’s gender identity.
Republicans have strongly opposed the rule. They argue it would force women to share private spaces –– such as locker rooms and bathrooms –– with biological men and allow transgender women to compete in women’s sports.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
A U.S. district judge in Kentucky sided with the Republican attorneys general who filed the lawsuit. In his ruling, Judge Danny C. Reeves wrote, “The entire point of Title IX is to prevent discrimination based on sex. Throwing gender identity into the mix eviscerates the statute and renders it largely meaningless.”
Reeves further explained that, when viewed in its entirety, Title IX clearly defines sex discrimination as discrimination based on being male or female, not gender identity.
In response to the ruling, the National Women’s Law Center, an advocacy group for gender justice, wrote, “Today’s decision displays extraordinary disregard for students who are most vulnerable to discrimination and are in the most need for federal protections under the Title IX rule.”
A conservative legal advocacy group, Alliance Defending Freedom, praised the decision, stating, “The Biden administration’s radical attempt to redefine sex not only tossed fairness, safety, and privacy for female students out the window, it also threatened free speech and parental rights.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
The ruling comes as Senate Republicans are introducing a bill, the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. The bill would bar transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports at public schools and colleges. A procedural vote on the bill is scheduled for Friday, Jan. 10.
A FEDERAL JUDGE HAS BLOCKED THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S NEW TITLE NINE RULE –
WHICH CHANGED THE LANGUAGE IN TITLE NINE’S BAN ON “SEX” DISCRIMINATION IN SCHOOLS” TO COVER DISCRIMINATION BASED ON GENDER IDENTITY OR SEXUAL ORIENTATION.
IN AUGUST LAST YEAR – PRESIDENT BIDEN’S RULE TOOK EFFECT –
BUT TWO DOZEN STATES SUED.
THERE HAS BEEN STRONG SUPPORT AMONG DEMOCRATS FOR THE RULE CHANGE.
AND STRONG OPPOSITION FROM REPUBLICANS… BOTH WITH DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS OF WHAT THE RULE CHANGE WOULD DO.
DEMOCRATS – ARGUING IT WOULD HAVE STRENGTHENED DISCRIMINATION PROTECTIONS FOR PEOPLE WHO IDENTIFY AS TRANSGENDER –
AND WOULD REQUIRE TEACHERS TO USE PRONOUNS ALIGNING WITH A STUDENT’S “GENDER IDENTITY.”
REPUBLICANS SAY THE ADDED LANGUAGE TO TITLE NINE WOULD HAVE FORCED WOMEN TO SHARE PRIVATE SPACES – SUCH AS LOCKERROOMS OR BATHROOMS – WITH BIOLOGICAL MEN –
AND COULD HAVE ALLOWED SWEEPING PROTECTIONS FOR BIOLOGICAL MEN TO COMPETE IN WOMEN’S SPORTS.
THE U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE SIDED WITH THE REPUBLICAN ATTORNEYS GENERAL WHO SUED.
THE JUDGE WROTE –
The entire point of Title IX is to prevent discrimination based on sex. Throwing gender identity into the mix eviscerates the statute and renders it largely meaningless. When Title IX is viewed in its entirety, it is abundantly clear that discrimination on the basis of sex means discrimination on the basis of being a male or female. As this Court and others have explained, expanding the meaning of ‘on the basis of sex’ to include ‘gender identity’ turns Title IX on its head.”
IN RESPONSE TO THE RULING –
AN ADVOCACY GROUP FOR “GENDER JUSTICE” WROTE –
“Today’s decision displays extraordinary disregard for students who are most vulnerable to discrimination and are in the most need for federal protections under the Title IX rule.”
AND A CONSERVATIVE LEGAL ADVOCACY GROUP REACTED TO THE RULING –
“The Biden administration’s radical attempt to redefine sex not only tossed fairness, safety, and privacy for female students out the window, it also threatened free speech and parental rights.”
THIS RULING COMES JUST AS SENATE REPUBLICANS ARE INTRODUCING A BILL – THE “PROTECTION OF WOMEN AND GIRLS IN SPORTS ACT” – WHICH WOULD BAR TRANS ATHLETES FROM COMPETING IN WOMEN’S SPORTS AT PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES.
A “PROCEDURAL VOTE” WILL HAPPEN FRIDAY.
THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.
FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –
DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS MOBILE APP OR VISIT US ONLINE AT SAN DOT COM.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lorem dignissim dolor fringilla sapien congue velit ac mi condimentum leo nam, taciti convallis mauris purus class ligula sagittis volutpat felis ut adipiscing, magnis facilisis tellus elementum dis feugiat etiam primis erat habitasse.
- Neque vulputate nunc sociosqu dis magnis integer dui faucibus habitant odio tempor ipsum, tincidunt non porttitor a dictum ante egestas massa eget libero varius.
- Id urna dui molestie lacus nisi torquent ad netus nulla consectetur mollis, maecenas sed risus eget dis enim eros scelerisque tempor primis.
- Dictum molestie laoreet malesuada rhoncus vel consectetur pharetra semper luctus ridiculus lobortis, habitant nec sapien penatibus diam arcu libero nunc auctor.
- Ex nibh in urna imperdiet velit ut ornare finibus senectus donec ad nunc vel tellus nascetur faucibus penatibus, posuere eu elit fusce turpis natoque tincidunt adipiscing nulla a fermentum condimentum eleifend elementum ipsum rhoncus.
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.