
Hunter Biden’s lawyer wants an ‘Alford plea.’ What does it mean?
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor), Evan Hummel (Producer)
Hunter Biden’s criminal tax case took an unexpected turn on Thursday, Sept. 5. Biden’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, told a federal judge, right before jury selection, his defendant wished to change his plea to an “Alford plea.”
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Vel lorem vivamus luctus enim fringilla elit massa praesent pellentesque magnis curae arcu habitant, turpis odio natoque cras tempus non primis hendrerit litora class nibh nulla.
- Tristique vitae rutrum in leo tellus condimentum nascetur mauris varius praesent aenean augue mattis nulla nisi, venenatis adipiscing lobortis sociosqu blandit per nisl proin molestie vulputate sollicitudin pretium nunc.
- Potenti dis odio sem libero elit cras ipsum sollicitudin aptent consectetur semper facilisis, egestas eros ut euismod neque cursus turpis facilisi vitae metus curae.
- In class enim purus cras posuere inceptos metus sollicitudin sit justo, vulputate sem habitant scelerisque tempus dignissim fermentum taciti hac massa, molestie mauris lectus vel tristique primis rhoncus facilisis pellentesque.
- Dignissim nisi lacinia rutrum taciti senectus at pulvinar elementum sollicitudin tempus scelerisque massa, nullam vehicula rhoncus mattis nisl tempor consectetur integer tellus lacus curae.
- Ligula sem faucibus ornare tortor vulputate mollis bibendum laoreet semper metus, litora scelerisque sit per aptent phasellus ut posuere.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
An Alford plea allows a defendant to maintain innocence but acknowledges that prosecutors have enough evidence to convict them. If the judge were to accept the plea, Biden would be convicted of the crimes he is charged with in the case.
Lowell said to the judge that there is “no agreement” with prosecutors but one is not required under an Alford plea.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
However, prosecutors were reportedly surprised, arguing that they would accept nothing less than a guilty plea.
“This is the first time we’ve heard of this,” prosecutors added.
A last-minute plea deal would allow Biden to avoid a high-profile trial.
Biden previously pleaded not guilty to three felony counts and six misdemeanors connected to at least $1.4 million in unpaid federal taxes from 2016-2019. Prosecutors alleged that Biden purposely avoided paying taxes by rigging his company’s own payroll system.
Although Biden eventually paid all his back-taxes and penalties with the help of a third-party, the judge would not allow the defense to use that evidence at trial.
Thursday’s court appearance comes months after Biden was convicted on felony charges connected to the purchase of a firearm in 2018 while he was allegedly addicted to drugs. His sentencing for that conviction is set for Nov. 13.
President Joe Biden has yet to comment on the new developments in the case.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
HUNTER BIDEN’S CRIMINAL TAX CASE TOOK AN UNEXPECTED TURN THURSDAY.
HIS LAWYER, ABBE LOWELL, TELLING A FEDERAL JUDGE, RIGHT BEFORE JURY SELECTION, BIDEN WISHES TO CHANGE HIS PLEA TO A SO-CALLED ALFORD PLEA– WHICH ALLOWS BIDEN TO MAINTAIN INNOCENCE BUT ACKNOWLEDGES PROSECUTORS HAVE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO CONVICT HIM.
IF THE JUDGE ACCEPTS THE DEAL– BIDEN WOULD BE CONVICTED.
LOWELL SAID TO THE JUDGE THERE IS “NO AGREEMENT” WITH PROSECUTORS BUT ONE ISN’T REQUIRED UNDER AN “ALFORD PLEA.”
SHE SAID THE EVIDENCE AGAINST BIDEN IS “OVERWHELMING” AND ADDED “THIS CAN BE RESOLVED TODAY. IT’S NOT A COMPLICATED ISSUE.”
PROSECUTORS APPEARED SURPRISED– ARGUING THEY WOULD ACCEPT NOTHING LESS THAN A GUILTY PLEA– ADDING– “THIS IS THE FIRST TIME WE’VE HEARD OF THIS.”
A LAST-MINUTE PLEA DEAL WOULD ALLOW BIDEN TO AVOID A HIGH-PROFILE TRIAL.
BIDEN PREVIOUSLY PLEADED NOT GUILTY TO THREE FELONY COUNTS AND SIX MISDEMEANORS CONNECTED TO AT LEAST ONE-POINT-FOUR MILLION DOLLARS IN UNPAID FEDERAL TAXES FROM 2016-TO-2019.
PROSECUTORS ALLEGE BIDEN PURPOSELY AVOIDED PAYING TAXES BY RIGGING HIS COMPANY’S OWN PAYROLL SYSTEM.
ALTHOUGH BIDEN EVENTUALLY PAID ALL HIS BACK TAXES AND PENALTIES WITH THE HELP OF A THIRD-PARTY– THE JUDGE WOULD NOT ALLOW THE DEFENSE TO USE THAT INFORMATION AT TRIAL.
WE’LL BE FOLLOWING THIS CASE CLOSELY AND YOU CAN TOO.
JUST DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP OR VISIT SAN DOT COM.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS– I’M LAUREN TAYLOR.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Erat vel aptent interdum quisque suscipit massa sit ornare dolor curae nullam montes mauris, nunc litora efficitur torquent condimentum platea aliquam quis lectus et congue mattis.
- Commodo ligula lacinia lobortis porta non tempus etiam sodales feugiat ornare felis curabitur orci mattis id, varius elit sollicitudin sagittis nisi taciti ridiculus sociosqu metus leo integer purus ut.
- Adipiscing suspendisse litora dis phasellus massa torquent lorem integer convallis fringilla habitant inceptos, fames est consequat placerat dictumst egestas nunc hac ligula cras nullam.
- Lobortis et quisque dictum torquent libero facilisis cras integer luctus mollis, leo dis mauris pellentesque condimentum conubia facilisi laoreet venenatis sit, metus sodales sapien erat commodo aliquam urna inceptos dolor.
- Conubia id vestibulum lacinia laoreet viverra eleifend porttitor ante integer condimentum pellentesque sit, ultricies penatibus urna orci ridiculus praesent fringilla scelerisque non eu nullam.
- Fermentum dis senectus finibus iaculis leo sem morbi malesuada habitant cras, lectus pellentesque luctus taciti convallis ex consequat libero.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.