The Department of Justice released a report analyzing the Uvalde police's response to the 2022 shooting, deeming their actions a "failure."

Associated Press

Karah Rucker Anchor/Reporter

U.S.

DOJ: Most significant ‘failure’ in Uvalde shooting was no police urgency

Jan 18, 2024

Karah Rucker Anchor/Reporter

By Karah Rucker (Anchor/Reporter), Ian Kennedy (Video Editor)

Bias Distribution Powered by Ground News™

The U.S. Justice Department released a nearly 600-page report on how law enforcement handled the active shooter situation at the Texas school, renewing criticism of law enforcement’s response. The report, released Jan. 18, states that police should have immediately confronted the gunman but failed to do so.

On May 24, 2022, 19 children and two teachers were gunned down at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, Texas. The nation watched school surveillance and police bodycam footage over the course of one hour.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.

Point phone camera here

The video shows the gunman enter the school. Three minutes later, officers are seen in the hallways with weapons drawn.

There were 376 law enforcement on scene. Around 77 minutes later, police stormed the classroom, ending one of the worst school massacres in history.

“The most significant failure was that responding officers should have immediately recognized the incident as an active shooter situation, using the resources and equipment that were sufficient to push forward immediately and continuously toward the threat until entry was made into classrooms 111/112 and the threat was eliminated,” the DOJ report says.

The Columbine High School mass shooting in 1999 taught law enforcement that waiting costs lives. Since then, standard protocol in active shooter training has emphasized confronting the gunman.

The failure to do that in Uvalde resulted in a handful of officers being fired, including the school’s police chief, Pete Arredondo. It also resulted in nationwide condemnation.

Since the shooting, there have been legislative hearings and reviews at the state level over how police responded that day. The comprehensive report from the federal level shares a similar conclusion as other reviews: There should have been better communication, better training and a swifter response. The DOJ called Uvalde Police’s response “a failure.”

Tags: Police, Robb Elementary School, School Shooting, Texas, Uvalde

[KARAH RUCKER]

UVALDE’S POLICE RESPONSE TO THE TRAGIC SCHOOL SHOOTING IS ONCE AGAIN UNDER THE MICROSCOPE.

CRITICIZED THIS TIME BY THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT.

A DAMNING REPORT RELEASED TODAY STATES THAT POLICE SHOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY CONFRONTED THE GUNMAN, BUT THEY FAILED TO DO SO.

ON MAY 24, 2022, 19 CHILDREN AND TWO TEACHERS WERE GUNNED DOWN AT UVALDE ELEMENTARY.

THE NATION WATCHED SCHOOL SURVEILLANCE AND POLICE BODYCAM FOOTAGE.

OVER THE COURSE OF ONE DREADFUL HOUR, A GUNMAN ENTERS.

3 MINUTES LATER – OFFICERS ARE THERE. POLICE WITH-WEAPONS-DRAWN CROWD THE HALLWAYS. NEARLY 400 LAW ENFORCEMENT ON SCENE.

ONE HOUR. 17 MINUTES LATER, POLICE FINALLY STORMED THE CLASSROOM WHERE THE SHOOTER KILLED OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

ONE OF THE WORST SCHOOL MASSACRES IN HISTORY WAS FINALLY OVER.

THE DOJ’S REPORT SAYS

“WAITING COSTS LIVES.”

THAT’S THE LESSON LAW ENFORCEMENT WALKED AWAY WITH AFTER THE COLUMBINE SHOOTING IN 1999.

EVER SINCE, THE STANDARD PROTOCOL IN ACTIVE SHOOTER TRAINING EMPHASIZES “CONFRONT THE GUNMAN.”

THE FAILURE TO DO THAT IN UVALDE RESULTED IN A HANDFUL OF OFFICERS BEING FIRED — INCLUDING THE SCHOOL’S POLICE CHIEF — AND NATIONWIDE CONDEMNATION.

SINCE THE SHOOTING, THERE HAVE BEEN LEGISLATIVE HEARINGS AND REVIEWS AT THE STATE LEVEL OVER HOW POLICE RESPONDED THAT DAY.

NOW, THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE REPORT FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL RELEASED TODAY SHARES A SIMILAR CONCLUSION AS OTHER REVIEWS:

THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER COMMUNICATION, BETTER TRAINING, A SWIFTER RESPONSE. OVERALL – “A FAILURE” BY UVALDE POLICE.

DOJ: Most significant ‘failure’ in Uvalde shooting was no police urgency

Bias Summary

Bias Comparison

Bias Distribution

Untracked Bias