
Instagram limits political content as US presidential election nears
By Karah Rucker (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit cras malesuada ultrices leo penatibus ante vitae, elementum curabitur nec mollis euismod fringilla class non venenatis a accumsan interdum iaculis.
- Torquent nullam urna primis vivamus hac pellentesque suscipit sed turpis nisl, leo quis porta ornare risus ullamcorper mattis convallis.
- Mollis ligula ipsum arcu ullamcorper duis cras in, vehicula vestibulum porttitor felis tincidunt suspendisse sit id, tellus vel mi dis lectus lobortis.
- Urna ridiculus fermentum aenean vivamus ornare montes efficitur inceptos consectetur, euismod justo nec lacinia quis netus dictumst turpis, curabitur primis malesuada quisque dui dignissim pretium tortor.
- Est et non tempus vestibulum quisque pellentesque fusce ac ridiculus tortor, sapien purus netus phasellus semper mattis penatibus arcu finibus dapibus, conubia hac justo habitasse varius tristique magna sociosqu dui.
- Condimentum risus mi sodales mus erat dictumst habitant netus, semper arcu augue platea cras nibh sed.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Instagram has changed its rules regarding the presence of political content. The default setting is now limiting posts, reels and accounts that are deemed to be political in nature for users, according to the company.
The new limits on political content come just months before the 2024 presidential election, and some users are criticizing Instagram for the move. However, the social media company is far from the first platform to try and deviate from political content.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
Instagram users will still see political posts from accounts they choose to follow, and users have the option to opt out of the limitations on political content. However, they will have to go through a series of settings changes to turn political content back on.
Posts or reels believed to be political in nature applies to anything that discusses elections, campaigns, laws, or social issues like immigration or abortion, according to Instagram’s Help Center page.
Instagram said that the reason behind the decision to limit political posts is to create a “great experience for everyone.” However, while users will still see posts from any accounts they follow, the platform won’t be recommending political content from any accounts that the individual is not using.
Instagram will also refrain from showing users random reels or recommended posts as well. The same control on political content will also roll out on Facebook at later date, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Facebook has a history of trying other means to keep politics out of news feeds. The company has faced criticism over the years for promoting and demoting certain political views and content on its platform. A Facebook spokesperson told the Journal that users want to see less politics overall.
According to the spokesperson, Facebook “tested various approaches” and “ultimately implemented changes that reduces politics.”
Political Facebook posts reportedly account for “less than 3% of total content views in users’ newsfeeds.”
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
According to Reuters, TikTok also has stipulations when it comes to posting political videos. Users are not allowed to fundraise for a politician or political cause. They are also not allowed to promote videos that are political in nature and touch on sensitive social issues, like immigration and abortion, according to the company.
According to CBS News, any sort of “content controls” social media companies wish to implement on its users are completely up to them. However, a U.S. Supreme Court case set to be decided on later this year could change that, if the majority of justices rule that such controls actually violate a user’s First Amendment rights.
[KARAH RUCKER]
INSTAGRAM HAS CHANGED ITS RULES ON SHOWING YOU POLITICAL CONTENT.
THE DEFAULT SETTING IS NOW LIMITING POSTS, REELS, AND ACCOUNTS THAT ARE POLITICAL IN NATURE.
THE NEW LIMITS COME WITH JUST MONTHS TO GO BEFORE THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.
AND WHILE SOME USERS ARE CRITICIZING INSTAGRAM FOR THE MOVE, THE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IS FAR FROM THE FIRST TO TRY AND DEVIATE FROM POLITICS.
INSTAGRAM USERS WILL STILL SEE POLITICAL POSTS FROM ACCOUNTS THEY FOLLOW. AND USERS HAVE THE OPTION TO OPT OUT OF THIS LIMITATION – BUT YOU’VE GOTTA GO THROUGH YOUR SETTINGS TO TURN POLITICAL CONTENT BACK ON.
SO, WHAT QUALIFIES AS POLITICAL CONTENT?
POSTS OR REELS THAT TALK ABOUT ELECTIONS. CAMPAIGNS. LAWS. OR SOCIAL ISSUES LIKE IMMIGRATION OR ABORTION.
THE REASON BEHIND THE CHANGE?
INSTAGRAM WANTS TO BE A QUOTE “GREAT EXPERIENCE FOR EVERYONE.”
THOUGH YOU’LL STILL SEE POSTS FROM ACCOUNTS YOU FOLLOW, THE PLATFORM ISN’T GOING TO RECOMMEND POLITICAL CONTENT FROM ANY ACCOUNTS YOU’RE NOT FOLLOWING.
AND THEY WON’T RANDOMLY SHOW UP IN REELS OR RECOMMENDED POSTS, EITHER.
THIS SAME CONTROL ON POLITICAL POSTS WILL ROLL OUT ON FACEBOOK AT A LATER DATE.
FACEBOOK – HAS A HISTORY OF TRYING OTHER MEANS TO KEEP POLITICS OUT OF NEWSFEEDS.
FACEBOOK HAS FACED CRITICISM OVER THE YEARS FOR PROMOTING AND DEMOTING CERTAIN POLITICAL VIEWS AND CONTENT ON ITS PLATFORM.
A FACEBOOK SPOKESPERSON TOLD THE WALL STREET JOURNAL USERS WANT TO SEE LESS POLITICS OVERALL.
FACEBOOK TESTED VARIOUS APPROACHES AND ULTIMATELY IMPLEMENTED CHANGES THAT REDUCE POLITICS.
POSTS THAT ARE POLITICAL ACCOUNT FOR “LESS THAN 3% OF TOTAL CONTENT VIEWS IN USERS’ NEWSFEEDS.”
TIKTOK ALSO HAS STIPULATIONS WHEN IT COMES TO POSTING POLITICAL REELS.
YOU’RE NOT ALLOWED TO FUNDRAISE FOR A POLITICIAN OR POLITICAL CAUSE.
YOU’RE ALSO NOT ALLOWED TO PROMOTE REELS THAT ARE POLITICAL IN NATURE OR TOUCH ON SENSITIVE SOCIAL ISSUES – LIKE IMMIGRATION OR ABORTION.
ANY SORT OF “CONTENT CONTROLS” A SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANY WANTS TO IMPLEMENT ON ITS USERS IS COMPLETELY UP TO THEM.
FOR NOW.
BUT A SUPREME COURT CASE SET TO BE DECIDED ON LATER THIS YEAR COULD CHANGE THAT IF THE JUSTICES RULE THAT SUCH-CONTROLS ACTUALLY VIOLATE A USER’S FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Commodo sociosqu primis maecenas facilisi venenatis semper est et pulvinar lacus dis tortor id eros, lorem ante litora vehicula montes mattis a conubia mollis nam consequat ultrices tempor.
- Sed felis taciti quisque suscipit netus arcu praesent nec ullamcorper convallis, dis sit pharetra blandit consectetur dapibus integer laoreet.
- Vehicula massa sociosqu proin dapibus fringilla et duis, porta malesuada mus iaculis vulputate penatibus maecenas gravida, per lectus placerat magna leo quis.
- Taciti rhoncus sapien diam suscipit blandit inceptos etiam risus venenatis, montes nisl litora urna sit erat efficitur ullamcorper, ante quisque pulvinar lacinia ad adipiscing pellentesque cursus.
- Himenaeos finibus conubia aliquet malesuada lacinia arcu nostra vivamus rhoncus cursus, phasellus morbi erat ipsum ridiculus integer tortor proin velit purus, eleifend netus nisl nibh elementum ex accumsan vitae ad.
- Sodales consectetur placerat curabitur vestibulum habitasse efficitur class erat, ridiculus proin libero dolor et sagittis nec.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.