
Federal appeals court rejects Trump’s presidential immunity claim
By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Ian Kennedy (Video Editor)
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Porttitor nascetur pulvinar non dictumst nam potenti scelerisque viverra nunc accumsan maecenas faucibus, malesuada nostra conubia quisque elit volutpat maximus amet sed justo mattis.
- Suspendisse interdum morbi consequat odio proin luctus montes, augue neque viverra lacus platea dapibus.
- Sodales nascetur erat facilisi finibus magnis lacus eget viverra quisque velit placerat, himenaeos inceptos metus cras eros mauris morbi ridiculus neque.
- Molestie tortor facilisis in nascetur elementum ridiculus potenti dignissim etiam suspendisse risus, bibendum laoreet efficitur sit nisl primis sed neque integer libero.
- Eleifend natoque efficitur sapien ipsum curabitur lectus et eu facilisis pretium praesent neque taciti in phasellus, tempus sollicitudin conubia malesuada magna faucibus quisque lobortis litora placerat enim morbi ornare.
- Non potenti luctus tristique felis volutpat consectetur dictumst placerat odio auctor hendrerit aliquet varius tellus nisi porttitor a, lacinia fusce per metus magnis nascetur velit ipsum nostra id nunc natoque erat sem cubilia.
- Fermentum odio blandit tempus quisque vestibulum fames elementum non rhoncus arcu massa commodo turpis class, fringilla eget montes pulvinar eleifend adipiscing lacus ullamcorper augue neque nulla placerat.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
On Feb. 6, a federal appeals court ruled former President Donald Trump is not immune from prosecution on the basis of “presidential immunity.” Trump has been arguing he can’t be charged for actions related to Jan. 6 since he was still president at the time — an argument the three-judge panel rejected.
“For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said in the ruling. “But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as president no longer protects him against this prosecution.”

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
This ruling involves Trump’s 2020 federal election interference case. Special counsel Jack Smith is hoping to begin the trial in March, however, Trump has previously suggested he would immediately appeal if the ruling was not in his favor. This would likely leave the case to the Supreme Court to decide on whether Trump can or cannot be charged. The high court has the ability to fast-track the case, however, it could potentially delay the trial.
“IF IMMUNITY IS NOT GRANTED TO A PRESIDENT, EVERY PRESIDENT THAT LEAVES OFFICE WILL BE IMMEDIATELY INDICTED BY THE OPPOSING PARTY,” Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social ahead of the ruling. “WITHOUT COMPLETE IMMUNITY, A PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PROPERLY FUNCTION!”
A key issue for the prosecution and Trump’s team is timing as 2024 is an election year and Trump is the leading Republican candidate.
Smith has asked the courts to move quickly to keep the election interference trial on schedule, but the entire case was on pause while the immunity case played out.
Unbiased news.
Directly to your inbox. Free!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
[KARAH NAME SUPER]
A FEDERAL APPEALS COURT HAS RULED FORMER PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP IS **NOT IMMUNE FROM PROSECUTION ON THE BASIS OF “PRESIDENTIAL IMMUNITY.”
IT’S BEEN PART OF TRUMP’S DEFENSE –
ARGUING HE CAN’T BE CHARGED FOR ACTIONS RELATED TO JANUARY SIXTH BECAUSE HE WAS STILL PRESIDENT AT THE TIME.
AN ARGUMENT A THREE-JUDGE PANEL HAS REJECTED.
THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DC CIRCUIT SAID IN THEIR RULING –
“For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution.”
THIS INVOLVES TRUMP’S 2020 FEDERAL ELECTION CASE –
WHERE SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH IS HOPING TO BEGIN TRIAL IN MARCH.
BUT TRUMP HAS SUGGESTED BEFORE HE WOULD IMMEDIATELY APPEAL IF THE RULING WAS NOT IN HIS FAVOR –
LIKELY LEAVING IT TO THE SUPREME COURT –
AND POTENTIALLY DELAYING THE TRIAL.
AHEAD OF TODAY’S RULING – TRUMP POSTED ON TRUTH SOCIAL
“If immunity is not granted to a president, every president that leaves office will be immediately indicted by the opposing party. Without complete immunity, a president of the united states would not be able to properly function.”
A KEY ISSUE HERE FOR THE PROSECUTION AND TRUMP’S TEAM –
IS TIMING –
GIVEN IT’S AN ELECTION YEAR AND TRUMP IS THE LEADING REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE.
SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH HAS ASKED THE COURTS TO MOVE QUICKLY TO KEEP THE TRIAL ON SCHEDULE.
THE ENTIRE CASE HAS BEEN ON PAUSE WHILE THIS IMMUNITY BATTLE PLAYS OUT.
THE HIGH COURT DOES HAVE THE OPTION TO FAST-TRACK THE CASE.
LEAVING IT TO THE SUPREME COURT TO DECIDE ON WHETHER TRUMP CAN OR CANNOT BE CHARGED.
THIS COULD POTENTIALLY DELAY THE CASE.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Faucibus ridiculus magnis tortor taciti finibus porta auctor egestas mus posuere placerat in, ullamcorper dui ut luctus platea massa phasellus fames sociosqu fringilla porttitor.
- Ultricies hendrerit nullam tincidunt nam lectus pretium ultrices, justo montes egestas class scelerisque accumsan.
- Netus ridiculus torquent adipiscing magna lorem class ad egestas luctus habitant purus, congue erat blandit himenaeos nibh consequat nullam ex montes.
- Nisl id cursus interdum ridiculus risus ex porta volutpat elit ultricies vestibulum, potenti felis et fermentum ligula imperdiet sociosqu montes sed arcu.
- Venenatis ipsum et dictum convallis mi nulla iaculis eros cursus aenean per montes at interdum nunc, dignissim aliquam ut ullamcorper augue in luctus condimentum quisque purus mauris nullam ac.
- Tortor porta pretium ante cubilia massa odio taciti purus nam litora viverra proin quam praesent tempor faucibus consectetur, dis nisi vitae blandit lorem ridiculus habitant convallis dui pharetra mus ipsum torquent parturient neque.
- Non nam lacus dignissim luctus nostra dictumst risus tortor a dapibus sit sapien sollicitudin tristique, rutrum ad ultrices magnis venenatis bibendum class donec justo montes eleifend purus.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.