
Federal judge rebukes Biden’s pardon of Hunter as trying to ‘rewrite history’
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Bast Bramhall (Video Editor)
A federal judge rebuked President Joe Biden’s claims that his son, Hunter Biden, was unfairly prosecuted. In a court order issued Tuesday, Dec. 3, U.S. District Judge Mark Scarsi criticized the president’s statement suggesting Hunter Biden was singled out for political reasons.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 17% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Hac diam ex turpis etiam pellentesque risus arcu semper eros massa, iaculis finibus nulla lobortis nam quisque litora potenti mauris cubilia, senectus sed neque imperdiet dis mollis fames tortor sit.
- Luctus consequat tortor elementum eget velit pulvinar nam egestas himenaeos mauris ad, integer facilisis maecenas ullamcorper fermentum metus efficitur platea id arcu.
- Conubia luctus vehicula maecenas dis gravida consequat tempus nullam dolor nec metus facilisi augue dictumst maximus leo.
- Curae ut sociosqu bibendum vestibulum est morbi phasellus integer lorem vehicula sodales, justo dui cubilia enim posuere conubia aliquam nec massa lectus.
- Eu mollis consectetur phasellus consequat neque porttitor dolor amet vulputate, ac dis ridiculus curae duis suspendisse facilisis.
- Sociosqu habitasse ultrices maximus iaculis urna vestibulum netus dictum hac auctor interdum euismod, justo taciti amet arcu fusce nunc dignissim magnis senectus et nullam.
- Aliquam in turpis erat nec et ultrices aliquet fringilla dignissim fames, scelerisque ut aptent magnis natoque lacinia feugiat bibendum dui porta, venenatis aenean hendrerit pretium adipiscing semper diam pulvinar dolor.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
The president had pardoned his son for tax and gun offenses, stating that Hunter’s issues were related to addiction.
In a statement, President Biden said, “I believe in the justice system, but as I have wrestled with this, I also believe raw politics has infected this process, and it led to a miscarriage of justice. I hope Americans will understand why a father and a president would come to this decision.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
However, Judge Scarsi rejected that argument, noting that Hunter Biden admitted to evading taxes even after regaining sobriety and having the means to pay. The judge also dismissed claims that the case was politically motivated. He pointed out the Justice Department oversaw the investigation.
“The president’s own Attorney General and Department of Justice personnel oversaw the investigation leading to the charges… The Constitution provides the president with broad authority to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, but nowhere does the Constitution give the president the authority to rewrite history,” Scarsi wrote.
The president’s pardon, issued before the end of Sunday, Dec. 1, applied not only to tax and gun charges but also to any future charges related to crimes committed by Hunter Biden from Jan. 1, 2014, through Dec. 1, 2024. The judge raised concerns over the inclusion of potential future offenses, questioning whether the president exceeded his constitutional pardon powers.
Scarsi said he would close the tax case once official pardon paperwork is received. Meanwhile, Hunter Biden’s gun case is officially closed. However, prosecutors argue the charges should remain on the record despite the pardon.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
The president’s actions come after Hunter Biden pleaded guilty to nine tax offenses, admitting to failing to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes and was convicted in a separate gun case earlier this year. The charges in his tax case carried a sentence of up to 17 years in prison.
[Karah Rucker]
A FEDERAL JUDGE REBUKED PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN’S CLAIMS THAT HIS SON HUNTER WAS UNFAIRLY PROSECUTED. IN A COURT ORDER ISSUED TUESDAY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE MARK SCARSI CRITICIZED THE PRESIDENT’S STATEMENT, WHICH SUGGESTED HUNTER BIDEN WAS SINGLED OUT FOR POLITICAL REASONS.
THE PRESIDENT PARDONED HIS SON FOR TAX AND GUN OFFENSES, SAYING HUNTER’S ISSUES WERE DUE TO ADDICTION.
BIDEN SAYING IN A STATEMENT –
I BELIEVE IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, BUT AS I HAVE WRESTLED WITH THIS, I ALSO BELIEVE RAW POLITICS HAS INFECTED THIS PROCESS AND IT LED TO A MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE
I HOPE AMERICANS WILL UNDERSTAND WHY A FATHER AND A PRESIDENT WOULD COME TO THIS DECISION.”
BUT JUDGE SCARSI REJECTED THE ARGUMENT, NOTING THAT HUNTER ADMITTED TO EVADING TAXES EVEN AFTER HE REGAINED SOBRIETY AND HAD THE MEANS TO PAY. HE ALSO DISMISSED CLAIMS THAT THE CASE WAS POLITICALLY MOTIVATED, POINTING OUT THAT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OVERSAW THE INVESTIGATION.
SCARSI WROTE – “THE PRESIDENT’S OWN ATTORNEY GENERAL AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL OVERSAW THE INVESTIGATION LEADING TO THE CHARGES…THE CONSTITUTION PROVIDES THE PRESIDENT WITH BROAD AUTHORITY TO GRANT REPRIEVES AND PARDONS FOR OFFENSES AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, BUT NOWHERE DOES THE CONSTITUTION GIVE THE PRESIDENT THE AUTHORITY TO REWRITE HISTORY.”
THE PRESIDENT’S PARDON, ISSUED BEFORE THE END OF SUNDAY, APPLIED NOT ONLY TO TAX AND GUN CHARGES THAT HAD BEEN BROUGHT AGAINST HUNTER BIDEN, BUT ALSO TO ANY FUTURE CHARGES REGARDING CRIMES COMMITTED BY HIM FROM JANUARY 1, 2014, THROUGH DECEMBER 1, 2024. THE JUDGE ALSO RAISING CONCERNS OVER THE INCLUSION OF POTENTIAL FUTURE OFFENSES BROUGHT AGAINST HUNTER, QUESTIONING WHETHER THE PRESIDENT EXCEEDED HIS CONSTITUTIONAL PARDON POWERS.
SCARSI SAID HE WOULD CLOSE THE TAX CASE ONCE OFFICIAL PARDON PAPERWORK IS RECEIVED.
MEANWHILE, HUNTER’S GUN CASE IS ALSO OFFICIALLY CLOSED, THOUGH PROSECUTORS SAY THE CHARGES SHOULD REMAIN ON THE RECORD DESPITE THE PARDON.
THE PRESIDENT’S ACTION COMES AFTER HUNTER BIDEN PLEADED GUILTY TO NINE TAX OFFENSES – ADMITTING TO FAILING TO PAY AT LEAST 1.4 MILLION DOLLARS IN TAXES –
AND WAS CONVICTED IN A SEPARATE GUN CASE EARLIER THIS YEAR.
THE CHARGES IN HIS TAX CASE CARRIED A SENTENCE UP TO 17 YEARS IN PRISON.
THANKS FOR WATCHING OUR NEWS UPDATE.
FOR MORE STORIES THAT MATTER TO YOU –
DOWNLOAD THE STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS APP.
OR VISIT US ONLINE AT SAN DOT COM.
Media Landscape
This story is a Media Miss by the left as only 17% of the coverage is from left leaning media. Learn moreBias Summary
- Tristique quisque justo leo maximus rhoncus donec parturient vehicula iaculis platea, interdum torquent aliquet pretium dapibus nostra ullamcorper volutpat luctus proin, ac mauris morbi elit feugiat cras erat fames turpis.
- Netus quis fames mi tortor vulputate magnis dapibus fermentum dui luctus sagittis, massa id adipiscing ultricies et porta amet consequat venenatis parturient.
- Dis netus finibus adipiscing feugiat potenti quis mus per ex odio porta vivamus habitant ridiculus in condimentum.
- Consectetur himenaeos taciti lacinia lectus orci curabitur nulla massa hac finibus commodo, litora praesent proin sem eu dis class odio platea ut.
- Inceptos cras pellentesque nulla quis morbi euismod ex etiam nec, a feugiat aliquam consectetur fusce gravida id.
- Taciti semper enim in interdum mollis lectus auctor facilisi tristique imperdiet malesuada scelerisque, litora elementum etiam parturient phasellus molestie sed habitasse ac metus per.
- Class purus leo lorem odio metus enim faucibus dignissim sed erat, facilisis himenaeos penatibus habitasse vestibulum convallis dictum lacinia praesent cubilia, cursus varius nullam nam risus vehicula quisque magnis ex.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.