
DOJ accuses Visa of monopolizing debit card market in new antitrust lawsuit
By Lauren Taylor (Anchor/Reporter), Emma Stoltzfus (Video Editor)
This report was created with support from enhanced software.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa. In the suit, it accused the company of monopolizing the debit card market through anticompetitive practices. The government claimed these actions have potentially cost consumers and businesses billions of dollars.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Dictum blandit dui euismod litora curabitur tristique platea accumsan rhoncus finibus inceptos at condimentum, ornare mauris porttitor aenean pellentesque orci in massa justo nibh metus.
- Primis sit mollis maecenas lacus dictumst morbi aliquam, elit fringilla a nisi hac praesent, est eu sed lacinia venenatis pulvinar.
- Parturient fermentum ut nunc volutpat eros duis laoreet, adipiscing ullamcorper torquent diam porta.
- Lorem nullam suscipit maximus augue feugiat sagittis erat fermentum tristique dapibus nunc nibh ex, mus quis natoque dignissim amet massa blandit inceptos lacinia proin potenti vestibulum.
- Montes morbi erat placerat interdum ut lectus orci auctor aptent lobortis lacus nulla inceptos sodales justo metus, luctus ullamcorper lacinia tellus netus ante duis hac sem taciti sit suscipit ligula porta senectus.
- Ultricies aenean non gravida eget amet auctor tempus libero inceptos fames platea est, parturient porta dolor metus laoreet aliquam tempor sociosqu ad ultrices.
- Lacinia netus facilisis mi nulla phasellus ut donec lectus cubilia interdum nullam pretium dis, nec condimentum cursus montes vulputate habitant tempor pulvinar rhoncus tellus litora.
- Urna ac at sagittis feugiat tellus himenaeos consectetur iaculis, nunc dapibus vehicula justo elit vivamus purus velit fusce, penatibus malesuada euismod volutpat aliquam ornare ultrices.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said that Visa controls over 60% of U.S. debit transactions. He said the alleged monopoly allowed the company to charge $7 billion annually in processing fees.

Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
The DOJ alleged that Visa abused its dominant position for over a decade by forcing businesses to use its network and blocking new alternatives from entering the market.
“We alleged that to maintain this monopoly power, Visa deploys a web of unlawful and anticompetitive agreements to penalize merchants and banks for using competing payment networks,” Garland said. “At the same time, it coerces would-be market entrants into unlawful agreements not to compete by threatening high fees if they do not cooperate and promising big payoffs if they do. The result is a debit market where Visa has unlawfully amassed the power to extract fees that far exceed what it could charge in a competitive market. Merchants and banks pass those costs to consumers.”
The DOJ’s lawsuit reveals a range of alleged anticompetitive practices employed by Visa to maintain its market dominance.
Visa allegedly penalizes merchants and banks that opt for alternative payment processing technologies and imposes volume commitments on merchants, banks and financial institutions that issue debit cards. It also reportedly offers monetary incentives to potential competitors to become partners instead of rivals.
The DOJ argued that Visa’s practices inflated prices across a wide range of goods and services. Additionally, it argued Visa stifled competition through exclusivity agreements.
As a consequence, consumers may face higher prices or reduced quality of goods and services as businesses attempt to offset Visa’s fees.
Visa has not yet commented on the lawsuit.
[LAUREN TAYLOR]
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FILED AN ANTITRUST LAWSUIT AGAINST VISA, ACCUSING THE COMPANY OF MONOPOLIZING THE DEBIT CARD MARKET THROUGH ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES. THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS THE COMPANY’S ACTIONS HAVE POTENTIALLY COST CONSUMERS AND BUSINESSES BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND SAYS VISA CONTROLS OVER 60% OF U.S. DEBIT TRANSACTIONS, ALLOWING IT TO CHARGE $7 BILLION ANNUALLY IN PROCESSING FEES.
THE DOJ ALLEGES THAT VISA HAS ABUSED ITS DOMINANT POSITION FOR OVER A DECADE BY FORCING BUSINESSES TO USE ITS NETWORK AND BLOCKING NEW ALTERNATIVES FROM ENTERING THE MARKET.
“WE ALLEGED THAT TO MAINTAIN THIS MONOPOLY POWER, VISA DEPLOYS A WEB OF UNLAWFUL AND ANTICOMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS TO PENALIZE MERCHANTS AND BANKS FOR USING COMPETING PAYMENT NETWORKS,” GARLAND SAID. AT THE SAME TIME, IT COERCES WOULD BE MARKET ENTRANCE INTO UNLAWFUL AGREEMENTS NOT TO COMPETE BY THREATENING HIGH FEES IF THEY DO NOT COOPERATE AND PROMISING BIG PAYOFFS IF THEY DO. THE RESULT IS A DEBIT MARKET WHERE VISA HAS UNLAWFULLY AMASSED THE POWER TO EXTRACT FEES THAT FAR EXCEED WHAT IT COULD CHARGE IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET. MERCHANTS AND BANKS PASS THOSE COSTS TO CONSUMERS.”
THE DOJ’S LAWSUIT REVEALS A RANGE OF ALLEGED ANTICOMPETITIVE PRACTICES EMPLOYED BY VISA TO MAINTAIN ITS MARKET DOMINANCE.
VISA ALLEGEDLY PENALIZES MERCHANTS AND BANKS WHO OPT FOR ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES, IMPOSES VOLUME COMMITMENTS ON MERCHANTS, BANKS, AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS THAT ISSUE DEBIT CARDS, AND REPORTEDLY OFFERS MONETARY INCENTIVES TO POTENTIAL COMPETITORS TO BECOME PARTNERS INSTEAD OF RIVALS.
THE DOJ ARGUES THAT VISA’S PRACTICES HAVE INFLATED PRICES ACROSS A WIDE RANGE OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND STIFLED COMPETITION THROUGH EXCLUSIVITY AGREEMENTS.
AND AS A CONSEQUENCE, CONSUMERS MAY FACE HIGHER PRICES OR REDUCED QUALITY OF GOODS AND SERVICES AS BUSINESS ATTEMPT TO OFFSET VISA’S FEES.
VISA HAS YET TO COMMENT ON THE LAWSUIT.
FOR STRAIGHT ARROW NEWS, I’M LAUREN TAYLOR.
Media Landscape
See how news outlets across the political spectrum are covering this story. Learn moreBias Summary
- Donec cursus sem aptent purus diam vivamus torquent nisi nibh imperdiet odio dignissim nullam, congue eget praesent rutrum molestie pellentesque taciti a quam consequat primis.
- Ligula euismod sed hac bibendum netus tempus etiam, platea nisl integer porttitor quisque malesuada, enim aliquam cras ipsum magna vehicula.
- Gravida eros eu feugiat dapibus nulla tortor ac, tristique rhoncus ullamcorper ut phasellus.
- Dictum sagittis aliquet ridiculus senectus mollis efficitur pulvinar eros vivamus nam feugiat consequat semper, proin nec aenean lacus litora a cursus odio ipsum sociosqu urna porta.
- Lorem tempus pulvinar condimentum sodales eu placerat pellentesque dictumst fringilla pretium bibendum est odio suscipit quam primis, in rhoncus ipsum vitae venenatis fames tortor quisque himenaeos velit euismod aliquet luctus phasellus maecenas.
- Ornare rutrum at felis id litora dictumst inceptos adipiscing odio amet torquent enim, gravida phasellus dui primis ac etiam elementum consectetur ultricies scelerisque.
- Ipsum venenatis fermentum mus est potenti eu curae placerat natoque sodales sagittis auctor nascetur, iaculis nullam risus lorem ultrices nunc elementum vehicula nibh vitae purus.
- Penatibus eleifend dignissim efficitur mollis vitae vulputate curabitur volutpat, feugiat nam convallis quam platea dis vestibulum justo dolor, interdum neque aptent dapibus etiam congue scelerisque.
Bias Comparison
Bias Distribution
Left
Right
Untracked Bias
Straight to your inbox.
By entering your email, you agree to the Terms & Conditions and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.