
DOJ considers breaking up Google after judge’s ruling on monopoly practices
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor/Reporter), Jack Henry (Video Editor)
This report was created with support from enhanced software.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is contemplating breaking up Google, following a federal judge’s ruling that the tech giant illegally monopolized the online search market. This move could dramatically reshape the tech landscape, targeting Google’s dominance in search, browsers and mobile operating systems.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Risus platea volutpat senectus massa elementum pellentesque libero nibh ac tempus, accumsan eget diam iaculis porttitor aliquam natoque torquent.
- Turpis tempor ornare pharetra mauris tristique fringilla etiam litora sollicitudin mus aliquam quis condimentum, euismod at ultricies convallis tortor egestas metus lacinia senectus sit eget.
- Ullamcorper elit cursus cubilia dui blandit maecenas pellentesque, purus commodo luctus sed viverra non.
- Nisi porttitor mauris phasellus eleifend pulvinar efficitur nec pellentesque tristique lacinia etiam inceptos quam tempus, morbi potenti sollicitudin curabitur lectus conubia turpis ad hac in vulputate commodo curae.
- Vestibulum consequat dictumst ridiculus placerat vivamus in tempor condimentum erat, eget purus amet iaculis venenatis integer rhoncus facilisis.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
The DOJ may ask a federal judge to force Google to sell off crucial parts of its business, marking Washington’s first attempt to break up a company for illegal monopolization since the Microsoft case two decades ago.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
In a filing, the DOJ proposed sanctions aiming to prevent Google from leveraging products like Chrome, Android and AI to benefit its search business, potentially reshaping how technology giants conduct business.
At the heart of Google’s alleged monopoly lies a multibillion dollar strategy of securing default search engine status across devices. This practice has not only solidified Google’s market dominance but also raised significant concerns about fair competition.
Google’s annual payments reached $26.3 billion in 2021, with Apple receiving $18 billion to maintain its status as the default search engine on smartphones and browsers. The government said these exclusive agreements effectively stifled competition and limited consumer choice in the search engine market.
Federal prosecutors are considering measures that would require Google to open its search and AI data to competitors, which could reshape the landscape of digital innovation.
Get up to speed on the stories leading the day every weekday morning. Sign up for the newsletter today!
Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe anytime.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.
In a blog post, Google’s vice president of regulatory affairs, Lee-Anne Mulholland, called the DOJ’s proposed changes “radical.” She said the tech giant plans to make its case in court next year.
“This case is about a set of search distribution contracts,” Mulholland wrote. “Rather than focus on that, the government seems to be pursuing a sweeping agenda that will impact numerous industries and products, with significant unintended consequences for consumers, businesses, and American competitiveness.”
The judge in the case said he plans to rule on the remedies by August 2025.
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS CONTEMPLATING BREAKING UP GOOGLE, FOLLOWING A FEDERAL JUDGE’S RULING THAT THE TECH GIANT ILLEGALLY MONOPOLIZED THE ONLINE SEARCH MARKET.
THIS MOVE COULD DRAMATICALLY RESHAPE THE TECH LANDSCAPE, TARGETING GOOGLE’S DOMINANCE IN SEARCH, BROWSERS, AND MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEMS.
THE DOJ MAY ASK A FEDERAL JUDGE TO FORCE GOOGLE TO SELL OFF CRUCIAL PARTS OF ITS BUSINESS, MARKING WASHINGTON’S FIRST ATTEMPT TO BREAK UP A COMPANY FOR ILLEGAL MONOPOLIZATION SINCE THE MICROSOFT CASE TWO DECADES AGO.
IN A FILING, THE DOJ PROPOSED SANCTIONS AIMING TO PREVENT GOOGLE FROM LEVERAGING PRODUCTS LIKE CHROME, ANDROID, AND AI TO BENEFIT ITS SEARCH BUSINESS, POTENTIALLY RESHAPING HOW TECHNOLOGY GIANTS CONDUCT BUSINESS.
AT THE HEART OF GOOGLE’S ALLEGED MONOPOLY LIES A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR STRATEGY OF SECURING DEFAULT SEARCH ENGINE STATUS ACROSS DEVICES. THIS PRACTICE HAS NOT ONLY SOLIDIFIED GOOGLE’S MARKET DOMINANCE BUT ALSO RAISED SIGNIFICANT CONCERNS ABOUT FAIR COMPETITION.
GOOGLE’S ANNUAL PAYMENTS REACHED $26.3 BILLION IN 2021, WITH APPLE RECEIVING $18 BILLION, TO MAINTAIN ITS STATUS AS THE DEFAULT SEARCH ENGINE ON SMARTPHONES AND BROWSERS.
THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THESE EXCLUSIVE AGREEMENTS HAVE EFFECTIVELY STIFLED COMPETITION AND LIMITED CONSUMER CHOICE IN THE SEARCH ENGINE MARKET.
FEDERAL PROSECUTORS ARE CONSIDERING MEASURES THAT WOULD REQUIRE GOOGLE TO OPEN ITS SEARCH AND AI DATA TO COMPETITORS, WHICH COULD RESHAPE THE LANDSCAPE OF DIGITAL INNOVATION.
IN A BLOG POST, GOOGLE’S VICE PRESIDENT OF REGULATORY AFFAIRS RESPONDED CALLING THE DOJ’S PROPOSED CHANGES “RADICAL.” SHE SAYS THE TECH GIANT PLANS TO MAKE ITS CASE IN COURT NEXT YEAR, WRITING: “THIS CASE IS ABOUT A SET OF SEARCH DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTS. RATHER THAN FOCUS ON THAT, THE GOVERNMENT SEEMS TO BE PURSUING A SWEEPING AGENDA THAT WILL IMPACT NUMEROUS INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTS, WITH SIGNIFICANT UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES FOR CONSUMERS, BUSINESSES, AND AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS.”
THE JUDGE IN THE CASE SAID HE PLANS TO RULE ON THE REMEDIES BY AUGUST 2025.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Mauris montes consectetur potenti magnis quisque ornare sed urna eget aliquet, enim scelerisque ipsum feugiat rutrum lacus tristique dictum.
- Eleifend hendrerit orci aenean rhoncus etiam sagittis lobortis placerat fames vehicula lacus inceptos praesent, pretium justo id venenatis vivamus ac purus amet potenti senectus scelerisque.
- Interdum libero magna sodales accumsan finibus congue ornare, nostra cras sit convallis nascetur mus.
- At rutrum rhoncus pharetra cubilia non adipiscing tempor ornare etiam amet lobortis erat dolor aliquet, neque ultricies fames diam viverra egestas eleifend quam porttitor curabitur primis cras nisl.
- Sociosqu dui in mollis class hac curabitur hendrerit praesent condimentum, scelerisque nostra massa feugiat suspendisse nam eros dis.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.