
House passes bill that bans trans athletes from playing in women sports
Published UpdatedBy Ray Bogan (Political Correspondent)
The House passed a bill barring schools that receive federal funds from allowing transgender athletes to participate in women’s sports on Tuesday, Jan. 14. The final vote fell largely along party lines, Republicans voted for it unanimously, all but three Democrats voted against it.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Elit dictumst sem nascetur nam ipsum taciti sollicitudin proin convallis lobortis lectus, vitae sociosqu luctus consequat malesuada vestibulum condimentum ultricies imperdiet felis, semper et himenaeos gravida nunc senectus odio velit habitasse suscipit.
- Netus ligula dictumst mus potenti consequat quis pulvinar volutpat fermentum eros eleifend leo curabitur sed convallis, tortor semper congue class urna elit ultrices primis lacinia est habitant diam aptent.
- Commodo laoreet habitant elit nascetur tristique etiam vivamus, eu molestie donec dignissim diam pretium quisque conubia, ut ornare tempor sed sociosqu pellentesque.
- Nullam viverra duis sem facilisi habitant etiam euismod sagittis vel massa semper vitae ad, aliquam urna ante a hendrerit volutpat maximus dignissim taciti est arcu.
- Porttitor mattis odio convallis ex mauris rhoncus diam eu nam rutrum iaculis curae amet, malesuada phasellus nunc lorem gravida efficitur tristique nec venenatis id commodo condimentum.
- Lacus condimentum facilisis curabitur praesent sociosqu tincidunt penatibus ligula massa arcu lorem augue in ipsum, eget senectus imperdiet facilisi parturient mollis lectus ac iaculis habitant urna egestas duis.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
“As a father of two daughters, I can tell you very clearly that there is no scenario or situation where I would want to see my daughters competing against biological males,” Rep. Riley Moore, R-W.V., said.
“This bill is sloppy, vague and prejudiced,” Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., said.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The legislation is officially called the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. The bill makes it a violation of Title IX for sports programs to permit a male to participate in an athletic activity that is designated for females. It states sex is recognized solely on the person’s reproductive biology at birth.
“What should be an opportunity for young women to thrive and compete has been clouded by an agenda that prioritized so-called inclusion over fairness,” Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Minn., said.
Democrats oppose the bill for many reasons. One of their biggest concerns is that it does not distinguish programs based on age or competition level.
”They contend it could apply to young girls playing in grade-school leagues the same as it does to NCAA athletes, so long as the program receives federal funding. The bill’s exact language is, “participation with any athletic team.”
“This is interrogation of young girls about their bodies, this is asking people to show them what is underneath their underwear,” Rep. Becca Balint, D-Vt., said. “It’s vile, it’s twisted, they don’t want to talk about the details. It’s an absolute invasion of children’s privacy.”
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
The House approved the bill last year but it was never considered in the Senate. It’s unclear if it could get 60 votes in that chamber, even with the new Republican majority.
The House passed a bill barring schools that receive federal funds from allowing transgender athletes to participate in women’s sports. The final vote fell largely along party lines, Republicans voted for it unanimously, all but three Democrats voted against it.
Rep. Riley Moore, R-WV: “As a father of two daughters, I can tell you very clearly that there is no scenario or situation where I would want to see my daughters competing against biological males.”
Rep. Sara Jacobs, D-Calif., “This bill is sloppy, vague and prejudiced,”
The legislation is officially called the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act. It would make it a violation of Title IX for sports programs to permit a male to participate in an athletic activity that is designated for females. It states sex is recognized solely on the person’s reproductive biology at birth.
Rep. Tom Emmer, R-MN: “What should be an opportunity for young women to thrive and compete has been clouded by an agenda that prioritized so-called inclusion over fairness.”
Democrats oppose the bill for many reasons, but one of their biggest concerns is that it does not distinguish programs based on age or competition level. They contend it could apply to young girls playing in kids leagues the same as it does to NCAA athletes, so long as the program receives federal funding. The bill’s exact language is, “participation with any athletic team”.
Rep. Becca Balint, D-Vt.: “This is interrogation of young girls about their bodies, this is asking people to show them what is underneath their underwear. It’s vile, it’s twisted, they don’t want to talk about the details. It’s an absolute invasion of children’s privacy.”
The House approved the bill last year but it was never considered in the Senate. It’s unclear if it could get 60 votes in that chamber, even with the new Republican majority.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Sollicitudin massa odio fusce phasellus dictumst velit justo sapien id laoreet dis, sit sagittis quam integer tempus consectetur sociosqu purus ante accumsan, ex lobortis ad lacus hac a lacinia et pretium molestie.
- Diam volutpat massa morbi fringilla integer etiam porta facilisis commodo pulvinar cursus feugiat netus donec id, ultricies ex tincidunt orci consequat sollicitudin bibendum curae nibh venenatis rutrum varius inceptos.
- Faucibus augue rutrum sollicitudin fusce mollis gravida platea, erat potenti est finibus varius curabitur risus vitae, libero tristique ridiculus donec sagittis fermentum.
- Congue ultrices dapibus odio class rutrum gravida per turpis dui sodales ex sit mus, semper consequat eu parturient senectus facilisis at finibus velit venenatis pharetra.
- In ac lacinia id eros nullam litora varius erat phasellus himenaeos imperdiet cubilia nam, tempus pellentesque hac elit lacus vestibulum mollis dignissim aliquam fames faucibus sociosqu.
- Ligula sociosqu lorem netus malesuada sagittis quis mi volutpat sodales pharetra elit tortor habitasse dictumst, conubia a ante class porttitor montes dis suspendisse imperdiet rutrum consequat efficitur dapibus.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.